Longitudinal Sex Differences during Landing in Knee Abduction in Young Athletes


Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181dc99b1
Applied Sciences

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine whether biomechanical and neuromuscular risk factors related to abnormal movement patterns increased in females, but not males, during the adolescent growth spurt.

Methods: A total of 315 subjects participated in two testing sessions approximately 1 yr apart. Male and female subjects were classified on the basis of their maturation status as pubertal or postpubertal. Three trials of a drop vertical jump (DVJ) were collected. Maximum knee abduction angle and external moments were calculated during the DVJ deceleration phase using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Changes in knee abduction from the first to second year were compared among four subject groups (female pubertal, female postpubertal, male pubertal, and male postpubertal).

Results: There were no sex differences in peak knee abduction angle or moment during DVJ between pubertal males and females (P > 0.05). However, pubertal females increased peak abduction angle from first to second year (P < 0.001), whereas males demonstrated no similar change (P = 0.90) in the matched developmental stages. After puberty, the peak abduction angle and moment were greater in females relative to males (angle: female −9.3° ± 5.7°, male −3.6° ± 4.6°, P < 0.001; moment: female −21.9 ± 13.5 N·m, male −13.0 ± 12.0 N·m, P = 0.017).

Conclusions: This study identified, through longitudinal analyses, that knee abduction angle was significantly increased in pubertal females during rapid adolescent growth, whereas males showed no similar change. In addition, knee abduction motion and moments were significantly greater for the subsequent year in young female athletes, after rapid adolescent growth, compared with males. The combination of longitudinal, sex, and maturational group differences indicates that early puberty seems to be a critical phase related to the divergence of increased anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factors.

Author Information

1Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center and Human Performance Laboratory, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; 2Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; 3Department of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; 4Graduate Program in Athletic Training, Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, Provo, UT; 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, Orthopaedic Research Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; and 6Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Bioengineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Address for correspondence: Kevin R. Ford, Ph.D., FACSM, Cincinnati Children'sHospital, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 10001, Cincinnati, OH 45229; E-mail: kevin.ford@cchmc.org

Submitted for publication October 2009.

Accepted for publication March 2010.

Article Outline

Biomechanical and neuromuscular risk factors may be critical components of the mechanisms that underlie the higher rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female compared with male athletes. Specifically, altered movement patterns such as knee abduction (valgus) may relate to an increased ACL injury risk (18). Several studies have shown increased knee abduction motion and load in females compared with males during a variety of landing and pivoting movements (7,12-14,16,17,22,27). Similar lower extremity abduction postures have been reported in females at the time of injury (24,30). In addition, a prospective combined biomechanical-epidemiologic study showed that knee abduction moments (valgus torques) and angles were significant predictors of future ACL injury risk. Knee abduction moments predicted ACL injury risk with 73% sensitivity and 78% specificity (18). Knee abduction angles were 8° greater in the ACL-injured groups than the uninjured groups. It is therefore likely that the increases in knee abduction moment and motion in the injured group were a significant risk factor that may have predisposed these athletes to ACL injury.

The onset of these neuromuscular risk factors may coincide with rapid adolescent growth that results in the divergence of a multitude of biomechanical and neuromuscular parameters between sexes. There is little if any evidence that demonstrates a sex difference in ACL injury rates in prepubescent athletes, which is in direct contrast to injury rates in adolescent and adult populations (1). Although ACL injuries increase with age in both males and females, females have higher rates immediately after the growth spurt (37). After an adolescent growth spurt, increased body mass and height of the center of mass may lead to altered movement patterns (17). Musculoskeletal growth during puberty, in the absence of corresponding neuromuscular adaptation, may facilitate the development of certain intrinsic risk factors (17). These intrinsic risk factors, if not addressed at the proper period, may continue through adolescence into maturity and predispose athletes to ACL injuries. The differences in neuromuscular performance between the sexes during and after puberty may contribute to altered biomechanics and resultant forces on the knee. These excessive knee loads, especially in the frontal plane, may explain the increased risk of ACL injury in females after puberty and may help identify the optimal time to implement injury prevention programs. Therefore, the timing of adolescent growth may be the critical phase of growth and development related to sex differences in ACL injury risk. However, the effects of rapid growth and development in females on ACL risk factors are currently unknown.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether neuromuscular risk factors related to abnormal movement patterns increase in females, but not males, during the adolescent growth spurt. The hypothesis was that during adolescent growth, pubertal females would demonstrate longitudinal increases in knee abduction moments and motion compared with pubertal males. In addition, we hypothesized that after the adolescent growth spurt, postpubertal females would have significantly greater knee abduction moments and motion than postpubertal males.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Back to Top | Article Outline

