Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 28, 2001 - Volume 15 - Issue 14 > Stromal-cell-derived factor 1 prevents the emergence of the...
AIDS:
Research Letters

Stromal-cell-derived factor 1 prevents the emergence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype of HIV-1 in vivo

Llano, Anuska; Barretina, Jordi; Blanco, Julià; Gutiérrez, Arantxa; Clotet, Bonaventura; Esté, José A.

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Retrovirology Laboratory irsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08916 Badalona, Spain. E-mail: jaeste@ns.hugtip.scs.es

Sponsorship: This work was partly supported by the Spanish FIPSE, project 3111/00, the ‘Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología’ project BFM2000-1382 and the Fundació irsiCaixa.

Received: 11 May 2001;

revised: 24 May 2001; accepted: 30 May 2001.

In a correlative study, the mean plasma level of the chemokine stromal-cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) was lower in subjects with syncytium-inducing (SI) than in subjects with non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) HIV isolates, regardless of the CD4 cell count or when compared with HIV-negative individuals. Individuals with high SDF-1 had an 81% probability of having an NSI virus phenotype compared with individuals with lower SDF-1. Increased expression of SDF-1 may help explain why the more pathogenic SI HIV-1 variants do not appear in some individuals.

Primary HIV-1 infection usually starts with non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) variants that use the chemokine receptor CCR5 (R5 variants). Later during infection, syncytium-inducing (SI) HIV-1 variants, which use CXCR4 as co-receptor (X4 variants), emerge in half the cases. The SI phenotype has been associated with faster T cell decline, immune failure, and the onset of AIDS [1]. These findings suggest that the HIV-1 phenotype switch is a causal factor of AIDS [2], and that host and not viral factors drive and contain the emergence of SI/X4 variants. However, it remains unclear why SI/X4 variants emerge.

We have shown that a CXCR4 antagonist, in cell culture infections, prevents the emergence of SI HIV-1 variants [3]. A polymorphism in the promoter region of the stromal-cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) gene has been associated with an effect on disease progression [4,5], and the constitutive expression of SDF-1 has been thought to be a plausible explanation for the control of HIV-1 X4 transmission and propagation [6,7]. SDF-1, the natural ligand of CXCR4, may thus have an in-vivo effect on the availability of CXCR4 for HIV-1.

Plasma samples from 42 HIV-negative volunteers (control group) and 172 HIV-positive individuals were evaluated for the levels of SDF-1 in plasma by an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay performed as described [8,9]. The expression of CXCR4 in the corresponding peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was followed by flow cytometry in HIV-negative or an available subset of HIV-positive individuals.

The mean SDF-1 concentration in the control group was 419 ± 282 pg/ml whereas the mean CXCR4 expression was 90 ± 4% of total lymphocytes with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of 75 ± 18. The level of SDF-1 in the plasma significantly correlated with the percentage of PBMC expressing CXCR4 (P < 0.05), although the association was weak (r = −0.34).

Standard virological and immunological markers were evaluated in the HIV-positive group. An inverse correlation was found between the CD4 cell count and viral load (r = −0.58, P < 0.01). The mean CD4 and CD8 cell counts were 776 ± 551 and 398 ± 434, respectively. The mean viral load was 5.25 ± 5.47 log10 copies/ml.

PBMC from each patient were co-cultured with PBMC from HIV-negative donors to isolate virus. HIV-1 p24 antigen-containing supernatant from each co-culture was then used for evaluation of the SI phenotype in MT-2 cells. A total of 79 virus samples tested as SI and 93 as NSI. Patients from these two groups had significantly different (P < 0.001) mean CD4 and CD8 cell counts (150 ± 178 and 320 ± 223 CD4 cells/μl and 663 ± 452 and 849 ± 597 CD8 cells/μl for the SI and NSI groups, respectively) despite a little (less than 0.5 log units) but significant difference in viral load (5.45 ± 5.58 and 5.01 ± 5.2 for the SI and NSI groups, respectively).

