Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 9 > Myocardial Performance during Progressive Exercise in Athlet...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a06cb5
Basic Sciences

Myocardial Performance during Progressive Exercise in Athletic Adolescent Males

ROWLAND, THOMAS W.1; GARRARD, MAX2; MARWOOD, SIMON2; GUERRA, MIRIAM E.3; ROCHE, DENISE2; UNNITHAN, VISWANATH B.2

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The extent that enhanced ventricular function contributes to superior aerobic fitness of trained athletes is unclear. This study compared cardiovascular responses to progressive cycle exercise in 12 adolescent soccer players and 10 untrained boys with assessment of ventricular inotropic and relaxation properties by Doppler ultrasound techniques.

Methods: Resting cardiac dimensions were measured by M-mode echocardiography. Stroke volume was estimated by the Doppler technique, and systolic function by peak aortic flow velocity and ejection flow rate. Diastolic transmitral pressure gradient was assessed by pulse wave peak E-wave velocity, ventricular relaxation properties by tissue Doppler imaging (E′ velocity, adjusted for ventricular size), and ventricular filling pressure by E/E′ ratio.

Results: Size-adjusted cardiac dimensions were significantly greater in the athletes. Peak V˙O2 values for the athletes and nonathletes were 57.4 ± 4.8 and 44.4 ± 6.6 mL·kg−1·min−1, respectively. Maximal cardiac index and stroke index were greater in the athletes (11.10± 1.52 vs 9.02 ± 2.05 L·min−1·m−2; 59 ± 8 vs 46 ± 10 mL·m−2). Athletes and nonathletes demonstrated similar maximal peak aortic velocity (231 ± 20 and 208 ± 45 cm·s−1, respectively) and ejection rate (13.3 ± 1.0 and 12.5 ± 2.8 mL·s−1·cm−2 × 10−2, respectively). No significant group differences were observed in Emax (155 ± 17 and 149 ± 23 cm·s−1 for athletes and nonathletes, respectively), adjusted Emax (5.9 ± 1.2 and 5.8 ± 1.2 cm·s−1·mm−1 for athletes and nonathletes, respectively), and E/Emax (265 ± 40 and 262 ± 56 for athletes and nonathletes, respectively).

Conclusions: This study revealed no differences between young trained athletes and nonathletes in myocardial functional responses to progressive exercise, implying that greater aerobic fitness in these athletes reflected volume expansion of the cardiovascular system without contribution of enhanced systolic or diastolic ventricular function. Such findings should be considered limited to the context of young athletes with limited duration of athletic training.

©2009The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us