A nested cohort design (total sample female n = 709; total sample male n = 250) was used to identify 401 subjects who had consecutive test sessions approximately 1 yr apart. The final study population consisted of 315 pubertal and postpubertal subjects (prepubertal subjects were excluded). The maturational status, either pubertal (n = 182) or postpubertal (n = 133), was based on the modified Pubertal Maturational Observational Scale (PMOS) (9,32). The modified PMOS incorporates both parental questionnaires and investigator observations to classify subjects into the pubertal categories. The PMOS has shown high reliability and can be used to differentiate between pubertal stages (9,17,31). The maturation observation checklist specifically included items related to acne, recent growth spurt, sweating after physical activities, evidence of muscular development, and darkened underarm hair (or shaves). Female-specific criteria consisted of menarche, breast development, and darkened leg hair (or shaves), whereas male criteria were evidence of facial hair (or shaves) and deepening voice (or currently breaking). If subjects scored ≤1 on the checklist, they were excluded from the current study. If subjects scored 2-5 in either the first or the second year of testing, they were operationally categorized as pubertal. Subjects classified as postpubertal (at least six characteristics) had to meet the postpubertal criteria on the first year of testing. The subjects in this study involved one school district with a matched school for male and female athletics to control for potential differences in sport exposure and level of play. The level of sports play was similar across the male and female teams (i.e., varsity, junior varsity, etc.).

Height was measured with a stadiometer with the subject standing with bare feet. Body mass was measured on a calibrated physician scale. Detailed demographics of both male and female subjects are included in Table 1. Each subject participated in the first testing session immediately before his/her basketball or soccer season. Approximately 1 yr after the initial testing session (mean 365.7 ± 14.7 d), the subjects were retested using the same methods. Subjects were excluded from this study if they had previous history of knee or ankle surgery. Regression equations were used to estimate adult stature for female and males (23).

The data collection procedures were approved by Cincinnati Children's Hospital Institutional Review Board. Each parent or guardian reviewed and signed the institutional review board-approved written informed consent to participate form before data collection. Child assent was also obtained from each subject before study participation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Each subject was instrumented with 37 retroreflective markers placed bilaterally on the shoulder, elbow, wrist, anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), greater trochanter, thigh, medial and lateral knee, tibial tubercle, shank, distal shank, medial and lateral ankle, heel, dorsal surface of the midfoot, lateral foot (fifth metatarsal), and toe (between second and third metatarsals) in addition to the sacrum, left posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), and sternum. A static trial was measured in which the subject was instructed to stand still in the anatomical position with foot placement standardized. This static measurement was used as each subject's neutral (zero) alignment. Each subject performed three trials of the drop vertical jump (DVJ). The DVJ consisted of the subjects starting on top of a 31-cm box with their feet positioned 35 cm apart and arms held comfortably at their sides. They were instructed to drop directly down off the box and immediately perform a maximum vertical jump, raising both arms as if they were jumping for a basketball rebound (12).

