Skip Navigation LinksHome > 2003 - Volume 17 - Issue > Virus–host interactions: role of HIV proteins Vif, Tat, and...
AIDS:
Review Papers: Virology

Virus–host interactions: role of HIV proteins Vif, Tat, and Rev

Strebel, Klaus

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Viral Biochemistry Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Building 4, Room 310, 4 Center Drive, MSC 0460, Bethesda, MD 20892-0460, USA.

Correspondence to Klaus Strebel, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, Viral Biochemistry Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Building 4, Room 310, 4 Center Drive, MSC 0460, Bethesda, MD 20892-0460, USA.

E-mail: ks10z@nih.gov

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

The primary goal of a virus is the replication of its genome in an appropriate host cell and the production of progeny virions for the infection of new target cells. This effort is commonly met by antiviral responses by the host organism, which in most cases abolishes or limits virus infections. Viruses have developed different strategies to overcome these restrictions, some causing long-lasting chronic infections, others replicating in fast, lytic cycles. However, all viruses depend to a large degree on specific host factors, from the recognition of specific cell-surface receptors required for virus entry into a target cell to the packaging of cellular factors into virions.

HIV penetrates target cells through fusion with the host plasma membrane. This is followed by partial uncoating and reverse transcription of the viral RNA, and subsequent integration of the double-stranded complementary DNA into the host genome. The integrated provirus then serves as a template for the synthesis of viral proteins, which ultimately assemble into progeny virions that are released from the infected host cell. We are far from understanding all of the complex virus–cell interactions that take place during the HIV life cycle, however, our current knowledge suggests that such interactions occur at virtually every step of virus replication. The past few years have brought rapid progress in the identification and characterization of novel host factors supporting HIV replication. In particular, the recent identification of chemokine receptors as HIV co-receptors has significantly advanced our understanding of HIV cell tropism and entry. Less well defined, however, is the extent to which cellular factors are involved in post-entry events required for the establishment of a productive HIV infection.

Primate immunodeficiency viruses, including HIV-1, are characterized by the presence of a number of viral accessory genes that encompass vif, vpr, vpx, vpu, and nef. The vif, vpr, and nef genes are expressed in most HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV isolates. In contrast, the vpu gene is found exclusively in HIV-1 and some SIV isolates. The vpx gene, on the other hand, is not found in HIV-1 isolates but is common to HIV-2 and most SIV isolates. Defects in accessory genes are frequently not correlated with a detectable impairment of virus replication in continuous cell lines, in contrast to primary cell types, which more closely reflect the in-vivo situation. However, it becomes increasingly clear that these proteins exert important functions in their relevant target cells in vivo, and most if not all of the HIV accessory proteins seem to exert multiple independent functions. For most of the HIV accessory and regulatory proteins the precise biochemical mechanisms are still under investigation, however, there is increasing evidence to suggest that none of the HIV accessory or regulatory proteins has catalytic activity on its own. Rather, they appear to function as adapter molecules that connect other viral or cellular factors to various cellular pathways. The goal of the current review is to summarize recent progress in the study of virus–host interactions involving the viral Tat, Rev, and Vif proteins.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Vif: overcoming a cellular restriction to virus replication

Ever since its identification as a virus infectivity factor in 1987 [1,2], the vif gene, which initially was termed ‘sor’ or ‘A’ [2], was the subject of intense research. However, despite significant progress over the past 16 years, the biochemical function of Vif remains largely unclear. A number of studies have attempted to reveal the biochemical function of Vif, but have produced somewhate conflicting results, and many reported observations regarding Vif remain controversial. It is now generally accepted, however, that Vif-defective viruses are capable of entering target cells but encounter an early block in virus replication before integration of the viral genome into the host genome. It is also now generally accepted that Vif is packaged into viral particles, although its functional significance is still under investigation (Fig. 1, step 2). Nevertheless, a recent analysis of the molecular defect in Vif-defective HIV virions did not detect any apparent abnormalities in Vif-defective virions, except for the lack of Vif [3]. There has been significant discussion regarding the number of Vif molecules packaged into virions, with estimates ranging from less than one molecule per virion to as many as 100 molecules of Vif per virion. In general, studies employing virus from chronically infected cells or from stable cell lines reported lower amounts of virus-associated Vif than studies using virus from productively infected cells [4].

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools

There is increasing evidence that the packaging of Vif into virus particles is functionally relevant. First, Vif packaging is specific and is mediated through an interaction with viral genomic RNA [5–7]. In addition, virus-associated Vif interacts with Gag or Gag–Pol precursor molecules [8] (K. Strebel, unpublished observation), and is stably associated with the viral nucleoprotein complex [5,9,10]. Finally, virus-associated Vif is proteolytically cleaved by the viral protease at a conserved sequence located near the C-terminus of the protein (residue 150 in HIV-1 Vif) [11]. Intravirion processing of Vif is not restricted to HIV-1 Vif, but was also observed for HIV-2 and some SIV Vif variants (K. Strebel, unpublished observation). Of note is the fact that mutations at or near the processing site that affect Vif processing were also found to affect Vif function, whereas mutations that did not affect Vif processing did not affect Vif function [11]. Interestingly, Vif processing separates the more conserved N-terminus of Vif from its highly variable C-terminal domain, which presumably contains a multimerization domain [12,13] as well as the immunodominant epitope. Removal of the C-terminal region of Vif induces a conformational change in Vif (K. Strebel, unpublished observation) that may expose new functional domains in the protein.

Vif is a highly insoluble protein with a strong tendency to aggregate. This characteristic has hampered efforts to purify Vif protein for structural analyses. Therefore, in contrast to most other HIV-encoded proteins, there are currently no structural data available for Vif. Attempts to define functional domains in Vif through biochemical analyses have demonstrated that residues throughout the protein are important for Vif function [14,15]. The only exception appears to be the very C-terminal region of Vif, as evidenced by the fact that a natural variant lacking the C-terminal 19 amino acids was found to be biologically active [16]. These results suggest that Vif contains multiple functional domains that might be important for the interaction with viral or cellular proteins. It is tempting to speculate that Vif, like most other HIV regulatory and accessory proteins, functions as a molecular adapter to connect otherwise unrelated viral or cellular mechanisms. However, the functionally relevant ligands of Vif have not yet been defined. Also, the search for negative trans-dominant Vif variants, which would support such a model, has so far been unsuccessful [17].

