Advances in Nursing Science

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > October/December 2008 - Volume 31 - Issue 4 > Concept Analysis of Symptom Disclosure in the Context of Can...
Advances in Nursing Science:
October/December 2008 - Volume 31 - Issue 4 - p 332-341
doi: 10.1097/01.ANS.0000341413.09801.7a
Original Article

Concept Analysis of Symptom Disclosure in the Context of Cancer

Sun, Yiyuan DNSc, RN; Knobf, M. Tish PhD, RN, FAAN, AOCN

Erratum

Erratum

Concept Analysis of Symptom Disclosure in the Context of Cancer: Erratum

In the article that appeared on page 332 of the October-December 2008 issue, the corresponding author is address was listed incorrectly. It should appear as Yiyuan Sun, DNSc, RN, Assistant Professor, Adelphi University School of Nursing, 1 South Avenue, Garden City, NY 11530-0701. This error has been noted in the online version of the article, which is available at www.advancesinnursingscience.com.

Advances in Nursing Science. 32(2):157, April/June 2009.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Although symptoms suggestive of cancer are the most common reason that people seek healthcare, the process undertaken to disclose the symptoms is unclear. The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the concept of symptom disclosure in the context of cancer. Rodgers' evolutionary approach was applied to analyze the concept of symptom disclosure. Concept analysis indicates that symptom disclosure is a decision-making process in which a person chooses to tell significant others and a healthcare provider about self-identified symptoms. Characteristics of the concept include symptom interpretation, weighing the risks and benefits of disclosure, and taking action. Influencing factors are knowledge, cancer risk perception, personal or family history of cancer, socioeconomic and cultural factors, and access to care. The concept analysis of symptom disclosure provides guidance for developing strategies to promote healthcare-seeking behavior in practice and suggest areas for future research.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.