HIV and other retroviruses exit infected cells by budding from the plasma membrane . The virion then spreads extracellularly, infecting new susceptible cells. Budding is promoted by short and highly conserved motifs within the HIV-1 P6gag protein , providing interaction sites for the host cellular proteins Tsg101 [3,4] and AIP1 . Both cellular proteins are required for the adequate release of HIV-1 [6,7]. A tetrapeptide P(T/S)AP motif (residues 7–10) within HIV-1 P6gag is crucial for recruiting Tsg101 [8,9], and for the detachment of virions from the cell surface . The same peptide has been recognized in Ebola and HTLV-1 viruses [1,9,10]. The HIV-1 P6gag residues 32–46 are involved in the binding to AIP1, being LYP and LXXLF domains (residues 35–37 and 41–45, respectively) part of the AIP1 primary binding site .
Nine subtypes (A, B, C, D, F, G, H, J, K) and multiple intersubtype recombinant variants have been described within HIV-1 group M . Most information about the HIV-1 cell cycle derives from subtype B viruses, prevalent in north America and western Europe. However, non-B subtypes are responsible for more than 90% of the 40 million HIV-1 infections worldwide [12,13]. Any significant difference between distinct HIV-1 subtypes may have implications for HIV vaccine development, serological and genetic diagnosis [14,15], viral load measurement  and antiretroviral therapy [17–21]. In this study we have examined the P6gag region across clades in an attempt to explore whether differences exist between subtypes in interactions with host cell proteins involved in viral budding.
The genetic variability within PT/SAP, LYP and LXXLF HIV-1 P6gag motifs was examined in plasma specimens collected during the past 10 years from 122 HIV-1-infected individuals living in Spain, 82 of whom are drug naive. These specimens had previously been ascribed to different HIV-1 gag subtypes: 50A, 54B, 2C, 1F, 12G, 1H and 2U . P6gag sequences were deposited at the GenBank. The chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to detect significant differences between proportions. Comparisons were conducted using Epi Info version 6.02 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA). Only P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
Earlier studies described specific patterns of insertions and deletions within P6gag across HIV-1 clades [22,23]. We found that insertions (from 3 to 9 amino acids) within P6gag were more frequent in subtype B compared with non-B subtypes (33% versus 4.4%; P = 0.0001), mostly (64%) being located nearby the PT/SAP motif (positions 7–10). Similarly, total or partial PT/SAP duplications were more frequent in clade B than in non-B strains (24% versus 1.5%; P < 0.001). The rate of P6gag insertions across subtypes did not differ significantly when comparing patients with and without exposure to antiretroviral therapy. This is in contrast to earlier reports [20,24,25], and according to others . For some authors these PTAPP duplications could be considered as natural polymorphisms . However, they could lengthen the Tsg101 binding site, and therefore these viruses might have an enhanced Tsg101 binding. Recent findings have suggested that PTAPP duplications could impact on the virus replicative capacity depending on the pol genetic context .
As HIV-1 budding cannot occur in the absence of Tsg101 , mutations that disrupt the Tsg101/Gag interaction typically inhibit HIV-1 release to a much greater extent than mutations that disrupt the AIP1/Gag interaction . Accordingly, we only found two out of 122 viruses (1.6%) from drug-naive individuals with substitutions within the PT/SAP motif. The first (accession number AY248409) had a clade B virus with a P10L substitution, known to disrupt the Tsg101 interaction, reducing virion release in vitro . It conserved the LYP motif and harboured a PTAPP insertion after the P11E change. This insertion could represent an additional binding site for the Tsg101 protein. The second specimen (accession number AY248370) was a clade G virus, with an A9T change within PT/SAP and a L35Q substitution at the LYP motif.
Despite similar rates of amino acid substitutions within the LYP motif in B and non-B viruses (27.8% versus 32.2%), a higher proportion of non-B than B subtypes presented two or more substitutions and deletions per specimen (29.4% versus 3.7%; P < 0.001). The LYP sequence was altered in clade C and H viruses, in 91% of clade A, and 80% of clade G. Conversely, it was conserved in clades J and F specimens, in 92% out of 39 recombinants AgagXpro, and in 67% of clade B viruses. P37 residue duplication at the LYP motif was present in 67.6% and 7.4% of non-B and B viruses, respectively (P < 0.0001), and could be considered a polymorphic change. The AIP1 binding site sequences carrying substitutions in the study population are shown in Table 1.
