Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 2 > Mechanical External Work and Recovery at Preferred Walking S...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818606e7
Applied Sciences

Mechanical External Work and Recovery at Preferred Walking Speed in Obese Subjects

MALATESTA, DAVIDE1; VISMARA, LUCA2; MENEGONI, FRANCESCO2,3; GALLI, MANUELA3; ROMEI, MARIANNA2,3; CAPODAGLIO, PAOLO2

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical external work (per kg) and pendular energy transduction at preferred walking speed (PWS) in obese versus normal body mass subjects to investigate whether obese adults adopt energy conserving gait mechanics.

Methods: The mechanical external work (Wext) and the fraction of mechanical energy recovered by the pendular mechanism (Rstep) were computed using kinematic data acquired by an optoelectronic system and were compared in 30 obese (OG; body mass index [BMI] = 39.6 ± 0.6 kg·m−2; 29.5 ± 1.3 yr) and 19 normal body mass adults (NG; BMI = 21.4 ± 0.5 kg·m−2; 31.2 ± 1.2 yr) walking at PWS.

Results: PWS was significantly lower in OG (1.18 ± 0.02 m·s−1) than in NG (1.33 ± 0.02 m·s−1; P ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference in Wext per unit mass between groups (OG: 0.36 ± 0.03 J·kg−1·m−1; NG: 0.31 ± 0.02 J·kg−1·m−1; P = 0.12). Rstep was significantly lower in OG (68.4% ± 2.0%) compared with NG (74.4% ± 1.0%; P = 0.01). In OG only, Wext per unit mass was positively correlated with PWS (r = 0.57; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Obese adults do not appear to alter their gait to improve pendular energy transduction and may select slower PWS to reduce mechanical and metabolic work.

©2009The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us