Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 10, 1999 - Volume 13 - Issue 13 > Cell-associated HIV-1 messenger RNA and DNA in T-helper cell...
AIDS:
Basic Science: Original Papers

Cell-associated HIV-1 messenger RNA and DNA in T-helper cell and monocytes in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected subjects on HAART plus an inactivated HIV-1 immunogen

Patterson, Bruce K.a; Carlo, Dennis J.b; Kaplan, Mark H.d; Marecki, Mariac; Pawha, Savitac; Moss, Ronald B.b

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

From the aNorthwestern University Medical School, Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Chicago, Illinois, the bImmune Response Corporation, Carlsbad, California, the cNorth Shore University Hospital and the dNorth Shore/LIJ Health System, Manhasset, New York, USA.

Correspondence to Dr. Bruce Patterson, Northwestern University, Dept. OB GYN, 333 E. Superior, Room 410, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. Tel: +1 (312) 926-0033; fax: +1 (312) 926-0367; e-mail: bpatters@nmh.org

Received: 9 March 1999; revised: 24 May 1999; accepted: 1 June 1999.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: We examined the effect of an HIV-1-specific immune-based therapy on cell-associated HIV-1 DNA and RNA.

Design: Five HIV-1-infected subjects receiving HIV-1 immunogen plus HAART were compared with three HIV-1-infected subjects who received incomplete Freund‚s adjuvant (IFA) plus HAART.

Methods: Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA or DNA in lymphocytes and monocytes was determined using a dual immunophenotyping/in situ hybridization assay with or without in situ PCR amplification.

Results: Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA in CD4 cells correlated with plasma RNA overall. CD4, HIV-1 gag-pol messenger (m)RNA+ cells decreased in the immunogen plus HAART group compared with the IFA plus HAART group. Decreases in HIV-1 DNA+ CD4 cells were observed in the immunogen plus HAART compared with the IFA plus HAART group. Decreases in HIV-1 gag-pol mRNA+ monocytes were observed in the immunogen plus HAART group compared with the IFA plus HAART group. Consistent with the findings in CD4 cells, decreases in HIV-1 DNA+ monocytes were observed in the immunogen plus HAART group compared with the IFA plus HAART group.

Conclusions: These preliminary observations support the rationale for examining the combination of immune-based therapies and antiretroviral drugs for effective HIV-1 control.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

In a pilot study of a larger 32-week double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial[1], we examined the effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and a HIV-1-specific immune-based therapy compared with HAART alone on peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-associated HIV-1 RNA and DNA in CD4 and CD14 positive cells by ultrasensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization (UFISH) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in situ hybridization (PISH)[2-8]. PISH has been previously used to quantify the number of HIV-1-infected PBMCs [4] and CD4 T cells [6] in antiretroviral-naïve patients. UFISH has been previously used to quantify the number of productively infected monocytes[2], CD8 cord blood cells[3], and CD4, CD45RO T lymphocytes in patients on and off antiretroviral therapy[8]. Using UFISH, our laboratory has determined that adoptively transferred anti-HIV CD8 T cells effectively reduce the number of HIV-infected cells in peripheral blood[7]. This technology also allowed us to show persistent gag-pol expression in T lymphocytes from HIV-infected patients with undetectable viral loads on HAART therapy[8]. Previously, treatment with this HIV-1-specific immune-based therapy (inactivated gp120-depleted HIV-1 antigen in incomplete Freund‚s adjuvant (IFA), HIV-1 immunogen, REMUNE®) had shown an augmentation of HIV-1-specific cell-mediated immune response in subjects with chronic asymptomatic HIV-1 infection[9]. For this pilot study, five protease-inhibitor-naive subjects who received HAART (zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir) plus HIV-1 immunogen were compared with three protease-inhibitor-naive subjects who received HAART plus IFA control.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Materials and methods

Study subjects

Eight HIV-1-seropositive protease-naive individuals enrolled at one clinical site were evaluated using dual immunophenotyping/PCR in situ hybridization for cells containing HIV-1 DNA and dual immunophenotyping/ FISH for cells containing HIV-1 RNA. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment into this study. PBMCs were isolated from fresh anticoagulated blood layered on a Histopaque 1077 (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) discontinuous density gradient and centrifuged at 600 g for 30 min at ambient temperature. The turbid layer was removed, washed twice with three volumes of RPMI and once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Vaccination

