AIDS

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 14, 2005 - Volume 19 - Issue 15 > MDR1 G1199A polymorphism alters permeability of HIV protease...
AIDS:
14 October 2005 - Volume 19 - Issue 15 - p 1617-1625
Clinical Science

MDR1 G1199A polymorphism alters permeability of HIV protease inhibitors across P-glycoprotein-expressing epithelial cells

Woodahl, Erica L; Yang, Ziping; Bui, Tot; Shen, Danny D; Ho, Rodney JY

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Received 6 April, 2005

Accepted 20 June, 2005

Correspondence to R.J.Y. Ho, University of Washington, Department of Pharmaceutics, Box 357610, Seattle, WA 98195-7610, USA. Tel: +1 206 543 9434; fax: +1 206 543 3204; e-mail: rodneyho@u.washington.edu

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the human multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) G1199A polymorphism (amino acid change Ser400Asn) on P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-dependent transepithelial permeability and uptake kinetics of HIV protease inhibitors (PI), by using recombinant epithelial cells expressing wild-type MDR1 (MDR1wt) or the G1199A variant (MDR11199A).

Methods: Using a recombinant expression system developed previously, the transepithelial permeability and uptake kinetic parameters of five PI, amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were estimated across polarized epithelial cells.

Results: For all PI, the transepithelial permeability ratio (basolateral-to-apical transport divided by apical-to-basolateral transport) was significantly greater in MDR11199A cells than MDR1wt cells: amprenavir (1.7-fold), indinavir (1.8-fold), lopinavir (1.5-fold), ritonavir (2.8-fold), and saquinavir (2.1-fold). However, the impact of G1199A on P-gp activity appeared to primarily influence drug permeability in the apical-to-basolateral direction. Kinetic analysis of ritonavir and saquinavir uptake by MDR1wt- and MDR11199A-expressing cells showed that Vmax was similar, while uptake Km was significantly higher in cells expressing the G1199A variant suggesting that alterations in P-gp-dependent efflux mediated by G1199A were due to changes in transporter affinity.

Conclusions: Alterations in transepithelial permeability of HIV PI due to the G1199A polymorphism may impact oral bioavailability of PI and penetration into cells and tissues of the lymphoid and central nervous systems.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Although highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is effective in containing plasma HIV loads, eventual disease progression to AIDS occurs even in individuals receiving intensive antiretroviral therapy. HAART combines the use of reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors (PI) each targeting different mechanisms of the life cycle of HIV. It is widely believed that viral sanctuary sites, with limited access to chemotherapy, exist in the body that ultimately lead to disease progression. Potential viral sanctuary sites that have been proposed include lymph nodes and lymphoid tissues and the central nervous system (CNS) [1-4]. Cellular and tissue dependent mechanisms that reduce local drug concentrations may compromise effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy and promote viral drug resistance.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the gene product of the human multidrug resistance gene (MDR1), has been shown to mediate the transport of HIV PI in both in vitro and in vivo models [5-9]. The oral bioavailability of PI is poor and variable, and while solubility and contribution of cytochrome P450-mediated first-pass metabolism also limit bioavailability, the highly efficient efflux by P-gp of PI in the intestine has been proposed to play a major role in limiting their bioavailability [5,10,11]. Furthermore, expression of P-gp may play a role in limiting effective delivery of HIV PI into viral sanctuary sites. P-gp expression and activity have also been documented in various subtypes of lymphocytes, as well as in endothelial cells at the blood-brain barrier [12-14]. The P-gp-dependent efflux of PI limits intracellular drug accumulation in lymphocytes [15-18], and reduces brain permeability at the blood-brain brain barrier [19,20]. Therefore, P-gp constitutes a significant obstacle for the access of PI to HIV sanctuary sites, and ultimately reduces the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in these tissues.

Researchers have evaluated the effect of P-gp expression on HIV disease progression and PI pharmacokinetics. In HIV patients, data suggest that expression of functionally defective P-gp increases with disease progression [21]. In addition, overexpression of MDR1 in HIV positive patients was shown to correlate with decreased systemic trough concentrations nelfinavir, indinavir, amprenavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir as well as decreased accumulation in lymphocytes [22]. Studies have also shown that saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, indinavir, amprenavir and lopinavir induce the expression of P-gp in human lymphocytes, which could act to further decrease intracellular accumulation of PI [23,24].

