Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2005 - Volume 37 - Issue 5 > Energy Cost Of A Basic KettlebellTM Training Protocol: 263 B...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
A-29: Free Communication/Poster - Training: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 1, 2005 9:30 AM - 12:30 PM ROOM: Ryman C1

Energy Cost Of A Basic KettlebellTM Training Protocol: 263 Board #170 11:00 AM ‐ 12:30 PM

Lanier, Angela B.; Bishop, Emmett; Collins, Mitchell A. FACSM

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA.

(Sponsor: Mitchell A. Collins, FACSM)

Email: alanier@kennesaw.edu

(A.B. Lanier, DragonDoor Research Grant Recipient.)

KettlebellTM training is a relatively ancient form of strength training that has been highly regarded among the Russian military and Eastern European power lifters for many years. Most recently, it has gained popularity among athletic strength coaches and recreationally active individuals as a novel way to enhance functional strength and positively impact cardiovascular endurance. However, to our knowledge this form of training with handheld weights has not been systematically investigated.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PURPOSE

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the energy cost and intensity of a basic KettlebellTM training protocol.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Ten subjects, mean age 30.2 ± 10.6 years, participated in a maximal treadmill test to assess VO2max. Participants subsequently performed 5 sets of 10 repetitions of two-armed swings, snatches, and clean and presses using a 4, 8, 12 or 16 kg KettlebellTM. Metabolic data were collected by a metabolic measurement system. The data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Training intensity in metabolic equivalents (METS) was 4.9 ± .88. The mean caloric expenditure and oxygen uptake values were 4.97 ± 2.02 kcal/min and 14.25 ± 3.08 ml/kg/min. Total energy expenditure during the session was 297.91 ± 121.13 kcal. Associated heart rate response during the training session was 122.08 ± 21.13 bpm that corresponded to 64.29 ± 11.74% of maximal heart rate. The training intensity relative to VO2max was 32.96 ± .08%.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

Although intensity as assessed by heart rate appeared to be high enough to improve cardiovascular fitness pursuant to the ACSM recommendation, the training stimulus of 32% of VO2max was less than the ACSM recommendation of ± 55%. However, a basic KettlebellTM training protocol may be an alternative activity for achieving the Surgeon General's recommended amount (150–200 kcal/day) and intensity (3–6 METS) of physical activity for improving health.

©2005The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Connect With Us