HIV-1 immunogen (REMUNE®; Immune Response Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) is composed of an HIV-1 isolate (HZ321) from serum collected from a patient in Zaire in 1976 which has been recently sequenced and classified as clade A envelope and clade G gag[10]. HIV-1 immunogen is obtained by concentration and purification from the supernatant fluid of HZ321-infected Hut-78 cells[11]. In the preparation of the immunogen, envelope gp120 is depleted during freezing, thawing and the purification process. Antigen preparations were viral inactivated through a sequential application of beta-propiolactone (BPL) [12]and 60Co irradiation[13]. For injection, the antigen (10 units) is emulsified in incomplete Freund‚s Adjuvant (IFA) for intramuscular injection. Injections of HIV-1 immunogen or IFA were given at week 4, 16, and 28 weeks in this study. Over 3000 HIV-1-seropositive individuals have participated in trials of the HIV-1 immunogen with the most common side-effect reported being transient local injection site reactions.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Cells and cell lines

The ACH-2 cell line (AIDS Research and Reagent Program, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), containing a single copy of integrated HIV-1 proviral DNA per cell, was harvested at an early passage number and used as the HIV-1-infected cell copy number control. ACH-2 cells were stimulated to produce virus with 0.1 μg/ml TNF-agr; (Sigma).

Back to Top | Article Outline
PCR-driven in situ hybridization

Cell samples were adjusted to a final concentration of 1×106 cells/l. The supernatant was removed and the cell pellet was resuspended in 90μl of PBS and 10μl of biotinylated anti-CD4 or CD14 (PharMingen, San Diego, California, USA). Cells were again centrifuged at 300 to 600 g for 2 min and the cell pellet was washed in PBS and once in 1×PCR buffer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Cells were fixed and permeabilized by the addition of 50μl of Permeafix (Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, New Jersey, USA) at ambient temperature for 60 min. HIV-1 DNA was amplified in situ as previously described[6]. Appropriate positive and negative controls amplified with or without the addition of Taq polymerase were simultaneously run with each sample. Following the last wash, the cells were resuspended in 80μl of PBS and 20μl streptavidin-phycoerythrin (PE) and incubated for 30 min at ambient temperature. The cells were then washed in PBS as described above.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Dual immunophenotyping/in situ hybridization

Duplicate samples of cells (1×106) were labeled with optimized concentrations of phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies specific for the cell types of interest (CD4, CD14) (PharMingen, Inc.) and fixed and permeabilized by the addition of 50 μl of Permeafix (Ortho Diagnostics) per 106 cells at ambient incubation temperature for at least 60 min and up to 18 h. The cells were then washed twice in PBS, pH 7.4 at ambient temperature and once in 2×SSC (0.3M sodium chloride, 0.03M sodium citrate) at ambient temperature. The cells were then resuspended with 50 μl hybridization buffer containing a cocktail of 5-carboxyfluorescein-labeled oligonucleotides specific for HIV gag-pol MRNA (MolPath, Inc., Frankfort, Michigan, USA). The probe was hybridized to target for 30 min at 43ºC in a water bath. The cells were washed for 5 min with 2 × SSC, 0.1% Triton X-100 at 42ºC, and 15 min with 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% Triton X-100 at 42ºC. Multi-parameter analysis of cell surface molecules and HIV RNA was performed on a Coulter XL flow cytometer (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, Florida, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Flow cytometry

In cell analysis of specific cell populations was performed as previously described[2,6]. Plasma viral load was measured by the Hoffman La Roche Ultrasensitive assay (Hoffman La Roche, Nutley, New Jersey, USA).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistics

The 95% confidence intervals are presented for the two treatment groups at baseline and week 32. For comparison at baseline between the groups the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. For analysis of plasma RNA between the groups of plasma RNA at week 32, as all subjects reached the lower limit, means were calculated and a one-sample t test was performed (Ho: μ=40). Spearman rank correlation was performed to examine associations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Effects of immunogen on plasma viral load and CD4 cell counts