Genetic polymorphisms in MDR1 are thought to play a role in P-gp expression and function, and may influence HIV PI levels and clinical response to antiretroviral drug therapy. In particular, the MDR1 C3435T polymorphism has been associated with alterations in P-gp; however, it is difficult to determine whether the C3435T polymorphism acts directly at the molecular level since it does not code for an amino acid modification. Therefore, the influence of MDR1 polymorphisms that lead to an amino acid modification must be evaluated at the cellular level. To accomplish this, we have developed a tool to probe the penetration and uptake of PI. A recombinant cell system expressing a non-synonymous MDR1 polymorphism, a G→A transition at nucleotide 1199 (G1199A) was developed previously by us [25]. G1199A results in a serine to asparagine transition at amino acid 400 (Ser400Asn) in a cytoplasmic domain of P-gp, with an allelic frequency of approximately 5.5% in Caucasians [26-28]. In our previous studies, we confirmed that cells expressing either wild-type MDR1 (MDR1wt) or the G1199A polymorphism (MDR11199A) expressed comparable levels of P-gp on the apical membrane of epithelial cells by real-time reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR, immunoblot, cell surface expression analysis, and deconvolution immunofluorescent microscopy [25].

In this report, functional significance of the MDR1 G1199A polymorphism was evaluated with the recombinant cell expression system, to assess the influence of G1199A on the transport and permeability of HIV PI. Our results suggest that altered transepithelial permeability of HIV PI due to MDR1 polymorphisms may affect absorption of PI from the intestine as well as penetration into potential HIV sanctuary sites such as lymphoid tissues and the CNS.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Cell culture

LLC-PK1 control and recombinant MDR1-expressing cells were grown in culture media and transport studies performed as described previously [25].

Back to Top | Article Outline
Transepithelial permeability assay

Transepithelial permeability of PI was evaluated by the protocol established previously [25] with radiolabeled 3H-amprenavir, 3H-lopinavir, 3H-ritonavir, and 3H-saquinavir (Moravek Biochemical, Brea, California, USA) at 5 μM (1 μCi/well) in Opti-MEM medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Ccalifornia, USA) in quadruplicate. Radioactivity was measured with a 1600 TR liquid scintillation analyzer (Canberra Packard, Zellik, Belgium). Indinavir was performed at 5 μM and aliquots diluted 1: 1 in methanol for liquid chromatography-coupled mass spectroscopy (LC/MS) using a protocol established previously [1]. Inhibition of transport was performed at 1 μM GF120918 [N-(4-[2-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6,7-dimethoxy-2-isoquinolinyl)ethyl]-phenyl)-9,10-dihydro-5-methoxy-9-oxo-4-acridine carboxamide] kindly provided by GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA). All PI experiments were duplicated. Percent transport was calculated as amount of drug in the recipient compartment divided by initial amount in the donor compartment. Apparent permeability (Papp) was calculated as Papp = [1/(A × C0)] × [dQ/dt], where A is the surface area of permeable support, C0 is the initial concentration in the donor compartment, and dQ/dt is the initial rate of transfer of compound into the acceptor compartment, and was estimated in the apical-to-basolateral direction (Papp A→B) and in the basolateral-to-apical direction (Papp B→A) [29]. The ratio of PappB→A/PappA→B was also estimated to evaluate net directional flux.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Uptake kinetics of PI

To evaluate influence of G1199A on P-gp efflux activity, the recombinant cells were exposed to 5 μM (0.5 μCi/well) 3H-ritonavir or 3H-saquinavir to optimize time-course of intracellular uptake in 0.25 × 106 cells seeded overnight in 12-well tissue culture plates (Corning, Corning, New York, USA). The uptake time-course was linear up to 60 min. Therefore, concentration-dependent drug accumulation was performed at 45 min over the concentration range. Cells were solubilized with 0.1 N NaOH and radioactivity was measured. The Vmax and Km values of drug uptake were analyzed based on the Michaelis-Menten model. Kinetic analyses were repeated three times and WinCurveFit software (Kevin Raner Software, Mt. Waverley, Australia) was used to model the data.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analysis