Interestingly, amino acid substitutions at the LYP motif were fourfold less frequent in clade B viruses from antiretroviral-experienced patients compared with drug-naive patients (9.5% versus 39.4%; P = 0.01). Restrictions imposed by drug resistance mutations selected in the pol gene could explain this finding. A similar influence of antiretroviral therapy on LYP variability was not recognized in non-B subtypes.
The deletion of residues 34–35 of P6gag has previously been associated with the disruption of the AIP1 binding site  and with non-progressive HIV-1 infection , Seven out of 122 viruses (5.7%) harboured amino acid deletions within the LYP P6gag motif (residues 35–37). Therefore, these viruses could have alternative sites for their interaction with the cellular machinery involved in viral budding.
The two leucines at the LXXLF motif (residues 41–45), required for AIP1 binding , were conserved in all 122 viruses, regardless of the HIV-1 subtype or antiretroviral exposure. A R42K substitution was observed in 90% of non-B and 50% of B viruses (P < 0.0001), most probably representing a polymorphism, because it is not critical for the AIP1 interaction.
In summary, we found high genetic variability in the HIV-1 P6gag region, including substitutions, deletions and insertions, which was influenced by subtype and antiretroviral exposure. It could affect the interaction between HIV-1 and Tsg101/AIP1 host proteins, modifying viral budding or favouring alternative budding pathways. Functional analyses are warranted to confirm our findings, particularly if there is an effect of antiretroviral treatment on the variability at Gag residues that might influence the virus replication capacity, as has previously been suggested [31,32], and whether it could occur in a subtype-dependent manner.
The authors wish to thank Juan Martinez-Serrano (Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York) for helpful comments.
Sponsorship: This work was supported in part by grants from Fundación Investigación y Educación en SIDA (IES), Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (SAF2003-03551), Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS PI030004) and Red de Investigación en SIDA (RIS, project 173).
1. Freed E. HIV-1 and the host cell: an intimate association. Trends Microbiol 2004; 12:170–177.
2. Gottlinger H, Dorfman T, Sodroski J, Haseltine W. Effect of mutations affecting the P6 gag protein on HIV particle release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88:3195–3199.
3. Garrus J, von Schwedler U, Pornillos O, Morham SG, Zavitz KH, Wang HE, et al. Tsg101 and the vacuolar protein sorting pathway are essential for HIV-1 budding. Cell 2001; 107:55–65.
4. Goff A, Ehrlich S, Cohen S, Carter C. Tsg101 control of HIV-1 Gag trafficking and release. J Virol 2003; 77:9173–9182.
5. Strack B, Calistri A, Craig S, Popova E, Göttlinger HG. AIP1/ALIX is a binding partner for HIV-1 P6 and EIAV P9 functioning in virus budding. Cell 2003; 114:689–699.
6. Gottlinger H. The HIV-1 assembly machine. AIDS 2001; 15(Suppl. 5):S13–S20.
7. Martín-Serrano J, Pérez-Caballero D, Bieniasz P. Context-dependent effects of L domains and ubiquitination on viral budding. J Virol 2004; 78:5554–5563.
8. Demirov D, Orenstein J, Freed E. The late domain of HIV-1 P6 promotes virus release in a cell type-dependent manner. J Virol 2002; 76:105–117.
9. Martín-Serrano J, Zang T, Bieniasz P. HIV-1 and Ebola virus encode small peptide motifs that recruit Tsg101 to sites of particles assembly to facilitate egress. Nat Med 2001; 7:1313–1319.
10. Pornillos O, Garrus J, Sundquist W. Mechanisms of envelope RNA virus budding. Trend Cell Biol 2002; 12:569–579.
11. Kuiken C, Foley B, Hahn B, Marx P, McCutchon F, Mellors J, et al. HIV sequence compendium. Los Alamos, NM: Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group. Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2001.
12. Peeters M, Toure-Kane C, Nkengasong J. Genetic diversity of HIV in Africa: impact on diagnosis, treatment, vaccine development and trials. AIDS 2003; 17:2547–2560.
13. Peeters M. Recombinant HIV sequences: their role in the global epidemic. In: HIV sequence compendium. Los Alamos, NM: Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2000. pp. 54–72.
14. Baldrich-Rubio E, Anagonou S, Stirrups K, Lafia E, Candotti D, Lee H, Allain JP. A complex HIV type 1 A/G/J recombinant virus isolated from a seronegative patient with AIDS from Benin. West Africa J Gen Virol 2001; 82:1095–1106.
