Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 28, 2006 - Volume 20 - Issue 18 > Varicella vaccination in HIV-1-infected children after immun...
doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3280113f29
Clinical Science: Concise Communication

Varicella vaccination in HIV-1-infected children after immune reconstitution

Bekker, Vincenta; Westerlaken, Geertje HAb,d; Scherpbier, Henriëttea; Alders, Sophieb; Zaaijer, Hansc; van Baarle, Debbieb,d; Kuijpers, Tacoa

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the aEmma Children's Hospital, the Netherlands

bDepartments of Clinical Viro-Immunology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, the Netherlands

cMedical Microbiology, Section of Clinical Virology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

dDepartment of Immunology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Received 28 March, 2006

Revised 14 August, 2006

Accepted 25 September, 2006

Correspondence to Taco W. Kuijpers, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Room G8-205, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tel: +31 20 5662727; fax: +31 20 6917735; e-mail:

Collapse Box


Background: HIV-1-infected children have an increased risk of severe chickenpox. However, vaccination is not recommended in severely immunocompromised children.

Objective: Can the live-attenuated varicella zoster virus (VZV) Oka strain be safely and effectively given to HIV-1-infected children despite previously low CD4 T-cell counts?

Methods: VZV vaccine was administered twice to 15 VZV-seronegative HIV-1-infected children when total lymphocyte counts were greater than 700 lymphocytes/μl, and six HIV-negative VZV-seronegative siblings. Weekly clinical follow-up and sampling were performed.

Results: None of the children developed any clinical symptom or serious adverse reaction after immunization. Only nine (60%) of the HIV-1-infected children had VZV-specific antibodies after two immunizations, whereas 100% of the siblings seroconverted. Age at baseline was negatively correlated with the VZV IgG titre at 6 weeks after the second vaccination in HIV-1-infected children. VZV-specific antibody titres after two immunizations were at a similar level to those found after wild-type infection in non-vaccinated HIV-1-infected patients, but significantly lower than in HIV-negative siblings. Importantly, VZV-specific T-cell responses increased after vaccination and were comparable in both groups over time. Documented wild-type VZV contact in three vaccinated patients did not result in breakthrough infections.

Conclusion: VZV vaccination of previously immunocompromised HIV-1-infected children was safe. Vaccination induced specific immune responses in some of the vaccinated HIV-1-infected children, suggesting that previously immunocompromised individuals are protected against severe forms of varicella.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Varicella is an acute, highly infectious disease caused by varicella zoster virus (VZV). Children generally develop mild disease. After the initial infection, VZV establishes latency in the dorsal route ganglia. Reactivation, resulting in zoster, is thought to occur when alterations in the balance between the virus and host factors allow local replication of the virus in the ganglion and axonal transport to the skin [1,2]. Complications of varicella are bacterial superinfection, cerebellitis and encephalitis. VZV is very common in temperate climates, where approximately 95% of the young adult population has serological evidence of previous infection [3]. In tropical areas VZV is less common [4]. After migration to colder areas individuals are at risk of contracting varicella at an older age, which increases the risk of developing complications [5].

Both virus-specific IgG and T cells can be detected after varicella infection [6] as well as after VZV vaccination of healthy individuals [7]. Virus-specific IgG probably neutralizes free viral particles, and therefore helps to counter reinfection upon repeated exposure. This is supported by the observation that the early administration of varicella zoster hyperimmune immunoglobulin protects against VZV infection after close contact with a contagious individual with active varicella. Both CD4 and CD8 cytotoxic T cells are thought to suppress reactivation from viral latency. Exposure to an individual with chickenpox gives an increase in VZV-specific T cells and reduces the risk of zoster later in life [8,9].

Individuals with untreated HIV-1 infection show continuous viral replication and subsequent loss of CD4 T cells, which eventually causes an immune deficiency and opportunistic infections as a consequence. VZV infection in these patients can cause severe chickenpox, with major morbidity and mortality [10,11]. Even during treatment with HAART, HIV-1-infected adults were found to have an increased risk of reactivation of VZV, causing shingles [12]. In our cohort of HIV-1-infected children, we recently observed that during treatment with HAART serological protection against VZV after natural infection fades over time despite immune reconstitution [13]. HAART may thus not normalize the risks of recurrent or reactivating VZV infection in HIV-1-infected patients.