Student's two-sided t test was used to evaluate differences between two sets of data. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Directional transepithelial permeability

The rate of transfer of protease inhibitors across an epithelial cell barrier was measured with alone (apical-to-basolateral, Fig. 1a-c; basolateral-to-apical, Fig. 2a-c) and in the presence of a P-gp-specific inhibitor GF120918 (apical-to-basolateral, Fig. 1d-f; basolateral-to-apical, Fig. 2d-f). Drug was placed in either the apical or basolateral compartment and percent transport was estimated at each time point.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools

Apical-to-basolateral flux, in the absence of GF120918, was greatly reduced by the expression of either MDR1wt or MDR11199A compared to control cells, indicating expression of functional P-gp (Fig. 1a-c). In control cells, movement of drug across a cell membrane is assumed to be mediated primarily by non-P-gp mechanisms, either diffusion or contribution of other transporters; notably, the PI under study did not cross the epithelial membrane all at the same rate, indicating rates of transfer is likely a function of their physiochemical properties. The rank order of transfer of PI corresponded between cell types, with amprenavir displaying the highest apical-to-basolateral flux and saquinavir the lowest.

Next, basolateral-to-apical flux, in the absence of GF120918, was evaluated in the three cell types (Fig. 2a-c). Expression of either MDR1wt or MDR11199A enhanced basolateral-to-apical flux compared to control cells, confirming expression of P-gp. Again, flux in the control cells was not uniform across the PI, but rank order corresponded between the cells with lopinavir displaying the highest basolateral-to-apical flux and indinavir the lowest.

Differences in the activity of P-gp between cells expressing MDR1wt or MDR11199A were observed for all PI. The transepithelial data were evaluated in each direction and the data are presented in Table 1. A significantly lower apical-to-basolateral flux was observed in MDR11199A cells for all PI compared to MDR1wt cells [amprenavir: 1.7-fold (P < 0.0001); indinavir: 1.9-fold (P < 0.001); lopinavir: 1.6-fold (P < 0.0001); ritonavir: 2.3-fold (P < 0.0001); and saquinavir 2.3-fold (P < 0.0001)]. These data indicate that P-gp expressed in MDR11199A cells was more efficient at limiting absorptive transport across the epithelial barrier than was P-gp expressed in MDR1wt cells. However, no differences were observed between MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells in the basolateral-to-apical direction, with the exception of a modest increase in efflux of ritonavir (1.2-fold; P < 0.05) in MDR11199A cells. Therefore, although a significant amount of drug was secreted across the epithelial cells in the basolateral-to-apical direction in both MDR1 cells, there appears to be little G1199A genotypic differences. Such a rapid basolateral-to-apical transfer was observed with lopinavir, the rate of accumulation in the apical compartment appeared to diminish over time in both MDR1-expressing cells (Fig. 2a-c); therefore, transfer kinetics may not be under sink conditions at later time points. These data suggest that although both MDR1wt- and MDR11199A-expressing cells display efficient efflux of PI, the influence of the G1199A polymorphism may have the largest impact on efflux transport in the absorptive or apical-to-basolateral direction; i.e., the impact of P-gp on transepithelial permeability is asymmetric.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

The P-gp-specific inhibitor GF120918 was used to confirm that efflux of PI was mediated by P-gp in the apical-to-basolateral (Fig. 1d-f) and basolateral-to-apical (Fig. 2d-f) directions. GF120918 had little effect on the efflux of PI across control cells in either direction. Inhibition with GF120918 effectively blocked P-gp activity in both MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells, and brought flux rates in both directions near to the values observed in control cells. These data confirm that the efflux of PI in these cells is a P-gp-specific effect, and that the potency of GF120918 inhibition was unaffected by G1199A polymorphism.

