Insulin resistance impairs rapid virologic response in HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients on peginterferon-alfa-2a
Nasta, Paola; Gatti, Francesca; Puoti, Massimo; Cologni, Giuliana; Bergamaschi, Viviana; Borghi, Federica; Matti, Alessandro; Ricci, Antonella; Carosi, Giampiero
From the Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Correspondence to Paola Nasta, MD, Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, University of Brescia, P. le Spedali Civili, 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy. Tel: +39 030 3995665; fax: +39 030 303061; e-mail: email@example.com
Objectives: To investigate the association between insulin resistance and rapid virologic response.
Design: All consecutive HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients who started peg-interferon alpha-2a (180 μg/week) and ribavirin 1000–1200 mg/day were analysed.
Methods: Insulin resistance was defined according to the homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance calculated as fasting insulin (mIU/l) × fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5. Rapid virologic response was defined as testing negative for hepatitis C virus-RNA after 4 weeks of therapy. Fasting levels of insulin and glucose in plasma were measured in all patients on the first day of treatment. Hepatitis C virus-RNA was determined by quantitative PCR assay (version 3.0). Hepatitis C virus-RNA was measured by qualitative PCR assay (COBAS 2.0) after 4 weeks of treatment.
Results: Seventy-four HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfected patients were enrolled [mean age 41.7 years (SD 5.3), 61 men, 54.1% with advanced fibrosis (F3-4 according to METAVIR classification), 52.4% with infection by hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4]. Rapid virologic response was reached by 30 subjects. In the multivariate analysis the independent predictors of rapid virologic response were: genotype 1 or 4 [adjusted odds ratio 0.18 (0.06–0.55)], hepatitis C virus-RNA < 400.000 UI/ml [adjusted odds ratio 0.229 (0.09–0.92)] and homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance more than 3.00 [adjusted odds ratio 0.1 (0.05–0.6)].
Conclusion: The homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance score should be evaluated and possibly corrected before starting anti-hepatitis C virus therapy.
Antiretroviral therapies, and HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections have been associated with abnormalities in carbohydrate metabolism including insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus [1,2].
Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C is higher than in the general population  and HCV-positive patients older than 40 years have three times the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus than HCV-negative subjects .
In persons with HIV infection, glucose abnormalities can be induced by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Induction of insulin resistance was reported in 61% of subjects on protease inhibitor based HAART . A prolonged use of zidovudine and stavudine (thymidine nucleoside analogues) could lead insulin resistance through mitochondrial dysfunction . Thus, in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, insulin resistance could be caused by both HCV infection and HAART .
Liver-related deaths are increasing among HIV patients with hepatitis coinfection  and anti-HCV treatment with peginterferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin is mandatory for eligible subjects . Among positive predictors of anti-HCV treatment success, the rapid HCV RNA decline, defined as rapid virologic response (RVR), is recognized as one of the most important . RVR is associated with a rapid first and second phase decline of HCV RNA expressing the sensitivity of the virus–host system to antiviral treatment . It is the key for both achieving end-of-treatment response and to preventing relapse after clearance induced by PegIFN and ribavirin. On the other hand, genotype, HCV viral load, level of fibrosis and, more recently, a higher homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score have been shown to be related to poor virological response [11,12].
On the basis of these findings, the association between HOMA-IR  and RVR was assessed to investigate the role of insulin resistance in the early outcome of PegIFN and ribavirin treatment in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.
Aims and methods
All HIV/HCV coinfected subjects who were naïve for HCV therapy and started anti-HCV combination therapy with PegIFN α-2a (180 μg/week) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg/day) (RBV) from January 2005 were enrolled into an observational prospective study.
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2). An overnight (12 h) fasting blood sample was drawn for the measurement of routine laboratory values such as plasma lipids, creatinine, glucose, transaminases, insulin, CD4+ T cells and HIV-RNA. Serum insulin levels were measured by electro-chemo-illuminescence immuno-assay using an autoanalayser. The HOMA-IR was calculated on the basis of fasting values of plasma glucose and insulin according to the HOMA equation: fasting insulin (IU/l) × fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22.5. Insulin resistance was defined as a HOMA value greater than 3.00, on the basis of normal values, (range 0.7–2.25), and one standard deviation . HCV-RNA by quantitative PCR assay (version 3.0) at baseline and HCV-RNA by qualitative PCR assay (COBAS 2.0) were measured after 4 weeks of treatment. RVR was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA by qualitative PCR assay after 4 weeks of treatment.