Trials were collected with EVaRT (Version 4; Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA) using a motion analysis system consisting of eight digital cameras (Eagle cameras; Motion Analysis Corporation) positioned in the laboratory and sampled at 240 Hz. Before data collection, the motion analysis system was calibrated with a two-step process, first using a static calibration frame to orient the cameras with respect to the laboratory coordinate system and second using dynamic wand data to fine-tune camera positions, calculate the lens distortion maps, and calculate the lens focal length. Two force platforms (AMTI, Watertown, MA) were sampled at 1200 Hz and time-synchronized with the motion analysis system. The force platforms were embedded into the floor and positioned 8 cm apart so that each foot would contact a different platform during the stance phase of the DVJ.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Data analysis.

After data collection, three-dimensional marker trajectories were examined for accurate marker identification within EVaRT (Version 4; Motion Analysis Corporation) and exported to a C3D formatted file. The C3D files were then further analyzed in Visual3D (Version 4.0; Inc., Germantown, MD). The procedures within Visual3D first consisted of the development of a static model customized for each subject. The model's coordinate system convention was +X toward the subject's right (medial-lateral), +Y forward (posterior-anterior), and +Z up (distal-proximal).

The pelvis, thigh, shank, and foot segments were generated on the basis of reflective markers from the static trial. Pelvis proximal joint center was assumed to be located at 50% of the distance between left and right ASIS markers (mid-ASIS) (X direction) and 50% of the distance from marker on the sacrum to the mid-ASIS (Y direction). The sacrum, right ASIS, and left ASIS markers were used as tracking markers for the pelvis segment. The hip joint center was aligned in the anterior direction (Y) with the greater trochanter marker. The hip joint center in the Y direction was positioned medially from the ASIS 14% of the inter-ASIS distance (2). In the Z direction, the hip joint center was located distally from the ASIS 30% of the inter-ASIS distance (2). Tracking markers for the thigh segment were placed on the greater trochanter, middle of the thigh and lateral knee. The knee and ankle joint centers were positioned 50% of the distance between the medial and lateral knee and ankle markers, respectively. Markers placed on the tibial tubercle and middle and distal portions of the shank were used as tracking markers for the shank. The foot segment tracking markers were the heel, instep, lateral foot, and toe.

Segment lengths were estimated as the distance between the proximal and distal joint centers (e.g., thigh segment distance was equal to the distance between the hip joint center and the knee joint center). The subjects were positioned for the static trial in a standardized position to align the global coordinate system with each segment coordinate system. The pelvis coordinate system was considered aligned with the global laboratory. The Z axis for thigh segment coordinate system was calculated as the unit vector from the hip to the knee joint center. The Y axis was then defined as the unit vector perpendicular to the Z axis and the anatomical plane formed based on the hip and knee joint centers and laboratory-projected lateral hip marker. The X axis was orthogonal to the Y and Z axes on the basis of the right-hand rule. The local shank segment coordinate system Z axis was the unit vector from the knee to the ankle joint center. The unit vector perpendicular to the shank Z axis and frontal plane (knee and ankle joint centers and laboratory-projected lateral knee marker) formed the shank Y axis. The shank X axis was then defined orthogonal to the Y and Z axes. The foot local Y axis was calculated as the unit vector from the ankle joint center to the toe. The local Z axis was then defined as perpendicular to the Y axis and plane formed on the basis of the projected lateral ankle marker and toe and ankle center. The mass and inertial properties for each segment were based on sex-specific parameters from de Leva (10). The subject's height and body mass were included in each model.

