Overall, patients reported clinical symptoms that were interpreted as a hepatic reaction after the introduction of their new antiretroviral regimen in a median of 24 days [interquartile range (IQR), 20–25 days], whereas transaminases peaked at 28 days (IQR, 27–32 days) (Table 2, Fig, 1).
As shown in Table 2, the injury pattern is in general mixed-hepatocellular. Aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase values (the highest of the two was used for grading) were graded according to the criteria of the AIDS Clinical Trial Group , yielding one patient with grade 2 toxicity, five patients with grade 3 toxicity, and two patients with grade 4 toxicity. Two patients (patients 3 and 7) experienced eosinophilia during the peak of the transaminases.
Clinical symptoms and signs of the acute hepatitis are outlined in Table 2. Rash occurred in conjunction with the hepatic reaction in five of the eight patients. These patients were treated with cetirizine plus prednisone (n = 4) or only prednisone (n = 1). Patients with only constitutional symptoms (without rash) were not treated, but their condition improved rapidly following withdrawal of the antiretroviral drugs including nevirapine.
Patients 3 and 4 were admitted to the hospital for 5 and 2 days, respectively. An abdominal ultrasound performed on patient 3 revealed a mild hepatomegaly with diffuse steatosis of the liver. Physical examination on patient 4 revealed no remarkable abnormalities.
Five patients discontinued nevirapine including the nucleosides. The other three patients discontinued only nevirapine (patients 2, 5 and 8). This resulted in a relatively rapid decrease in the transaminases in all patients (see Fig. 1), reaching normal values in a median time of 44.5 days (IQR, 28.8–46.3 days). Clinical symptoms revealed in seven patients within 15 days and in one patient (patient 1) in 37 days.
The patients in this case series all experienced an acute hepatitis with constitutional symptoms, sometimes including rash, within a maximum of 31 days after initiation of a new antiretroviral regimen including nevirapine. Two types of hepatotoxicity have been encountered in nevirapine-containing therapy. The first might represent an intrinsic toxic effect, as it does not involve other organs and has a delayed onset (> 12 weeks) [6,8]. The second involves elevations in transaminases, constitutional symptoms sometimes including skin reactions, and it develops quickly (< 12 weeks) after initiation of nevirapine-containing treatment, suggesting an immune-mediated mechanism [7,9,11]. Patients in our case series probably experienced the latter mechanism, because of the short onset, in some cases in conjunction with rash (n = 5) or eosinophilia (n = 2), and the observed clinical symptoms.
The observed delay in the peak of transaminase levels after onset of clinical symptoms was probably caused by the determination of transaminases as a consequence of the symptoms and, thus, in most cases performed after the occurrence of the symptoms. However, three patients (patients 1, 3 and 4) had two laboratory results after the occurrence of symptoms, of which the second showed the peak in transaminases.
All nucleosides have been associated with hepatic steatosis , but stavudine (d4T) is the drug that is typically related to this adverse event [15,16], especially in combination with nevirapine . Hepatic steatosis develops secondary to the ability of nucleosides to inhibit the mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ, the enzyme required for replication of mitochondrial DNA. Disease symptoms appear when the mitochondrial energy-generating capacity falls below the energetic threshold of an organ. Therefore, these toxicities generally emerge only in long-term antiretroviral therapy. The four antiretroviral naive patients received lamivudine (3TC) plus zidovudine (ZDV; n = 3) and 3TC plus d4T (n = 1) besides nevirapine, and just started their first antiretroviral regimen, probably excluding mitochondrial toxicity in these cases as the primary cause. The pretreated patients received 3TC plus d4T or 3TC plus ZDV as a backbone for at least 7.4 months (range, 7.4–21.3 months) without elevations of transaminases. Patient 8 had relatively high transaminases at baseline, but in the preceding period normal values were observed.
Seven of the eight patients have commenced antiretroviral treatment (without nevirapine) again after recovery of the hepatic reaction. No problems were encountered in these seven patients, except for one patient (patient 3) who had elevations in transaminases again after the introduction of d4T, 3TC, and abacavir, and the disturbances in transaminases persisted when therapy was changed to 3TC, ZDV and nelfinavir. In this case it is not certain if nevirapine was the culprit in the first hepatic reaction, because this patient already had elevated transaminases at baseline. However, the shortness of his therapy (24 days) before the development of symptoms, makes d4T as the primary cause disputable.
One patient (patient 6) also had chronic hepatitis B infection (HBV), and increases in liver enzymes have been described in patients with HBV because of immune-restoration caused by highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) . This patient (patient 6), however, was pretreated with HAART and had high CD4 cell counts, making HBV less likely to be a contributor.
Several factors associated with an increased risk of developing hepatotoxicity during nevirapine-containing treatment have been described. These include HBV and HCV, baseline levels of transaminases, baseline CD4 cell count, concomitant use of other hepatotoxic agents, and duration of prior exposure to antiretroviral drugs [6,19–21]. Patients in our case series had CD4 cell counts ranging from 230 to 890 × 106 cells/l, and four were antiretroviral naive, one patient had HBV, no patients had HCV, and only two patients had elevated levels of transaminases at baseline. Thus, these patients differ greatly in their characteristics, and no specific risk factor applying to all patients could be identified.
At our hospital, nevirapine is a frequently prescribed antiretroviral drug, being part of HAART in both first- and second-line treatment. Compared to the incidence reported in the literature (1.1%) , the incidence observed at our institute is fairly high (2.6%). The reason for this is unclear.