Since 1974 a live attenuated vaccine against VZV has been available [14]. Routine vaccination of all children without a history of varicella is recommended in the United States [15]. However, vaccination of children with any known immune deficiency is not recommended, because of the potential of disseminated viral infection. To date, VZV immunization of HIV-1-infected children has been restricted to children with stable disease [stage N1 or A1 according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification [16], with CD4 T-lymphocyte percentages greater than or equal to 25%] [15], based on a study that excluded severely immunocompromised children [17]. These HIV-1-infected patients would benefit most from an effective vaccination, in order to prevent severe forms of primary wild-type VZV infection.

A high plasma viral load is correlated with a rapid CD4 T-cell decline and disease progression [18–21]. HIV enters its target cell by binding to CD4 and one of the chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 as a co-receptor [21], upregulated during immune activation during acute viral infections or vaccination [22]. It was hypothesized that vaccination of HIV-1-infected individuals may make T cells more susceptible to HIV-1 entry.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VZV vaccination of HIV-1-infected children irrespective of CDC category or treatment. To this end, children were followed intensively for the development of clinical symptoms, and both cellular and humoral responses were measured.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Patients and methods

Patient selection

From June 2002 to June 2005 all patients in the Paediatric Amsterdam Cohort on HIV (n = 78) were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: HIV-1 seropositive, VZV seronegative, under the age of 18 years, lymphocyte count above 700 cells/μl, and without any active disease. Of 22 eligible HIV-1-infected children in our paediatric cohort, 15 consented to participate. During vaccination two children were not being treated with antiretroviral drugs, others had been on HAART for a median of 289 weeks (Table 1).

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

All HIV-1-negative household members of the patients included were also tested for VZV serology. If tested VZV seronegative, all HIV-1-negative household members of the patients included were also offered VZV vaccination. All six eligible HIV-negative sibs consented to participate.

HIV-1-infected children in our cohort manifesting clinical VZV symptoms during the same 3-year period of study were included for comparison. In our cohort, eight children had clinically evident chickenpox (of whom four were VZV IgG positive before chickenpox), and four VZV-seropositive children had clinical herpes zoster during treatment with HAART (Table 2). At the first symptoms of chickenpox the children had been on HAART for a median of 132 weeks. The children who developed herpes zoster had been on HAART for a median of 14 weeks.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, controls and caregivers. The medical ethical committee of the Academic Medical Centre approved the research protocol.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Study design

All VZV-seronegative patients received the VZV vaccine. Study visits and blood samples were planned at 2, 3, 4 and 6 weeks after primary immunization. All patients received a second immunization 3–6 months after the primary immunization, with an evaluation of the serological and cellular responses after 6 weeks.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Varicella vaccine (Varilrix; GlaxoSmithKline UK, Uxbridge, UK) containing the live-attenuated VZV Oka strain was administered subcutaneously as per the manufacturer's recommendations for immunocompromised children.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Lymphocytes, T-cell subsets

Blood samples were collected and the numbers of B cells (CD19+), T cells (CD3+) and T-cell subsets (CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+) were determined by standard flow cytometry procedures, as described before in detail [3]. In short, 100 μl ethylenediammine tetraacetic acid anticoagulated whole blood was incubated with fluorescent label conjugated monoclonal antibodies (concentrations according to manufacturer's instructions). CD4 T-cell and CD8 T-cell subsets were additionally defined by monoclonal antibodies specific for CCR5-FITC (CD195; BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) and CXCR4-PE (CD184; BD Biosciences). The number of activated CD4 and CD8 T cells were determined using monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR-PE (BD Biosciences) and CD38-FITC (Beckman Coulter, Miami. Florida). Analysis of cells was performed using a FACScan flowcytometer and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from blood samples using standard density gradient centrifugation techniques, after separation of the plasma. Both plasma and PBMC were stored until further analyses.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Antigen-specific T-cell proliferation assay

