Share this article on:

Adverse events associated with nevirapine and efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shubber, Zaraa; Calmy, Alexandrab,c; Andrieux-Meyer, Isabellec; Vitoria, Marcod; Renaud-Théry, Françoised; Shaffer, Nathand; Hargreaves, Sallye; Mills, Edward J.f; Ford, Nathanc

doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835f1db0
Clinical Science

Introduction: Since 2002, the WHO has recommended either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy. These two drugs are known to have differing toxicity profiles, but the risk of these toxicities overall is not well established.

Methods: We systematically reviewed adverse events among treatment-naive HIV-positive adults and children receiving either NVP or EFV as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy. The primary outcome was drug discontinuation as a result of any adverse event; specific toxicities were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated and proportions and odds ratios (ORs) pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis.

Results: We reviewed data on 26 446 adults and 3975 children from eight randomized trials and 26 prospective cohorts. Overall, adults on NVP were more than two times more likely to discontinue treatment due to any adverse event compared to patients on EFV (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.9–2.6). Severe hepatotoxicity (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.5–4.2), severe skin toxicity (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.5–5.4), and severe hypersensitivity reactions (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9–2.9) were more likely to occur among patients on NVP. Patients receiving EFV were more likely to experience severe central nervous system events (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.1–5.4). Similar associations were seen in children.

Discussion: Compared to NVP, EFV is associated with a lower frequency of severe adverse events, in particular treatment discontinuations. This finding supports a move toward EFV-based therapy as the preferred first-line treatment regimen for HIV treatment within a public health approach.

aDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK

bHIV/AIDS Unit, Infectious Disease Service, Geneva University Hospital

cMédecins Sans Frontières, Geneva

dDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

eThe International Health Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK

fFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Nathan Ford, Médecins Sans Frontières, 78 rue de Lausanne, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: nathan.ford@msf.org

Received 9 October, 2012

Revised 10 January, 2013

Accepted 17 January, 2013

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (http://www.AIDSonline.com).

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.