Vif functions in a host cell-specific manner. Accordingly, Vif-defective viruses produced in permissive host cells are unrestricted and are thus capable of infecting both permissive and non-permissive target cells. In contrast, Vif-defective viruses grown in non-permissive host cells were unable to infect permissive and non-permissive target cells alike [18–24]. This suggests that host factors play a significant role in restricting virus replication. A number of host factors have been identified as possible targets of Vif. These include vimentin [10], HP68 [25], Hck [26], sp140 [27], and CEM15 [28]. Importantly, the expression of Hck and CEM15 appeared to be associated with the inhibition of viral infectivity in a Vif-dependent manner [26,28]. However, only CEM15 expression was closely linked to non-permissive cellular phenotypes, and, unlike Hck, did not seem to have additional effects on virus production. CEM15 thus represents to date the most promising factor that fits most, if not all, of the characteristics required of a protein associated with Vif-dependent host cell restriction: it appears to be expressed exclusively in non-permissive cells, and furthermore, expression in permissive cells was found to inhibit virus infectivity in the absence but not in the presence of Vif [28,29].

CEM15 is identical to APOBEC3G and is a member of the family of cytidine deaminases [30]. APOBEC3G was found to have DNA cytidine deaminase activity in vitro [31]. The physiological substrates of APOBEC3G are not currently known; however, the tissue-specific expression of APOBEC3G suggests a role in growth or cell cycle control [30]. Interestingly, mutations in the catalytic site of APOBEC3G were associated both with decreased cytidine deaminase activity and a loss of the inhibitory activity of APOBEC3G on HIV replication [32,33]. Most recently, four research groups almost simultaneously reported that APOBEC3G induces the hypermutation of newly synthesized HIV DNA [32–35], thus providing a plausible explanation for the antiviral activity of APOBEC3G. All four reports noted a significant increase in G to A mutations in the viral genome (Fig. 1, step 6). As APOBEC3G-induced C to U mutations will result in a G to A mutation on the complementary strand, the observed G to A changes are most consistent with hypermutation of the minus-strand DNA rather than viral genomic RNA. Consistent with this, a direct analysis of RNA from Vif-defective virions produced in non-permissive H9 cells without endogenous reverse transcription did not reveal G to A hypermutation, whereas an analysis of cDNA derived by endogenous reverse transcription of the same viruses revealed G to A hypermutation [32,35]. This suggests that all the factors involved in hypermutation of HIV cDNA are present in virions from non-permissive cells. Consistent with these results, APOBEC3G was found to be packaged into HIV-1 virions [28,29,36]. Details of how APOBEC3G interferes with the replication of Vif-defective HIV have yet to be investigated. However, the observation that APOBEC3G induced defects in Vif-defective virions that became more and more severe with each step of virus replication has led to the proposal that the APOBEC3G-induced inhibition of HIV replication is the cumulative result of multiple defects [33]. It is possible that hypermutation of proviral DNA induces aberrant stop codons or mutates viral proteins (Fig. 1, step 9). More likely, however, seems to be the possibility that deaminated minus strand DNA is targeted by uracil-DNA glycosylase, which could result in the degradation of viral DNA via a uracil-based excision pathway [32,34], and could thus lead to abortive infection typical of Vif-defective viruses (Fig. 1, step 8).

The mechanism by which Vif prevents hypermutation by APOBEC3G is still under investigation. Data from several groups, including our own, suggested that Vif inhibits the packaging of APOBEC3G into HIV-1 particles in a dose-dependent manner [29,36] (Fig. 1, step 2). Moreover, the inhibition of APOBEC3G packaging requires biologically active Vif protein, whereas a series of biologically inactive Vif variants, including point mutants and in-frame deletions of larger portions of Vif, did not affect APOBEC3G packaging (Fig. 1, step 6). The inhibition of APOBEC3G packaging by wild-type Vif protein is paralleled by a reduction in the cell-associated expression levels of APOBEC3G protein [29]. Interestingly, Vif did not affect the expression level of APOBEC3G messenger RNA [28,29], suggesting that Vif affects APOBEC3G protein expression via a post-transcriptional mechanism (Fig. 1, step 1). A major focus of future research will undoubtedly be how Vif blocks APOBEC3G-induced deamination of viral cDNA. This should lead to a detailed understanding of Vif function, and may reveal novel targets for antiviral therapy.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Tat: making the connections

Because of its crucial role in activating viral gene transcription, the HIV Tat protein has been a key focus of HIV research for many years. It is now well accepted that Tat functions as a molecular adapter, directing components of the cellular transcription machinery to the viral RNA to promote the processivity of transcription by the RNA polymerase II complex. Tat is a small protein of 101 amino acids that is expressed from a multiply spliced RNA early during HIV replication. Tat contains several functional domains: residues 1–47 encompass the activation domain or co-factor-binding domain, whereas the basic domain located between residues 48 and 60 is required for RNA binding as well as the nuclear transport of Tat [37]. In addition, the C-terminal domain of Tat has been implicated in stimulating the co-transcriptional capping of HIV-1 mRNA through a direct interaction with the capping enzyme MceI [38].

In the absence of Tat, transcription from the HIV-1 long-terminal repeat (LTR) produces predominantly short, non-polyadenylated RNA that include the trans-activation response region (TAR) stem-loop structure. In contrast, the expression of Tat results in the production of longer, polyadenylated RNA and in increased gene expression [39–42]. The predominance of short transcripts in the absence of Tat is most likely caused by the poor processivity of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes recruited to the viral LTR and not, as was initially proposed, caused by an anti-terminator activity of TAR (Fig. 2b, step 1). There is a complex interplay between the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) and negative transcription elongation factors 5, 6-dichloro-1-beta-d-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole sensitivity-inducing factor and the negative elongation factor complex [43,44]. A key factor in the regulation of RNA polymerase II is the phosphorylation status of its carboxyterminal domain (CTD). Hypophosphorylation of the CTD correlates with low processivity of the RNA polymerase II complex, whereas hyperphosphorylation of the CTD promotes the processivity of the enzyme complex [45]. Phosphorylation of the CTD is regulated by P-TEFb containing a CTD-specific kinase activity (Fig. 2b, step 3). The nuclear Tat-associated kinase [46], which was originally identified as the kinase subunit of the P-TEFb complex [47,48], was subsequently identified as the cyclin-dependent kinase, CDK9 [49]. CDK9 can interact with different cyclin partners, including cyclin T1, cyclin T2a, cyclin T2b, and cyclin K [50]. However, Tat was found to recruit cyclin T1 selectively into the Tat–P-TEFb complex in the process of transcriptional activation from the HIV LTR promoter [51] (Fig. 2b, step 2).

