Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 1 > Cardiovascular Consequences of Completing a 160-km Ultramara...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818313ff
Clinical Sciences

Cardiovascular Consequences of Completing a 160-km Ultramarathon

SCOTT, JESSICA M.1; ESCH, BEN T.A.1; SHAVE, ROB2; WARBURTON, DARREN E.R.1; GAZE, DAVID2,3; GEORGE, KEITH4

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purposes: To comprehensively investigate the cardiovascular consequences of a 160-km ultramarathon using traditional echocardiography, speckle tracking imaging, cardiac biomarkers, and heart rate variability (HRV) and to examine the relationship between the changes in these variables.

Methods: We examined athletes before an ultramarathon and reassessed all finishers immediately after the race. Left ventricular (LV) systolic (ejection fraction [EF], systolic blood pressure/end-systolic volume [SBP/ESV] ratio) and diastolic (ratio of early [E] to late [A], filling E:A) measurements were assessed using traditional echocardiography, whereas myocardial peak strain and strain rate were analyzed using speckle tracking. Cardiac biomarkers measured were cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP). HRV indices were assessed using standard frequency and time domain measures.

Results: Twenty-five athletes successfully completed the race (25.5 ± 3.2 h). Significant pre- to postrace changes in EF (66.8 ± 3.8 to 61.2 ± 4.0 %, P < 0.05) and E:A ratio (1.62 ± 0.37 to 1.35 ± 0.33, P < 0.05) were reported. Peak strain was significantly decreased in all planes, with the largest reduction occurring circumferentially. NT-pro-BNP concentrations increased significantly (28 ± 17.1 vs 795 ± 823 ng·L−1, P < 0.05), whereas postrace cTnT were elevated in just five athletes (20%). No significant alterations in HRV were noted postrace. Reductions in LV function were not significantly associated with changes in cardiac biomarkers and/or HRV.

Conclusions: Although the stress of an ultramarathon resulted in a mild reduction in LV function and biomarker release, the mechanisms behind such consequences remain unknown. It is likely that factors other than myocardial damage or strong vagal reactivation contributed to postexercise decreases in LV function after an ultramarathon.

© 2009 American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us