Introduction
In HIV-infected persons, plasma viremia correlates with CD4 T-cell decline and disease progression [1]. Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) usually suppresses viremia and increases peripheral CD4 T-cell number [2], viral rebound is common [3,4].
Recent cohort studies suggest that virologic failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy may not predict clinical failure [3,5,6]. The role of PI in maintaining CD4 T-cell levels during active viral replication is unclear; T-cell gains are greater and more sustained than those seen with failure of reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors alone [7,8]. This apparent discordance in viral replication and immune preservation may reflect the evolution toward less virulent strains under PI selection, alterations in the host immune system allowing increased CD4 T-cell regeneration or a continued partial virologic response.
This study tested whether PI-resistant primary isolates from patients demonstrating long-term virologic rebound without significant CD4 T-cell loss replicate less cytopathically in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) than PI-sensitive viruses from the same subject or from asymptomatic drug-naive patients.
Patients and methods
This is a cross-sectional study of HIV-infected adults experiencing long-term virologic failure on continued PI-based therapy [3]. The study eligibility criteria were a documented CD4 cell count nadir < 300 cells/μl, at least 18 months of continuous ART including a PI, and documented virologic failure for the previous 24 weeks (HIV RNA > 500 copies/ml and recently > 2500 copies/ml). Four subjects subsequently enrolled in a prospective study evaluating virologic and immunologic effects of treatment interruption [9,10].
Viral cocultures were initiated with equal numbers of unstimulated PBMC from study subjects and phytohemagglutanin-stimulated PBMC from HIV negative donors as described [11]. For each patient, cocultures were established and maintained in parallel in the presence and absence of 50 nM of the most recently failed PI (indinavir, n = 3; nelfinavir, n = 3; or ritonavir, n = 8). Cocultures from patients undergoing treatment interruption were maintained in up to 500 nM PI to suppress PI-sensitive viral outgrowth.
Isolates from asymptomatic patients naive to ART were generated from frozen archived virus stocks under conditions identical to those used to derive PI-resistant isolates. Viruses were titrated by endpoint dilution on activated PBMC [11]. Phytohemagglutinin-stimulated PBMC from uninfected donors were inoculated with 1 × 103 TCID50(50% tissue culture infectious dose)/106 cells, and cultures were maintained at 2 × 106cells/ml as described above.
The relative proportion of CD4 T-cells was determined by three-color flow cytometry (CD3, CD4, CD8) with a FACSCalibur and CELLQuest (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, California, USA) and FlowJo (Treestar, San Carlos, California, USA) analysis software. The percentages of CD3+ CD4+ cells from infected cultures were normalized to those in matched uninfected control cultures.
MT-2 and GHOST cl.3 (parental, CXCR4, and CCR5) cell lines were obtained from the National Institutes of Health AIDS Reagent Program (Rockville, Maryland, USA). The MT-2 cell assay was performed as described [11]. The GHOST-cell assay [12] was performed 36 h after addition of virus isolates at a two-thirds dilution in the presence of 10 μg/ml polybrene.
Protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) gene sequences were determined from frozen culture supernatants and plasma by RT-PCR of the protease and RT reading frame followed by automated cycle sequencing using either nested PCR and dye-labeled terminators [13-15] or the TRUEGENE HIV-1 genotyping kit (Visible Genetics, Toronto, Canada).
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess differences in p24 concentrations and CD4 T-cell depletion between groups. Spearman rank correlation tests were used to evaluate associations between continuous variables. Analyses were performed with SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
Results
Fourteen subjects on continuous ART were studied. Four subjects subsequently discontinued ART, and virus was isolated after the predominant species switched from PI-resistant to PI-susceptible [9,10]. The median duration of PI-based therapy (baseline to sampling) was 136.7 weeks (range, 109.3-193.4). Median baseline CD4 T-cell count was 120 cells/μl (range, 29-251 cells/μl); median viral load was 4.8 log10copies RNA/ml (range, 4.5-5.7 log10copies RNA/ml). After an initial response to PI-based therapy, all subjects had virologic failure to within o1ne log10 of baseline (Fig. 1a and b). Despite this rebound in plasma viremia, subjects demonstrated an overall sustained CD4 T-cell increase (median gain, 159 cells/μl; range, 30-251 cells/μl).
The HIV protease and RT gene sequences were determined from all isolates and from plasma of 12 patients. Culture supernatants and plasma virus from any one patient on continued therapy showed multiple primary and secondary genetic markers of PI resistance. Primary isolates obtained after treatment interruption grown in the absence of PI selection showed no such markers. Parallel isolates grown in the presence of PI contained genetic resistance markers identical to those of the same subject obtained during therapy. Consistent with their extensive treatment histories, isolates from these subjects also had multiple genetic markers of RT inhibitor resistance.
These results indicate that isolates obtained during therapy and cultured with or without PI have genetic markers predictive of resistance to multiple classes of antiretroviral drugs and suggest limited genetic drift in vitro. Further, with respect to the protease/RT reading frame, the culture isolates are representative of the major viral quasi-species found in blood plasma.