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools

Unlike most transcriptional activators, Tat does not bind to a DNA target but interacts with the TAR element, an RNA structure located near the 5'-end of the viral genome [37]. The TAR structure is an unusual stem-loop structure containing a three-nucleotide bulge (residues 23–25) and a six-nucleotide loop (residues 30–35) (Fig. 2a). Originally, the TAR RNA structure was mapped to residues 1–80 on the viral RNA, however, the minimal sequence element required for Tat-responsiveness was subsequently narrowed down to residues 19–42 (Fig. 2a) [52–54]. The bulge structure in TAR is essential for the high-affinity binding of Tat [55]. Earlier reports demonstrated that mutations in the TAR loop of HIV-1 did not interfere with Tat binding, but significantly reduced Tat transactivation [55,56]. This suggested that the TAR loop acts as a binding site for transcriptional co-factors. The search for TAR loop binding proteins led to the identification of cyclin T1. Unlike Tat, cyclin T1 alone does not bind to TAR RNA. However, the interaction of Tat with cyclin T strongly enhances the affinity and specificity of the Tat–TAR RNA interaction [57]. In addition to the TAR bulge, at least one residue in the TAR loop, G34, is critical for the binding of the cyclin T1–Tat complex. G34 forms a base pair with residue C30 of the TAR loop [58], creating a single-nucleotide bulge at position 35 that is important for the overall structure of the TAR element [58]. The binding of cyclin T1 to Tat is zinc-dependent and involves a cysteine at position 261 in human cyclin T1. None of the other cysteine residues in human cyclin T1 are involved in Tat binding [59]. In the Tat–TAR–cyclin T1 complex, residues 252–260 of cyclin T1 form a Tat-TAR recognition motif that interacts with one side of the TAR RNA loop and enhances the interaction of Tat lysine-50 to the other side of the loop [58]. The TRM region of cyclin T1, when fused to Tat was found to be sufficient for high-affinity binding to the TAR recognition motif, and supported Tat transactivation in murine cells [59]. Interestingly, in murine cyclin T1, which does not support Tat transactivation [51,60–63], residue 261 is a tyrosine. Whereas murine cyclin T1 can bind Tat with similar efficiency to human cyclin T1, it is unable to form a functional P-TEFb–Tat–TAR complex [61,62]. This defect may explain the reported defect in HIV-1 transcription in rodent cells [51,57,61,64].

P-TEFb plays an important role in the regulation of mammalian gene expression. In that context, P-TEFb can function independent of TAR or Tat. This raised the question of why P-TEFb cannot activate the HIV-1 promoter in the absence of Tat and TAR. Previous data showed that TAR is only one component of the Tat-responsive target. Efficient Tat transactivation was observed only when TAR was present in conjunction with the HIV-1 LTR nuclear factor kappa B/SP1 DNA sequences [65,66]. Furthermore, Tat was able to mediate transcriptional activation in vitro through its interaction with Sp1 [67]. It was therefore proposed that TAR is required for Tat to stimulate the efficiency of elongation by RNA polymerase II, whereas Sp1 and other DNA sequence-specific transcription factors activate the rate of transcription initiation from the HIV LTR promoter [39]. Consistent with this idea is the observation that both murine and human cyclin T1 are able to interact with SP1 to allow Tat/TAR independent transcription, and that SP1 is necessary to recruit cyclin T1 to the HIV-1 LTR [68]. Finally, it was shown that the Tat-mediated assembly of active transcription complexes is regulated by nuclear bodies through modulation of the availability of cyclin T1 and other co-factors at the site of transcription [69]. This is supported by biochemical and biophysical analyses, which suggest that cyclin T1 interacts with the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein in vivo in PML nuclear bodies [69].

Apart from its function in promoting the processivity of RNA polymerase II, Tat has a function in remodeling chromatin near the transcription start site. Integrated proviral DNA is incorporated into the cellular chromatin and covered at specific sequences with nucleosomes [70]. Tat-mediated chromatin remodeling involves the inhibition of cellular histone acetylases, such as p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP), p300/CREB binding protein-associated factor (PCAF), and TIP60 [71–74]. In the case of CBP, Tat was found to induce substrate selectivity and to inhibit the acetylation of histones by CBP severely. No effect was seen on the basal level acetylation of other substrates, such as p53 and MyoD [75], whereas ultraviolet-induced acetylation of p53 was severely inhibited in HIV-infected cells [76]. However, the ultraviolet-induced inhibition of p53 acetylation by HIV infection was not strictly correlated with the levels of Tat, suggesting that other factors (e.g. Nef) might be involved in the stress-induced p53 response [76]. Apart from its negative effect on histone acetylation, Tat was found to promote acetylation of the p50 subunit of nuclear factor kappa B by p300/CBP, adding further evidence for the ability of Tat to alter the substrate specificity of p300/CBP [77].

Tat itself was found to be a substrate for acetylation by p300/CBP and PCAF [78–81]. Acetylation was found at lysine residues at positions 28, 50 and 51 [80]. As lysines 50 and 51 of Tat are located in its RNA binding motif, acetylation of these residues could regulate the association of Tat and TAR or affect the stability of Tat–TAR–cyclin T1 complexes. A mutation of lysines 50 and 51 in Tat was found to inhibit acetylation at these sites, and significantly reduced Tat transactivation [80]. The functional importance of Tat-acetylation is still under investigation, however, it is possible that the acetylation of Tat affects its three-dimensional structure and could create or expose new protein binding domains. Consistent with such a mechanism is the recent observation that lysine 50-acetylated Tat can bind to the transcriptional co-activator PCAF [81]. Such an interaction of PCAF with acetylated Tat was found to compete against the TAR RNA binding of lysine-acetylated Tat [82]. These data are consistent with the model that Lys50 acetylation of Tat causes its dissociation from TAR RNA, thereby enhancing the transcriptional elongation of HIV-1 [79,80] (Fig. 2b, step 4).