In-vitro T-cell proliferation to VZV antigen was measured using 5,6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, USA) dye dilution assay according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, after thawing, PBMC were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline at a final concentration of 5–10 × 106 cells/ml and labeled with 0.5 μmol (final concentration) of CFSE for 8 min at room temperature. Labeling was stopped using human pool serum (Sanquin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Cells were washed and subsequently resuspended in RPMI (BioWhittaker, Verviers, Belgium), supplemented with 10% human pool serum and antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin).

CFSE-labeled PBMC were cultured for 6 days at 37°C with VZV antigen in a final concentration of 20 μl/ml (Microbix Biosystems, Toronto, Canada), previously defined as the optimal effective dose for lymphocyte stimulation [23]. Cells were stimulated otherwise with CD3 and CD28 monoclonal antibodies to define T-cell reactivity under optimal lymphocyte proliferation induction at final concentrations of 0.3 and 2 μg/ml, respectively (Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). At day 6, cells were stained extracellularly with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibody against CD4 and CD8 (BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed in Cellfix (BD Biosciences), and 60 000–300 000 events were acquired using FACScalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The stimulation index (SI) was calculated by dividing the percentage of proliferating (CFSE low) CD4 or CD8 T cells after stimulation with VZV by the percentage of proliferation after stimulation without VZV antigen (control).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Plasma HIV-1-RNA determination

The plasma HIV-1-RNA concentration (plasma viral load) was determined using Versant HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (Bayer, Tarrytown, New York, USA). All tests were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturers.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Varicella zoster virus serology

Specific IgG to VZV was determined by Vidas immunoassay (Biomerieux, Lyon, France) following the instructions of the manufacturers. The test values of this assay were converted to IU/ml as determined by van der Zwet et al. [24]. An antibody level greater than 0.14 IU/ml was regarded as positive. Seropositivity was defined by the presence of specific IgG after the age of 18 months to exclude any confounding contribution of maternal antibodies in the very young. Serological tests within 3 months after the administration of blood products were excluded from the analyses.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Varicella zoster virus culture

VZV culture on human embryo lung cells and VERO cells was performed, using standard procedures.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). All P values were two-tailed. P values smaller than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Continuous data were analysed using a Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical data were compared with a Fisher's exact test. Correlation was tested using the Spearman's correlation test. SI was modeled using a mixed model incorporating repeated measurements. This model handles missing data adequately by estimating the outcome using a ‘first order autoregressive’ structure. Differences in these estimates between different levels of the variable were tested for significance using t-statistics. Age correction for CD4 and CD8 T cells was done by dividing the counts by the mean of an age-matched healthy control group [3].

Back to Top | Article Outline


Baseline characteristics of study population

Twelve out of 13 patients on HAART (92%) included in this study had an undetectable plasma viral load at first vaccination. The median nadir percentage of CD4 T lymphocytes was 19%, 12 out of 15 vaccinated children had a nadir percentage below 25% and six even below 15%, having by definition a severe immune deficiency [16]. CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts were comparable between HIV-1-infected and HIV-negative children (P = 1.0 and P = 0.3, respectively; Table 1).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Safety of the vaccine

After vaccination none of the 15 HIV-1-positive children experienced a serious adverse event related to primary or secondary vaccination. The plasma viral load did not change within the 6 weeks after the first or second immunization, irrespective of treatment or detectable plasma viral load at the time of immunization. VZV DNA was only detectable once in the whole blood of a single patient at 2 weeks after the first immunization (100 copies/ml). The patient had no clinical complaints or signs of varicella infection upon physical examination. All cultures for VZV from throat swabs remained negative.

