Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 1999 - Volume 31 - Issue 8 > Left ventricular function during interval and steady state e...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
August 1999 - Volume 31 - Issue 8 - pp 1157-1162
Basic Sciences: Original Investigations

Left ventricular function during interval and steady state exercise

FOSTER, CARL; MEYER, KATHARINA; GEORGAKOPOULOS, NIKOLAOS; ELLESTAD, AMY J.; FITZGERALD, DANI J.; TILMAN, KEN; WEINSTEIN, HOWARD; YOUNG, HEIDI; ROSKAMM, HELMUT

Collapse Box

Abstract

Left ventricular function during interval and steady state exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1157-1162, 1999.

Purpose: Interval training (INT) is a commonly used method of exercise training in both athletic and clinical populations. Although we generally understand left ventricular (LV) function during steady state (SS) exercise, there are no data regarding LV function during INT.

Methods: We studied eight healthy, physically active volunteers during upright cycle ergometry during 15 min of both SS and INT, at the same average power output (90% individual anaerobic threshold), using first pass radionuclide ventriculography. During INT (60s/60s), measures of LV function were made during work (220 W) after 4 and 12 min and during recovery (120 W) after 7 and 15 min. These were compared with the average of four temporally matched measures made during SS (170 W).

Results: During INT, LV ejection fraction increased from rest (67 ± 6%) to 77 ± 5, 80 ± 5, 77 ± 5 and 79 ± 4% after 4, 7, 12, and 15 min, respectively. During SS, LV ejection fraction was not significantly different at rest (70 ± 4%) or during exercise (76 ± 4, 79 ± 4, 80 ± 3, and 81 ± 3%) after 4, 7, 12, and 15 min, respectively. Other measures of LV function (HR, BP, LV volumes, cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, peak emptying, and filling rates) were likewise similar during temporally matched measurements during INT and SS.

Conclusions: Although there were the expected transitions of ejection fraction with work and recovery, the overall hemodynamic picture during INT was very similar to SS. These data suggest that LV function during INT is not substantially different to that during SS.

© 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.