Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
Allen, M R.1; Bloomfield, S A. FACSM1
1Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Deficits in the rate and amount of new bone formation significantly contribute to the bone loss that occurs during periods of skeletal unloading. This study was designed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these deficits with the specific goal of investigating 1) if the rate/quantity of bone formation can be artificially stimulated in unloaded bones, and 2) if declines in formation are caused by reductions in osteoblast function or an impaired differentiation of osteoblast progenitor cells. Skeletally-mature male mice (C3H) were divided into five groups, three hindlimb unloaded (HU) groups, one control (C) group, and baseline control (BC). One HU group (HU_AB) and the C group (C_AB) underwent marrow ablation (AB), a procedure that stimulates bone formation, on day 0; one HU group was unloaded for 10d prior to AB and then returned to HU (HU10_AB); the final HU group served as an unloaded control. Animals were sacrificed post-AB at 1–3d (to assess changes in gene expression) or 10–14d (to assess bone formation). Cancellous bone analyses included peripheral quantitative computed tomography to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and fluorescent histomorphometry to assess the rate (MAR) and quantity (MS/BS) of bone formation. After 10d, cancellous BMD was significantly increased in HU_AB (+28%), C_AB (+42%) and HU10_AB (+43%) groups vs both BC and HU groups. Preliminary results (n = 3–5/gp) show that at 14d post-AB, MAR was increased in C_AB (+60%) vs BC, confirming the stimulatory effect of AB on bone formation. HU_AB animals had non-significantly higher MAR vs BC and HU groups, while HU10_AB animals had a higher MAR vs BC (+52%) and vs HU (+113%). All three HU groups, independent of AB, tended to have lower MS/BS compared to BC. These preliminary results suggest that bone formation rate can be stimulated in unloaded bones, yet numbers of active osteoblasts may be limited. Ongoing analyses will assess osteoblast lined bone surfaces and osteoblast-specific gene expression patterns, both which will provide key insight into the mechanisms responsible for these altered responses to marrow ablation in unloaded bone.
©2003The American College of Sports Medicine
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics