Of 15 randomized patients, three patients dropped out within the first month for reasons unrelated to ADA treatment and one patient had his medication bottles mixed up between the open-label and double-blind periods. During the double-blind period, four of five patients dropped out of the ADA group and one of six patients dropped out of the placebo group.
The main reason for discontinuing ADA was nephrotoxicity: renal colic in one patient, nephrolithiasis with papillary necrosis in another and increase in serum creatinine in a patient treated with indinavir and with a history of renal insufficiency before this study. The common denominator is probably the precipitation of biurea and the formation of nephrolithiasis. Casts were found in urine at the end of the period on 2 g ADA t.i.d. in the first patient and the patient developed renal colic about 1 month later. Casts were also found in one patient after 1 month of ADA at 1 g t.i.d. and at the end of the open-label period with 2 g t.i.d. The patient's creatinine levels increased in parallel, probably in relation to ADA combined with indinavir, and the patient was eventually withdrawn from the study. Blood was found in the urine in a third patient at the 2 g t.i.d. ADA dosage and appeared again at the end of the study when they were taking placebo, but the latter was probably related to the intake of 3 g ADA t.i.d. the month before. In these three patients, the total daily dosage inducing nephrolithiasis (129−142 mg/kg) was in excess of the no-observed effect level (100 mg/kg) in the most sensitive animals. No renal effects have been observed during the first month at 1 g ADA t.i.d. No patient with normal renal function at study entry developed nephrolithiasis, papillary necrosis, renal colic, or increased serum creatinine at a dosage of 2 g t.i.d. or less.
Gastrointestinal intolerance occurred in isolated patients, such as abdominal pain, diarrhoea and flatulence. In one patient who had a history of abdominal lymphoma and gastrointestinal ulcerations related to exudative enteropathy, this led to his withdrawal from the study after 1 month at 1 g ADA t.i.d. Otherwise, these symptoms were mild to moderate and medication was continued.
In vitro, ADA is cytotoxic to human T lymphocytes. Two response patterns appear to underscore the risk of cytotoxicity towards CD4 helper cells in patients. The first is a continuous dose-related decline of > 33% in CD4 cells from baseline under ADA, followed by a rebound of > 33% after withdrawal of ADA. The second is a CD4 cell recovery of > 33% after one or more consecutive dosage levels of ADA, followed by a sharp fall (> 33%) at the next higher dosage, with or without rebound of > 33% after withdrawal of ADA.
Mild glucose intolerance was associated with ADA in a dose-dependent manner. Fasting glucose (mean ± SD) increased from 96 ± 24 mg/dl at baseline to 115 ± 29 mg/dl at the end of the second month during open-label treatment. It appeared to stabilize thereafter. The differences between baseline and visit 5 (month 1) [P = 0.010, degrees of freedom (df) = 8, paired t-test] and baseline and visit 7 (month 3) (P = 0.028, df = 9) are statistically significant. In five out of six patients for whom data were available, including two with elevated glucose at baseline, glucose values decreased after withdrawal of ADA from a mean of 128 mg/dl under ADA to a mean of 102 mg/dl. The potential impact of concomitant use of PI is difficult to assess because of the sample size.
Methaemoglobin was slightly increased in two patients, confirming earlier observations in one healthy volunteer. The highest value observed was 3.5% at the dosage of 3 g ADA t.i.d., which is without clinical relevance.
Total glutathione was not affected by ADA. However, reduced glutathione increased from 175 ± 69 μmol/l at baseline to 191 ± 38 μmol/l after 1 week of therapy with ADA at 1 g t.i.d. (not statistically significantly different from baseline:P = 0.379, paired two-sided t-test; df = 10), and to 235 ± 33 μmol/l after 3 months of treatment (not statistically significantly different from baseline:P = 0.079; df = 7). Oxidized glutathione, on the contrary, decreased significantly from 501 ± 107 μmol/l at baseline to 443 ± 69 μmol/l after 1 week at 1 g ADA t.i.d. (P = 0.034; df = 10) and to 413 ± 115 μmol/l after 3 months of treatment (P = 0.022; df = 7), suggesting a biological effect of ADA but not of its metabolite biurea.