Custom MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA) code was used to process each subject through the Visual3D pipeline. The code generated a text file that the Visual3D pipeline engine could read and process the subject-specific model and kinematic and kinetic analyses. Three-dimensional marker trajectories from each trial were filtered at a cutoff frequency of 12 Hz (low-pass fourth-order Butterworth filter) determined on the basis of residual analysis techniques. Three-dimensional knee joint angles were calculated according to a Cardan rotation sequence (i.e., flexion/extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation). Kinematic data were combined with force data to calculate knee joint moments using inverse dynamics. The ground reaction force was filtered through a low-pass fourth-order Butterworth filter at a cutoff frequency of 12 Hz to minimize possible impact peak errors (6). Net external knee moments are described in this article, and they represent the external load on the joint. Knee abduction angle and knee external abduction moment are represented as negative values on the basis of the analysis convention. Knee abduction moment was analyzed unnormalized (N·m) as well as normalized to body mass (N·m·kg−1), height (N·m·m−1), and body mass × height (N·m·kg−1·m−1). The kinematic and kinetic data were exported to MATLAB (mat file), and the peak knee abduction angle and moment (negative) were calculated during the deceleration phase of the DVJ stance phase (ground contact). Data from initial contact (vertical ground reaction force first exceeded 10 N) to toe-off (vertical ground reaction force dropped below 10 N) were operationally defined as the stance phase. The deceleration phase was defined as being from initial contact to the lowest vertical position of the body center of mass during the stance phase. The right side data were used for statistical analysis.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analysis.

Two between-group independent variables of sex (female and male) and maturation level (pubertal and postpubertal) in addition to the within-subject independent variable (repeated-measure) of two-consecutive-year screening sessions were used in the statistical design. The dependent variables were peak knee abduction angle and moment. A 2 × 2 × 2 ANOVA (maturation, sex, and session) was used to test each hypothesis. It is important to clarify that longitudinal analyses were used for the within-group comparison of the change from the first to the second year of testing, whereas cross-sectional comparisons were made between maturational levels. Post hoc analyses with simple mean comparisons (t-test) were used if significant interactions were observed between factors. An α ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Analyses were conducted using SPSS v16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Back to Top | Article Outline
Stature change.

Percent of adult stature was estimated to present a related measure of somatic maturation. The percent of adult stature in pubertal subjects (female: year 1 = 87.8% ± 3.4% and year 2 = 91.8% ± 2.7%; male: year 1 = 87.7% ± 4.5% and year 2 = 91.7% ± 3.9%) and postpubertal subjects (female: year 1 = 94.7% ± 3.4% and year 2 = 96.9% ± 3.0%; male: year 1 = 96.7% ± 2.3% and year 2 = 98.4% ± 1.5%) was similar (P = 0.3) between sexes. The within-subject change in stature in the pubertal group was 4.8 ± 2.4 cm in females and 6.6 ± 2.8 cm in males (within subject, P < 0.001). The increase in stature from first to second year was <2 cm in postpubertal subjects (postpubertal female 0.8 ± 1.5 cm and postpubertal male 1.6 ± 2.2 cm; within subject, P > 0.05). The percentage change in height was significantly greater in pubertal but not postpubertal athletes (P < 0.001; Table 1). The average increase in height was 3.3% ± 1.7% for pubertal subjects compared with 0.5 ± 0.9% for postpubertal subjects.

The changes from year 1 to year 2 in subject height measured with a standard stadiometer were compared with yearly changes in length of the segments calculated from the motion analysis system (summed tibia, femur, and trunk). The average difference in stature of 3.4 ± 3.1 cm over all subjects measured with the stadiometer was not different compared with 3.2 ± 2.8 cm for the change in summed segment length (P > 0.05). Figure 1 shows the agreement between the change in length measured with the stadiometer and segment motion analysis. The two measures demonstrated high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(3,1) = 0.83).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Knee abduction angle.

Mean knee flexion and abduction angle during the DVJ stance phase are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. There was a significant three-way interaction with peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.029). Post hoc analysis identified, within the pubertal group, a significant longitudinal increase in peak abduction angle in females (P < 0.001) with no change in males (P = 0.90). Table 2 shows the longitudinal increase in knee abduction angle during 1 yr of adolescent growth in pubertal females compared with pubertal males.