Collectively, these data indicate that P-gp is the primary contributor of PI efflux across the recombinant MDR1 cell system. Significant differences in P-gp efflux between MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells were observed for all PI in the apical-to-basolateral direction, but negligible genotypic differences existed in efflux in the basolateral-to-apical direction. G1199A expression had the largest impact on the apical-to-basolateral efflux of ritonavir and saquinavir, followed in order by indinavir, amprenavir, and lopinavir. This highly significant decrease in apical-to-basolateral permeability in MDR11199A cells was abolished in the presence of GF120918, indicating that the observed G1199A effect was entirely attributable to altered P-gp function.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Apparent transepithelial permeability

After evaluating P-gp-mediated efflux of PI in the individual directions, the next step was to estimate permeability ratios (PappB→A/PappA→B) that represent the net active steady-state flux of drug across an epithelial membrane (Table 2). If cells display directional efflux mediated by P-gp, a permeability ratio greater than 1.0 is expected, and in the presence of the P-gp-specific inhibitor GF120918, the ratio should be reduced to about unity. In the control cells, the permeability ratios were close to unity for amprenavir and indinavir, indicating no directional flux; however, the permeability ratios for lopinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were greater than unity, but the ratios were unaffected by GF120918 indicating that the net flux of these compounds was mediated by transporters other than P-gp. Cells expressing MDR11199A had significantly higher permeability ratios of all PI compared to MDR1wt [amprenavir: 1.7-fold (P < 0.0005); indinavir: 1.8-fold (P < 0.05); lopinavir: 1.5-fold (P < 0.0005); ritonavir: 2.8-fold (P < 0.0005); and saquinavir: 2.1-fold (P < 0.0005)]. Permeability ratios of saquinavir in both MDR1 cell types were substantially higher than the ratios for other PI, indicating that saquinavir is very efficiently effluxed by P-gp. In the presence of GF120918, permeability ratios were dramatically reduced in both MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells, confirming that efflux was mediated by P-gp. Although the permeability ratios were not reduced to that of the control cells in the presence of GF120918, the numbers were similar between MDR1wt and MDR11199A. These data suggest that G1199A enhances the transepithelial permeability ratio of PI by promoting P-gp-mediated efflux.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Uptake kinetics of HIV PI

Traditionally, P-gp transport kinetic studies were performed with plasma membrane vesicles to enrich P-gp activity. Our recombinant MDR1 cells consistently express high levels of P-gp, which allowed for the estimation of uptake kinetic parameters for ritonavir and saquinavir. The preceding analyses suggest that the effect of G1199A may be most significant for ritonavir and saquinavir. Uptake kinetic parameters were estimated from intracellular drug accumulation rate versus medium concentration plots; namely, the Michaelis-Menten constants Vmax and Km (Table 3). Vmax, the maximal rate of uptake, is expected to diminish as P-gp efflux transport increases, and Km, the drug concentration at half-maximal uptake transport, is expected to increase as the affinity of P-gp for the drug increases. For ritonavir, Vmax values were similar between MDR1wt- and MDR11199A-expressing cells; however, the Km value was more than twofold greater in MDR11199A-expressing cells than MDR1wt cells. In the case of saquinavir, Vmax was slightly decreased in MDR11199-expressing cells, while Km was also greater in MDR11199A-expressing cells. Collectively, these data suggest that G1199A impacts apparent Km of P-gp with minimum impact on Vmax for both ritonavir and saquinavir.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

The ability of HIV PI to cross a cellular barrier is important not only for effective absorption from the intestine but also for their penetration into potential HIV sanctuary sites, such as lymphoid tissues and the CNS. We have previously shown that the recombinant cell system expressing either MDR1wt or MDR11199A is a highly reliable and consistent method with which to evaluate functional changes in P-gp due to the G1199A polymorphism [25]. Using this system, expression of G1199A was shown to result in variable cellular sensitivity and permeability of P-gp substrates [25]. This system has now been extended to study the phenotypic penetrance of the G1199A polymorphism in transepithelial permeability of HIV PI.

Evaluating transport of compounds across an epithelial cell barrier provides the ability to predict how drugs will move across physiologic cell barriers in the body, including the intestine, kidney, and blood-brain barrier. For a physiologic comparison, the apical compartment represents the intestine lumen, the lumen of kidney proximal tubules, and the capillary lumen at the blood-brain barrier. In contrast, the basolateral compartment represents the blood relative to the intestine and kidney and the brain interstitium relative to the blood-brain barrier.