Apart from its crucial role in activating the transcription of the HIV genome, Tat was associated with a number of additional activities. Because of its unusual ability to exit HIV-infected cells and enter uninfected bystander cells, Tat has been investigated for its potential effect on bystander cells. Extracellular Tat was found to induce the production of cytokines such as transforming growth factor beta, IL-2, or IL-6 [83–86], cause neurotoxicity in the central nervous system [87–93] and apoptosis in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells and at least one CD4 T-cell line [94–97]. On the other hand, Tat was found to upregulate the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2 in infected primary human macrophages, suggesting that in certain cell types, Tat expression may contribute to cell survival [98]. Some of these effects may be caused by an interaction of extracellular Tat with specific cell-surface receptors that trigger the activation of cellular signal transduction pathways. However, some of these effects may also be caused by Tat after internalization into uninfected bystander cells. Tat was found to bind to tubulin and polymerized microtubules in the cytoplasm of Jurkat cells, altering microtubule dynamics and activating a mitochondria-dependent apoptotic pathway [99]. Last but not least, the two-exon form of Tat was found to suppress reverse transcriptase activity during the late stages of viral replication and to increase viral infectivity, presumably by preventing the premature synthesis of viral DNA [100]. Finally, Tat was found to exhibit RNA annealing activity and to promote the placement of transfer RNA onto viral RNA, although the significance of this observation for the in-vivo function of Tat remains to be investigated [101].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Rev: shuttling viral RNA

Transcription in HIV takes place from a single promoter located within the 5'-LTR. The resulting full-length primary transcript functions both as genomic RNA and as mRNA for the expression of the gag and pol genes. Expression of genes downstream of gag/pol, however, requires extensive splicing of the primary transcript, resulting in a complex mixture of singly or multiply spliced RNA. Unlike the fully spliced mRNA species encoding Tat, Rev, and Nef, which are readily transported to the cytoplasm, the export of unspliced or partly spliced transcripts requires the activity of Rev. The Rev protein contains an arginine-rich RNA binding motif that binds to a stem-loop structure, known as the Rev response element (RRE), located in the env gene [102] (Fig. 3, step 1). The same arginine-rich motif in Rev also acts as a nuclear localization signal (NLS), which is required for the transport of Rev from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. The Rev NLS promotes the direct binding of the protein to the nuclear import factor importin, which targets the resultant protein complex to the nucleus [103] (Fig. 3, step 2). In addition, the nucleolar phosphoprotein B23, a putative ribosome assembly factor with affinity to NLS-containing proteins, was found to play a role in the nuclear import of Rev [104]. After transport to the nucleus, the formation of multimeric complexes between Rev and its RRE-containing target RNA is thought to displace B23 from Rev and to mask the NLS [105,106]. The multimerization of Rev on the RRE is initiated presumably by the high-affinity binding of the first Rev monomer to the Rev binding element in the RRE structure, followed by the cooperative binding of up to 12 additional Rev monomers to the RRE region [107–109]. This cooperative assembly of Rev on the RRE is thought to be accomplished via a series of symmetrical tail-to-tail and head-to-head protein–protein interactions [110].

Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Image Tools

The nuclear export of Rev–RRE complexes requires a nuclear export signal (NES) that mediates the interaction of Rev with nuclear export factors. The Rev NES is located in the C-terminal half of Rev, and consists of a leucine-rich stretch of amino acid residues [111,112]. The nuclear export of Rev–RRE complexes involves Crm1, an evolutionary conserved 110 000 Mr protein that acts as a cellular receptor for NES-containing proteins [113–115] (Fig. 3, step 3). Human Crm1 localizes to the nuclear pore complex (NPC) and the nucleoplasm and interacts with nuclear pore proteins [116,117]. Crm1 was found to interact with Rev–RRE complexes containing an intact Rev NES but not with the M10 mutant of Rev containing an inactive NES [118]. The association of Crm1 with NES-containing proteins such as Rev is thought to be regulated by Ran, a cellular guanosine triphosphate (GTP)ase [113,115,119]. In the nucleus, the chromatin-bound exchange factor RCC1 generates Ran-GTP, which is the GTP-bound form of Ran (Fig. 3, step 4), whereas in the cytoplasm Ran-GTP is converted into Ran-guanosine diphosphate through RanGAP1, a cellular GTPase-activating protein, resulting in a Ran-GTP gradient across the nuclear membrane [119] (Fig. 3, step 5). It is believed that this asymmetric distribution of Ran-GTP plays a crucial role in nuclear import and export. High nuclear Ran-GTP levels favor the cooperative binding of Ran-GTP and NES-containing proteins such as Rev to Crm1 [113]. Such complexes are kinetically very stable, and their disassembly in the cytoplasm requires an additional factor, RanBP1 [120]. The binding of RanBP1 to Ran-GTP appears to be the key in catalysing the disassembly of the Crm1–Rev–Ran-GTP complexes (Fig. 3, step 6). Ran-GTP associated with RanBP is subsequently subjected to GTP hydrolysis, thus preventing Crm1 from rebinding Ran-GTP [120]. This results in the release of Crm1 from the Rev–RRE complexes.

In addition to Crm1, the nuclear export of Rev–RRE complexes was found to require the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF-5A) [121]. The importance of eIF-5A in the nuclear export of the Rev–RRE complexes is highlighted by the fact that two non-functional mutants of eIF-5A, still capable of interacting with Rev–RRE complexes, were found to block Rev-mediated nuclear export when constitutively expressed in human CEM T cells [122]. In addition, microinjection experiments in somatic cells confirmed the crucial role of eIF-5A in nuclear export [121]. EIF-5A was found to be localized at the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC, and to interact specifically with nucleoporins CAN/nup214, nup153, nup98 and nup62, which are involved in nuclear export [123]. The precise role of eIF-5A in Rev function remains to be defined; however, it was proposed that eIF-5A may act as an adapter that targets the Rev-NES to the nucleoplasmic face of the NPC, and mediates efficient binding to CRM1 [123].