15. Candotti D, Adu-Sarkodie Y, Davies F, Baldrich-Rubio E, Stirrups H, Allain J. AIDS in an HIV-seronegative Ghanaian woman with intersubtype A/G recombinant HIV-1 infection. J Med Virol 2000; 62:1–8.
16. Jenny-Avital E, Beatrice S. Erroneously low or undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA load, determined by PCR, in West African and American patients with non-B subtype HIV-1 infection. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32:1227–1230.
17. Descamps D, Apetrei C, Collin G, Damond F, Simon F, Brun-Vézinet F. Naturally occurring decreased susceptibility of HIV-1 subtype G to protease inhibitors. AIDS 1998; 12:1109–1111.
18. Holguín A, Soriano V. Resistance to antiretroviral agents in individuals with HIV-1 non-B subtypes. HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3:403–411.
19. Loemba H, Brenner B, Parniak M, Ma'ayan S, Spira B, Moisi D, et al. Genetic divergence of HIV type 1 Ethiopian clade C reverse transcriptase (RT) and rapid development of resistance against non-nucleoside inhibitors of RT. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46:2087–2094.
20. Peters S, Muñoz M, Yerly S, Sanchez-Merino V, Lopez-Galindez C, Perrin L, et al. Resistance to analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors mediated by HIV-1 P6 protein. J Virol 2001; 75:9644–9653.
21. Velazquez-Campoy A, Vega S, Freire E. Amplification of the effects of drug resistance mutations by background polymorphisms in HIV-1 protease from African subtypes. Biochemistry 2002; 41:8613–8619.
22. Holguín A, Alvarez A, Soriano V. Differences in Gag proteins length across different HIV-1 subtypes. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2005; 21:886–893.
23. Marlowe N, Flys T, Hackett J, Schumaker M, Brooks Jackson J, Eshleman S. Analysis of insertions and deletions in the gag p6 region of diverse HIV-1 strains. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2004; 20:1119–1125.
24. Kaufmann G, Suzuki K, Cunningham P, Mukaide M, Kondo M, Imai M, et al. Impact of HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, cleavage site, and p6 mutations on the virological response to quadruple therapy with saquinavir, ritonavir, and two nucleoside analogs. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2001; 17:487–497.
25. Lastere S, Dalban C, Collin G, Descamps D, Girard PM, Clavel F, et al. Impact of insertions in the HIV-1 p6 PTAPP region on the virological response to amprenavir. Antiviral Ther 2004; 9:221–227.
26. Brume Z, Chan K, Dong W, Wynhoven B, Mo T, Hogg RS, et al. Prevalence and clinical implications of insertions in the HIV-1 P6gag N-terminal region in drug-naive individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy. Antiviral Ther 2003; 8:91–96.
27. Gallego O, de Mendoza C, Corral A, Soriano V. Changes in HIV-1 p7/p1/p6 gag gene in drug-naive and pretreated patients. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:1245–1247.
28. Lastere S, Perrin V, Dam E, Brun-Vezinet F, Mammano F. Replicative capacity and drug susceptibility of viral clones carrying duplication of the PTAPP motif in wild-type and drug-resistant PR–RT contexts. Antiviral Ther 2005; 10:S174.
29. Von Schewdler U, Stuchell M, Müller B, Ward DM, Chung HY, Morita E, et al. The protein network of HIV budding. Cell 2003; 114:701–713.
30. Alexander L, Weiskopf E, Geenough T, Gaddis NC, Auerbach MR, Malim MH, et al. Unusual polymorphisms in HIV-1 associated with non-progressive infection. J Virol 2000; 74:4361–4376.
31. Bates M, Chappey C, Parkin N. Mutations in P6 Gag associated with alterations in replication capacity in drug sensitive HIV-1 are implicated in the budding process mediated bt Tsg101 and AIP1. In: 11th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston 2004 [Abstract 121].
32. Brondani V, Kirchhoff W, Schefer Q, Klimkait T. Variation of Gag p6 in clinical HIV-1 samples of B and non-B origin: effects on viral fitness and correlation with clinical parameters. In: 3rd Conference on AIDS Pathogenesis and Treatment. Río de Janeiro, Brasil 2005 [Abstract MoPe14.3B04].
© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.