Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2006 - Volume 38 - Issue 10 > Contribution of the Legs to Double-Poling Performance in Eli...
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000230121.83641.d1
APPLIED SCIENCES: Physical Fitness and Performance

Contribution of the Legs to Double-Poling Performance in Elite Cross-Country Skiers

HOLMBERG, HANS-CHRISTER1; LINDINGER, STEFAN2,3; STÖGGL, THOMAS2,3; BJÖRKLUND, GLENN4,5; MÜLLER, ERICH2,3

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: In the classical style of cross-country skiing, the double-poling (DP) technique, which is regarded as an upper-body exercise, is used on the flatter parts of a course. Limited biomechanical and physiological data are available about DP compared with other cross-country skiing techniques. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the possible role of the lower body during DP.

Methods: Eleven elite cross-country skiers performed two incremental tests using DP roller skiing at 1° inclination on a treadmill with or without locking the knee and ankle joints (DPLOCKED and DPFREE). Maximal and peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2max and V˙O2peak) during classic diagonal skiing and DP, respectively, were measured. In addition, heart rate, blood lactate concentration, and maximal DP velocity (V˙max) were determined. Pole-ground reaction forces and joint angles (elbow, hip, knee, and ankle) were analyzed.

Results: The skiers obtained 7.7% higher V˙O2peak, 9.4% higher V˙max, and 11.7% longer time to exhaustion during DPFREE compared with DPLOCKED (all P < 0.05). There was a higher heart rate and blood lactate concentration in DPLOCKED at submaximal stages (all P < 0.05), with no difference in oxygen consumption. At 85% V˙max, corresponding to approximately 81% V˙O2peak FREE, the differences in physiological variables were accompanied by a 13.6% higher poling frequency, a 4.9% shorter poling phase, 13.3% shorter recovery phase, and 10.9% lower relative pole force in DPLOCKED (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Movements of the knee and ankle joints are an integrative part in the skillful use of the DP technique, and restriction of the motion in these joints markedly affects both biomechanical and physiological variables, impairing DP performance.

©2006The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us