To determine the effects of immunogen on routine parameters of HIV-1 disease progression, we performed CD4 cell counts and plasma viral load by quantitative RNA (data not shown). Subjects in both arms of the study had similar CD4 cell counts and plasma viral load at baseline (day 1). HAART suppressed plasma viral load in both the immunogen plus HAART group (P = 0.03) and IFA plus HAART groups (P = 0.13).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Effects of immunogen on HIV-1-infected lymphocytes

To determine the effects of immunogen on productive HIV-1 infection in lymphocytes, we simultaneously labeled lymphocytes with CD4 and detected gag-pol messenger (m)RNA with ultrasensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization[2,7,8]. Using flow cytometry, lymphocytes were analyzed on the basis of light scatter characteristics and CD4 staining including in the scatter gates large, atypical lymphocytes previously determined to be the morphology of infected lymphocytes[8]. Cell-associated RNA in CD4 cells correlated with plasma RNA overall (r=0.66, P=0.008). There was no significant difference in CD4 cells expressing HIV-1 RNA between the two groups at baseline (day 1, P > 0.05). Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA in CD4 cells decreased in the immunogen plus HAART group (P < 0.01; baseline 95% confidence interval (CI) =-1.1 to 5.2; week 32 95% CI=0.05 to 0.27) compared with the IFA plus HAART group (P=0.2; baseline 95% CI=-1.1 to 7.5; week 32 95% CI=0.78 to 2.7) as shown in Fig. 1a. Cell-associated HIV-1 DNA tended to decrease in CD4 cells in the immunogen plus HAART group (P=0.15; baseline 95% CI=-7.4 to 43.6; week 32 95% CI= 0.53 to 12.2) but not in the IFA plus HAART group (P=1.0; baseline 95% CI=2.8 to 11.4, week 32 95% CI=4.5 to 9.5) as shown in Fig. 1b.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Effects of immunogen on HIV-1-infected monocytes

We have previously described productive infection of monocytes in patients that were infected by HIV-1[2]. To determine the effects of immunogen plus HAART on productively infected monocytes, we stained peripheral blood monocytes with CD14 and detected gag-pol mRNA as described. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of CD14 HIV-1 RNA positive at baseline (P=0.4, day 1). HIV-1 gag-pol mRNA+ monocytes tended to decrease in the immunogen plus HAART group (P=0.15; baseline 95% CI=2.5 to 89.9, week 32 95% CI=-0.6 to 25) but not in the IFA plus HAART group (P=0.7; baseline 95% CI=-10.9 to 45.7, week 32 95% CI=2.9 to 19.4) as shown in Fig. 2a. There was a difference at baseline in the number of CD14 positive cells expressing HIV-1 DNA with lower numbers of cells in the IFA plus HAART group (P=0.04). Decreases in HIV-1 DNA in monocytes approached statistical significance in the immunogen plus HAART group (P=0.095; baseline 95% CI=-12.3 to 71.9, week 32 95% CI=3.3 to 17.9) but not in the IFA plus HAART group (P=0.4; baseline 95% CI=-2.5 to 12.7, week 32 95% CI=0.27 to 13.7) as shown inFig. 2b.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Highly active antiretroviral therapy has been effective in lowering plasma viral load to undetectable levels in patients are infected by HIV-1[14]. Several studies indicate, however, that cellular reservoirs of HIV-1 exist following long-term therapy with HAART[15-18]. Previously, we showed that despite undetectable plasma viral load, cells containing HIV-1 DNA remained in tonsil biopsies following 24 weeks of HAART[15]. These studies emphasized the need for therapies not only directed at decreasing viral production in cells but also eliminating cells containing HIV-1 DNA that can cause virus rebound following a treatment failure.

In the present study, we have shown that HIV-1-specific immune-based therapy in combination with HAART lowers plasma viral load levels. HIV-1-specific immune-based therapy plus HAART, however, was observed to be more effective than IFA plus HAART in reducing the number of productively HIV-1-infected cells. This effect mimics the results seen in another recent study from our laboratory determining the effects of combined HAART and HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte infusions[7].