In conclusion, the patients in this case series developed a hepatic reaction rapidly after introduction of a nevirapine-containing regimen. Nevirapine was probably the cause of this syndrome. Withdrawal of the antiretroviral agent led to rapid restoration in transaminases and resolution of clinical symptoms. The reason for developing this hepatic reaction is not clear in every case as no specific risk factor that applied to all of the patients in this group could be identified. However, increased transaminase levels accompanied the observed clinical symptoms in every patient. It is, therefore, very important to monitor closely transaminase levels of all patients starting a nevirapine-containing regimen, including patients with hitherto no specific characteristics that put them at risk. The rapid onset of the clinical symptoms suggests that determination of transaminase levels needs to be done in a very early stage (i.e., within 2 weeks of initiation) of the nevirapine-containing regimen.
We thank H. Paap for help with data collection.
Sponsorship: Supported by AGIS Health Insurances, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
1. Katlama C, Murphy R, Johnson V, Squires K, Horban A, Gatell J, et al
. The Atlantic Study: A randomised open-label study comparing two protease inhibitors (PI)-sparing antiretroviral strategies versus a standard PI-containing regimen, 48 week data.39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
, San Francisco, September, 1999 [abstract LB-22].
2. Podzamczer D, Ferrer E, Consiglio E, Gatell JM, Perez JL, Lozano L, et al
. A randomized, open, multicenter trial comparing combivir plus nelfinavir or nevirapine in HIV-infected naive patients (The Combine Study).Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 327].
3. Ruiz L, Negredo E, Domingo P, Paredes R, Francia E, Balagué M, et al
. Antiretroviral treatment simplication with nevirapine in protease inhibitor-experienced patients with hiv-associated lipodystrophy: 1-year prospective follow-up of a multi-center, randomized, controlled study.J Aquir Immune Defic Syndr
4. Murphy RL, Montaner J. Nevirapine: a review of its development, pharmacological profile and potential for clinical use.Exp Opin Invest Drugs
5. Montaner JSG, Reiss P, Cooper D, Vella S, Harris M, Conway B, et al
. A randomized, double-blind trial comparing combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine for HIV-infected patients.JAMA
6. Martinez E, Blanco JL, Arnaiz JA, Pérez-Cuevas JB, Mocroft A, Cruceta A, et al
. Hepatotoxicity in HIV-1-infected patients receiving nevirapine-containing antiretroviral therapy.AIDS
7. Cattelan AM, Erne E, Salatino A, Trevenzoli M, Carretta G, Meneghetti F, et al
. Severe hepatic failure related to nevirapine treatment.Clin Infect Dis
8. Clarke S, Harrington P, Condon C, Kelleher D, Smith OP, Mulcahy F. Late onset hepatitis and prolonged deterioration in hepatic function associated with nevirapine therapy
. Int J STD AIDS
9. Jarrousse B, Cohen O, Berlureau P, Bentata M, Mahr A, Guillevin L. Nevirapine induced fulminant hepatitis: presentation of case and analysis of risk factors.Seventh European Conference on Clinical Aspects and treatment of HIV-Infection.
Lisbon, October 1999 [abstract 1009].
10. Mateu S, Gurgui M, Sambeat MA, Barrio JL, Fuster M, Llinares J, et al
. Cholestatic hepatitis by nevirapine: report of five cases.Seventh European Conference on Clinical Aspects and treatment of HIV-Infection.
Lisbon, October 1999 [abstract 1080].
11. Leitze Z, Nadeem A, Choudhary A, Saul Z, Roberts I, Manthous CA. Nevirapine-induced hepatitis treated with corticosteroids?AIDS
12. Fernandez-Guerrero ML, Becares J, Gorgolas M, Garcia-Delgado R. Nevirapine induced acute hepatitis.41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. Chicago, December, 2001 [abstract I-209].
13. AIDS Clinical Trial Group. Table of Grading Severity of Adult Adverse Experiences
. Rockville, MD: Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and infectious Diseases; 1996.
14. Brinkman K, ter Hofstede HJM, Burger DM, Smeitink JAM, Koopmans PP. Adverse effects of reverse transcriptase inhibitors: mitochondrial toxicity as common pathway.AIDS
15. Lenzo NP, Garas BA, French MA. Hepatic steatosis and lactic acidosis associated with stavudine treatment in an HIV patient: a case report.AIDS
16. Miller KD, Cameron M, Wood LV, Dalakas MC, Kovacs JA. Lactic acidosis and hepatic steatosis associated with use of stavudine: report of four cases.Ann Intern Med
17. Bartlett J. Severe liver toxicity in patients receiving two nucleoside analogues and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor.Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 19].
18. Carr A, Cooper DA. Restoration of immunity to chronic hepatitis B infection in HIV-infected patient on protease inhibitor.Lancet
19. Dieterich D, Stern J, Robinson P, Hall D, Carlier H. Analyses of four key clinical trials to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity with nevirapine: correlation with CD4+ levels, hepatitis B & C seropositivity, and baseline liver function tests.First IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment.
Buenos Aires, July 2001 [abstract 44].
20. Sulkowski M, Mehta S, Thomas D, Moore R. Hepatotoxicity associated with NNRTI use: Role of drugs and chronic viral hepatitis.Eighth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections
. Chicago, February 2001 [abstract 618].
21. Martin-Carbonero L, Rodríguez-Rosado R, Soriano V, González-Lahoz J. Hepatotoxicity of non nucleoside analogues: nevirapine vs efavirenz.Fifth International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection.
Glasgow, October 2000 [abstract P164].
Keywords:© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
nevirapine; acute clinical hepatitis; patient characteristics