Exercise & Sport Sciences Reviews:
Motor Control Strategies Revealed in the Structure of Motor Variability
Latash, Mark L.1; Scholz, John P.2; Schöner, Gregor3
1Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania; 2Department of Physical Therapy and Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Program, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware; and 3Institut für Neuroinformatik, Rühr University, Bochum, Germany
Accepted for publication: October 10, 2001.
Address for correspondence: Mark L. Latash, Rec Hall-267, Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (E-mail: email@example.com).
LATASH, M.L., J.P. SCHOLZ, and G. SCHÖNER. Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., Vol. 30, No. 1, pp 26–31, 2002. We describe an uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, which suggests a particular solution for the notorious problem of motor redundancy. A body of recent experiments supports the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis and shows its ability to discover biological strategies of the coordination of apparently redundant motor systems. The hypothesis and associated computational apparatus have great potential for application in the areas of motor rehabilitation and motor skill acquisition.
One of the most commonly seen features in human movements is motor variability. Several attempts at the same task always lead to somewhat different patterns of performance, including the kinematics, kinetics, and patterns of muscle activation. Bernstein (1) used an expression “repetition without repetition” when he described consecutive attempts at solving a motor task. He meant that each repetition of an act involved unique, nonrepetitive neural and motor patterns. During the last half-century, motor variability has become an object of study in its own right, with review articles and monographs dedicated to this topic (8). Thus, most motor control researchers now view variability not as a nuisance that forces experimenters to record many trials of each motor task but rather as a window into the central organization of the system that produces voluntary movements.
One of the obvious origins of motor variability is motor redundancy. At each level of analysis of the system for the production of voluntary movements, there are many more elements contributing to performance than are absolutely necessary to solve a motor task. In other words, a motor task does not prescribe a single, particular motor pattern such that the CNS is confronted with a problem of choice: how to select a particular way of solving each particular problem. Examples of such problems in motor control literature include the problem of inverse kinematics and the problem of inverse dynamics. Problems of this type belong to the ill-posed class; they have been termed problems of motor redundancy or Bernstein’s problems (5,14). Bernstein himself viewed the problem of “elimination of redundant degrees of freedom” (DOFs) as the central issue of motor control (1).
There have been many attempts to address the problem of motor redundancy in its original formulation. These involved, in particular, application of optimization principles based on certain mechanical, engineering, psychological, or complex cost functions. However, we suggest that the problem itself has been inadequately formulated.
SYNERGIES AND STRUCTURAL UNITS
In the 1960s, Gelfand and Tsetlin (4) formulated a set of axioms for the organization of groups of elements united by a common goal (structural units). They considered movements to be controlled in a hierarchical but not prescriptive manner. The controller organizes relations among elements at an hierarchically lower level, and these relations assure stability of motor performance with respect to a particular motor task. Figure 1 presents a general scheme and a few examples of such organizations at very different scales. Just like a football coach never specifies a precise sequence of all the movements of all the players for a particular play, the CNS does not specify a precise pattern of joint rotations that would lead to a new, desired position of the endpoint of the limb. A structural unit is always organized in a task-specific way such that, if an element introduces an error into the common output, other elements change their contributions to minimize the original error, and no corrective action is required of the controller (cf. the principle of minimal interaction (4)). Only systems that function according to this principle and demonstrate error compensation among elements are going to be called synergies.
More recently, a principle of abundance (3) has been suggested; it states that all the elements (DOFs) always participate in all the tasks, assuring both stability and flexibility of the performance. As such, the principle of abundance renders the redundancy problem irrelevant: No DOFs are ever eliminated or frozen. The principle of abundance allows the introduction of elements of exactness into one of the most commonly (ab)used terms in the area of movement studies, that of a synergy. Here, we present an approach that allows one to address in a formal way the following questions: 1) how to tell a synergy from a “nonsynergy”; 2) how to measure the “strength” of a synergy; 3) how to test whether an alleged synergy contributes to a particular task; and 4) how to test whether a new synergy has been developed for a particular task (for example, as a result of practice or adaptation to an injury).
THE UNCONTROLLED MANIFOLD (UCM) HYPOTHESIS
The UCM hypothesis assumes that, when a controller of a multi-element system wants to stabilize a particular value of a performance variable, it selects a subspace within the state space of the elements such that, within the subspace, the desired value of the variable is constant. This subspace has been termed the “uncontrolled manifold” (UCM). After selecting a UCM, the controller selectively restricts the variability of elements along “essential” directions within the state space that do not belong to the UCM, but not along directions within the UCM. This means that the controller allows the elements to show high variability (have more freedom) as long as it does not affect the desired value of the variable. The term “uncontrolled manifold” refers to this basic feature of the UCM: the elements are “less controlled” as long as they remain within the UCM.