The effects observed in the present study were most pronounced in lymphocytes, but are also seen in monocytes. Immunogen plus HAART also tended to be more effective than IFA plus HAART in eliminating reservoirs of cells containing HIV-1 DNA. Taken together, these data indicate that the combination of an immune-based therapy with highly active antiretroviral therapy may decrease both viral production from cells that are infected by HIV-1 and the number of cells containing HIV-1. These two activities are essential for any chance of viral eradication. This preliminary observation supports further study with more patients to examine the effects of immune-based therapies and HAART on the reservoirs of viral burden in HIV-1 infection.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of G. Theofan in the monitoring of this study and M. Harden for manuscript preparation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Balter M, Cohen J. AIDS Research: International AIDS meeting injects a dose of realism. Science 1998, 281:159-160.

2. Patterson BK, Mosiman VL, Canterero L, Furtado M, Bhattacharya M, Goolsby C. Detection of HIV-RNA-positive monocytes in peripheral blood of HIV-positive patients by simultaneous flow cytometric analysis of intracellular HIV RNA and cellular immunophenotype. Cytometry 1998, 31:265-274.

3. Yang L-P, Riley JL, Carroll RG, et al. Productive infection of neonatal CD8+ T lymphocytes by HIV-1. J Exp Med 1998, 187:1139-1144.

4. Patterson BK, Till M, Otto P, et al. Detection of HIV-1 DNA and messenger RNA in individual cells by PCR-driven in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. Science 1993, 260:976-979.

5. Re MC, Furlini G, Gibellini D, et al. Quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected mononuclear cells in peripheral blood of seropositive subjects by newly developed flow cytometric analysis of the product of an in situ PCR assay. J Clin Micro 1994, 32:2152-2157.

6. Patterson BK, Goolsby C, Hodara V, Otto P, Lohman K, Wolinsky SM. Flow cytometric detection of CD4+ cells harboring human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) DNA by dual immunophenotyping and PCR-driven in situ hybridization: Evidence of epitope masking of the CD4 cell surface molecule in vivo. J Virol 1995, 69:4316-4322.

7. Brodie SJ, Lewinson DA, Patterson BK, et al. In vivo migration and function of transferred HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T cells. Nature Med 1999, 5:34-41.

8. Patterson BK, Czerniewski MA, Pottage J, Agnoli M, Kessler H, Landay A. Monitoring HIV therapy in immune cell subsets using ultrasensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization. Lancet 1999, 353:211-212.

9. Moss RB, Giermakowska WK, Savary JR, et al. A primer on HIV type 1-specific immune function and Remune®. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 1998, 14(suppl 2):S167-S175.

10. Choi DJ, Dube S, Slade HB, Spicer TP, Jensen FC, Poiesz BJ. Seqeunce Note: HIV type 1 isolate Z321, the strain used to make a therapuetic HIV type 1 immunogen, is intersubtype recombinant. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 1997, 13:357-361.

11. Getchell JP, Hicks DR, Srinivasan A, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus isolated from a serum sample collected in 1976 in Central Africa. J Infect Dis 1987, 156:833-837.

12. LoGrippo GA. Investigations of the use of beta-propiolactone in viral inactivation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1960 83:578-594.

13. Kitchen AD, Mann GF, Harrison JF, Zuckerman AJ. Effect of gamma irradiation on the human immunodeficiency virus and human coagulation proteins. Vox Sang 1989, 56:223-229.

14. Hammer SM, Squires KE, Hughes MD, et al. A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. N Engl J Med 1997, 337: 725-733.

15. Andersson J, Fehniger TE, Patterson BK, et al. Early reduction of immune activation in lymphoid tissue following highly active HIV therapy. AIDS 1998, 12: F123-F129.

16. Chun TW, Stuyver L, Mizell SB, et al. Presence of an inducible HIV-1 latent reservoir during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Proc Natl Acad. Sci 1997, 94: 13193-13197.

17. Finzi D, Hermankova M, Pierson T, et al. Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Science 1997, 278:1295-1300.

18. Wong JK, Hezareh M, Gunthard HF, et al. Recovery of replication-competent HIV despite prolonged suppression of plasma viremia. Science 1997, 278:1291-1295.

Keywords:

CD4; CD14; flow cytometry; HIV-1 viral load; in situ hybridization

© 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.