Another host factor implicated in Rev nuclear export is SAM68. SAM68 was originally described as a 68 000 Mr Src-associated protein in mitosis [124], and was found to promote the nuclear export of Rev in astrocytes [125]. Using an antisense expression strategy it was subsequently shown that the downmodulation of endogenous Sam68 in 293T and Jurkat cells but also in peripheral blood mononuclear cells significantly inhibited HIV expression by inhibiting the CRM1-mediated export of nuclear Rev, resulting in the nuclear retention of both Rev and Crm1 [126].

In conclusion, much progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of HIV regulatory and accessory gene products. There is accumulating evidence to suggest that all of the HIV accessory and regulatory proteins share a common function as adapter molecules to recruit cellular factors for various steps in the viral replication cycle. In the case of Tat, the recruitment of a variety of transcription factors to nascent HIV RNA is crucial to promote the processivity of RNA polymerase II transcription. Rev on the other hand has the ability to shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus of HIV-infected cells through reversible binding to nuclear import and export factors. Nuclear Rev can binds to the RRE element on viral RNA promoting their export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Like Tat and Rev, Vif has the ability to bind specifically to viral RNA, and was found to interact with a variety of host factors. It is therefore possible that Vif similarly functions as a molecular adapter molecule. However, in contrast to Tat and Rev, whose interaction with the TAR and RRE structures, respectively, has been well established, the RNA motif recognized by Vif is currently not well defined. It also remains to be shown if and how the interaction of Vif with viral RNA, as well as viral and cellular proteins, is connected to the ability of Vif to regulate viral infectivity.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Fisher AG, Ensoli B, Ivanoff L, et al. The sor gene of HIV-1 is required for efficient virus transmission in vitro. Science 1987, 237:888–893.

2. Strebel K, Daugherty D, Clouse K, et al. The HIV ‘A’ (sor) gene product is essential for virus infectivity. Nature 1987, 328:728–730.

3. Gaddis NC, Chertova E, Sheehy AM, et al. Comprehensive investigation of the molecular defect in vif-deficient human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions. J Virol 2003, 77: 5810–5820.

4. Kao S, Akari H, Khan MA, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif is efficiently packaged into virions during productive but not chronic infection. J Virol 2003, 77: 1131–1140.

5. Khan MA, Aberham C, Kao S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein is packaged into the nucleoprotein complex through an interaction with viral genomic RNA. J Virol 2001, 75:7252–7265.

6. Zhang H, Pomerantz RJ, Dornadula G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vif protein is an integral component of an mRNP complex of viral RNA and could be involved in the viral RNA folding and packaging process. J Virol 2000, 74:8252–8261.

7. Dettenhofer M, Cen S, Carlson BA, et al. Association of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif with RNA and its role in reverse transcription. J Virol 2000, 74:8938–8945.

8. Huvent I, Hong SS, Fournier C, et al. Interaction and co-encapsidation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag and Vif recombinant proteins. J Gen Virol 1998, 79: 1069–1081.

9. Liu H, Wu X, Newman M, et al. The Vif protein of human and simian immunodeficiency viruses is packaged into virions and associates with viral core structures. J Virol 1995, 69: 7630–7638.

10. Karczewski MK, Strebel K. Cytoskeleton association and virion incorporation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein. J Virol 1996, 70:494–507.

11. Khan MA, Akari H, Kao S, et al. Intravirion processing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein by the viral protease may be correlated with Vif function. J Virol 2002, 76:9112–9123.

12. Yang S, Sun Y, Zhang H. The multimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type I Vif protein: a requirement for Vif function in the viral life cycle. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 4889–4893.

13. Yang B, Gao L, Li L, et al. Potent suppression of viral infectivity by the peptides that inhibit multimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Vif proteins. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:6596–6602.

14. Simon JH, Sheehy AM, Carpenter EA, et al. Mutational analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein. J Virol 1999, 73:2675–2681.

15. Sakai K, Horiuchi M, Iida S, et al. Mutational analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vif gene. Virus Genes 1999, 18:179–181.

16. Henzler T, Harmache A, Herrmann H, et al. Fully functional, naturally occurring and C-terminally truncated variant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Vif does not bind to HIV Gag but influences intermediate filament structure. J Gen Virol 2001, 82:561–573.

17. Fujita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurai A, et al. Apparent lack of trans-dominant negative effects of various vif mutants on the replication of HIV-1. Microbes Infect 2002, 4:1203–1207.

18. Akari H, Sakuragi J, Takebe Y, et al. Biological characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and type 2 mutants in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Arch Virol 1992, 123:157–167.

19. Blanc D, Patience C, Schulz TF, et al. Transcomplementation of VIF- HIV-1 mutants in CEM cells suggests that VIF affects late steps of the viral life cycle. Virology 1993, 193:186–192.

20. Borman AM, Quillent C, Charneau P, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif- mutant particles from restrictive cells: role of Vif in correct particle assembly and infectivity. J Virol 1995, 69:2058–2067.

21. Fan L, Peden K. Cell-free transmission of Vif mutants of HIV-1. Virology 1992, 190:19–29.

22. Gabuzda DH, Lawrence K, Langhoff E, et al. Role of vif in replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Virol 1992, 66:6489–6495.

23. Sakai H, Shibata R, Sakuragi J, et al. Cell-dependent requirement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein for maturation of virus particles. J Virol 1993, 67:1663–1666.

24. von Schwedler U, Song J, Aiken C, et al. Vif is crucial for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA synthesis in infected cells. J Virol 1993, 67:4945–4955.

25. Zimmerman C, Klein KC, Kiser PK, et al. Identification of a host protein essential for assembly of immature HIV- 1 capsids. Nature 2002, 415:88–92.

26. Hassaine G, Courcoul M, Bessou G, et al. The tyrosine kinase Hck is an inhibitor of HIV-1 replication counteracted by the viral Vif protein. J Biol Chem 2001, 276:16885–16893.

27. Madani N, Millette R, Platt EJ, et al. Implication of the lymphocyte-specific nuclear body protein sp140 in an innate response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 2002, 76: 11133–11138.

28. Sheehy AM, Gaddis NC, Choi JD, et al. Isolation of a human gene that inhibits HIV-1 infection and is suppressed by the viral Vif protein. Nature 2002, 418:646–650.