The Karnofsky index improved under ADA treatment as patients moved to higher dosages during the open-label period. The mean Karnofsky index at baseline for the whole population was 85 ± 12% and it increased progressively to 92 ± 8% towards the end of the third month. Compared with baseline, the mean indexes at visit 6 (month 2) and visit 7 (month 3) are statistically significant (month 2 P = 0.026; df = 11 and month 3 P = 0.053, df = 10; paired two-sided t-test). The paucity of data at the end of the double-blind study period did not allow any comparison with placebo.
Many concomitant medications were administered with the study medication, in particular antimicrobial medicines for treating/preventing bacterial, mycotic and viral opportunistic infections. Of key importance is the potential contribution of ADA to resistance development. From the viral sensitivity determinations, it appears that ADA did not influence sensitivity to RTI or PI utilized throughout the study and to which the patient's virus was either sensitive or resistant at baseline. No HIV strains resistant to ADA were isolated. Of interest is the decreased number of successful HIV cultures after ADA therapy: from 73% successful cultures at baseline, only 46% of the cultures were successful at the end of the study period with ADA therapy.
Safety parameters apparently not influenced by azodicarbonamide
ADA did not appear to have any effect on body weight, temperature, systolic or diastolic blood pressure or pulse. There was no apparent effect on electrocardiographic tracings, in particular there was no prolongation of QTc. No negative effects on haematology, coagulation, blood chemistry (including liver enzymes, bilirubin, total protein and protein electrophoresis, ions, blood lipids, urea, uric acid, thyroid hormones), urinalysis and urinary microscopy parameters could be attributed to ADA at any of the dosage levels.
Sensitivity to azodicarbonamide and standard antiretrovirals
Viral cultures were obtained at baseline from 11 of 15 patients (success rate of 73% for viral growth). However, two of the cultures did not yield sufficient virus for sensitivity testing.
The IC50 values for ADA ranged from 40 to 200 μmol/l with a CC50 of approximately 140 μmol/l (range 111−166). ADA seems to have a very small selectivity index, 1–3, in PBMC in vitro. There was no evidence of viral resistance to ADA.
In six out of eight patients (75%), viral resistance in vitro could be shown to one of the antiretroviral medicines taken by the patient at study entry. Few comparisons are possible with the double-blind end-of-study sample. Indeed, the success rate for growing the virus from the patient samples fell to 46%. It proved very difficult to grow the virus from samples received after add-on therapy with ADA, while the median plasma viral load did not change significantly during the treatment period In patients 6 and 7, sensitivity to the standard antiretrovirals taken throughout the study was determined. Patient 6 had a virus that was resistant to zidovudine and lamivudine at baseline and was still resistant to these at the end of the study. Patient 7 had a virus sensitive to zidovudine and zalcitabine at baseline and the virus was still sensitive at the end of the study. For these two patients, therefore, there was no evidence of a change in the sensitivity profile of the virus towards standard antiretrovirals following exposure to ADA.
Preliminary efficacy results
Figure 2 shows the evolution of surrogate markers during the open-label period. The CD4 cell change expressed as a percentage of the baseline value improved, reaching a peak of 32 ± 81% after the intermediate dosage of 2 g ADA t.i.d. However, the higher dosage of 2–3 g t.i.d. during month 3, although still showing positive recovery, was probably cytotoxic to CD4 lymphocytes in some patients. In the subgroup treated with zidovudine plus lamivudine, the CD4 cell percentage change was of the same pattern as for the open-label population, only with higher values, reaching a peak at 68 ± 110% after the intermediate dosage. During the open-label period, there was a slight but not significant reduction of viral load from that seen with 1 g ADA t.i.d. (month 1) to that seen with 2–3 g ADA t.i.d. (month 3), with a peak fall from baseline of 0.08 ± 0.33 log10 copies/ml after the middle dosage As with the CD4 cell count, there was a larger reduction of viral load in the subgroup receiving ADA as add-on to a regimen containing zidovudine plus lamivudine. The fall from baseline in this subgroup peaked at 0.17 ± 0.63 log10 copies/ml after the high dosage The CD4 cell recovery (coefficient of variation: approximately 150%) and viral load reduction (coefficient of variation approximately 400%) were not statistically significant (repeated measures ANOVA). However, in the subgroup of virological responders (n = 3; 27%), the peak fall in viral load was 0.75 log10 copies/ml at 12 weeks after the 2–3 g ADA t.i.d. dosage in this population of patients with advanced disease and no other new anti-HIV therapy.