Our apical-to-basolateral transport data indicate that MDR1 expression and, therefore, P-gp efflux dramatically reduces absorption of PI from the apical to the basolateral compartment. This may reflect the role of P-gp in limiting absorption of PI from the intestine after oral administration, and limiting brain penetration at the blood-brain barrier. The basolateral-to-apical data, which represent the contribution of P-gp to systemic clearance when drug in arterial blood is presented to the basolateral cell membrane (i.e., after absorption of orally administered drug or after intravenous administration), suggest that MDR1 expression enhances efflux of PI for exsorption and elimination.

The rank order of PI transfer in the apical-to-basolateral direction did not correspond to the rank order for the basolateral-to-apical direction; however, the two rank orders were similar between cell types. These data suggest that differences in membrane structure or contribution from non-P-gp transporters between the apical and basolateral membranes of the polarized epithelial cells become evident as the physiochemical properties of the drug permeants are varied. The observed rank orders in the recombinant cell system are similar to previously reported studies with MDR1wt. Apparent permeability ratios estimated in MDR1-MDCKII cells were the largest for saquinavir followed by ritonavir and amprenavir [29]. Transport studies in MDR1-MDCKII and Caco-2 cells found that saquinavir had lower apical-to-basolateral flux than ritonavir, corresponding to larger apparent permeability of saquinavir compared to ritonavir [30]. Another report in Caco-2 cells observed that apical-to-basolateral permeability was less for saquinavir than indinavir and that the apparent permeability ratio was greater for saquinavir than indinavir [31]. Therefore, the LLC-PK1 recombinant expression cell system appears to display transport characteristics of HIV PI similar to other in vitro cell systems.

Differences in P-gp-mediated efflux of PI were observed between MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells. Permeability ratios were significantly higher in MDR11199A cells compared to MDR1wt cells for all PI, demonstrating that MDR11199A-expressing cells display a more efficient net flux of amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir across an epithelial membrane. However, this net flow analysis derived from permeability ratios does not reveal the exact impact of the G1199A polymorphism on the modulating effects of P-gp upon barrier permeability. Characterization of the influence of the G1199A polymorphism on P-gp activity requires independent evaluation of both absorptive (apical-to-basolateral) and secretory (basolateral-to-apical) processes. Our detailed analysis of the unidirectional flux data clearly showed that the observed changes in permeability ratios were due primarily to changes in apical-to-basolateral efflux between MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells. All drugs displayed decreased apical-to-basolateral transepithelial permeability in MDR11199A cells compared to MDR1wt cells, indicating that the G1199A polymorphism led to greater P-gp-mediated efflux, with the greatest effect observed in efflux of ritonavir and saquinavir, followed by indinavir, amprenavir, and lopinavir. The basolateral-to-apical transepithelial permeability of PI was similar between MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells, with the exception of a modest increase in basolateral-to-apical flux of ritonavir in MDR11199A cells. Therefore, the effect of the G1199A polymorphism appears to be most significant when drug is delivered first to the apical membrane of epithelial cells (i.e., the first step in intestinal absorption and penetration into the blood-brain barrier) than when it is presented to the basolateral membrane (i.e., requisite step in secretion and elimination from blood by the kidney and intestine).

The P-gp-mediated efflux of PI in MDR1wt and MDR11199A cells was almost completely inhibited in the presence of GF120918, that is, to the level of the control cells. These data indicate that the asymmetric effect of G1199A expression on transepithelial permeability of PI fully reflects the alteration in P-gp function. However, there was evidence in the control cells, that other transporters may play a role in the permeability of lopinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir, but not of amprenavir and indinavir.

Since our recombinant cell system expresses high levels of wild-type and variant P-gp, it allowed for a more detailed analysis of the uptake kinetics between MDR1wt- and MDR11199A-expressing cells. Historically, kinetics analysis of P-gp activity has been performed using membrane vesicles, but the high level of expression of P-gp in these recombinant cells allows for evaluation of kinetics in intact cells. The preliminary kinetic analysis of ritonavir and saquinavir indicates that the changes in P-gp-dependent efflux due to G1199A are mediated by an apparent change in affinity, observed in Km values, for the substrates.