29. Kao S, Khan MA, Miyagi E, et al. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vif protein reduces intracellular stability and blocks packaging of APOBEC3G (CEM15), a cellular inhibitor of virus infectivity. J Virol 2003, 77:11398–11404.

30. Jarmuz A, Chester A, Bayliss J, et al. An anthropoid-specific locus of orphan C to U RNA-editing enzymes on chromosome 22. Genomics 2002, 79:285–296.

31. Harris RS, Petersen-Mahrt SK, Neuberger MS. RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 and some of its homologs can act as DNA mutators. Mol Cell 2002, 10:1247–1253.

32. Zhang H, Yang B, Pomerantz RJ, et al. The cytidine deaminase CEM15 induces hypermutation in newly synthesized HIV-1 DNA. Nature 2003, 424:94–98.

33. Mangeat B, Turelli P, Caron G, et al. Broad antiretroviral defence by human APOBEC3G through lethal editing of nascent reverse transcripts. Nature 2003, 424:99–103.

34. Harris RS, Bishop KN, Sheehy AM, et al. DNA deamination mediates innate immunity to retroviral infection. Cell 2003, 113:803–809.

35. Lecossier D, Bouchonnet F, Clavel F, et al. Hypermutation of HIV-1 DNA in the absence of the Vif protein. Science 2003, 300:1112.

36. Mariani R, Chen D, Schrofelbauer B, et al. Species-specific exclusion of APOBEC3G from HIV-1 virions by Vif. Cell 2003, 114:21–31.

37. Rana TM, Jeang KT. Biochemical and functional interactions between HIV-1 Tat protein and TAR RNA. Arch Biochem Biophys 1999, 365:175–185.

38. Chiu YL, Ho CK, Saha N, et al. Tat stimulates cotranscriptional capping of HIV mRNA. Mol Cell 2002, 10:585–597.

39. Zhou Q, Sharp PA. Novel mechanism and factor for regulation by HIV-1 Tat. EMBO J 1995, 14:321–328.

40. Ratnasabapathy R, Sheldon M, Johal L, et al. The HIV-1 long terminal repeat contains an unusual element that induces the synthesis of short RNAs from various mRNA and snRNA promoters. Genes Dev 1990, 4:2061–2074.

41. Marshall NF, Price DH. Control of formation of two distinct classes of RNA polymerase II elongation complexes. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:2078–2090.

42. Kessler M, Mathews MB. Premature termination and processing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-promoted transcripts. J Virol 1992, 66:4488–4496.

43. Garber ME, Jones KA. HIV-1 Tat: coping with negative elongation factors. Curr Opin Immunol 1999, 11:460–465.

44. Majello B, Napolitano G. Control of RNA polymerase II activity by dedicated CTD kinases and phosphatases. Front Biosci 2001, 6:D1358–D1368.

45. Dahmus ME. Phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1995, 1261: 171–182.

46. Herrmann CH, Rice AP. Lentivirus Tat proteins specifically associate with a cellular protein kinase, TAK, that hyperphosphorylates the carboxyl-terminal domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II: candidate for a Tat cofactor. J Virol 1995, 69:1612–1620.

47. Mancebo HS, Lee G, Flygare J, et al. P-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro. Genes Dev 1997, 11:2633–2644.

48. Zhu Y, Pe'ery T, Peng J, et al. Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro. Genes Dev 1997, 11:2622–2632.

49. Gold MO, Yang X, Herrmann CH, et al. PITALRE, the catalytic subunit of TAK, is required for human immunodeficiency virus Tat transactivation in vivo. J Virol 1998, 72:4448–4453.

50. Peng J, Zhu Y, Milton JT, et al. Identification of multiple cyclin subunits of human P-TEFb. Genes Dev 1998, 12:755–762.

51. Bieniasz PD, Grdina TA, Bogerd HP, et al. Recruitment of a protein complex containing Tat and cyclin T1 to TAR governs the species specificity of HIV-1 Tat. EMBO J 1998, 17: 7056–7065.

52. Jakobovits A, Smith DH, Jakobovits EB, et al. A discrete element 3’ of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 mRNA initiation sites mediates transcriptional activation by an HIV trans activator. Mol Cell Biol 1988, 8:2555–2561.

53. Selby MJ, Bain ES, Luciw PA, et al. Structure, sequence, and position of the stem-loop in tar determine transcriptional elongation by tat through the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Genes Dev 1989, 3:547–558.

54. Garcia JA, Harrich D, Soultanakis E, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 LTR TATA and TAR region sequences required for transcriptional regulation. EMBO J 1989, 8: 765–778.

55. Dingwall C, Ernberg I, Gait MJ, et al. HIV-1 tat protein stimulates transcription by binding to a U-rich bulge in the stem of the TAR RNA structure. EMBO J 1990, 9:4145–153.

56. Cordingley MG, LaFemina RL, Callahan PL, et al. Sequence-specific interaction of Tat protein and Tat peptides with the transactivation-responsive sequence element of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990, 87:8985–8989.

57. Wei P, Garber ME, Fang SM, et al. A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA. Cell 1998, 92:451–462.

58. Richter S, Cao H, Rana TM. Specific HIV-1 TAR RNA loop sequence and functional groups are required for human cyclin T1-Tat-TAR ternary complex formation. Biochemistry 2002, 41:6391–6397.

59. Fujinaga K, Irwin D, Taube R, et al. A minimal chimera of human cyclin T1 and tat binds TAR and activates human immunodeficiency virus transcription in murine cells. J Virol 2002, 76:12934–12939.

60. Chen D, Fong Y, Zhou Q. Specific interaction of Tat with the human but not rodent P-TEFb complex mediates the species-specific Tat activation of HIV-1 transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:2728–2733.

61. Fujinaga K, Taube R, Wimmer J, et al. Interactions between human cyclin T, Tat, and the transactivation response element (TAR) are disrupted by a cysteine to tyrosine substitution found in mouse cyclin T. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96: 1285–1290.

62. Garber ME, Wei P, KewalRamani VN, et al. The interaction between HIV-1 Tat and human cyclin T1 requires zinc and a critical cysteine residue that is not conserved in the murine CycT1 protein. Genes Dev 1998, 12:3512–3527.