The CD4/CD8 cell ratio (Fig. 3) showed a dose-dependent improvement at 1 g ADA t.i.d. (month 1) and 1-2 g ADA t.i.d. (month 2), and a consolidation at 2–3 g ADA t.i.d. (month 3).
During the double-blind period, the CD4 cell percentage fell in the placebo group from 59 × 106 cells/l at the beginning of the period to 41 × 106 cells/l at week 24. Patient attrition during the double-blind period in the ADA group was high because of two adverse dropouts related to high-dose ADA, one intercurrent infection and one administrative dropout. The evolution of CD4 cell count was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. In the placebo group, the CD4/CD8 cell ratio fell slightly from 0.10 at the beginning of the period to 0.09 at week 24, and viral load increased slightly from 4.43 to 4.6 log10 copies/ml.
Although the mean viral load reduction was small in the open-label population, there were three patients (7, 11 and 19) with clinically important responses with respect to both surrogate markers (Fig. 4). Consistent viral load reductions were observed in these patients over the entire treatment period with ADA (Fig. 2). Peak reduction at end of treatment (12 or 24 weeks depending on randomization) ranged from 0.52 to 1.2 log10 copies/ml. There was a continuous linear decline of plasma viral load over time. Evidence of efficacy in these three patients is based on a dose-dependent reduction of viral load > 0.5 log10 copies/ml and evidence of worsening viral load after withdrawal, if any, by at least 0.5 log10 copies/ml. One of the virological responders (patient 7) had a dose-dependent positive evolution of his CD4 cell count during the open-label period and a severe worsening after switching to placebo. Patient 11 also showed a sharp deterioration of CD4 cell count after withdrawal from the study. Patient 19 was resistant to the two PI he was receiving throughout the study (Fig. 4).
The efficacy analysis (Table 2) indicates a similar proportion of immunological responders at high and low dosage (5/11 and 6/15, respectively), but only the high dosage is associated with virological responders. There was a trend towards superiority of the high dosage with respect to the proportion of immunological and virological responders (P = 0.063, Fisher exact probability, 1-sided). During the double-blind period, the proportions of immunological, immunological and virological, and overall responders were greater in the ADA group. There was not a single immunological or virological responder in the placebo group. The overall response rate in the ADA group was statistically significantly greater than in the placebo group (P = 0.048, Fisher exact probability, 1-sided).
The improvement in CD4 cell count under ADA compares favourably with results with other antiretrovirals in the literature [10–30] when the median CD4 cell count at baseline is taken into account (Fig. 5). In Fig. 5, average CD4 cell changes at 12 weeks under various anti-HIV therapies (PI not included) have been plotted as a function of the median CD4 cell count at baseline. Except for one outlier value with little biological plausibility, the best results found in the literature can be linked by a straight line. The results observed in this study with ADA fall on this line. This would indicate that CD4 cell recovery with ADA was comparable in this study at 12 weeks with the best results reported so far in the literature, given the paucity of CD4 cells at baseline and given that the patient's viruses were resistant to PI.
There were no deaths during the study. Intercurrent infections occurred more frequently at the low dosage during month 1 and in the placebo group during the double-blind period (Table 3), but this requires careful interpretation because of the size of the sample and the short period of observation.
This is the first report about the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of ADA in patients with advanced AIDS and the first report of a clinical investigation with a zinc finger inhibitor in HIV infection. In view of the small number of patients involved, the study should primarily be considered as a safety and tolerability study. Nevertheless, it is possible to look at the potential efficacy by assessment of surrogate markers.