Continuous variables are expressed as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables are expressed as number of cases (percentage). The associations between RVR and HOMA were analysed. Likewise, we also appraised the relationship between RVR and the following covariates: sex, age, HIV risk factors, smoking, alcohol consumption, body weight, BMI, HIV and HCV exposure, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) status, time of antiretroviral (ARV) exposure, type of antiretroviral therapy at baseline (protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor based), level of liver fibrosis and HCV genotype (T lymphocytes CD4+ nadir and zenith).
In the bivariate analysis, the comparisons between continuous variables were carried out using the Student's t-test if they followed a normal distribution, or the Mann–Whitney U test if they did not. Frequencies were compared using the χ2 test or by applying Fisher's test when there were cells with expected frequencies lower than five. The two-tailed P value was selected in all cases and those less than 0.05 were considered significant. Variables associated with RVR with a P value less than or equal to 0.08 in the bivariate analysis were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis where the dependent variable was RVR. A sensitivity analysis was performed including HOMA-IR score and baseline HCV-RNA levels as continuous variables. Patients' data were collected in a computerized database and analysed using Epi Info version 3.3.2 (9 February 2005).
Seventy-four HIV/HCV co-infected patients started PegIFN α-2a and ribavirin between January 2005 and March 2007.
The baseline characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. The mean time of HIV exposure was 13.5 years (SD 5.9); 91.9% of the subjects were on HAART and the mean T lymphocyte CD4+ cell count was 492 (SD 213) cells/mm3. HIV-RNA was under the limit of detection (<50 copies/ml) in all treated patients.
Thirty-five out of 74 (47.2%) subjects had HCV genotype 2–3; 40 (54%) subjects had an advanced liver fibrosis, defined as grades 3–4 at METAVIR score. A low HCV viral load <400 000 UI/ml was found in 43/74 (58.1%) subjects.
RVR was obtained in 30 patients [22/30 (73.3%) of genotype 2–3 and 8/30 (26.6%) with genotype 1–4]. In multivariate analysis variables significantly related to RVR were genotype 1–4 [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.04 (0.009–0.2)], HCV-RNA > 400 000 UI/μl [AOR 0.229 (0.09–0.92)] and HOMA-IR score greater than 3 [AOR 0.1(0.05–0.6)] (Table 1). Protease inhibitor-based HAART at the beginning of anti-HCV treatment was negatively related to RVR [AOR 0.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–1.04) P 0.04]. A sensitivity analysis introducing HCV-RNA levels and HOMA-IR scores as continuous variables did not change the results. Figure 1 shows the rate of RVR based on HOMA-IR score, HCV viral load and HCV genotype.
Treatment with PegIFN and ribavirin should be implemented in HIV/HCV coinfected patients because of the high rate of liver-related mortality .
Nevertheless, the sustained viral response rate is lower in these patients than in HCV monoinfected subjects: [17 versus 46% in genotype 1 and 67 versus 76% in genotype 2–3] and the treatment withdrawal incidence seems to be similar in the two groups (22 versus 25%) [14,15]. Thus optimization of anti-HCV treatment and identification of cofactors associated with the reduced response observed in HIV-infected patients are urgent and unmet needs. As in monoinfected patient, the predictors of low sustained virologic response (SVR) in HIV/HCV coinfected patients are three characteristics that cannot be modified: HCV genotype 1–4 [16,17], high HCV viral [14,15] and advanced fibrosis [18,19]. Insulin resistance could be influenced by lifestyle and HAART regimens in HIV-infected persons. We demonstrated that insulin resistance is associated with a reduced sensitivity to anti-HCV treatment in HIV/HCV coinfected persons. In HIV-infected patients the incidence of diabetes mellitus is four times higher than in HIV negative persons  and insulin resistance is recognized in 50% of protease inhibitor treated patients . Insulin resistance is multifactorial in HIV/HCV coinfected persons. The GLUT- 4 (glucose transporter 4) activity is impaired by HCV and by some protease inhibitors. The lack of glucose intake is mediated directly by HCV through inhibition of IRS1-2  and by the increase of suppressor of cytokines signalling (SOCS)-3  and indirectly by both HIV and HCV through increased cytokine levels (tumour necrosis factor α and interleukin-6) . In addition, the lack of β oxidation due to HCV, PPAR α and γ (peroxisome proliferator activation receptor α and γ), inhibition by HCV , steroil and carbohydrate regulatory binding protein (SREBP and ChreBP) activation by antiretroviral agents and NUCs mitochondrial toxicity favour insulin resistance .
In this study, insulin resistance was an independent predictor of RVR in HIV/HCV coinfected patients. Most of the subjects studied were treated with a protease inhibitor. Protease inhibitor use at the beginning of PegIFN/RBV treatment was also found to be negatively related to SVR . The reasons for this are still controversial. The correlation between protease inhibitor exposure and higher HCV viral load is suggested as a hypothesis . Insulin resistance could be another possible link between protease inhibitor exposure and lower SVR rate.
