AIDS

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 12, 2008 - Volume 22 - Issue 5 > HAART improves quality of life: should we care about the qua...
AIDS:
12 March 2008 - Volume 22 - Issue 5 - p 647-648
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f4de4d
Epidemiology and Social: Editorial Comments

HAART improves quality of life: should we care about the quality of spermatozoa?

Vernazza, Pietro

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital St Gallen, CH-9007 St Gallen, Switzerland.

Received 17 September, 2007

Accepted 26 September, 2007

Correspondence to Pietro L. Vernazza, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland. Tel: +41 71 494 2631; fax: +41 71 494 6114; e-mail: Pietro.Vernazza@kssg.ch

Improvement in quality of life (QOL) under HAART has been extensively reported in the past few years [1]. Complete suppression of viral replication in blood not only results in an improvement of the cell-mediated immune system, it also dramatically improves life expectancy for most patients with no co-morbidity such as hepatitis C or substance abuse [2]. As a result of this development, an increasing proportion of couples living in an HIV-discordant partnership express the desire to conceive a child [3]. Consequently, several clinics in Europe specialized in artificial reproduction techniques are now offering artificial insemination with processed semen and even more specialized in-vitro techniques [4].

In order to limit the risk of transmission during a medical procedure, most European programmes of artificial insemination in HIV-discordant couples request or at least suggest that the HIV-infected partner is under treatment with a fully suppressive HAART. Unfortunately, information about the effect of HAART on semen quality and male fertility is limited. A number of cross-sectional studies have examined alterations in sperm quality, including sperm motility in HIV-infected individuals, but the results still remain controversial [5-11]. More importantly, the cross-sectional nature of such studies precludes conclusions about the cause of the observed changes in sperm quality. Theoretically, the mitochondrial toxicity associated with some nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), could have a negative impact on sperm mitochondria, and thus on energy production and the motility of mature spermatozoa [12]. In a small cross-sectional study (n = 31) [13], we found a weak association between the exposure to d-drugs and mitochondrial DNA content in spermatozoa, but no significant association with reduced sperm motility. The two largest cross-sectional studies found a reduction in sperm motility in HIV-infected male patients (mostly under HAART) compared with fertile, HIV-negative individuals [5,10]. None of those studies could, however, dissect the role of HIV infection from the effects of treatment.

In this issue of the journal AIDS, Van Leeuwen et al. [14] describe for the first time a longitudinal analysis of qualitative aspects of semen after the initiation of HAART. Almost all of the 34 male patients studied had never been exposed to an antiretroviral therapy when they were included in the 48-week observational study. At inclusion, the authors carefully evaluated potential co-factors such as sexually transmissible infections, follicle-stimulating hormone levels and CD4 cell counts. As a result of the multiple semen collection visits over the period of one year, the authors were able to apply a repeated measurements procedure using mixed-effects models. All possible confounders that might have influenced the results were carefully ruled out. As a result of the longitudinal design and the sophisticated statistical methodology, the authors have been able to demonstrate clearly that antiretroviral treatment resulted in a significant effect on sperm motility. Surprisingly, this effect was demonstrated despite the use of drugs that are generally considered to be less toxic to mitochondria. None of the 34 patients was taking stavudine and only one was taking didanosine, whereas five were on a zidovudine-based regimen and another five were on a nucleotide-sparing regimen.

The results of the trial are indeed remarkable. If confirmed, semen motility would be one of the most sensitive indicators of the toxicity of antiretroviral drugs. Future comparative studies should therefore evaluate the relative effect of different drugs on sperm motility, and the role of mtDNA depletion as a potential biological mechanism should be further evaluated.

What also remains to be shown is the long-term treatment effect on sperm motility. More importantly, the extent to which reduced sperm motility translates into reduced male fertility is also unclear. In our small series of 22 couples having unprotected intercourse with a short preexposure prophylaxis for the woman while the male partner was under completely suppressive HAART, pregnancy rates were still surprisingly high [15]. After three timed intercourses, more than 50% of the women were pregnant but six women remained non-pregnant despite more than six timed intercourses.

