Heart Rate Recovery Predicts Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes


Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815c4844
BASIC SCIENCES: Epidemiology

Purpose: Heart rate recovery (HRR) immediately after peak exercise has utility as a predictor of all-cause mortality. However, a prognostic role for HRR has not been specifically evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), nor has an association between HRR and cardiovascular (CV) events been documented. This study investigated whether HRR is predictive of all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and CV events in asymptomatic patients with T2DM.

Methods: HRR in subjects with T2DM was obtained via chart review of peak exercise treadmill tests (N = 890) performed at entry into the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes trial. Survival analysis was used to test the association of 1- and 2-min HRR with all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and CV events during the follow-up period.

Results: Subjects were followed for a median of 5.0 yr. All-cause mortality and CV events were significantly greater among the lowest quintile (< 12 bpm) of 1-min HRR compared with the fourth (23-28 bpm) quintile. Similarly all-cause mortality and CV events were significantly greater among the lowest quintile (< 28 bpm) of 2-min HRR compared with the third quintile (37-42 bpm) quintile. After adjustment for traditional cardiac risk factors, attenuated 1- and 2-min HRR remained significantly associated with increased risk of CV events as compared with those without attenuation.

Conclusions: HRR provides information beyond traditional CV risk factors that could aid in the clinical risk stratification of patients with T2DM. The results suggest that HRR results should be incorporated into standard diagnostic treadmill testing reports and target those patients with T2DM and attenuated HRR who can benefit from directed therapies.

Author Information

1University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; and 2Colorado Prevention Center, Denver, CO

Address for correspondence: Raymond O. Estacio, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Colorado Prevention Center, 789 Sherman St., Suite 200, Denver, CO 80203; E-mail: Ray.Estacio@cpcmed.org.

Submitted for publication May 2007.

Accepted for publication August 2007.

Article Outline

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (16). Traditional risk factors, including hypertension, smoking, and cholesterol, as well as nontraditional risk factors such as microalbuminuria, left ventricular mass, and abnormal autonomic function (5,20,26), have been identified as predictors of future coronary events and death among this population of patients. However, one major limitation of available risk factors is the reliance on clinical information that occurs relatively late in the T2DM disease process (33). Thus, the identification of a prognostic marker that occurs earlier in the disease process of T2DM could lead to improved treatment guidelines and outcomes in this growing patient population.

Heart rate recovery (HRR) has emerged as a novel marker for mortality in predominantly nondiabetic populations (6,7,22,36) and has been associated with the occurrence of CV events in other patient groups (27,32). An attenuated HRR immediately after exercise is considered an index of autonomic imbalance and may identify clinically silent autonomic dysfunction. Because autonomic dysfunction is a common complication in patients with T2DM that can be reversed with strict glycemic control (39), it may be useful to identify those patients at risk as early as possible. However, the relationship of HRR and cardiac-related events in patients with diabetes mellitus remains to be clarified, and is particularly relevant because patients with T2DM may be increasingly referred for screening exercise treadmill testing on the basis of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines (18).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of 1- and 2-min HRR and the incidence of all-cause and CV mortality, and CV events in patients with T2DM who had exercise treadmill testing performed on a screening basis. We hypothesized that subjects with attenuated HRR (1 and 2 min after exercise) would be at increased risk of CV mortality and CV events. The study was performed on a cohort of T2DM patients from the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial (14).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Back to Top | Article Outline
Study design and participants.

Exercise data were abstracted retrospectively from chart review from baseline exercise treadmill tests in patients enrolled in the ABCD trial (1991-1993). The ABCD trial was approved by the Colorado multiple institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects before their participation. Study design, protocol, and results for the ABCD trial have been previously described (13,14). Briefly, the ABCD trial was a large, single-site, prospective, randomized, blinded trial designed to measure the effects of moderate versus intensive blood pressure control, using initial therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), enalapril, or a calcium channel blocker, nisoldipine, on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM. On entry, asymptomatic patients with T2DM were enrolled if they had a diastolic blood pressure of at least 80 mm Hg and were not on antihypertensive medications. Patients were primarily recruited from a major metropolitan area. Exclusion criteria included unstable angina, myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of entry, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery within 3 months of entry, New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, severe peripheral vascular disease, isolated systolic hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 160 and diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg without or before medical therapy), serum creatinine greater than 3 mg·dL−1 (265 μM·L−1), and patients who had an absolute need to be on an ACEI or calcium channel blocker for therapy. During a placebo run-in period, all baseline studies, including exercise testing, were performed. Patients underwent renal, retinal, and neural assessments frequently throughout the trial, as has been previously described. (14)

Back to Top | Article Outline
Exercise testing.