Within this cohort of postpubertal athletes, females and males did not show significant longitudinal changes (P > 0.05) in peak knee abduction angle (Table 2). However, postpubertal females had significantly greater overall peak abduction angle after adolescent growth compared with males (female −9.3° ± 5.7° and male −3.6° ± 4.6°, P < 0.001).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Knee abduction moment.

Figure 4 details the mean knee abduction moment for maturation and sex groups during each year. There was a significant main effect of year (P < 0.001) indicative of longitudinal increases in peak knee abduction moment in the subjects overall. A two-way interaction between sex and maturation group was identified (P = 0.013). Post hoc analysis indicated that postpubertal females had significantly greater peak knee abduction moment compared with postpubertal males (female −21.9 ± 13.5 N·m and male −13.0 ± 12.0 N·m, P = 0.017). Sex differences in knee abduction moment were not found in pubertal subjects (P > 0.05).

Similar findings were observed when knee abduction moment was normalized to body mass (main effect of year, P = 0.001), height (main effect of year, P < 0.001), and body mass × height (main effect of year, P = 0.005; Table 3). Regardless of how the moment was normalized, there were within-subject increases in the magnitude of knee abduction moment from the first to the second year of testing. In addition, a two-way interaction between sex and maturation group was consistent with the unnormalized moment analysis (P = 0.016). Post hoc analysis indicated that postpubertal females landed with significantly greater, approximately double, body mass-normalized (female −0.37 ± 0.22 N·m·kg−1 and male −0.18 ± 0.16 N·m·kg−1, P = 0.002), height-normalized (female −13.2 ± 8.0 N·m·m−1 and male −7.1 ± 6.6 N·m·m−1, P = 0.006), and body mass × height-normalized (female −0.22 ± 0.14 N·m·kg−1·m−1 and male −0.10 ± 0.09 N·m·kg−1·m−1, P = 0.001) knee abduction moment. Sex differences in normalized knee abduction moment were not found in pubertal subjects (P > 0.05).

Back to Top | Article Outline


The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a neuromuscular risk factor related to abnormal movement patterns increase in females, but not males, during the adolescent growth spurt. The pubertal group of male and female athletes showed an increase in stature that indicated they were going through rapid adolescent growth compared with the postpubertal group. Knee abduction angle was not changed in postpubertal females from the first to the second year testing session. However, the postpubertal females exhibited a significantly greater knee abduction angle than postpubertal males.

The findings from the current study support the first hypothesis that, through longitudinal analyses, pubertal female athletes increased peak knee abduction angle during a year of rapid adolescent growth. These combined results have not been previously identified and are likely important consequences of maturation that increase risk of injury after puberty. The pubertal group was estimated at approximately 88%-92% of adult stature during the first and second year of testing, respectively. These percent adult stature values indicate that the male and female subjects were at similar stages of somatic growth. Peak height velocity (greatest increase in height during adolescence) occurs at approximately 91% of adult stature in both males and females, with the onset of the adolescent growth spurt near 81%-84% (36). Therefore, this further supports that the pubertal group seemed to be within the phase of rapid growth.

Both male and female athletes had increased knee abduction moments from the first to the second testing session. The within-subject increases in moments were consistent regardless of the normalization method (body mass, height, or body mass × height). The increases in knee abduction, a potentially modifiable risk factor, may coincide with the increased risk of ACL injury in female athletes compared with males (17). Whereas several studies have demonstrated that females land with greater knee abduction angles, the current study identifies, through longitudinal measures, a possible relationship between maturational group and increases in ACL injury risk factors. The combination of increased motion and torque in female athletes may predispose them to increased risk of injury as they develop and mature (17,18).