63. Kwak YT, Ivanov D, Guo J, et al. Role of the human and murine cyclin T proteins in regulating HIV-1 tat-activation. J Mol Biol 1999, 288:57–69.

64. Zhou Q, Chen D, Pierstorff E, et al. Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb mediates Tat activation of HIV-1 transcription at multiple stages. EMBO J 1998, 17:3681–3691.

65. Berkhout B, Gatignol A, Rabson AB, et al. TAR-independent activation of the HIV-1 LTR: evidence that tat requires specific regions of the promoter. Cell 1990, 62:757–767.

66. Harrich D, Garcia J, Wu F, et al. Role of SP1-binding domains in in vivo transcriptional regulation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat. J Virol 1989, 63:2585–2591.

67. Kamine J, Subramanian T, Chinnadurai G. Sp1-dependent activation of a synthetic promoter by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991, 88:8510–8514.

68. Yedavalli VS, Benkirane M, Jeang KT. Tat and trans-activation-responsive (TAR) RNA-independent induction of HIV-1 long terminal repeat by human and murine cyclin T1 requires Sp1. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:6404–6410.

69. Marcello A, Ferrari A, Pellegrini V, et al. Recruitment of human cyclin T1 to nuclear bodies through direct interaction with the PML protein. EMBO J 2003, 22:2156–2166.

70. Marcello A, Zoppe M, Giacca M. Multiple modes of transcriptional regulation by the HIV-1 Tat transactivator. IUBMB Life 2001, 51:175–181.

71. Marzio G, Tyagi M, Gutierrez MI, et al. HIV-1 tat transactivator recruits p300 and CREB-binding protein histone acetyltransferases to the viral promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95:13519–13524.

72. Hottiger MO, Nabel GJ. Interaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat with the transcriptional coactivators p300 and CREB binding protein. J Virol 1998, 72:8252–8256.

73. Kamine J, Elangovan B, Subramanian T, et al. Identification of a cellular protein that specifically interacts with the essential cysteine region of the HIV-1 Tat transactivator. Virology 1996, 216:357–366.

74. Benkirane M, Chun RF, Xiao H, et al. Activation of integrated provirus requires histone acetyltransferase. p300 and P/CAF are coactivators for HIV-1 Tat. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 24898–24905.

75. Col E, Gilquin B, Caron C, et al. Tat-controlled protein acetylation. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:37955–37960.

76. Harrod R, Nacsa J, Van Lint C, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type-1 Tat/co-activator acetyltransferase interactions inhibit p53Lys-320 acetylation and p53-responsive transcription. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:12310–12318.

77. Furia B, Deng L, Wu K, et al. Enhancement of nuclear factor-kappa B acetylation by coactivator p300 and HIV-1 Tat proteins. J Biol Chem 2002, 277:4973–4980.

78. Bres V, Tagami H, Peloponese JM, et al. Differential acetylation of Tat coordinates its interaction with the co- activators cyclin T1 and PCAF. EMBO J 2002, 21:6811–6819.

79. Deng L, de la Fuente C, Fu P, et al. Acetylation of HIV-1 Tat by CBP/P300 increases transcription of integrated HIV-1 genome and enhances binding to core histones. Virology 2000, 277:278–295.

80. Kiernan RE, Vanhulle C, Schiltz L, et al. HIV-1 tat transcriptional activity is regulated by acetylation. EMBO J 1999, 18:6106–6118.

81. Dorr A, Kiermer V, Pedal A, et al. Transcriptional synergy between Tat and PCAF is dependent on the binding of acetylated Tat to the PCAF bromodomain. EMBO J 2002, 21:2715–2723.

82. Mujtaba S, He Y, Zeng L, et al. Structural basis of lysine-acetylated HIV-1 Tat recognition by PCAF bromodomain. Mol Cell 2002, 9:575–586.

83. Zauli G, Davis BR, Re MC, et al. Tat protein stimulates production of transforming growth factor-beta 1 by marrow macrophages: a potential mechanism for human immunodeficiency virus-1-induced hematopoietic suppression. Blood 1992, 80:3036–3043.

84. Westendorp MO, Li-Weber M, Frank RW, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat upregulates interleukin-2 secretion in activated T cells. J Virol 1994, 68:4177–4185.

85. Scala G, Ruocco MR, Ambrosino C, et al. The expression of the interleukin 6 gene is induced by the human immunodeficiency virus 1 TAT protein. J Exp Med 1994, 179:961–971.

86. Lotz M, Clark-Lewis I, Ganu V. HIV-1 transactivator protein Tat induces proliferation and TGF beta expression in human articular chondrocytes. J Cell Biol 1994, 124:365–371.

87. Sabatier JM, Vives E, Mabrouk K, et al. Evidence for neurotoxic activity of tat from human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 1991, 65:961–967.

88. Hofman FM, Dohadwala MM, Wright AD, et al. Exogenous tat protein activates central nervous system-derived endothelial cells. J Neuroimmunol 1994, 54:19–28.

89. Nath A, Psooy K, Martin C, et al. Identification of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat epitope that is neuroexcitatory and neurotoxic. J Virol 1996, 70:1475–1480.

90. Philippon V, Vellutini C, Gambarelli D, et al. The basic domain of the lentiviral Tat protein is responsible for damages in mouse brain: involvement of cytokines. Virology 1994, 205: 519–529.

91. Weeks BS, Lieberman DM, Johnson B, et al. Neurotoxicity of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tat transactivator to PC12 cells requires the Tat amino acid 49–58 basic domain. J Neurosci Res 1995, 42:34–40.

92. Kim TA, Avraham HK, Koh YH, et al. HIV-1 tat-mediated apoptosis in human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Immunol 2003, 170:2629–2637.

93. Haughey NJ, Mattson MP. Calcium dysregulation and neuronal apoptosis by the HIV-1 proteins Tat and gp120. J Acquired Immune Defic Syndr 2002, 31 (Suppl.2):S55–S61.

94. Li CJ, Friedman DJ, Wang C, et al. Induction of apoptosis in uninfected lymphocytes by HIV-1 Tat protein. Science 1995, 268:429–431.