The mechanisms by which G1199A alters P-gp activity are not yet known. The G1199A polymorphism causes a Ser400Asn, which lies adjacent to the first ATP-binding domain of P-gp and to transmembrane domain 6, one of the transmembrane domains important in substrate binding [32,33]. However, because a crystal structure for P-gp is not yet available, the exact orientation of Ser400Asn relative to the substrate-binding regions or ATP-binding domain of P-gp is not known. The G1199A polymorphism may affect ATPase activity of P-gp, altering ATP hydrolysis necessary for substrate efflux. Because the impact of G1199A was not equal across the PI evaluated, expression of G1199A may also affect P-gp drug binding, affinity, or transport. Multiple binding sites of P-gp have been proposed, so it is probable that amino acid modification due to MDR1 polymorphisms may differentially modulate efflux of P-gp substrates (reviewed in [34]).

The recombinant expression system we have developed will be useful in clarifying the contradictory results in estimating clinical impact of MDR1 polymorphisms on antiretroviral therapy. MDR1 C3435T polymorphism, which does not code for an amino acid modification, has been suggested to influence plasma HIV PI levels and virological and immunological responses to antiretroviral drug therapy, however the data remains inconclusive [35-41]. As we have successfully established and characterized a recombinant cell system expressing G1199A, future studies are under development to evaluate the influence of C3435T, alone and in linkage with C1236T and G2677T, on PI uptake and transepithelial permeability, which may help us to understand the significance of C3435T at the cellular level.

In summary, the transepithelial efflux and permeability of amprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir in the stable recombinant cell system was evaluated and showed that these drugs are excellent substrates of P-gp. Expression of MDR1wt or MDR11199A in LLC-PK1 cells enhances the P-gp-mediated efflux transport of PI across polarized epithelial cells, which can be reversed with the specific P-gp inhibitor GF120918. A significant impact of the G1199A polymorphism on efflux and permeability was observed. Most importantly, the magnitude of a G1199A effect is drug specific and has a preferential effect on drug permeability in the apical-to-basolateral direction. Therefore, the G1199A polymorphism may impact intestinal absorption of PI and penetration into cells and tissues of the lymphoid and central nervous systems. Further phenotype-genotype association studies are needed to confirm these predictions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Loren Kinman for help with indinavir analysis.

Sponsorship: Supported in part by NIH grants GM62883, AI52663, NS39178, AI31854, ES07033 and HL56548. E.L.W. is a recipient of the NIH Pharmaceutical Sciences Training Grant (GM07750), and the William E. Bradley Fellowship in Pharmaceutics.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Kinman L, Brodie SJ, Tsai CC, Bui T, Larsen K, Schmidt A, et al. Lipid-drug association enhanced HIV-1 protease inhibitor indinavir localization in lymphoid tissues and viral load reduction: a proof of concept study in HIV-2287-infected macaques. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 34:387-397.

2. Kinman LM, Worlein JM, Leigh J, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Anderson DM, Hu SL, et al. HIV in central nervous system and behavioral development: an HIV-2287 macaque model of AIDS. AIDS 2004; 18:1363-1370.

3. Cavert W, Notermans DW, Staskus K, Wietgrefe SW, Zupancic M, Gebhard K, et al. Kinetics of response in lymphoid tissues to antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1 infection. Science 1997; 276:960-964.

4. Schacker T, Little S, Connick E, Gebhard-Mitchell K, Zhang ZQ, Krieger J, et al. Rapid accumulation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in lymphatic tissue reservoirs during acute and early HIV infection: implications for timing of antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2000; 181:354-357.

5. Kim RB. Drug transporters in HIV Therapy. Top HIV Med 2003; 11:136-139.

6. Lee CG, Gottesman MM, Cardarelli CO, Ramachandra M, Jeang KT, Ambudkar SV, et al. HIV-1 protease inhibitors are substrates for the MDR1 multidrug transporter. Biochemistry 1998; 37:3594-3601.