The development of a suitable detection method for ADA in blood has not yet been possible. Consequently the pharmacokinetic parameters of ADA are unknown. This study provides some indications that ADA is absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract in its active form. Its metabolite biurea is inactive against HIV [1–3] and does not oxidize reduced glutathione. The observation of significant reductions in viral load in certain patients in this study, and the dose-dependent reduction of oxidized glutathione in serum, would suggest that ADA does get inside the cells. Indeed, the paradoxical increase of reduced glutathione in serum is an indication of oxidative stress, which could only result from systemic absorption of intact ADA, which has well-established cell toxicity. Interestingly, all three patients with serious nephrotoxicity related to high-dose ADA showed significant CD4 cell recovery during the open-label dose-escalation period, and one of these patients showed signs of CD4 cell toxicity at the 3 g ADA t.i.d. dosage. If nephrotoxicity is the consequence of large amounts of biurea being excreted via the kidneys, patients presenting such adverse events and showing evidence of antiretroviral activity testify that some, at least, of the parent compound ADA is absorbed intact via the gastrointestinal tract. Other evidence that ADA is absorbed with an intact double bond is the induction of methaemoglobin. This confirms the presence of ADA inside red blood cells, which appear to take up a large amount of the active form of ADA before a further release (on-going studies). This effect of ADA in this study does not appear to be related to the inhibition of methaemoglobin reductase It is also unlikely that biurea is responsible for the dose-related glucose intolerance observed. Rather, it is possible that ADA interferes with the formation of insulin from pro-insulin. Sulphydryl groups are involved in building the disulphide bridges in the functional insulin protein, and ADA, not biurea, is known to oxidize free sulphydryl groups.
ADA, but not biurea, induces cell death in human lymphocytes and PBMC in vitro at concentrations > 200 μmol/l [1–3]. Evidence in this study of competition between dose-related CD4 lymphocyte recovery and toxicity from ADA at high dosages is another argument supporting the hypothesis that ADA passes the gastrointestinal barrier in its active form.
Nephrolithiasis (including renal colic and renal insufficiency) is a known adverse reaction in rodents and dogs exposed for months to ADA or biurea, both insoluble in water, at dosage regimens in excess of 100 mg/kg per day . The aggravation of renal failure in one patient taking indinavir with ADA indicates the need for a downward dose-adjustment study in patients with renal insufficiency and in patients receiving other potentially nephrotoxic drugs, such as acyclovir, foscarnet etc., in combination with ADA, as well as a careful monitoring of renal function. In humans, a total daily dose of 100 mg/kg perday should not be exceeded.
Methaemoglobin formation was observed in a previous study in healthy volunteers and is confirmed here. Another azo compound, phenazopyridine , is known to induce methaemoglobin formation. However, the level of methaemoglobin is not clinically relevant. Careful monitoring should be considered for patients taking other compounds such as dapsone, which may be associated with increased methaemoglobin level.
The dose-related and statistically significant increase in fasting glucose in serum in this study was unexpected. Recently, ADA has been shown to have potent immunosuppressant properties in rodents . Glucose intolerance is a well-known adverse reaction of immunosuppressant medicines such as cyclosporin and FK506 [11,12], mycophenolate mofetil  and glucocorticosteroids.
Also unexpected was the important toxicity towards CD4 lymphocytes of ADA in combination with zalcitabine. Zalcitabine is known to be a drug depressing intracellular dCTP levels  and to be cytotoxic towards lymphocyte subpopulations . ADA is now also known to reduce the dCTP pool (unpublished results). Since human lymphocytes have a low dCTP pool and are devoid of any dCTP salvage pathway , any drug added to zalcitabine that further depresses the dCTP pool may precipitate cell death.
Because of a structural analogy between ADA and hydroxyurea, which is potentially active against HIV , it is perhaps useful to highlight that ADA has a mechanism of action that differs from hydroxyurea. Hydroxyurea inhibits ribonucleotide reductase [18,19] and depresses all dNTP inside the lymphocyte, whereas ADA has no significant activity on this enzyme and depresses the dCTP pool through a different mechanism (P. Robberecht, personal communication; M. Ussery, personal communication). Hydroxyurea does not affect retroviral zinc fingers  and has no relevant immunosuppressive properties, as demonstrated in graft rejection studies .
