Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 7 > A Comparison of Questionnaire, Accelerometer, and Pedometer:...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819b3533
Basic Sciences

A Comparison of Questionnaire, Accelerometer, and Pedometer: Measures in Older People

HARRIS, TESS J.1,2; OWEN, CHRISTOPHER G.1; VICTOR, CHRISTINA R.3; ADAMS, RIKA2; EKELUND, ULF4; COOK, DEREK G.1

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: To compare (i) the convergent validity of the self-report Zutphen Physical Activity Questionnaire with the 7-d objective physical activity (PA) measurement by accelerometers and pedometers and (ii) the construct validity of these measures by examining their associations with physical health and psychological and anthropometric variables.

Methods: Five hundred and sixty community-dwelling people aged ≥65 yr were invited from a UK primary care practice and 238 (43%) participated (mean age = 74, 53% male). PA was assessed subjectively by the Zutphen questionnaire (modified to include housework questions) and objectively by the 7-d accelerometer monitoring: a random half also had a pedometer. A questionnaire assessed health, disability, and psychological factors, and anthropometric assessment was performed.

Results: Mean daily PA levels were as follows: Zutphen = 9.1 kcal·kg−1·d−1 (SD = 6.6 kcal·kg−1·d−1); accelerometer activity count = 226,648 (SD = 121,966); accelerometer step count = 6495 (SD = 3212); and pedometer step count = 6712 (SD = 3526). Zutphen score was moderately correlated with accelerometer activity count (R = 0.34, P < 0.001) and pedometer step count (R = 0.36, P < 0.001). Pedometer step count was highly correlated with accelerometer activity count (R = 0.82, P< 0.001) and accelerometer step count (R = 0.86, P < 0.001). Objective PA measures showed strong associations with health and anthropometric and psychological variables. Zutphen score was not significantly related to most health or anthropometric measures but was associated with psychological variables and provided information about activity type.

Conclusions: Convergent validity was strong between accelerometers and pedometers but weaker between these and self-report Zutphen. Pedometers may be preferred to accelerometers for simple studies due to their lower cost. Objective measures had better construct validity, being more strongly associated with established PA determinants, and thus offered better value to researchers than the questionnaire, but the latter provided useful detail on activity type, so a combined approach to PA assessment may be preferable.

©2009The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us