In conclusion, our results suggest that insulin resistance should be evaluated in HIV/HCV coinfected patients and corrected before starting anti-HCV treatment by changing life styles and, when necessary, HAART regimens in order to enhance ‘virus-host system’ sensitivity to antiviral treatment.
1. Grinspoon S. Mechanism and strategies for insulin resistance in acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37:S85–S90.
2. Brown TT, Cole SR, Li X, Kingsley LA, Palella FJ, Riddler SA, et al
. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus in the multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165:1179–1184.
3. Mason AL, Lau JYN, Hoang N, Qian K, Alexander GJ, Xu L, et al
. Association of diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 1999; 29:328–333.
4. Mheta SH, Brancati SL, Strathdee SA, Pankow JS, Netski D, Coresh J, et al
. HCV infection and incident type 2 diabetes. Hepatology 2003; 38:50–56.
5. Tsiodras S, Mantzoros C, Hammer S, Samore M. Effects of protease inhibitors on hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidemia, and lipodistrophy: a five years cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2050–2056.
6. Mirò O, Lopez S, Cardellach F, Casademont J. Mitochondrial studies in HAART related lipodistrophy: from experimental hypothesis to clinical findings. Antivir Ther 2005; 10:73–81.
7. Duong M, Petit JM, Piroth L, Grappin M, Buisson M, Chavanet P, et al
. Association between insulin resistance and hepatitis C virus chronic infection in HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infected patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Def Syndr 2001; 27:245–250.
8. Anderson KB, Guest JL, Rimland D. Hepatits C virus co-infection increases mortality in HIV-infected patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: data from the HIV Atlanta VA cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1507–1513.
9. Carosi G, Puoti M, Antonucci G, De Luca A, Maserati R, Torti C, et al
. Antiretroviral therapy in chronic liver disease: focus on HIV/HCV co-infection. Statements of the first Italian consensus workshop. AIDS Rev 2005; 7:161–167.
10. Nunez M, Marino A, Miralles C, Berdún MA, Sola J, Hernandez-Burruezo JJ, et al
. Baseline serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA Level and response at week 4 are the best predictors of relapse after treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007; 45:439–444A.
11. Romero-Gomez M, Viloria MM, Andrade RJ, Salmerón J, Diago M, Fernández-Rodríguez CM, et al
. Insulin resistance impairs sustained response rate to peginterferon plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C patients. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:636–641.
12. D'Souza R, Sabin CA, Foster GR. Insulin resistance plays a significant role in liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C and in the response to antiviral therapy. Am J Gastrenterol 2005; 100:1509–1515.
13. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC, et al
. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28:412–419.
14. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL Jr, et al
. Peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:975–982.
15. Torriani FJ, Rodriguez-Torres M, Rockstroh JK, APRICOT Study Group. Peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C infection in HIV infected patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:438–450.
16. Knobler H, Schattner A. TNF alfa, chronic hepatitis C and diabetes: a novel triad. QJM 2005; 98:1–6.
17. Kawaguchi T, Yoshida T, Harada M, Hisamoto T, Nagao Y, Ide T, et al
. Hepatitis C virus down regulates insulin receptor substrates 1-2 through up-regulation of suppressor of cytokines signalling -3. Am J Pathol 2004; 165:1499–1508.
18. Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H Jr, Morgan TR, Balan V, Diago M, Marcellin P, et al
. Peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:346–355.
19. Heathcote EJ, Shiffman ML, Cooksley WG, Dusheiko GM, Lee SS, Balart L, et al
. Peginterferon alpha-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1673–1680.
20. The data collection on adverse events of anti-HIV drugs (DAD) Study Group. Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med
21. Aytung S, Reich D, Sapiro LE, Bernstein D, Begum N. Impaired IRS1/PI-3 kinase signaling in patients with HCV: a mechanism for increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Hepatology 2003; 30:1384–1392.
22. Dharancy S, Malapel M, Perlemuter G, Roskams T, Cheng Y, Dubuquoy L, et al
. Impaired expression of the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor alpha during hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterol 2005; 128:334–342.
23. Donnelly KL, Smith CL, Schwarzenberg SJ, Jessurun J, Boldt MD, Parks EJ. Sources of fatty acid stored in liver and secreted via lipoproteins in patients with nonalcholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:1343–1351.
24. Lo JC, Kazemi MR, Hsue PY, Martin JN, Deeks SG, et al
. The relationship between nucleoside analogue treatment duration, insulin resistance, and fasting arterialized lactate level in patients with HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41:1335–1340.
HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection; insulin resistance; peginterferon; rapid virologic response
© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.