Several immunosuppressants have been shown to have potential benefits in the treatment of AIDS. Their effect is probably indirect through prevention of cell death induced by both viral replication and cytokine release. Some of these cytokines may trigger or sustain the viral replication. ADA is an effective inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine release in vivo in rodents after single doses and in vitro at concentrations similar to those inhibiting HIV replication . In contrast to existing immunosuppressants, ADA has also a direct effect on retroviral zinc fingers and is apparently devoid of any effect on zinc fingers associated with mammalian cell proteins . As a third mechanism of action, ADA could reduce the activated target cells, hence reducing their infectivity by circulating viral particles.
Our study shows that zinc finger inhibitors represent potentially an important contribution to combination therapy in AIDS because they are not likely to produce escape mutants . There was no evidence of the emergence of resistance in the present study using quasi-monotherapy with ADA, since the patients’ viruses were mostly resistant to the combination antiretroviral therapy to which ADA was added. This must be confirmed in larger studies with long-term administration. New antiretroviral medications, including especially fusion inhibitors, should be evaluated for potential synergism and to reduce the risk of developing resistance against these molecules, as already shown for one such drug, T-20. Indeed, ADA could act both before and after fusion events and potentiate these new fusion drugs.
A clinically significant reduction of viral load was observed in this study only in three patients (27%). This was, however, a very unfavourable population for the initial evaluation of a new drug in AIDS: patients had advanced AIDS, the mean CD4 cell count at baseline was 77 × 106 cells/l, most patients had several years of prior therapy with a variety of RTI, 75% of patients had a virus phenotypically resistant to one or more drugs in the patient's antiviral therapy at baseline (indicated by sensitivity measurements at study entry), 20% of patients were taking a drug combination containing zalcitabine at entry, and 60% were taking one containing lamivudine. Lamivudine may, at certain doses, interact with ADA to induce cytotoxicity in CD4 lymphocytes and lamivudine and, particularly, zalcitabine depress dCTP in the cell . The high heterogeneity in combination therapies, the common protocol violations and the high dropout rate (53% over 6 months), partly owing to the access to PI, all played a role in reducing the power of the study. These difficulties can certainly be overcome in future clinical trials. Despite such unfavourable characteristics, during the double-blind period, immunological and virological responders were found in the ADA group and not in the placebo group (P = 0.048, Fisher exact, 1-sided).
The improvement in CD4 cell count under ADA compares favourably with results in the literature for other antiretrovirals when the median CD4 cell count at baseline is taken into account (Fig. 5). The absolute increase in CD4 cells observed at 3 months with ADA in the open-label population (12 × 106 cells/l) is on the curve of the best results published so far in the literature at 12 weeks from initial therapy considering the median CD4 cell count at study entry (88 × 106 cells/l for ADA).
In contrast, the overall effect of ADA on viral load in this study looks rather modest, despite clinically significant reductions greater than 0.5 and 1.1 log10 copies/ml (in one and two patients, respectively). However, the viral load that is measured in peripheral blood with a branched DNA diagnostic kit (Chiron) does not discriminate between infectious and non-infectious particles. The results in patients who show no significant improvement in viral load must be interpreted in the light of the effect of ADA on zinc fingers. Without functional zinc fingers, viral particles are not infectious. If the concentration of the zinc finger inhibitor is insufficient inside infected cells to inhibit viral replication, it may nevertheless act on extracellular particles. A reduction in viral load would not then be observed because current test methods measure total genetic load and not the infectious load. However, there should be a CD4 cell count recovery if non-infected and newly formed CD4 cells are prevented from being infected. Patients 3, 4 and 6 clearly had a positive area under the curve of CD4 cell percentage change from baseline under ADA therapy even though their viral loads were apparently stable. It would be interesting in future studies, to test the infectivity of blood samples collected from patients treated with an optimum dosage of ADA.