Cross-sectional differences in knee abduction angle among maturational groups have been previously reported (17). Similar to our current study, Hewett et al. (17) found significant differences in knee abduction angle in postpubertal but not pubertal athletes. The postpubertal females also had a significantly greater knee abduction angle than pubertal females (17). In addition, a recent study showed similar results, with maturing females exhibiting greater knee valgus posture during DVJ (33). Schmitz et al. (33) found in a cross-sectional study that females classified as Tanner stage 1 or 2 had less knee valgus posture compared with females classified as Tanner stage 4 or 5. The measure of knee valgus in the study of Schmitz et al. (33) incorporated a two-dimensional frontal plane angle calculated from digital video. Although this single-plane measure may involve confounding additional rotations of the hip, knee, and ankle, these authors did find similar results on the basis of maturation within female subjects. In the current study, we chose to examine pubertal compared with postpubertal athletes with the hypothesis that increased knee abduction would be observed during puberty in females but not in males. Yu et al. (39) investigated the effects of age and sex on lower extremity movement in male and female soccer players between 11 and 16 yr as they performed a stop-jump task. They found that knee abduction angle was greater in female subjects who were older compared with the younger subjects (39).

Within-subject increases in knee abduction motion and moments are of particular concern given previous cadaveric and modeling work that have linked these measures to increased ACL strain (5,11,20,26,35,38). In a recent cadaveric study, Withrow et al. (38) simulated landings in 10 specimens with knee abduction angles at 15° and 0° (neutral). The impact with the knee in abduction led to a primary abduction (valgus) moment that increased ACL strain compared with the neutral landings. Shin et al. (35) used a similar single-leg landing impact that resulted in a knee abduction (valgus) moment to a three-dimensional dynamic knee model and found a 35% increase in ACL strain compared with a "neutral lander" (zero knee abduction moment). On the basis of incremental increase of the knee abduction moment, these authors showed that peak ACL strain increased rapidly between approximately 20 and 50 N·m (35). Although direct comparisons are difficult between modeling and in vivo data, postpubertal females (21.9 N·m) were within the steepest region of ACL strain curve (35), which indicates that slight increases in abduction moments would result in large increases in ligament strain. It is important to point out that all the knee loading conditions in this study were noninjurious (i.e., no injuries occurred during DVJ testing). However, it is likely that repeatedly performing a task with increased knee abduction moment and motion may place females at risk of an ACL injury when an unanticipated or unbalanced landing occurs. For example, during unanticipated cutting, knee abduction-adduction and internal-external moments can be twice as high compared with preplanned directional cutting (3).

Mechanisms of growth and development in females may underlie the increased risk of ACL injury through altered neuromuscular control and movement biomechanics such as knee abduction (8,17). ACL injuries do not seem to be different between male and female athletes before the onset of puberty and the adolescent growth spurt (1,15). However, after rapid pubertal growth, females have higher rates of knee sprains compared with males (37). The lower extremity segments also go through rapid increases in length during adolescent growth and may potentially lead to increases in knee moments. Increased inertial properties of the segment could partially explain the higher joint moments. Peak body mass velocity, greatest increase in body mass during adolescence, for both sexes generally occurs after peak height velocity (4). It is interesting that both males and females had increases in knee abduction moment, but knee abduction motion changes were found only in pubertal females. Therefore, growth alone is not likely to be responsible for the increased abduction motion in females. An additional mechanism that differs between sexes as they mature likely plays a role in increased risk of ACL injury in females compared with males. Fat mass remains relatively consistent in males, with skeletal tissue and muscle mass gains being primarily responsible for the observed mass increase (4,25). In contrast, females have less overall gains in skeletal tissue and muscle mass compared with males, in addition to a continuous rise in fat mass throughout puberty (4,25). The higher center of mass, which results from skeletal growth and subsequent mass gain during adolescence, makes muscular control of body position more difficult and may translate into larger joint forces at the knee (17). Males naturally demonstrate a "neuromuscular spurt" (increased strength and power during maturational growth and development) to match the increased demands of growth and development (17,19,21,25,31). A recent longitudinal study concluded that males demonstrated a neuromuscular spurt as evidenced by increased vertical jump height and increased ability to attenuate landing force (31). The absence of similar adaptations in females during maturation may facilitate the mechanisms that lead to increased risk of ACL injury (34).