Of the 950 participants enrolled in the ABCD trial, 890 underwent exercise treadmill testing at baseline before randomization of drug therapy. The remaining 60 patients were either unable to physically perform exercise testing or refused testing. All exercise tests were performed after a 7- to 11-wk washout period from any antihypertensive medications. This included beta-adrenergic-blocking medications. Digoxin therapy was deemed essential and, therefore, was continued in 77 (8.7%) patients during the washout period and was present in these patients during exercise testing.

Exercise testing was performed at a single site, using a modified Bruce protocol (2). During each stage of exercise, data on symptoms, heart rate, blood pressure, and ECG changes were recorded. Patients were encouraged to reach symptom-limited peak exercise using the Borg scale to help objectively assess when a patient had attained maximal exertion (3). The recovery period consisted of 2 min of walking at 1.9 km (1.2 miles) per hour on a 0% grade. Heart rate was recorded every minute for up to 5 min during the recovery period. Heart rate data was obtained from ECG printouts of 10-s averaged heart rate data collected at exactly 1 and 2 min into recovery for each subject, for entry into the database.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Definition of HRR and chronotropic incompetence.

HRR was defined as the value between the heart rate at peak exercise (immediately before termination of the test) minus the value at either 1 or 2 min into the recovery period (1-min HRR and 2-min HRR). Chronotropic incompetence (CI) was defined as the inability to reach 85% of predicted maximal heart rate (2). Predicted maximal heart rate was calculated as 220 − age in years.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Outcome measures.

The ABCD subjects were followed for 5 yr after the last patient enrollment. Enrollment lasted for 2 yr, so subjects had the opportunity for 5-7 yr of follow-up, depending on when they were enrolled. Time to event for survival analysis was calculated as the time from randomization to either event or the patient's last follow-up day without an event. An independent end point committee blinded to the study arms adjudicated all CV events. Cardiovascular mortality included death from progressive congestive heart failure (CHF), fatal myocardial infarction, fatal arrhythmias, CVA, ruptured aortic aneurysm, and sudden death. Cardiovascular events included all categories of CV mortality plus nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal CVA events, and CHF requiring hospital admission. Evidence of macrovascular complications was defined as patients with an ankle:brachial index < 0.9 or a history of cardiovascular disease. Microvascular disease includes patients with neuropathy, retinopathy, or overt albuminuria at baseline.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Statistical analyses.

SAS software version 8.2 or higher (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses. Two-sided P values of less than or equal to 0.05 were considered significant. The study population included the 890 patients with exercise test data at baseline of the ABCD trial. Baseline characteristics were compared between those with HRR at 1 min of less than or equal to 12 bpm and those greater than 12 bpm. Categorical variables such as race were compared using a chi-square test. Continuous variables such as age were compared using Student's t-test.

Initially, the relationship of CV events and mortality was explored using the published abnormal HRR cutoff at 1 min of < 12 bpm (6). To further explore our specific T2DM population, HRR values at 1 and 2 min were divided into quintiles, and their independent associations with all-cause and CV mortality and CV events were assessed with a chi-square test. Multiple-comparisons-adjusted Fisher's exact P values were employed to contrast event rates among combinations of pairwise comparisons among the five quintiles.

