Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2006 - Volume 38 - Issue 7 > Androgenic Responses to Resistance Exercise: Effects of Feed...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
July 2006 - Volume 38 - Issue 7 - pp 1288-1296
doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000227314.85728.35
BASIC SCIENCES: Original Investigations

Androgenic Responses to Resistance Exercise: Effects of Feeding and L-Carnitine

KRAEMER, WILLIAM J.; SPIERING, BARRY A.; VOLEK, JEFF S.; RATAMESS, NICHOLAS A.; SHARMAN, MATTHEW J.; RUBIN, MARTYN R.; FRENCH, DUNCAN N.; SILVESTRE, RICARDO; HATFIELD, DISA L.; VAN HEEST, JACI L.; VINGREN, JAKOB L.; JUDELSON, DANIEL A.; DESCHENES, MICHAEL R.; MARESH, CARL M.

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of 3 wk of L-carnitine L-tartrate (LCLT) supplementation and post-resistance-exercise (RE) feeding on hormonal and androgen receptor (AR) responses.

Methods: Ten resistance-trained men (mean ± SD: age, 22 ± 1 yr; mass, 86.3 ± 15.3 kg; height, 181 ± 11 cm) supplemented with LCLT (equivalent to 2 g of L-carnitine per day) or placebo (PL) for 21 d, provided muscle biopsies for AR determinations, then performed two RE protocols: one followed by water intake, and one followed by feeding (8 kcal·kg-1 body mass, consisting of 56% carbohydrate, 16% protein, and 28% fat). RE protocols were randomized and included serial blood draws and a 1-h post-RE biopsy. After a 7-d washout period, subjects crossed over, and all experimental procedures were repeated.

Results: LCLT supplementation upregulated (P < 0.05) preexercise AR content compared with PL (12.9 ± 5.9 vs 11.2 ± 4.0 au, respectively). RE increased (P < 0.05) AR content compared with pre-RE values in the PL trial only. Post-RE feeding significantly increased AR content compared with baseline and water trials for both LCLT and PL. Serum total testosterone concentrations were suppressed (P < 0.05) during feeding trials with respect to corresponding water and pre-RE values. Luteinizing hormone demonstrated subtle, yet significant changes in response to feeding and LCLT.

Conclusion: In summary, these data demonstrated that: 1) feeding after RE increased AR content, which may result in increased testosterone uptake, and thus enhanced luteinizing hormone secretion via feedback mechanisms; and 2) LCLT supplementation upregulated AR content, which may promote recovery from RE.

©2006The American College of Sports Medicine

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.