A limitation in our study was that group differences between pubertal groups were cross-sectional in nature. We did not follow the subjects through pubertal development and into postpubertal status. Knee abduction angle was decreased (closer to neutral) in the postpubertal males compared with the pubertal males. The possible protective mechanism in postpubertal males should be further investigated, which may limit excessive knee abduction.

The timing of rapid growth may be the critical phase of development related to sex differences in ACL injury risk. As females reach maturity, a variety of discrete sex differences in lower extremity measures have been shown in females compared with males performing landing and cutting maneuvers (7,12,13,16,17,22,27). Sex differences between postpubertal athletes, combined with the timing of the onset of these variables, indicate that an appropriate time to implement an intervention program would be during early puberty. A prospective study that will investigate the timing of intervention is warranted. Prevention programs that incorporate plyometrics, technique biofeedback, and dynamic balance components seem to be effective at reducing measures of knee abduction and the occurrence of ACL injuries (18,28,29).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Knee abduction angle was significantly increased in pubertal females during rapid adolescent growth compared with that in males. In addition, the important reported risk factors of knee abduction motion and torque were significantly greater across consecutive years in young female athletes, after rapid adolescent growth, compared with males. An important maturational period related to a potential increase in risk of ACL injury seems to be early within pubertal development. The current investigation may also help explain the mechanisms that underlie this phenomenon of sex-related injury risk divergence. Future studies should focus on specific mechanisms that may limit or regulate dynamic abduction motion and torque, such as lower extremity strength, muscular cocontraction, and joint stiffness parameters in young females who are at increased risk of ACL injury.

This work was supported by grants R01-AR049735, R01-AR055563, and R01-AR056259 from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

We thank the entire Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center for their dedication and support. We also acknowledge the work of Scott McLean, Bhushan Borotikar and Xuemei Huang during this project. The authors acknowledge Boone County, Kentucky, School District, especially School Superintendent Randy Poe, Mike Blevins, Ed Massey, and Brian Blavatt, for participation in this study.

The authors have no conflicts of interest related to the results of this study.