Kaplan-Meier (24) estimates were used to plot the survivor curves for time to event stratified by HRR quintiles. The survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Six Cox regression models (1) were fit to examine the relationship of all-cause and CV mortality and CV events with quintiles of 1- and 2-min HRR, adjusting for other suspected risk factors. To compare the magnitude of the effect of HRR at 1 and 2 min across the three outcomes, these covariates were consistent in all six models. We included covariates with clinical relevance including age, race, gender, duration of exercise, CI, urinary albumin excretion, evidence of macrovascular complications, total cholesterol, baseline systolic blood pressure, smoking status, duration of diabetes, study drug (either enalapril or nisoldipine), and blood pressure goal (intensive or moderate). Urinary albumin excretion is positively skewed, so the natural log transformation was used in the Cox regression models. Colinearity among the exercise measures included as adjustment factors was tested visually and was deemed insignificant.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Characteristics of the ABCD participants who underwent exercise testing at baseline are shown in Table 1. Patients with an attenuated HRR (< 12 bpm) at 1 min after exercise (N = 188) were older, had longer duration of diabetes, higher seated heart rate, higher systolic blood pressure at entry into the study, and shorter exercise times, and were more likely to have CI compared with those subjects without attenuated HRR after exercise. Those with attenuated HRR were also more likely to have microvascular disease, defined by overt albuminuria, retinopathy, or neuropathy at baseline (P < 0.01). The log transformation of urinary albumin excretion was significantly higher in those with HRR < 12 bpm (P < 0.01), as was the serum creatinine level (P < 0.01). There was no evidence of an association between history of macrovascular disease and attenuated HRR (P = 0.81).

One- and two-minute HRR data according to quintile are presented in Table 2. Data for 1- and 2-min HRR were not available for 19 and 23 of the 890 patients, respectively. The event rates were lowest in the middle quintiles when HRR ranged from 19-28 bpm at 1 min and 37-49 bpm at 2 min. The highest event rates were found in the lowest or most attenuated HRR quintile. All-cause mortality and CV events were significantly greater among the lowest quintile (< 12 bpm) of 1-min HRR compared with the fourth (23-28 bpm) quintile. Similarly, all-cause mortality and CV events were significantly greater among the lowest quintile (< 28 bpm) of 2-min HRR compared with the third quintile (37-42 bpm) quintile. Event rates seemed to increase slightly in the highest or most rapid HRR quintiles for all-cause and CV mortality and CV events. However, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, only the most attenuated quintile of HRR had significantly higher event rates in pairwise comparison with any of the other quintiles. The significant pairwise P values are provided in the legend of Table 2.

The median follow-up time from randomization to either event-free survival time or first cardiovascular event was 5.0 (range 0-6.9) yr. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for time to CV event or censoring stratified by quintiles of HRR at 1 min are plotted in Figure 1. The estimated 5-yr survival rates and 95% confidence limit (CL) from lowest (< 12 bpm) to highest quintile (> 28 bpm) were 80% (73-85%), 89% (84-93%), 90% (84-94%), 89% (83-93%), and 86% (79-90%). The log-rank test, used to compare these unadjusted survival curves across the five quintiles, shows a statistically significant difference among the groups (P = 0.007).

Hazard ratios from the Cox proportional hazards regression models testing the time to occurrence of all-cause and CV mortality and CV events for quintiles of HRR are displayed in Tables 3 and 4. The hazard ratio of a CV event was decreased by half for those in middle quintiles of HRR of both 1- and 2-min HRR (hazard ratio = 0.5, 95% CL 0.3-0.8, and hazard ratio = 0.5, 95% CL 0.3-0.8, respectively) compared with the lowest quintiles. When compared with the reference group of < 28 bpm, patients with a 2-min HRR between 37 and 42 bpm had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 0.1, 95% CL 0.03-0.5).

The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality was increased for those with CI in the 1-min model (hazard ratio = 1.9, 95% CL = 1.1-3.4). As expected, age was consistently associated with increased risk mortality and events in the models. The unadjusted log-rank statistic comparing survival curves for each quintile were significant for each of the comparisons, with the exception of the model for CV mortality and 1-min HRR, as presented in Tables 3 and 4.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The present study demonstrates that attenuated HRR is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic patients with T2DM. Additionally, an attenuated HRR was also associated with an increased risk for CV events in this population of T2DM patients. Thus, in addition to serving as an important prognostic marker of mortality, the attenuation of HRR may also identify individuals with T2DM at high risk for cardiovascular-related events and highlight those patients who are candidates for therapy directed at attenuated HRR.