95. Purvis SF, Jacobberger JW, Sramkoski RM, et al. HIV type 1 Tat protein induces apoptosis and death in Jurkat cells. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1995, 11:443–450.

96. Westendorp MO, Shatrov VA, Schulze-Osthoff K, et al. HIV-1 Tat potentiates TNF-induced NF-kappa B activation and cytotoxicity by altering the cellular redox state. EMBO J 1995, 14:546–554.

97. Westendorp MO, Frank R, Ochsenbauer C, et al. Sensitization of T cells to CD95-mediated apoptosis by HIV-1 Tat and gp120. Nature 1995, 375:497–500.

98. Zhang M, Li X, Pang X, et al. Bcl-2 upregulation by HIV-1 Tat during infection of primary human macrophages in culture. J Biomed Sci 2002, 9:133–139.

99. Chen D, Wang M, Zhou S, et al. HIV-1 Tat targets microtubules to induce apoptosis, a process promoted by the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 relative Bim. EMBO J 2002, 21:6801–6810.

100. Kameoka M, Rong L, Gotte M, et al. Role for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein in suppression of viral reverse transcriptase activity during late stages of viral replication. J Virol 2001, 75:2675–2683.

101. Kameoka M, Morgan M, Binette M, et al. The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can promote placement of tRNA primer onto viral RNA and suppress later DNA polymerization in HIV-1 reverse transcription. J Virol 2002, 76:3637–3645.

102. Malim MH, Hauber J, Le S-Y, et al. The HIV-1 rev trans-activator acts through a structured target sequence to activate nuclear export of unspliced viral mRNA. Nature 1989, 338:254–257.

103. Truant R, Cullen BR. The arginine-rich domains present in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat and Rev function as direct importin beta-dependent nuclear localization signals. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:1210–1217.

104. Szebeni A, Mehrotra B, Baumann A, et al. Nucleolar protein B23 stimulates nuclear import of the HIV-1 Rev protein and NLS-conjugated albumin. Biochemistry 1997, 36:3941–3949.

105. Henderson BR, Percipalle P. Interactions between HIV Rev and nuclear import and export factors: the Rev nuclear localisation signal mediates specific binding to human importin-beta. J Mol Biol 1997, 274:693–707.

106. Fankhauser C, Izaurralde E, Adachi Y, et al. Specific complex of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 rev and nucleolar B23 proteins: dissociation by the Rev response element. Mol Cell Biol 1991, 11:2567–2575.

107. Malim MH, Tiley LS, McCarn DF, et al. HIV-1 structural gene expression requires binding of the Rev trans- activator to its RNA target sequence. Cell 1990, 60:675–683.

108. Tiley LS, Malim MH, Tewary HK, et al. Identification of a high-affinity RNA-binding site for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992, 89:758–762.

109. Iwai S, Pritchard C, Mann DA, et al. Recognition of the high affinity binding site in rev-response element RNA by the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 rev protein. Nucl Acids Res 1992, 20:6465–6472.

110. Jain C, Belasco JG. Structural model for the cooperative assembly of HIV-1 Rev multimers on the RRE as deduced from analysis of assembly-defective mutants. Mol Cell 2001, 7: 603–614.

111. Wen W, Meinkoth JL, Tsien RY, et al. Identification of a signal for rapid export of proteins from the nucleus. Cell 1995, 82:463–473.

112. Meyer BE, Meinkoth JL, Malim MH. Nuclear transport of human immunodeficiency virus type 1, visna virus, and equine infectious anemia virus Rev proteins: identification of a family of transferable nuclear export signals. J Virol 1996, 70: 2350–2359.

113. Fornerod M, Ohno M, Yoshida M, et al. CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 1997, 90:1051–1060.

114. Fukuda M, Asano S, Nakamura T, et al. Crm1 is responsible for intracellular transport mediated by the nuclear export signal. Nature 1997, 390:308–311.

115. Stade K, Ford CS, Guthrie C, et al. Exportin 1 (Crm1p) is an essential nuclear export factor. Cell 1997, 90:1041–1050.

116. Fornerod M, van Deursen J, van Baal S, et al. The human homologue of yeast CRM1 is in a dynamic subcomplex with CAN/Nup214 and a novel nuclear pore component Nup88. EMBO J 1997, 16:807–816.

117. Neville M, Stutz F, Lee L, et al. The importin-beta family member Crm1p bridges the interaction between Rev and the nuclear pore complex during nuclear export. Curr Biol 1997, 7:767–775.

118. Bogerd HP, Echarri A, Ross TM, et al. Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus rev and human T-cell leukemia virus rex function, but not mason-pfizer monkey virus constitutive transport element activity, by a mutant human nucleoporin targeted to crm1. J Virol 1998, 72:8627–8635.

119. Izaurralde E, Katay U, von Kobbe C, et al. The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J 1997, 16:6535–6547.

120. Bischoff FR, Görlich D. RanBP1 is crucial for the release of RanGTP from importin beta-related nuclear transport factors. FEBS Lett 1997, 419:249–254.

121. Elfgang C, Rosorius O, Hofer L, et al. Evidence for specific nucleocytoplasmic transport pathways used by leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:6229–6234.

122. Bevec D, Jaksche H, Oft M, et al. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication in lymphocytes by mutants of the rev cofactor eIF-5A. Science 1996, 271:1858–1860.

123. Hofmann W, Reichart B, Ewald A, et al. Cofactor requirements for nuclear export of Rev response element (RRE)- and constitutive transport element (CTE)-containing retroviral RNAs. An unexpected role for actin. J Cell Biol 2001, 152:895–910.

124. Fumagalli S, Totty NF, Hsuan JJ, et al. A target for Src in mitosis. Nature 1994, 368:871–874.

125. Li J, Liu Y, Park IW, et al. Expression of exogenous Sam68, the 68-kilodalton SRC-associated protein in mitosis, is able to alleviate impaired Rev function in astrocytes. J Virol 2002, 76:4526–4535.

126. Li J, Liu Y, Kim BO, et al. Direct participation of Sam68, the 68-kilodalton Src-associated protein in mitosis, in the CRM1-mediated Rev nuclear export pathway. J Virol 2002, 76: 8374–8382.

Keywords:

Adapter complex; APOBEC3G; nuclear export; Rev; Tat; transcriptional activation; Vif

© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.