The results of this study do not constitute endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Andrish JT. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the skeletally immature patient. Am J Orthop. 2001;30(2):103-10.
2. Bell AL, Pedersen DR, Brand RA. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech. 1990;23(6):617-21.
3. Besier TF, Lloyd DG, Ackland TR, Cochrane JL. Anticipatory effects on knee joint loading during running and cutting maneuvers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(7):1176-81.
4. Beunen G, Malina RM. Growth and physical performance relative to the timing of the adolescent spurt. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1988;16:503-40.
5. Beynnon BD, Fleming BC. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: a review of previous work. J Biomech. 1998;31(6):519-25.
6. Bisseling RW, Hof AL. Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics. J Biomech. 2006;39(13):2438-44.
7. Chappell JD, Yu B, Kirkendall DT, Garrett WE. A comparison of knee kinetics between male and female recreational athletes in stop-jump tasks. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(2):261-7.
8. Croce RV, Russell PJ, Swartz EE, Decoster LC. Knee muscular response strategies differ by developmental level but not gender during jump landing. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;44(6):339-48.
9. Davies PL, Rose JD. Motor skills of typically developing adolescents: awkwardness or improvement? Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2000;20(1):19-42.
10. de Leva P. Joint center longitudinal positions computed from a selected subset of Chandler's data. J Biomech. 1996;29(9):1231-3.
11. Fleming BC, Ohlen G, Renstrom PA, Peura GD, Beynnon BD, Badger GJ. The effects of compressive load and knee joint torque on peak anterior cruciate ligament strains. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(5):701-7.
12. Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Valgus knee motion during landing in high school female and male basketball players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(10):1745-50.
13. Ford KR, Myer GD, Smith RL, Vianello RM, Seiwert SL, Hewett TE. A comparison of dynamic coronal plane excursion between matched male and female athletes when performing single leg landings. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(1):33-40.
14. Ford KR, Myer GD, Toms HE, Hewett TE. Gender differences in the kinematics of unanticipated cutting in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(1):124-9.
15. Gallagher SS, Finison K, Guyer B, Goodenough S. The incidence of injuries among 87,000 Massachusetts children and adolescents: results of the 1980-81 Statewide Childhood Injury Prevention Program Surveillance System. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(12):1340-7.
16. Hewett TE, Ford KR, Myer GD, Wanstrath K, Scheper M. Gender differences in hip adduction motion and torque during a single leg agility maneuver. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(3):416-21.
17. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR. Decrease in neuromuscular control about the knee with maturation in female athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1601-8.
18. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, et al. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(4):492-501.
19. Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Slauterbeck JL. Preparticipation physical exam using a box drop vertical jump test in young athletes: the effects of puberty and sex. Clin J Sport Med. 2006;16(4):298-304.
20. Kanamori A, Woo SL, Ma CB, et al. The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: a human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16(6):633-9.
21. Kellis E, Tsitskaris GK, Nikopoulou MD, Moiusikou KC. The evaluation of jumping ability of male and female basketball players according to their chronological age and major leagues. J Strength Cond Res. 1999;13(1):40-6.
22. Kernozek TW, Torry MR, Van Hoof H, Cowley H, Tanner S. Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(6):1003-12, discussion 1013.
23. Khamis HJ, Roche AF. Predicting adult stature without using skeletal age: the Khamis-Roche method. Pediatrics. 1994;94(4 Pt 1):504-7.
24. Krosshaug T, Nakamae A, Boden BP, et al. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury in basketball: video analysis of 39 cases. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):359-67.
25. Malina RM, Bouchard C. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1991. 501 p.
26. Markolf KL, Burchfield DM, Shapiro MM, Shepard MF, Finerman GA, Slauterbeck JL. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces. J Orthop Res. 1995;13(6):930-5.
27. McLean SG, Huang X, Su A, van den Bogert AJ. Sagittal plane biomechanics cannot injure the ACL during sidestep cutting. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:828-38.
28. Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(3):490-8.
29. Myer GD, Ford KR, Palumbo JP, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training improves performance and lower-extremity biomechanics in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):51-60.
30. Olsen OE, Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(4):1002-12.
31. Quatman CE, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. Maturation leads to gender differences in landing force and vertical jump performance: a longitudinal study. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(5):806-13.
32. Quatman CE, Ford KR, Myer GD, Paterno MV, Hewett TE. The effects of gender and pubertal status on generalized joint laxity in young athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2008;11(3):257-63.
33. Schmitz RJ, Shultz SJ, Nguyen AD. Dynamic valgus alignment and functional strength in males and females during maturation. J Athl Train. 2009;44(1):26-32.
34. Shea KG, Pfeiffer R, Wang JH, Curtin M, Apel PJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury in pediatric and adolescent soccer players: an analysis of insurance data. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(6):623-8.
35. Shin CS, Chaudhari AM, Andriacchi TP. The effect of isolated valgus moments on ACL strain during single-leg landing: a simulation study. J Biomech. 2009;42(3):280-5.
36. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marubini E, Resele LF. The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden Growth Study. Ann Hum Biol. 1976;3(2):109-26.
37. Tursz A, Crost M. Sports-related injuries in children. A study of their characteristics, frequency, and severity, with comparison to other types of accidental injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1986;14(4):294-9.
38. Withrow TJ, Huston LJ, Wojtys EM, Ashton-Miller JA. The effect of an impulsive knee valgus moment on in vitro relative ACL strain during a simulated jump landing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(9):977-83.
39. Yu B, McClure SB, Onate JA, Guskiewicz KM, Kirkendall DT, Garrett WE. Age and gender effects on lower extremity kinematics of youth soccer players in a stop-jump task. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(9):1356-64.


©2010The American College of Sports Medicine