Previous studies in predominantly nondiabetic populations referred for treadmill testing have demonstrated that an attenuated 1-min HRR after peak exercise, commonly defined as < 12 bpm, can be used as a prognostic marker for all-cause mortality (6,7,28,36). Furthermore, attenuated HRR has been found to be predictive of all-cause mortality independently of Duke score (7,28) and severity of underlying coronary disease (10,40). The usefulness of prognostic markers from exercise treadmill tests is highlighted by the most recent modification to the American Heart Association guidelines for exercise testing (18), which found that the weight of evidence is in favor of screening exercise testing in patients with diabetes.

To our knowledge, only one study has previously demonstrated an association between attenuated HRR and CV events (32), conducted in a population of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Exploration of the Framingham data (27) failed to yield a significant association between HRR and CV events. In the present study of asymptomatic patients with T2DM, these data demonstrate higher CV event rates in those patients that had an attenuated HRR at 1 or 2 min into recovery, consistent with the work by Pitsavos et al. (32).

The potential mechanisms linking abnormal HRR and CV events are unclear. Attenuated HRR is considered to reflect abnormal control of autonomic function, suggesting reduced parasympathetic activity (21), increased sympathetic activity, or both after peak exercise. Low vagal tone and high sympathetic states have both been linked to excess mortality (34), particularly from sudden death, which is believed to be mediated through fatal arrhythmias (23,25). However, unlike the majority of markers for CV events in T2DM that focus on atherosclerotic disease and endothelial dysfunction as the basis of pathophysiology, attenuated HRR would seemingly identify those at risk for sudden death (22), although this relationship has not been rigorously evaluated. In this context, it is interesting to note that fasting plasma glucose, ratio of trigylcerides to high-density lipoproteins, diabetes, endothelial dysfunction, and recently myocardial perfusion have all been associated with an attenuated HRR (17,30,35,37). Thus, it seems that factors associated with the progression of T2DM could provide a pathophysiologic rationale for the association of attenuated HRR with CV events in our study.

Only one other study has specifically examined HRR and outcomes in patients with diabetes. Cheng et al. (4) have demonstrated an association between 5-min HRR and mortality in diabetic men. It seems unlikely that this association at 5 min after exercise can be solely explained on the basis of abnormal vagal tone (21), but it could also describe prolonged sympathetic activation in those patients. Nevertheless, although the decrement of heart rate later in recovery may still be partially attributed to continued vagal reactivation, the slower withdrawal of sympathetic activation could play a larger role in determining heart rate as recovery continues beyond 1 min (31). The present study is the first to specifically examine attenuated HRR in patients with T2DM as it relates to CV outcomes and mortality at 1 and 2 min after exercise, the time points suggested as most relevant to autonomic imbalance.

An intriguing finding in our study was that event rates did not steadily decrease with more rapid HRR. In fact, we observed an increase in event rates among those with the most rapid 1- and 2-min HRR, although the observed increase in events was not significant when adjusted for multiple comparisons. However, we note higher event rates also occurred in patients with more rapid HRR in other published studies (6,22,28). Although it is difficult to speculate on the underlying mechanisms for this observation, altered sympathetic tone or baroreflex sensitivity may explain these observations. Further work is necessary to evaluate the potential relevance and mechanisms of abnormally rapid HRR and the occurrence of CV events.

A significant confounder to the evaluation of HRR in persons with T2DM may be related to CI (8), a factor that may be related to latent autonomic neuropathy in T2DM and can affect measures of fitness. As expected, patients with CI showed little variability with regards to peak exercise heart rate, percent of age-predicted maximum heart rate, and time on treadmill. To control for an abnormal chronotropic response, we included both HRR and CI parameters in our Cox regression models. Both HRR and CI consistently emerged as predictors of CV events and mortality in the presence of other disease risk factors, including urinary albumin excretion.

Other studies have been limited by the influence of patients taking beta-blockers at the time of exercise testing (6,7). However, this was not true for our study population, in which no patients were on beta-blockers at the time of their exercise test. Additionally, because the ABCD trial was originally designed to prospectively test outcomes in a diabetic population without cardiac symptoms at baseline, all exercise tests in these patients were performed as part of a baseline screening characterization, and we were therefore able to avoid the referral bias for exercise testing present in previous studies (6,9,11,24,28). Note that a small percentage of patients in the present study remained on digoxin therapy during exercise testing. Although this can lower resting heart rate, the effects on heart rate during exercise and maximal heart rate are considered negligible (15).