7. Srinivas RV, Middlemas D, Flynn P, Fridland A. Human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors serve as substrates for multidrug transporter proteins MDR1 and MRP1 but retain antiviral efficacy in cell lines expressing these transporters. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42:3157-3162.

8. Williams GC, Knipp GT, Sinko PJ. The effect of cell culture conditions on saquinavir transport through, and interactions with, MDCKII cells overexpressing hMDR1. J Pharm Sci 2003; 92:1957-1967.

9. Washington CB, Duran GE, Man MC, Sikic BI, Blaschke TF. Interaction of anti-HIV protease inhibitors with the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in human cultured cells. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998; 19:203-209.

10. Kim RB, Fromm MF, Wandel C, Leake B, Wood AJ, Roden DM, et al. The drug transporter P-glycoprotein limits oral absorption and brain entry of HIV-1 protease inhibitors. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:289-294.

11. Huisman MT, Smit JW, Wiltshire HR, Hoetelmans RM, Beijnen JH, Schinkel AH. P-glycoprotein limits oral availability, brain, and fetal penetration of saquinavir even with high doses of ritonavir. Mol Pharmacol 2001; 59:806-813.

12. Laupeze B, Amiot L, Bertho N, Grosset JM, Lehne G, Fauchet R, et al. Differential expression of the efflux pumps P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Hum Immunol 2001; 62:1073-1080.

13. Meaden ER, Hoggard PG, Khoo SH, Back DJ. Determination of P-gp and MRP1 expression and function in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vivo. J Immunol Methods 2002; 262:159-165.

14. Parasrampuria DA, Lantz MV, Benet LZ. A human lymphocyte based ex vivo assay to study the effect of drugs on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) function. Pharm Res 2001; 18:39-44.

15. Donahue JP, Dowdy D, Ratnam KK, Hulgan T, Price J, Unutmaz D, et al. Effects of nelfinavir and its M8 metabolite on lymphocyte P-glycoprotein activity during antiretroviral therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 73:78-86.

16. Hennessy M, Clarke S, Spiers JP, Kelleher D, Mulcahy F, Hoggard P, et al. Intracellular accumulation of nelfinavir and its relationship to P-glycoprotein expression and function in HIV-infected patients. Antivir Ther 2004; 9:115-122.

17. Jones K, Bray PG, Khoo SH, Davey RA, Meaden ER, Ward SA, et al. P-Glycoprotein and transporter MRP1 reduce HIV protease inhibitor uptake in CD4 cells: potential for accelerated viral drug resistance? AIDS 2001; 15:1353-1358.

18. Jones K, Hoggard PG, Sales SD, Khoo S, Davey R, Back DJ. Differences in the intracellular accumulation of HIV protease inhibitors in vitro and the effect of active transport. AIDS 2001; 15:675-681.

19. van der Sandt IC, Vos CM, Nabulsi L, Blom-Roosemalen MC, Voorwinden HH, de Boer AG, et al. Assessment of active transport of HIV protease inhibitors in various cell lines and the in vitro blood-brain barrier. AIDS 2001; 15:483-491.

20. Ronaldson PT, Lee G, Dallas S, Bendayan R. Involvement of P-glycoprotein in the transport of saquinavir and indinavir in rat brain microvessel endothelial and microglia cell lines. Pharm Res 2004; 21:811-818.

21. Andreana A, Aggarwal S, Gollapudi S, Wien D, Tsuruo T, Gupta S. Abnormal expression of a 170-kilodalton P-glycoprotein encoded by MDR1 gene, a metabolically active efflux pump, in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1996; 12:1457-1462.

22. Chaillou S, Durant J, Garraffo R, Georgenthum E, Roptin C, Dunais B, et al. Intracellular concentration of protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected patients: correlation with MDR-1 gene expression and low dose of ritonavir. HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3:493-501.

23. Ford J, Meaden ER, Hoggard PG, Dalton M, Newton P, Williams I, et al. Effect of protease inhibitor-containing regimens on lymphocyte multidrug resistance transporter expression. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 52:354-358.

