Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2007 - Volume 39 - Issue 10 > Separate and Combined Effects of Airflow and Rehydration dur...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180de4dad
BASIC SCIENCES: Original Investigations

Separate and Combined Effects of Airflow and Rehydration during Exercise in the Heat


Collapse Box


Purpose: To determine whether airflow is required to obtain the beneficial effects of rehydration (thermoregulatory and cardiovascular) during exercise in dry heat.

Methods: Ten moderately trained (V˙O2max = 55 ± 8 mL·kg−1·min−1) heat acclimated males pedaled for 60 min at 60% V˙O2max in a hot-dry environment (36 ± 1°C; 29 ± 2% relative humidity) on four different occasions: 1) without rehydration or forced airflow (control trial; CON); 2) rehydrating 100% of sweat losses by ingestion of a 6% carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (rehydration trial; REH); 3) receiving airflow at a velocity of 2.55 m·s−1 (wind trial; WIND); and 4) combining airflow and rehydration (W + R).

Results: Without airflow, rehydration alone (REH) did not lower rectal temperature below CON (39.0 ± 0.1 vs 39.1 ± 0.1°C at 60 min; respectively). However, with airflow, rehydration reduced final rectal temperature (38.8 ± 0.1 vs 38.5 ± 0.1°C; P < 0.05; WIND vs W + R). In the trials with wind (WIND and W + R), skin temperature was reduced by about 0.6°C (P < 0.05), and heart rate drift was prevented. In the trials with rehydration (REH and W + R trials), cardiac output (CO2-rebreathing technique) was maintained higher than CON (16.5 ± 0.4 and 17.0 ± 0.7 vs 15.4 ± 0.4 L·min−1, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusion: When exercising in a hot-dry environment, airflow is required for rehydration to improve thermoregulation and cardiovascular function.

©2007The American College of Sports Medicine


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us