Back to Top | Article Outline
No change in immune activation markers on T cells

Vaccination could induce immune activation of T cells and the upregulation of HIV co-receptors on CD4 T cells, which would lead to more target cells for HIV, potentially resulting in an increase in the plasma viral load. During the weeks after vaccination we measured the CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts, CCR5 and CXCR4 receptors, and immune activation as assessed by HLA-DR and CD38. At baseline the median percentages of CCR5 and CXCR4-positive CD4 and CD8 T cells were comparable between HIV-1-infected and HIV-negative children (P = 0.5, P = 0.07, P = 0.8, P = 0.9, respectively; Table 1). CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts did not change over time after immunization (Fig. 1a and b). The number of activated T cells as assessed by HLA-DR and CD38 expression remained unchanged (data not shown). The expression of both chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 did not show any change in the weeks after primary and secondary immunization (Fig. 1c–f).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Low humoral response rate of HIV-1-infected children

At 6 weeks after each immunization the VZV-specific serological response was assessed. After primary vaccination, five out of 15 HIV-1-infected children seroconverted for VZV. The median VZV IgG was 0.12 IU/ml. After booster vaccination, nine of the 15 children (60%) became VZV IgG positive. In the HIV-negative siblings, the response rate was three out of six (50%) after primary vaccination and six out of six (100%) after boosting. In addition, the anti-VZV IgG titres in HIV-1-infected children after two vaccinations against VZV were significantly lower than those of the HIV-negative siblings (median 0.2 versus 4.6 IU/ml, P = 0.002; Fig. 2). Of the nine children who seroconverted, seven were retested at 24 weeks after the second immunization. VZV-specific IgG was no longer detectable in two of the children. Of the five VZV-seronegative children who remained seronegative after two immunizations, two received a third vaccination. Only one of these two children seroconverted.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Low varicella zoster virus IgG titres after wild-type varicella zoster virus in HIV-1-infected children

To investigate antibody responses against VZV in natural VZV infection in HIV-infected children, we studied eight children with clinically evident chickenpox (of whom 50% had been VZV seropositive in the past), and an additional four children with clinical herpes zoster during treatment with HAART (Table 2). The median nadir percentages of CD4 T lymphocytes of the children who had wild-type VZV or herpes zoster were 16 and 7%, respectively. Only six of these eight children with wild-type varicella were VZV IgG positive after chickenpox. The titres of anti-VZV IgG after chickenpox in HIV-1-infected children were significantly lower than in HIV-negative siblings after vaccination (median 0.8 versus 4.6 IU/ml, P = 0.04). The titre after chickenpox was no different from the titre after vaccination of HIV-1-infected children (median 0.8 versus 0.2 IU/ml, P = 0.3).

The four children with herpes zoster had previously tested positive for VZV IgG. However, one child lost VZV antibodies during HAART, before herpes zoster. All four children were VZV seropositive after herpes zoster. The titre after wild-type zoster in HIV-1-infected children (0.4 IU/ml) was also lower than the titre after the immunization of HIV-negative siblings (P = 0.02), but was comparable with the immunization of HIV-1-infected children (P = 0.4).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Varicella zoster virus-specific T-cell responses after vaccination

The cellular immune response upon vaccination was measured after stimulation with VZV antigen using CFSE dye dilution assay and was expressed as SI. We measured separately the VZV-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferative responses after 6-day stimulation. The occurrence of VZV-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation after primary and secondary vaccination in an HIV-1-infected child and an HIV-negative sibling are shown with the corresponding CD4 and CD8 SI (Fig. 3a and b and Table 3).

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools
Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools

All children showed a peak in SI at approximately 4 weeks after immunization. The median peak CD4 SI of HIV-1-infected children was 6.9 [interquartile range (IQR) 3.0–18.1] and of HIV-negative siblings 3.3 (IQR 2.0–8.2, P = 0.2). The median peak CD8 SI of HIV-1-infected children was 0.7 (IQR 0.4–1.8) and of HIV-negative siblings 1.0 (IQR 0.7–1.4, P = 0.5; Fig. 3c). Also after the second immunization an increase in cellular reactivity was seen. The median CD4 SI at 6 weeks after the second vaccination was 4.2 in HIV-1-infected children and 3.9 in HIV-negative children. The median CD8 SI reached 1.5 in HIV-1-infected children and 1.6 in HIV-negative children (Fig. 3c). No difference over time was seen in either CD4 or CD8 proliferation between HIV-1-infected children and HIV-negative siblings [interaction term (SI*time) P = 0.5 and P = 0.7, respectively].