Other groups have experienced weak effects of rescue therapy on viral load reduction in severely immunocompromised and heavily pretreated patients, despite the use of potent anti-HIV medicines. The addition of saquinavir to the antiretroviral regimen in patients with advanced HIV disease heavily treated with nucleoside drugs resulted in only transient decreases in HIV plasma RNA and this in only half the patients . In a group of 18 patients who had failed on therapy with indinavir or ritonavir, only four patients (22%) had > 0.5 log10 copies/ml decrease in viral load after 24 weeks of therapy . In 13 patients refractory to standard triple therapy, the combination of nelfinavir and saquinavir showed only short-term virological efficacy in a minority of patients (39% after 4 weeks, 23% after 8 weeks and 8% after 16 and 24 weeks) .
The present study shows that it is possible to combine ADA with other antiretrovirals belonging to the two main classes: dideoxynucleoside RTI and PI. In combination with RTI that depress the intracellular dCTP pool, such as zalcitabine and lamivudine, ADA's cytotoxicity towards CD4 lymphocytes may be enhanced and dosage should be modified appropriately. The somewhat complex toxicity of the drug is of concern, and patients in future trials should be carefully monitored, in particular for renal function and the metabolic adverse events that have already been shown to be a problem with some of the antiretroviral drugs. Certain PI may be nephrotoxic (e.g., indinavir) and care should be taken when co-administering ADA.
In order to reduce the total body burden of biurea and/or improve the bioavailability of ADA, which is known to be only one third absorbed after oral administration in rats , and hence increase the intracellular levels of ADA, new pharmaceutical developments would be needed. Indeed the median particle size of the current formulation is greater than 30 μm.
The current formulation appears to show some activity on surrogate marker endpoints in this study. Larger clinical trials should be undertaken in order to confirm these very preliminary, yet encouraging, results and further approaches should also focus on the pharmacokinetics of this first candidate of the family of zinc finger inhibitors.
The optimum dosage recommended for further clinical development of this current pharmaceutical formulation appears to be 2 g t.i.d., because this dosage showed the highest mean CD4 cell percentage change from baseline, the highest mean absolute change in CD4/CD8 cell ratio from baseline, significant viral load reduction to < 1.0 log10 copies/ml after 6 months of treatment, a statistically significant improvement of the Karnofsky performance index and fewer intercurrent infections. In addition, cytotoxicity towards CD4 lymphocytes, nephrotoxicity and glucose intolerance were less frequent than at a dosage of 3 g t.i.d.
We thank Professor L. Thunus, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Liège, Belgium, for purifying azodicarbonamide to clinical grade and for testing the purity and stability of the supplies,. SANICO S.A., Turnhout, Belgium for the manufacture of study supplies to GMP standards following the randomization code kindly provided by PSI Pharma Support Inc., Switzerland and Professor P. Hermans for help in writing.
1. Vandevelde M, Witvrouw M, Sprecher S, de Clercq E, Tassignon J-P. ADA, a potential anti-HIV drug.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1996, 12: 567 –568.
2. Witvrouw M, Vandevelde M, Tassignon J-P, Schmit J-C, Desmyter J, de Clercq E .ADA, a potential anti-HIV drug.
9th International Conference on Antiviral Research. Urabandai, Fukushima, Japan, May 1996 [abstract].
3. Rice WG, Turpin JA, Huang M. et al. Azodicarbonamide inhibits HIV-1 replication by targeting the nucleocapsid protein.
Nat Med 1997, 3: 341 –345.
4. Huang M, Maynard A, Turpin JA. et al. Anti-HIV agents that selectively target retroviral nucleocapsid protein zinc fingers without affecting cellular zinc finger proteins
. J Med Chem 1998, 41: 1371 –1381.
5. Rice WG, Turpin JA. Virus-encoded zinc fingers as targets for antiviral chemotherapy
. Med Virol 1996, 6: 187 –199.
6. Tassignon J, Ismaili J, Lemoine A. et al. Azodicarbonamide inhibits T cell responsesin vitroandin vivo.
Nat Med 1999, 5: 947 –950.
7. Mewhinney JA, Ayres PH, Bechtold WE. et al. The fate of inhaled azodicarbonamide in rats.
Fund Appl Toxicol 1987, 8: 372 –381.
