Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2010 - Volume 42 - Issue 6 > Concurrent Endurance and Strength Training Not to Failure Op...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c67eec
Applied Sciences

Concurrent Endurance and Strength Training Not to Failure Optimizes Performance Gains

IZQUIERDO-GABARREN, MIKEL1; GONZÁLEZ DE TXABARRI EXPÓSITO, RAFAEL1; GARCÍA-PALLARÉS, JESÚS2; SÁNCHEZ-MEDINA, LUIS3; DE VILLARREAL, Eduardo SÁEZ SÁEZ3; IZQUIERDO, MIKEL4

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 8 wk of resistance training to failure versus not to failure training regimens at both moderate and low volumes for increasing upper-body strength and power as well as cardiovascular parameters into a combined resistance and endurance periodized training scheme.

Methods: Forty-three trained male rowers were matched and then randomly assigned to four groups that performed the same endurance training but differed on their resistance training regimen: four exercises leading to repetition failure (4RF; n = 14), four exercises not leading to failure (4NRF; n = 15), two exercises not to failure (2NRF; n = 6), and control group (C; n = 8). One-repetition maximum strength and maximal muscle power output during prone bench pull (BP), average power during a 20-min all-out row test (W20min), average row power output eliciting a blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol·L−1 (W4mmol·L−1), and power output in 10 maximal strokes (W10strokes) were assessed before and after 8 wk of periodized training.

Results: 4NRF group experienced larger gains in one-repetition maximum strength and muscle power output (4.6% and 6.4%, respectively) in BP compared with both 4RF (2.1% and −1.2%) and 2NRF (0.6% and −0.6%). 4NRF and 2NRF groups experienced larger gains in W10strokes (3.6% and 5%) and in W20min (7.6% and 9%) compared with those found after 4RF (−0.1% and 4.6%), whereas no significant differences between groups were observed in the magnitude of changes in W4mmol·L−1 (4NRF = 6.2%, 4RF = 5.3%, 2NRF = 6.8%, and C = 4.5%).

Conclusions: An 8-wk linear periodized concurrent strength and endurance training program using a moderate number of repetitions not to failure (4NRF group) provides a favorable environment for achieving greater enhancements in strength, muscle power, and rowing performance when compared with higher training volumes of repetitions to failure in experienced highly trained rowers.

©2010The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us