Age at baseline was negatively correlated with the anti-VZV IgG titre at 6 weeks after the second vaccination (r = −0.7, P = 0.007), but not with the peak in VZV-specific T-cell response (r = −0.15, P = 0.6) or the T-cell response 6 weeks after the second vaccination (r = −0.27, P = 0.4). The nadir age-adjusted CD4 T-cell ratio was neither correlated with the T-cell response nor with the serological response or peak of the CD4 T-cell response. We also found no correlation with any of the immunological outcomes and baseline age-adjusted CD4 T-cell ratio. The T-cell response at 6 weeks after the second vaccination was positively correlated with the antibody titre at the same timepoint (r = 0.6, P = 0.03). However, none of the three children above 13 years of age seroconverted, whereas nine of 12 children younger than 13 years of age demonstrated seroconversion upon immunization.

Back to Top | Article Outline


This study describes the results of VZV vaccination in a single-centre study in VZV-seronegative HIV-1-infected children. The live-attenuated VZV vaccine was well tolerated by both previously immunocompromised HIV-1-infected children treated with HAART despite previous immunodeficiency, as well as by stable, non-progressing HIV-1-infected children.

VZV vaccination of 15 HIV-1-infected children in our cohort and six healthy siblings was undertaken under strict surveillance by weekly clinical checks for fever, vesicular lesions and other clinical symptoms that could be associated with VZV infection by the Oka vaccine strain. VZV vaccination of HIV-1-infected children did not result in any adverse reaction upon vaccination. Specific T-cell responses against VZV were induced in all, but seroconversion occurred in only 60% of the children after two vaccinations. Three documented VZV contacts did not result in breakthrough infection in any of these VZV-immunized HIV-infected children, even in the presence of low VZV-specific titres. Again VZV titres did not rise afterwards (data not shown).

We show that the number of CCR5 or CXCR4-positive cells was stable in the weeks after vaccination, and plasma viral loads also did not increase upon VZV vaccination in any of the children, either with or without HAART. These data suggest that VZV vaccination has no effect on HIV-1 infection. Therefore, VZV vaccination can be considered safe in HIV-1-infected children during HAART despite previous immunodeficiency.

Current guidelines recommend vaccination of HIV-1-infected children with a well-maintained immune system [16]. However, most children are tested HIV-1 positive at a later stage of the disease. Effectiveness in our study was similar to the seroconversion rate of 60% after two doses, as reported in 41 HIV-1-infected children with N1 or A1 disease [17]. In this study severely immunocompromised patients were excluded.

Early trials of VZV vaccination of healthy immunocompetent children and adults showed high seroconversion rates (up to 100%) after primary vaccination. Serological and cellular responses persisted 3–4 years postimmunization in approximately 95% [6,25]. Clinical reactions were generally mild, being limited to 5–10% of recipients in the form of a mild generalized rash with less than 50 papules and some vesicles. These results are in line with our findings in HIV-negative siblings who showed 100% seroconversion after two vaccinations.

Children on chemotherapy or radiotherapy for malignant disease showed cellular and humoral immune responses after vaccination; however, at a lower level compared with otherwise healthy individuals [26]. Lymphocyte counts below 700 cells/μl resulted in more frequent and severe side effects. This observation underlines the need for a re-established immunity before the vaccine can be administered safely. In our study, immune reconstitution was established because HAART was started months to years before immunization, and the plasma viral load was undetectable in 12 out of 15 vaccinated children. Seroconversion rates in immunocompromised patients are lower than in healthy children. Also in HIV-1-infected children only 60% had detectable VZV-specific IgG.