The ABCD trial consisted of a normotensive and a hypertensive cohort, and cohort-specific results have been published previously (12). We adjusted for the study design and intervention by pooling the data from both cohorts and adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure and study interventions. In addition, our study population was limited to patients who underwent exercise testing at baseline. Sixty patients who did not undergo exercise testing at baseline had higher rates of both all cause and CV mortality than those who did undergo testing at baseline. Thus, although the results of this retrospective study must be qualified, our findings suggest a strong relationship between abnormal HRR and CV events in a diabetic population that may be representative of the population at large.

Our results suggest that both slowed HRR and possibly very rapid HRR at 1 and 2 min should be considered when assessing risk of mortality and CV events in future studies. The usefulness of HRR may go beyond simple prognostic information, as recent work has focused on HRR as a modifiable risk factor. It has been demonstrated that exercise training can improve autonomic dysfunction and, thereby, HRR in this population (19). Another consideration is the use of pharmacological interventions to alter the autonomic balance, similar to what has been done using beta-blockade in patients with heart failure (29) or statins in patients with diabetes (38). Targeting autonomic dysfunction in T2DM with lifestyle and pharmacological interventions may thus be indicated for patients with autonomic dysfunction versus those without autonomic abnormalities. Future studies are needed to address this interesting possibility.

In conclusion, the present study performed in patients with T2DM provides further support for the utility of HRR in gauging risk for future morbidity and mortality in an asymptomatic population. Unique to this study is the finding that HRR can also be used for prognosis in determining CV events. In T2DM, quintiles of 1- and 2-min HRR were found to be independently predictive of CV events after adjusting for other traditional risk factors. The models also confirmed that CI is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality. Thus, HRR and CI provide information beyond the traditional CV risk factors that could aid in the clinical risk stratification of asymptomatic T2DM patients. Our results support prior work that suggests that HRR and CI should be incorporated into standard diagnostic treadmill testing with particular regard to the T2DM population. Therapies directed at normalizing HRR in this high-risk group of patients should be pursued.

