Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 1988 - Volume 20 - Issue 1 > Training effects of sub-maximal electrostimulation in a huma...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise:
Original Investigations: PDF Only

Training effects of sub-maximal electrostimulation in a human muscle

DUCHATEAU, JACQUES; HAINAUT, KARL

Collapse Box

Abstract

This paper compares the effects of 6 wk of sub-maximal training by electrostimulation (100 Hz) and voluntary contractions on the contractile properties of the adductor pollicis muscle in intact man. The daily training program consisted of ten series of twenty 1-s isotonic contractions (60 to 65% of maximum) separated by 1-s intervals. The observed increase in muscle force, tested in maximal voluntary and electrically evoked contractions, appears to be significantly smaller during electrostimulation than during a training session performed by voluntary contractions. The increase in force recorded during electrostimulation is not associated with changes in the tetanus rates of tension development and tension relaxation (dP0/dt). Conversely, the tetanus time course is found to be significantly accelerated in muscles trained by voluntary contractions. No change of the surface action potential total area was observed during both training procedures. Furthermore, electrostimulation does not improve muscle resistance to fatigue, which is observed to be significantly increased after training by voluntary contractions. This study indicates that electrostimulation augments the muscle force of contraction by changing peripheral processes associated with intra-cellular events, without modifying the nervous command of the contraction. The comparison of the peripheral changes recorded during sub-maximal training by electrostimulation and voluntary contractions suggests that electrostimulation is less efficient, but complementary to voluntary training because the number and the type of trained motor units are different in the two procedures.

(C)1988The American College of Sports Medicine

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.