Our study provides new evidence that HIV-1-infected children remain immunodeficient, even when properly treated with HAART. First, serological responses to vaccination were significantly less than those observed in HIV-negative siblings or previously described in the literature [6,27]. Second, a relatively high number of wild-type VZV reinfections were observed in VZV-seropositive HIV-infected children, and once reinfected, titres did not rise steeply. Whether life-long immunity upon re-exposure [8,28] is maintained in HIV-infected individuals remains to be shown upon further follow-up.

The lack of any clinical symptom after vaccination and only one positive VZV polymerase chain reaction result in blood indicates that the immune system of children during HAART is able to mount an adequate primary cellular immune response upon vaccination. However, in the presence of comparable T-cell reactivity between HIV-1-positive and HIV-negative children, the serological response was much lower in HIV-1-infected individuals. Although the short-term restoration of immune function seems to protect individuals from vaccine-related varicella, functional immune restoration and immunological fine tuning is still incomplete, resulting in absent and low VZV-specific IgG. Perturbations in B-cell responsiveness were found not only to be caused by impaired CD4 T-cell help, but were also intrinsic to the detrimental changes in the B-cell compartment itself [29,30]. In our study we show that even during successful treatment with HAART, B-cell function remained disturbed. The absence of serological memory induction may also explain the increased rate of herpes zoster during HAART [12].

In conclusion, VZV vaccination of HIV-1-infected children is safe during HAART, even in children with previous CDC stage C events. Repeated vaccination of VZV-seronegative HIV-positive children seems mandatory, because primary and secondary vaccine failures frequently occur. Additional research with more children and longer follow-up is needed to determine further the effectiveness of vaccination against chickenpox by breakthrough wild-type infection or shingles by reactivated VZV.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The authors are indebted to the patients, their parents and caretakers for their participation, to the HIV nurses Atie van der Plas and Eugenie le Poole for their enthusiasm and care of the paediatric cohort, and to Mrs H. Schuitemaker and Mrs D. Pajkrt for critically reading and commenting on the manuscript.

Sponsorship: This study was financially supported by a grant from the Dutch AIDS foundation (grant 2002 7006).

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9:361–381.

2. Strauss JH, Strauss EG, editors. DNA-containing viruses. San Diego, California: Elvevier; 2002. pp. 221–277.

3. Kuijpers TW, Vossen MT, Gent MR, Davin JC, Roos MT, Wertheim-van Dillen PM, et al. Frequencies of circulating cytolytic, CD45RA+CD27−, CD8+ T lymphocytes depend on infection with CMV. J Immunol 2003; 170:4342–4348.

4. Lee BW. Review of varicella zoster seroepidemiology in India and Southeast Asia. Trop Med Int Health 1998; 3:886–890.

5. Preblud SR. Age-specific risks of varicella complications. Pediatrics 1981; 68:14–17.

6. Arbeter AM, Starr SE, Plotkin SA. Varicella vaccine studies in healthy children and adults. Pediatrics 1986; 78:748–756.

7. Diaz PS, Smith S, Hunter E, Arvin AM. T lymphocyte cytotoxicity with natural varicella-zoster virus infection and after immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Immunol 1989; 142:636–641.

8. Vossen MT, Gent MR, Weel JF, de Jong MD, van Lier RA, Kuijpers TW. Development of virus-specific CD4+ T cells on reexposure to varicella-zoster virus. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:72–82.

9. Thomas SL, Wheeler JG, Hall AJ. Contacts with varicella or with children and protection against herpes zoster in adults: a case–control study. Lancet 2002; 360:678–682.

10. von Seidlein L, Gillette SG, Bryson Y, Frederick T, Mascola L, Church J, et al. Frequent recurrence and persistence of varicella-zoster virus infections in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Pediatr 1996; 128:52–57.

11. Winquist AG, Roome A, Hadler J. Varicella outbreak at a summer camp for human immunodeficiency virus-infected children. Pediatrics 2001; 107:67–72.

12. Glesby MJ, Hoover DR, Tan T, Shi Q, Gao W, French AL, et al. Herpes zoster in women with and at risk for HIV: data from the women's interagency HIV study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004; 37:1604–1609.