To determine if PI-resistant primary isolates show an uncoupling of replication and virulence and to determine if such a phenotype is dependent on the presence of PI, we measured viral growth and CD4 T-cell depletion in PBMC cocultures. For each subject, isolates maintained in the absence and presence of PI showed similar kinetic profiles for up to 4 weeks (P > 0.2) (Fig. 1c), indicating phenotypic resistance to PI at 50 nM. After periods of peak viral replication, CD4 T-lymphocyte depletion levels varied widely and were not altered significantly by the presence of PI [with PI: mean, 49.5% (range, 0-87.5%); without PI: mean, 41% (range, 0-89.5%)]. For a given isolate, CD4 T-cell depletion was reproducible in multiple cocultures. Isolates with characteristic minimal, moderate, or extensive pathogenicity at similar replication levels are shown in Fig. 1c. The mean CD4 cell depletion of all paired isolates showed similar cytopathicity in the presence versus absence of PI at all time points (Fig. 1d).
The extent of CD4 T-cell depletion correlated with coreceptor phenotype. In MT-2 and GHOST cell assays, isolates from seven patents each were syncytia-inducing (SI), CXCR4-utilizing or were non-syncytia-inducing (NSI), CCR5-utilizing. When stratified by coreceptor use, SI and NSI isolates showed statistically indistinguishable growth kinetics at steady-state replication in cocultures with or without PI. However, SI/CXCR4-utilizing isolates caused significantly greater mean CD4 T-cell depletion than NSI/CCR5-utilizing isolates (%CD3+ CD4+ at week 2, 29 ± 7.5 versus 72 ± 9.1, P = 0.01).
To compare cytopathicity induced by drug-resistant versus drug-sensitive isolates from the same patient, phenotypically and genotypically distinct virus pairs were isolated after extended ART interruption in four patients. Viral growth kinetics and CD4 T-cell depletion in representative parallel cocultures of matched PI-resistant and PI-sensitive isolates are shown in Fig. 2a. For all patients at equal replication levels, T-cell depletion from the PI-sensitive strains was indistinguishable from that seen in the resistant strains.
Next, activated PBMC were infected with isolates (three SI, three NSI) at equivalent titers from PI-resistant subjects and similarly derived isolates (two SI and five NSI) from seven untreated progressors showing continued CD4 T-cell depletion. Viral growth kinetics and CD4 T-cell depletion after peak viral replication were assessed (Fig. 2b and c). Consistent with our results from all 14 PI-resistant isolates, SI isolates were substantially more cytopathic at similar replication levels than NSI isolates regardless of drug susceptibility phenotype (P = 0.0043).
Discussion
Our results indicate that primary HIV-1 isolates with multiple markers of genotypic resistance and reduced phenotypic drug susceptibility from patients showing substantial long-term viremia without immunologic signs of disease progression can be highly cytopathic in activated, primary CD4 T cells, particularly SI/CXCR4-utilizing strains. These results are consistent with increased expression of CXCR4 on recently activated T lymphocytes [16,17], as seen in PBMC cocultures. When stratified by HIV-1 coreceptor phenotype, PI-resistant isolates were no less virulent at equivalent replication levels and with equal input infectious titers than PI-susceptible isolates from the same subject or from untreated naive patients with declining CD4 cell counts. Similarly, these PI-resistant viruses can be highly cytopathic for CD4 T cells in human tonsil organ cultures in the absence of exogenous stimulation [18], where the chemokine receptor distribution closely resembles that of activated PBMC [19]. These results do not support the hypothesis that PI-resistant viruses have evolved during long-term drug exposure to a state where replication is uncoupled from virulence in activated mature peripheral T cells.
It is possible that the decreased virulence of PI-resistant isolates from patients with sustained immunologic responses may be more evident in target tissues other than differentiated PBMC. In human fetal thymocyte infections with either paired primary isolates or chimeric viruses, PI-resistant viruses showed significantly attenuated growth profiles when compared to PI-sensitive ones [20] (C. A. Stoddart, T. J. Liegler, F. F. Mammano, V. D. Linquist-Stepps, M. Hayden, J. M. Harris, S. G. Deeks, R. M. Grant, F. Clavel and J. M. McCune, unpublished data). Even slightly reduced infectivity and cytopathicity in lymphoid precursor cells or non-cycling T cells could shift the balance in favor of T-cell production over destruction, leading to a net increase in CD4 T-cell count. An intriguing possibility is that PI-resistant viruses are associated with decreased clinical progression due to a restricted host tissue range, sparing cells essential for lymphoid cell regeneration.
Alternatively, CD4 T-cell preservation may simply reflect decreased absolute viremia due to partial drug suppression, rather than any qualitative change in the virus or specific cytopathicity. On average, patients with a transient response to therapy showed partial viral rebound to levels below those before PI-based therapy [3,8] (Fig. 1b). Interruption of ART in patients with long-term virologic failure results in rapid outgrowth of PI-sensitive virus, increased plasma viremia and decreased CD4 T-cell count, suggesting partial viral suppression and attenuated fitness of PI-resistant viruses in vivo[9,10]. Partially suppressed plasma viremia may allow host immune cell regeneration to match or exceed virus-induced cell destruction, resulting in preserved peripheral CD4 T-cell counts.
