Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 1998 - Volume 30 - Issue 2 > Cross training: indices of training stress and performance
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
Applied Sciences: Physical Fitness and Performance

Cross training: indices of training stress and performance

FLYNN, MICHAEL G.; CARROLL, KATHY K.; HALL, HEATHER L.; BUSHMAN, BARBARA A.; BROLINSON, P. GUNNAR; WEIDEMAN, CAROL A.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Twenty well-trained runners (˙VO2max 4.6 ± 0.5 L·min-1) were age and ability matched and assigned to either a cross training (CT) or run only group (RT). All subjects maintained normal running distance and intensity for 6 wk and reported for three additional training sessions per week. These workouts were performed outdoors on a 400-m track or measured road course (RT) or on a bicycle ergometer (CT). The sessions were as follows: (work·rest-1 ratio = 1): 5 × 5 min at >95% ˙VO2max/peak (Monday), 50-60 min at 70%˙VO2max/peak (Wednesday), and 3 × 2.5 min at >105%˙VO2max/peak, plus 6 × 1.25 min at >115%˙VO2max/peak (Friday). Subjects were tested before (PRE), after 3 wk (MID), and after 6 wk (POST) of intensified training. Blood samples were obtained from RT, CT, and ten controls (CON) at each time point (0600 h). Runners also completed a 10-min submaximal run at the same absolute intensity(velocity to elicit 75% of initial ˙VO2max) during which heart rate, RPE, and ˙VO2 were measured. Each runner then completed a simulated 5-km race (time trial) on a treadmill. Total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), cortisol (C), and creatine kinase activity (CK) were determined. Running economy was similar between RT and CT; however, RPE decreased significantly at MID and POST compared with that at PRE (P< 0.05; time effect). There were no significant differences among groups for TT, FT, or CK, but C was significantly lower in CON than in RT and CT. Performance was significantly faster (P < 0.05; time effect) in the 5-km race at MID (1076.1 ± 81.4 s) and POST (1068.6 ± 83.9) compared with PRE (1096.6 ± 79.5) but was not different between CT and RT. In conclusion, RT and CT responded similarly to 6 wk of increased training, and both groups improved 5-km performance to a similar extent.

©1998The American College of Sports Medicine

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us