In our experience, an increasing number of couples testify that they have unprotected sex with or without the desire to conceive a child. The concept of a very limited infectivity under HAART, especially in a steady partnership, is increasingly adopted by HIV-discordant couples. It is therefore likely that more and more couples will try on their own, with or without timed intercourse or preexposure prophylaxis, to conceive by natural intercourse. If HAART results in reduced male fertility, progressively more sterile couples will seek professional advice. It therefore remains crucial that infertility clinics specialize in the treatment of HIV-infected patients and offer artificial reproductive assistance to these couples.

Conflicts of interest: None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Nieuwkerk PT, Gisolf EH, Reijers MH, Lange JM, Danner SA, Sprangers MA. Long-term quality of life outcomes in three antiretroviral treatment strategies for HIV-1 infection. AIDS 2001; 15:1985-1991.

2. Jaggy C, Von Overbeck J, Ledergerber B, Schwarz C, Egger M, Rickenbach M, et al. Mortality in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) and the Swiss general population. Lancet 2003; 362:877-878.

3. Panozzo L, Battegay M, Friedl A, Vernazza PL. High risk behaviour and fertility desires among heterosexual HIV-positive patients with a serodiscordant partner - two challenging issues. Swiss Med Wkly 2003; 133(7-8):124-127.

4. Bujan L, Hollander L, Coudert M, Gilling-Smith C, Vucetich A, Guibert J, et al. Safety and efficacy of sperm washing in HIV-1-serodiscordant couples where the male is infected: results from the European CREAThE network. AIDS 2007; 21:1909-1914.

5. Bujan L, Sergerie M, Moinard N, Martinet S, Porte L, Massip P, et al. Decreased semen volume and spermatozoa motility in HIV-1-infected patients under antiretroviral treatment. J Androl 2007; 28:444-452.

6. Crittenden JA, Handelsman DJ, Stewart GJ. Semen analysis in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Fertil Steril 1992; 57:1294-1299.

7. Dondero F, Rossi T, D'Offizi G, Mazzilli F, Rosso R, Sarandrea N, et al. Semen analysis in HIV seropositive men and in subjects at high risk for HIV infection. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:765-768.

8. Garrido N, Meseguer M, Alvarez J, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Relationship among standard semen parameters, glutathione peroxidase/glutathione reductase activity, and mRNA expression and reduced glutathione content in ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(Suppl 3):1059-1066.

9. Krieger JN, Coombs RW, Collier AC, Koehler JK, Ross SO, Chaloupka K, et al. Fertility parameters in men infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis 1991; 164:464-469.

10. Muller CH, Coombs RW, Krieger JN. Effects of clinical stage and immunological status on semen analysis results in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive men. Andrologia 1998; 30(Suppl 1):15-22.

11. Nicopoullos JD, Almeida PA, Ramsay JW, Gilling-Smith C. The effect of human immunodeficiency virus on sperm parameters and the outcome of intrauterine insemination following sperm washing. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:2289-2297.

12. Moyle G. Mitochondrial toxicity: myths and facts. J HIV Ther 2004; 9:45-47.

13. Diehl S, Vernazza P, Trein A, Schnaitmann E, Grimbacher B, Setzer B, et al. Mitochondrial DNA and sperm quality in patients under antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2003; 17:450-451.

14. Van Leeuwen E, De Witt FW, Eeftinck Schattenkerk JKM, Reiss P, Van der Veen F, Prins JM. Effects of antiretroviral therapy on semen quality. AIDS 2008; 21:In press.

15. Vernazza PL, Brenner I, Graf I. Preexposure prophylaxis and timed intercourse for HIV-discordant couples willing to conceive a child. In: 4th IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. Sydney, Australia, 22-25 July 2007. Abstract MOPDC01.

Keywords:

antiretroviral treatment; fertility; semen; sperm motility; toxicity

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.