The ABCD trial was supported by Bayer Pharmaceutical Company and the National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases (DK50298-02). Dr. Bauer is supported by NIH F32 DK078413-01. Dr. Dixon was supported by the General Internal Medicine Division's Research Scholars Program for medical students at the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Allison PD. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing, 1995.
2. Armstrong LE, Brubaker PH, Whaley MH, Otto M. ACSM'S Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005.
3. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.
4. Cheng YJ, Lauer MS, Earnest CP, et al. Heart rate recovery following maximal exercise testing as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2052-7.
5. Cohen JA, Estacio RO, Lundgren RA, Esler AL, Schrier RW. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy is associated with an increased incidence of strokes. Auton Neurosci. 2003;108:73-8.
6. Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Heart-rate recovery immediately after exercise as a predictor of mortality. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1351-7.
7. Cole CR, Foody JM, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after submaximal exercise testing as a predictor of mortality in a cardiovascularly healthy cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:552-5.
8. Desai MY, Pena-Almaguer E, Mannting F. Abnormal heart rate recovery after exercise as a reflection of an abnormal chronotropic response. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:1164-9.
9. Desai MY, Pena-Almaguer E, Mannting F. Abnormal heart rate recovery after exercise: a comparison with known indicators of increased mortality. Cardiology. 2001;96:38-44.
10. Diaz LA, Brunken RC, Blackstone EH, Snader CE, Lauer MS. Independent contribution of myocardial perfusion defects to exercise capacity and heart rate recovery for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1558-64.
11. Dresing TJ, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Marwick TH, Lauer MS. Usefulness of impaired chronotropic response to exercise as a predictor of mortality, independent of the severity of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:602-9.
12. Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, Biggerstaff SL, Gifford N, Schrier RW. The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:645-52.
13. Estacio RO, Regensteiner JG, Wolfel EE, Jeffers B, Dickenson M, Schrier RW. The association between diabetic complications and exercise capacity in NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:291-5.
14. Estacio RO, Savage S, Nagel NJ, Schrier RW. Baseline characteristics of participants in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes trial. Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:242-57.
15. Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:854-906.
16. Geiss LS, Herman WH, Smith PS. Mortality in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes. NIH publication No. 95-1468 (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.),1995.
17. Georgoulias P, Demakopoulos N, Orfanakis A, et al. Evaluation of abnormal heart-rate recovery after exercise testing in patients with diabetes mellitus: correlation with myocardial SPECT and chronotropic parameters. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:165-71.
18. Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:1531-40.
19. Hao SC, Chai A, Kligfield P. Heart rate recovery response to symptom-limited treadmill exercise after cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease with and without recent events. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:763-5.
20. Havranek EP, Esler A, Estacio RO, Mehler PS, Schrier RW. Differential effects of antihypertensive agents on electrocardiographic voltage: results from the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial. Am Heart J. 2003;145:993-8.
21. Imai K, Sato H, Hori M, et al. Vagally mediated heart-rate recovery after exercise is accelerated in athletes but blunted in patients with chronic heart-failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1529-35.
22. Jouven X, Empana JP, Schwartz PJ, Desnos M, Courbon D, Ducimetiere P. Heart-rate profile during exercise as a predictor of sudden death. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1951-8.
23. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Hohnloser SH, et al. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in the identification of patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias: implications for clinical trials. Circulation. 2001;103:2072-7.
24. Lauer MS, Francis GS, Okin PM, Pashkow FJ, Snader CE, Marwick TH. Impaired chronotropic response to exercise stress testing as a predictor of mortality. JAMA. 1999;281:524-9.
25. Lown B, Verrier RL. Neural activity and ventricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:1165-70.
26. Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria predicts clinical proteinuria and early mortality in maturity-onset diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:356-60.
27. Morshedi-Meibodi A, Larson MG, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Vasan RS. Heart rate recovery after treadmill exercise testing and risk of cardiovascular disease events (The Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:848-52.
28. Nishime EO, Cole CR, Blackstone EH, Pashkow FJ, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery and treadmill exercise score as predictors of mortality in patients referred for exercise ECG. JAMA. 2000;284:1392-8.
29. Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, et al. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1651-8.
30. Panzer C, Lauer MS, Brieke A, Blackstone E, Hoogwerf B. Association of fasting plasma glucose with heart rate recovery in healthy adults: a population-based study. Diabetes. 2002;51:803-7.
31. Pierpont GL, Voth EJ. Assessing autonomic function by analysis of heart rate recovery from exercise in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:64-8.
32. Pitsavos CH, Chrysohoou C, Panagiotakos DB, et al. Exercise capacity and heart rate recovery as predictors of coronary heart disease events, in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173:347-52.
33. Redberg RF, Greenland P, Fuster V, et al. Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Writing Group III: risk assessment in persons with diabetes. Circulation. 2002;105:e144-52.
34. Schwartz PJ, La Rovere MT, Vanoli E. Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death. Experimental basis and clinical observations for post-myocardial infarction risk stratification. Circulation. 1992;85(suppl):I77-91.
35. Seshadri N, Acharya N, Lauer MS. Association of diabetes mellitus with abnormal heart rate recovery in patients without known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:108-11.
36. Shetler K, Marcus R, Froelicher VF, et al. Heart rate recovery: validation and methodologic issues. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1980-7.
37. Shishehbor MH, Hoogwerf BJ, Lauer MS. Association of triglyceride-to-HDL cholesterol ratio with heart rate recovery. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:936-41.
38. Tekin G, Tekin A, Canatar T, et al. Simvastatin improves the attenuated heart rate recovery of type 2 diabetics. Pharmacol Res. 2006;54:442-6.
39. The Diabetes Control and Complication Research Trial Group. The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on measures of autonomic nervous system function in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). Diabetologia. 1998;41:416-23.
40. Vivekananthan DP, Blackstone EH, Pothier CE, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery after exercise is a predictor of mortality, independent of the angiographic severity of coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:831-8.


©2008The American College of Sports Medicine