8. BG Chemie. Azodicarbonamide
. In Toxicological Evaluations 6. Potential Health Hazards of Existing Chemicals
. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1992: 133 –155.
9. Japour AJ, Mayers DL, Johnson VA. et al. Standardized peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture assay for determination of drug susceptibilities of clinical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993, 37: 1095 –1101.
10. Reynolds JEF (ed.). Phenazopyridine hydrochloride
. Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia
, 29th edn. London: The Pharmaceutical Press; 1989: 35 35.
11. Hirano Y, Mitamura T, Tamura T, Ohara K, Mine Y, Noguchi H. Mechanism of FK506-induced glucose intolerance in rats.
J Toxicol Sci 1994, 19: 61 –65.
12. Ishizuka J, Gugliuzza KK, Wassmuth Z. et al. Effects of FK506 and cyclosporine on dynamic insulin secretion from isolated dog pancreatic islets.
Transplantation 1993, 56: 1486 –1490.
13. EMEA (European Medicines Evaluation Agency). European Public Assessment Report for Cellcept, CPMP/767/95
. London: European Medicines Evaluation Agency; February 1996.
14. Gao W-Y, Shirasaka T, Johns DG, Broder S, Mitsuya H. Differential phosphorylation of azothymidine, dideoxycytidine, and dideoxyinosine in resting and activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells
. J Clin Invest 1993, 91: 2326 –2333.
15. Taylor LD, Binienda Z, Schmued L, Slikker W Jr. The effect of dideoxycytidine on lymphocyte subpopulations in nonhuman primates.
Fund Appl Toxicol 1994, 23: 434 –438.
16. Bofill M, Fairbanks LD, Ruckemann K, Lipman M, Simmonds HA. T-lymphocytes from AIDS patients are unable to synthesize ribonucleotidesde novoin response to mitogenic stimulation
. J Biol Chem 1995, 270: 2969 –2967.
17. Malley SD, Grange JM, Hamedi-Sangsari F, Vila JR. Synergistic anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 effect of hydroxamate compounds with 2',3'-dideoxyinosine in infected resting human lymphocytes.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91: 11017 –11021.
18. Tai AW, Lien EJ, Moore EC, Chun Y, Roberts JD. Studies ofN-hydroxy-N'-aminoguanidine derivatives by nitrogen 15 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and as ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors
. J Med Chem 1983, 26: 1326 –1329.
19. Weckbecker G, Lien EJ, Cory JG. Properties ofN-hydroxy-N'-aminoguanidine derivatives as inhibitors of mammalian ribonucleotide reductase.
Biochem Pharmacol 1988, 37: 529 –534.
20. Allegra CJ, Grem JL. Hydroxyurea
. Antimetabolites in Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology,
5th edn, Ch. 19.6. Edited by DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Philadelphia: Lipincott-Raven; 1997: 448 448.
21. Gao W-Y, Agbaria R, Driscoll JS, Mitsuya H. Divergent anti-human immunodeficiency virus activity and anabolic phosphorylation of 2',3'-dideoxynucleoside analogs in resting and activated human cells.
J Biol Chem 1994, 269: 12633 –12638.
22. Walmsley S, Walach C, Fletcher D et al
. Efficacy of saquinavir in patients with advanced HIV infection.
. Fourth Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections.
Washington DC, January 1997 [abstract 192].
23. Deeks SG, Grant RM, Beatty GW, Horton C, Detmer J, Eastman S. Activity of a ritonavir plus saquinavir-containing regimen in patients with virologic evidence of indinavir or ritonavir failure.
AIDS 1998, 12: F97 –F102.
24. Reiser M, Salzberger B, Stiepel A, Ivette A, Hoetelmans R, Fatkenheuer G. Virological efficacy and drug levels of nelfinavir plus saquinavir as salvage therapy in HIV-infected patients refractory to standard triple therapy
XII International Conference on AIDS. Geneva, June1998 [abstract 22338].
25. Abrams DI, Goldman AI, Launer C. et al. A comparative trial of didanosine or zalcitabine after treatment with zidovudine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.
:The Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS [see comments].
N Engl J Med 1994, 330: 657 –662.