24. Dupuis ML, Flego M, Molinari A, Cianfriglia M. Saquinavir induces stable and functional expression of the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein in human CD4 T-lymphoblastoid CEMrev cells. HIV Med 2003; 4:338-345.

25. Woodahl EL, Yang Z, Bui T, Shen DD, Ho RJ. Multidrug resistance gene G1199A polymorphism alters efflux transport activity of P-glycoprotein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004; 310:1199-1207.

26. Cascorbi I, Gerloff T, Johne A, Meisel C, Hoffmeyer S, Schwab M, et al. Frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the P-glycoprotein drug transporter MDR1 gene in white subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69:169-174.

27. Hoffmeyer S, Burk O, von Richter O, Arnold HP, Brockmoller J, Johne A, et al. Functional polymorphisms of the human multidrug-resistance gene: multiple sequence variations and correlation of one allele with P-glycoprotein expression and activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:3473-3478.

28. Kim RB, Leake BF, Choo EF, Dresser GK, Kubba SV, Schwarz UI, et al. Identification of functionally variant MDR1 alleles among European Americans and African Americans. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 70:189-199.

29. Polli JW, Wring SA, Humphreys JE, Huang L, Morgan JB, Webster LO, et al. Rational use of in vitro P-glycoprotein assays in drug discovery. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 299:620-628.

30. Troutman MD, Thakker DR. Novel experimental parameters to quantify the modulation of absorptive and secretory transport of compounds by P-glycoprotein in cell culture models of intestinal epithelium. Pharm Res 2003; 20:1210-1224.

31. Balimane PV, Patel K, Marino A, Chong S. Utility of 96 well Caco-2 cell system for increased throughput of P-gp screening in drug discovery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2004; 58:99-105.

32. Loo TW, Clarke DM. Identification of residues in the drug-binding site of human P-glycoprotein using a thiol-reactive substrate. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:31945-31948.

33. Loo TW, Clarke DM. Identification of residues within the drug-binding domain of the human multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein by cysteine-scanning mutagenesis and reaction with dibromobimane. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:39272-39278.

34. Safa AR. Identification and characterization of the binding sites of P-glycoprotein for multidrug resistance-related drugs and modulators. Curr Med Chem Anti-Cancer Agents 2004; 4:1-17.

35. Fellay J, Marzolini C, Meaden ER, Back DJ, Buclin T, Chave JP, et al. Response to antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals with allelic variants of the multidrug resistance transporter 1: a pharmacogenetics study. Lancet 2002; 359:30-36.

36. Brumme ZL, Dong WW, Chan KJ, Hogg RS, Montaner JS, O'Shaughnessy MV, et al. Influence of polymorphisms within the CX3CR1 and MDR-1 genes on initial antiretroviral therapy response. AIDS 2003; 17:201-208.

37. Nasi M, Borghi V, Pinti M, Bellodi C, Lugli E, Maffei S, et al. MDR1 C3435T genetic polymorphism does not influence the response to antiretroviral therapy in drug-naive HIV-positive patients. AIDS 2003; 17:1696-1698.

38. Haas DW, Wu H, Li H, Bosch RJ, Lederman MM, Kuritzkes D, et al. MDR1 gene polymorphisms and phase 1 viral decay during HIV-1 infection: an adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003; 34:295-298.

39. Winzer R, Langmann P, Zilly M, Tollmann F, Schubert J, Klinker H, et al. No influence of the P-glycoprotein genotype (MDR1 C3435T) on plasma levels of lopinavir and efavirenz during antiretroviral treatment. Eur J Med Res 2003; 8:531-534.

40. Winzer R, Langmann P, Zilly M, Tollmann F, Schubert J, Klinker H, et al. No influence of the P-glycoprotein polymorphisms MDR1 G2677T/A and C3435T on the virological and immunological response in treatment naive HIV-positive patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2005; 4:3.

41. Saitoh A, Singh KK, Powell CA, Fenton T, Fletcher CV, Brundage R, et al. An MDR1-3435 variant is associated with higher plasma nelfinavir levels and more rapid virologic response in HIV-1 infected children. AIDS 2005; 19:371-380.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.