In summary, primary isolates from subjects with continued CD4 T-cell accumulation after virologic failure replicated cyotopathically in activated PBMC. PI did not alter replication and cytopathicity, which were equivalent to the levels seen with matched PI-susceptible isolates. These results suggest that the sustained immunologic response in patients with virologic failure of PI-containing regimens may be due to decreased viral replication or reduced HIV-1-associated pathogenicity in a compartment other than mature activated T cells. Further investigation into the virologic basis of CD4 T-cell maintenance in the setting of continued viral replication using primary isolates may address fundamental questions in HIV-1 virulence and pathogenesis, as well as guide the timing of changes in antiviral therapy after virologic failure.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank B. Drews, M. Thounaojam, J. Javier and P. Wong at the Gladstone/UCSF Laboratory of Clinical Virology for expert technical help with viral cultures and HIV-1 sequencing. We also thank J. Barbour, S. Ordway, G. Howard and C. Stoddart for their critical reading of this manuscript. We are appreciative of the patients in the SFGH positive Health Program for their continued participation in research studies.
References
1. Mellors JW, Muñoz A, Giorgi JV. et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med 1997, 126: 946 -954.
2. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD. et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. :AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team. N Engl J Med 1997, 337: 725 -733.
3. Deeks SG, Barbour J, Martin JN. et al. Sustained CD4 T cell response after virologic failure of protease inhibitor based regimens in HIV infected patients. J Infect Dis 2000, 181: 946 -953.
4. Deeks SG, Hecht FM, Swanson M. et al. HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response to protease inhibitor therapy in an urban AIDS clinic: response to both initial and salvage therapy. AIDS 1999, 13: F35 -F43.
5. Ledergerber B, Egger M, Opravil M. et al. Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study. :Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Lancet 1999, 353: 863 -868.
6. Kaufmann D, Pantaleo G, Sudre P, Telenti A, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. CD4-cell count in HIV-1-infected individuals remaining viraemic with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Lancet 1998, 351: 723 -724.
7. Eron JJ, Benoit SL, Jemsek J. et al. Treatment with lamivudine, zidovudine, or both in HIV-positive patients with 200 to 500 CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter. :North American HIV Working Party. N Engl J Med 1995, 333: 1662 -1669.
8. Hirsch M, Steigbigel R, Staszewski S. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine in adults with advanced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and prior antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 1999, 180: 659 -665.
9. Deeks SG, Wrin T, Hoh R, et al. Virologic and immunologic evaluation of structured treatment interruptions (STI) in patients experiencing long-term virologic failure.Seventh Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. San Francisco, January 200 [abstract LB10].
10. Deeks SG, Wrin T, Liegler T, et al. Virologic and immunologic consequences of discontinuing combination antiretroviral drug therapy in HIV-infected patients with detectable viremia. N Engl J Med 2000 (in press).
11. Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and collaborating investigators. HIV syncytium-inducing (MT-2) assay. In DAIDS Virology Manual for HIV Laboratories. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human services, publication HIV-97-3828; 1997:73-77.
12. Cecilia D, KewalRamani VN, O'Leary J. et al. Neutralization profiles of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates in the context of coreceptor usage. J Virol 1998, 72: 6988 -6996.
13. Winters MA, Schapiro JM, Lawrence J, Merigan TC. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease genotypes and in vitro protease inhibitor susceptibilities of isolates from individuals who were switched to other protease inhibitors after long-term saquinavir treatment. J Virol 1998, 72: 5303 -5306.
14. Schapiro JM, Winters, MA, Lawrence J, Merigan TC. Clinical and genotypic cross resistance between the protease inhibitors saquinavir and indinavir.International Workshop on HIV Drug Resistance, Treatment Strategies, and Eradication. St. Petersburg. June 1997 [abstrct 87].
15. Nijhuis M, Boucher CA, Schuurman R. Sensitive procedure for the amplification of HIV-1 RNA using a combined reverse-transcription and amplification reaction. Biotechniques 1995, 19: 178 -182.
16. Wu L, Paxton WA, Kassam N. et al. CCR5 levels and expression pattern correlate with infectability by macrophage-tropic HIV-1 in vitro. J Exp Med 1997, 185: 1681 -1691.
17. Bleul CC, Wu L, Hoxie J, Springer TA, Mackay C. The HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94: 1925 -1930.
18. Penn ML, Myers M, Eckstein DA, et al. Primary and recombinant HIV-1 strains resistant to protease inhibitors are pathogenic in mature human lymphoid tissues. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000 (in press).
19. Grivel JC, Margolis LB. CCR5- and CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 are equally cytopathic for their T-cell targets in human lymphoid tissue. Nat Med 1999, 5: 344 -346.
20. Stoddart CA, Liegler T, Linquist-Steps VD, et al. Impaired replication of protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 in human thymus.Keystone Symposia on Novel Biological Approaches to HIV-1 Infection Based on New Insights into HIV-Biology. Keystone, April 2000 [abstract 470].
© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.