26. Bartlett JA, Benoit SL, Johnson VA. et al. Lamivudine plus zidovudine compared with zalcitabine plus zidovudine in patients with HIV infection.
:A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. North American HIV Working Party.
Ann Intern Med 1996, 125: 161 –172.
27. Biron F, Lucht F, Peyramond D. et al. Anti-HIV activity of the combination of didanosine and hydroxyurea in HIV-1-infected individuals.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1995, 10: 36 –40.
28. Carr A, Vella S, de Jong MD, Sorice F. et al. A controlled trial of nevirapine plus zidovudine versus zidovudine alone in p24 antigenaemic HIV-infected patients.
:The Dutch–Italian–Australian Nevirapine Study Group.
AIDS 1996, 10: 635 –641.
29. Cheeseman SH, Havlir D, McLaughlin MM. et al. Phase I/II evaluation of nevirapine alone and in combination with zidovudine for infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1995, 8: 141 –151.
30. Danner SA, Carr A, Leonard JM. et al. A short-term study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of ritonavir, an inhibitor of HIV-1 protease.
:European–Australian Collaborative Ritonavir Study Group.
N Engl J Med 1995, 333: 1528 –1533.
31. Fischl MA, Richman DD, Hansen N. et al. The safety and efficacy of zidovudine (AZT) in the treatment of subjects with mildly symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) infection.
:A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group [see comments].
Ann Intern Med 1990, 112: 727 –737.
32. Kitchen VS, Skinner C, Ariyoshi K. et al. Safety and activity of saquinavir in HIV infection [see comments].
Lancet 1995, 345: 952 –955.
33. Markowitz M, Saag M, Powderly WG. et al. A preliminary study of ritonavir, an inhibitor of HIV-1 protease, to treat HIV-1 infection.
N Engl J Med 1995, 333: 1534 –1539.
34. Meng TC, Fischl MA, Boota AM. et al. Combination therapy with zidovudine and dideoxycytidine in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection.
:A phase I/II study [see comments].
Ann Intern Med 1992, 116: 13 –20.
35. Pluda JM, Cooley TP, Montaner JS. et al. A phase I/II study of 2′-deoxy-3′-thiacytidine (lamivudine) in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection.
J Infect Dis 1995, 171: 1438 –1447.
36. Rutschmann OT, Kaiser L, Perrin L, Fathi M, Hirschel BJ. Adding saquinavir to stavudine in patients with advanced HIV-1 infection.
AIDS 1997, 11 (4): 548. 548.
37. Skowron G, Bozzette SA, Lim L. et al. Alternating and intermittent regimens of zidovudine and dideoxycytidine in patients with AIDS or AIDS-related complex.
Ann Intern Med 1993, 118: 321 –330.
38. Staszewski S, Miller V, Rehmet S. et al. Virological and immunological analysis of a triple combination pilot study with loviride, lamivudine and zidovudine in HIV-1-infected patients.
AIDS 1996, 10: F1 –F7.
39. Yarchoan R, Perno CF, Thomas RV. et al. Phase I studies of 2',3'-dideoxycytidine in severe human immunodeficiency virus infection as a single agent and alternating with zidovudine (AZT).
Lancet 1988, i: 76 –81.
40. Jablonowski H. Studies of zidovudine in combination with didanosine and zalcitabine.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1995, 10: S52 –S56.
41. Spruance SL, Pavia AT, Peterson D. et al. Didanosine compared with continuation of zidovudine in HIV-infected patients with signs of clinical deterioration while receiving zidovudine.
:A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The Bristol–Myers Squibb AI454-010 Study Group [see comments].
Ann Intern Med 1994, 120: 360 –368.
42. Giacca M, Zanussi S, Comar M. et al. Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with hydroxyurea: virologic and clinical evaluation.
J Infect Dis 1996, 174: 204 –209.
43. Hubriphar study HU/ADA-03 EU.
© 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
44. Greka P, Michaliou S, Kavatha D. et al. Treatment with ziduvodine and lamivudine combination in HIV(+) patients: a preliminary report.
AIDS 1996, 10 (suppl 2): P42. P42.