13. Bekker V, Scherpbier H, Pajkrt D, Jurriaans S, Zaaijer H, Kuijpers TW. Persistent humoral immune defect in highly active antiretroviral therapy-treated children with HIV-1 infection: loss of specific antibodies against attenuated vaccine strains and natural viral infection. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e315–e322.

14. Takahashi M, Otsuka T, Okuno Y, Asano Y, Yazaki T, Isomura S. Live vaccine used to prevent the spread of varicella in children in hospital. Lancet 1974; 304:1288–1290.

15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of varicella. Update recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 1999; 48:1–5.

16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1994 revised classification system for human immunodeficiency virus infection in children less than 13 years of age. Official authorized addenda: human immunodeficiency virus infection codes and official guidelines for coding and reporting ICD-9-CM. MMWR 1994; 43:1–19.

17. Levin MJ, Gershon AA, Weinberg A, Blanchard S, Nowak B, Palumbo P, Chan Y. Immunization of HIV-infected children with varicella vaccine. J Pediatr 2001; 139:305–310.

18. Dunn D. Short-term risk of disease progression in HIV-1-infected children receiving no antiretroviral therapy or zidovudine monotherapy: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2003; 362:1605–1611.

19. Abrams EJ, Weedon J, Steketee RW, Lambert G, Bamji M, Brown T, et al. Association of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) load early in life with disease progression among HIV-infected infants. New York City Perinatal HIV Transmission Collaborative Study Group. J Infect Dis 1998; 178:101–108.

20. Shearer WT, Quinn TC, LaRussa P, Lew JF, Mofenson L, Almy S, et al. Viral load and disease progression in infants infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Women and Infants Transmission Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1337–1342.

21. Alkhatib G, Combadiere C, Broder CC, Feng Y, Kennedy PE, Murphy PM, Berger EA. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 1996; 272:1955–1958.

22. Juffermans NP, Paxton WA, Dekkers PEP, Bergon A, de Jonge E, Speelman P, et al. Up-regulation of HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 on CD4(+) T cells during human endotoxemia and after stimulation with (myco)bacterial antigens: the role of cytokines. Blood 2000; 96:2649–2654.

23. Vossen MTM, Biezeveld MH, de Jong MD, Gent M-R, Baars PA, von Rosenstiel IA, et al. Absence of circulating natural killer and primed CD8+ cells in life-threatening varicella. J Infect Dis 2005; 191:198–206.

24. van der Zwet WC, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, van Elburg RM, Cranendonk A, Zaaijer HL. Neonatal antibody titers against varicella-zoster virus in relation to gestational age, birth weight, and maternal titer. Pediatrics 2002; 109:79–85.

25. Kuter B, Matthews H, Shinefield H, Black S, Dennehy P, Watson B, et al. Ten year follow-up of healthy children who received one or two injections of varicella vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23:132–137.

26. Gershon AA, Steinberg SP. Cellular and humoral immune responses to varicella-zoster virus in immunocompromised patients during and after varicella-zoster infections. Infect Immun 1979; 25:170–174.

27. Ampofo K, Saiman L, LaRussa P, Steinberg S, Annunziato P, Gershon A. Persistence of immunity to live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthy adults. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:774–779.

28. Krause PR, Klinman DM. Varicella vaccination: evidence for frequent reactivation of the vaccine strain in healthy children. Nat Med 2000; 6:451–454.

29. Moir S, Ogwaro KM, Malaspina A, Vasquez J, Donaghue ET, Hallahan CW, et al. Perturbations in B cell responsiveness to CD4+ T cell help in HIV-infected individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:6057–6062.

30. Moir S, Malaspina A, Ogwaro KM, Donoghue ET, Hallahan CW, Ehler LA, et al. HIV-1 induces phenotypic and functional perturbations of B cells in chronically infected individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:10362–10367.


Children; HIV-1-infection; immunology; vaccination; varicella zoster virus

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.