There were no significant differences in SDF-1 values between the control group and the HIV-positive group (mean SDF-1 419 ± 282 and 398 ± 434 pg/ml, respectively). The group of SI samples had a significantly lower mean SDF-1 (P < 0.05) than the NSI group (319 ± 206 and 467 ± 549 pg/ml for the SI and NSI groups, respectively). Fig. 1a shows the SDF-1 levels of HIV-positive individuals when plotted in groups according to the CD4 cell count and the SI and NSI phenotype. The NSI subsets always had higher SDF-1 levels than the SI subsets, regardless of the CD4 cell count. However, there were no significant differences between mean SDF-1 concentrations among the NSI subsets or among the SI subsets in the three CD4 cell groups. The mean SDF-1 levels thus remained unchanged despite immunological failure (CD4 cell count < 200 cells/μl), but were consistently higher in the NSI subset. Nevertheless, the NSI subsets showed a relatively higher SD, which may reflect the existence of NSI individuals with low SDF-1 that have not yet converted to the SI phenotype. Consistently, individuals with CD4 cell counts lower than 200 cells/μl had a 66% probability of having SI variants. This probability decreased to 24 or 17% when the CD4 cell count ranged from 200 to 500 cells/μl or over 500 cells/μl, respectively.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools

When HIV-positive individuals were grouped according to SDF-1 levels, of the 26 HIV-positive individuals with high (> 570 pg/ml) SDF-1, 21 (81%) had the NSI and five (19%) the SI phenotype (Fig. 1b). The percentage of SI individuals increased to 43 and 56% in the intermediate (SDF-1 250–570 pg/ml) and low (SDF-1 < 250 pg/ml) groups, respectively. When we evaluated the expression of CXCR4 in PBMC from a subset of these high SDF-1 individuals (SDF-1 concentration from the subset: 1671 ± 1338 pg/ml, n = 8), a significant (P < 0.05) lower mean CXCR4 expression was found (49 ± 24 MFI) when compared with a subset of individuals with low SDF-1 (SDF-1 < 250 pg/ml, CXCR4 MFI 71 ± 39, n = 13) or intermediate SDF-1 (between 250 and 570 pg/ml; CXCR4 MFI 85 ± 50, n = 15).

Our data show a significant number of individuals with NSI isolates having less than 200 CD4 cells/μl (n = 26). In the NSI subset of less than 200 CD4 cells/μl (n = 26), 30% (eight patients) had SDF-1 levels greater than 570 pg/ml, whereas the remaining 70% (18 patients) had lower SDF-1. Conversely, in the SI subset of less than 200 CD4 cells/μl, only two patients (4%, n = 51) had high SDF-1 levels. We have also shown that high SDF-1 in the plasma modified CXCR4 expression in PBMC, supporting the hypothesis that high SDF-1 will limit the emergence of the SI phenotype, and partly explaining why the SI phenotype does not develop in all patients who progress to AIDS.

SDF-1 levels remain unchanged over time in healthy individuals [9]. Our results show that the SDF-1 level in the plasma is an independent factor of CD4 cell count, viral load, immunological status or presence of the SDF-1 3'A variant (data not shown).

Our data suggest that high SDF-1 levels in the plasma will reflect a predisposition for HIV to retain the NSI phenotype in vivo.

Anuska Llano

Jordi Barretina

Julià Blanco

Arantxa Gutiérrez

Bonaventura Clotet

José A. Esté

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Fauci AS. Host factors and the pathogenesis of HIV-induced disease. Nature 1996, 384: 529–534.

2. Glushakova S, Grivel JC, Fitzgerald W, Sylwester A, Zimmerberg J, Margolis LB. Evidence for the HIV-1 phenotype switch as a causal factor in acquired immunodeficiency. Nat Med 1998, 4: 346–349.

3. Este JA, Cabrera C, Blanco J. et al. Shift of clinical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from X4 to R5 and prevention of emergence of the syncytium-inducing phenotype by blockade of CXCR4. J Virol 1999, 73: 5577–5585.

4. Winkler C, Modi W, Smith MW. et al. Genetic restriction of AIDS pathogenesis by an SDF-1 chemokine gene variant. ALIVE Study, Hemophilia Growth and Development Study (HGDS), Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study (MHCS), San Francisco City Cohort (SFCC). Science 1998, 279: 389–393.

5. Mummidi S, Ahuja SS, Gonzalez E. et al. Genealogy of the CCR5 locus and chemokine system gene variants associated with altered rates of HIV-1 disease progression. Nat Med 1998, 4: 786–793.

6. Agace WW, Amara A, Roberts AI. et al. Constitutive expression of stromal derived factor-1 by mucosal epithelia and its role in HIV transmission and propagation. Curr Biol 2000, 10: 325–328.

7. Pablos JL, Amara A, Bouloc A. et al. Stromal-cell derived factor is expressed by dendritic cells and endothelium in human skin. Am J Pathol 1999, 155: 1577–1586.

8. Poznansky MC, Olszak IT, Foxall R, Evans RH, Luster AD, Scadden DT. Active movement of T cells away from a chemokine. Nat Med 2000, 6: 543–548.

9. Derdeyn CA, Costello C, Kilby JM. et al. Correlation between circulating stromal cell-derived factor 1 levels and CD4+ cell count in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1999, 15: 1063–1071.

© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login