Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
You currently have no recent searches
Glaister, Mark1; Witmer, Chad2; Clarke, Dustin W.2; Guers, John J.2; Heller, Justin L.2; Moir, Gavin2
1St Mary's University College, Twickenham, United Kingdom. 2East Stroudsburg University, East Stroudsburg, PA.
(Sponsor: Dr Gregory B Dwyer, FACSM)
(No relationships reported)
PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were to investigate the process of self-selected recovery in a multiple sprint test with a view to using self-selected recovery time as a means of reliably quantifying an individual's ability to perform this type of exercise.
METHODS: Twenty physically active exercise science students (Means ± standard deviation for age, height, body mass, body fat, and VO2max of the subjects were: 21 ± 2 years, 179.2 ± 8.6 cm, 83.7 ± 10.8 kg, 16.6 ± 3.9%, and 52.7± 7.2 ml·kg-1·min-1 respectively) completed four trials of a 12 × 30 m multiple sprint running test under the instruction that they should allow sufficient recovery time between sprints to enable maximal sprint performance to be maintained throughout each trial. Heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each trial, with sprint and recovery times recorded using twin-beam photocells.
RESULTS: Mean recovery times across the four trials were 73.9 ± 24.7 s, 82.3 ± 23.8 s, 77.6 ± 19.1 s, and 77.5 ± 13.9 s respectively; with variability in the first two trials considered evidence of learning effects. Test-retest reliability across trials 3-4 revealed a good level of reliability as evidenced by a coefficient of variation of 11.1% (95% likely range: 8.0 to 18.1%) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76 (95% likely range: 0.40 to 0.91). Despite no change in sprint performance throughout the trials, RPE increased progressively and significantly (p < 0.001) from a value of 10 ± 2 after sprint 3 to 14 ± 2 after sprint 12. Mean heart rate throughout trial 4 was 152 ± 18 b·min-1. The correlation between absolute VO2max and mean recovery time was 0.46 (95% likely range: -0.03 to 0.77).
CONCLUSIONS: Although self-selected recovery time is a reliable measure in a multiple sprint test, it only appears to be moderately associated with an individual's VO2max.
©2009The American College of Sports Medicine
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics