Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 3 > How Many Days of Pedometer Monitoring Are Needed?
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e181914ab5
SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS: Letters to the Editor-in-Chief

How Many Days of Pedometer Monitoring Are Needed?

Aoyagi, Yukitoshi PhD1; Shephard, Roy J. MD, PhD, DPE, LLD1

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

1Exercise Sciences Research Group, Tokyo Metropolitan, Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan

2Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Dear Editor-in-Chief:

Clemes and Griffiths (2) examined how many days of pedometer monitoring are needed to predict monthly ambulatory activity. They retrace much of the ground covered in a previous report of surprisingly similar title (5). However, certain limitations to their study lead to conclusions that diverge from the earlier findings.

Their recording instrument (Digi-Walker SW-200) was less sophisticated than the one that we adopted (modified Kenz Lifecorder). It lacks an acceleration filter to screen out incidental movement artifacts, and because of limited data storage, variance is introduced by frequent removal of the device.

Clemes and Griffiths (2) elected as their "gold standard" a 28-d period, despite substantial seasonal variations in physical activity (1,4,5,7). Reliability should be determined for a whole year and not just a single month. The recommendation of a 7-d collection period is particularly questionable because of short-term reactive responses; people who know that they have been fitted with a pedometer walk some 13,000 additional steps during the first week of observation (3).

Like us, Clemes and Griffiths (2) have used an intraclass correlation analysis to establish the reliability of data. If a coefficient of 0.8 is accepted, the estimate provides only 64% of the intended information. We used a power spectrum analysis and fast Fourier transformation to evaluate the periodicity of counts over an entire year and defined the number of days of monitoring needed to estimate annual habitual physical activity at specified levels of confidence (5). The necessary period of continuous sampling for individual subjects proved surprisingly long, although obviously it would have been shorter with other approaches to sampling or if the need was simply for averaged information on a large population. In our men, 25 d of consecutive data collection was required to yield a coefficient of 0.8 relative to a yearlong gold standard (5). An individual's movement patterns show a varying vulnerability to exogenous factors such as an adverse climate (1,4,7). Probably because elderly Japanese women usually assume the main burden of low-intensity household tasks (6), the activity pattern of women in our sample was more regular than that of the men, and a coefficient of 0.8 was obtained with 8 d of observation (5). To reach a more satisfactory coefficient of 0.9, 105 and 37 d of consecutive observation were needed in men and women, respectively (5).

Finally, Clemes and Griffiths (2) studied a population of working age. Occupations are not specified, but most subjects were presumably used. This would have imposed a structure on weekday activity that is lacking in other segments of the population, such as the elderly people that we studied.

Yukitoshi Aoyagi, PhD

Exercise Sciences Research Group

Tokyo Metropolitan

Institute of Gerontology

Tokyo, Japan

Roy J. Shephard, MD, PhD, DPE, LLD

Faculty of Physical Education and Health

University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Aoyagi Y, Shephard RJ. Steps per day: the road to senior health? Sports Med. (in press).

2. Clemes SA, Griffiths PL. How many days of pedometer monitoring predict monthly ambulatory activity in adults? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(9):1589-95.

3. Clemes SA, Matchett N, Wane SL. Reactivity: an issue for short-term pedometer studies? Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(1):68-70.

4. Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y. Meteorology and the physical activity of the elderly: the Nakanojo Study. Int J Biometeorol. 2005;50(2):83-9.

5. Togo F, Watanabe E, Park H, et al. How many days of pedometer use predict the annual activity of the elderly reliably? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(6):1060-6.

6. Yasunaga A, Park H, Watanabe E, et al. Development and evaluation of the physical activity questionnaire for elderly Japanese: the Nakanojo Study. J Aging Phys Act. 2007;15(4):398-411.

7. Yasunaga A, Togo F, Watanabe E, et al. Sex, age, season, and habitual physical activity of older Japanese: the Nakanojo Study. J Aging Phys Act. 2008;16(1):3-13.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 3 time(s).

Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Habitual physical activity and health in the elderly: The Nakanojo Study
Aoyagi, Y; Shephard, RJ
Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 10(): S236-S243.
10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00589.x
CrossRef
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Sex differences in relationships between habitual physical activity and health in the elderly: Practical implications for epidemiologists based on pedometer/accelerometer data from the Nakanojo Study
Aoyagi, Y; Shephard, RJ
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(2): 327-338.
10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.006
CrossRef
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Response
Clemes, SA; Griffiths, PL
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(3): 735.
10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181914ac6
PDF (45) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

©2009The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Connect With Us