Consider the following example: A person is asked to press with two fingers to produce a total force of 10 N. Let this person perform the task 100 times and plot the values of individual finger forces on the force-force plane (state space of the system). The data points will form a cloud (Fig. 2A, the ovals indicate the data distribution shapes). Let us consider two main possibilities. First, the cloud may be circular (Fig. 2A). This means that, if one finger by chance produced a higher than usual force (introduced an error), the other finger would produce with equal probabilities higher than usual or lower than usual forces (amplify or reduce the error). By definition, this is not a synergy. In Figure 2B, the data ellipsoid is elongated along a line corresponding to the equation F1 +F2 = 10 (dashed line). Now, if by chance, one finger produced a larger force, the other finger would more likely produce a lower force to keep the sum closer to the required value. The two elements are at least partly compensating for each other’s errors. This is a synergy, and the dashed line is the UCM.
Let us introduce two measures of variance for the data clouds in Figure 2. One of them is the projection of the variance on the UCM (VarUCM), whereas the other one is the projection of the variance on the orthogonal to the UCM direction (VarORT). Let us normalize both VarUCM and VarORT by the number of dimensions (DOFs) within the UCM and within the orthogonal subspace (in Fig. 2, no normalization is required because both dimensions are unity). If, after the normalization, VarUCM is significantly higher than VarORT, as in Figure 2B, the system functions according to the UCM hypothesis. If there is no difference between VarUCM and VarORT, the system controls the elements independently. This may be quantified using the ratio RV = VarUCM/VarORT. If RV > 1, the system functions according to the UCM hypothesis with respect to the selected criterion.
Let us make a few important points with respect to the UCM hypothesis:
1) A UCM always reflects a “control hypothesis,”i.e., a hypothesis about a performance variable, whose value the system is assumed to stabilize. In Figure 2, the control hypothesis was that the system tried to stabilize the total force at 10 N. Other control hypotheses may assume, for example, that the total force is stabilized at a different value, or that another function of the forces is stabilized at a certain value. If RV > 1 for a control hypothesis, the hypothesized performance variable is selectively stabilized. If RV = 1, the organization of control is indifferent to the selected performance variable. If RV < 1, the organization of control is such that the selected performance variable is destabilized, i.e., an error introduced by an element is more likely to be amplified by changes in the outputs of other elements.
2) Using the UCM method of control only predicts certain relations between variance components but not their absolute magnitudes. As such, it is compatible with better, equal, or worse performance as compared with controlling each element of the system independently (as a nonsynergy).
3) An improvement in performance, for example as a result of practice, may be associated with increased or decreased RV (see panels C and D of Fig. 2). In both cases, VarORT is decreased, implying less variable overall performance. In Figure 2C, this is associated with no changes in VarUCM leading to an increase in RV (a stronger synergy). In Figure 2D, VarUCM decreased more than VarORT, leading to a drop in RV (a weaker synergy).
4) A multi-element system may be able to selectively stabilize several performance variables at the same time. This is true as long as the number of elements is at least as high as the number of task constraints plus the number of stabilized variables.
5) The UCM method shares certain similar features with the principal component analysis. A major difference is that the principal component analysis is “objective,”i.e., it identifies the directions and magnitudes of the main axes of an ellipsoid describing a distribution of data points. It does not say, however, whether these directions are in any way special with respect to characteristics of the external performance of the system. The UCM always analyzes data clouds with respect to a particular control hypothesis, i.e., a particular performance variable.
To summarize, the UCM method combines a hypothesis on a particular type of control and a toolbox that allows one to analyze the output of a multi-element system to discover which variables the system stabilizes preferentially.
To use the UCM approach to analyze a multi-element system, one needs to have a Jacobian (J) of the system, i.e., a set of coefficients that describe how small changes in the outputs of individual elements are reflected in the magnitude of a selected performance variable. This is formalized as a matrix of partial derivatives of the selected variable with respect to outputs of the elements. In some cases, the J matrix can be computed based on the geometrical properties of the system, for example, when one is interested in how individual joint rotations are organized to produce a particular motion of the endpoint of the multi-joint limb. In other situations, however, getting an estimate of the J matrix itself becomes a major problem, in particular when one deals with a system whose apparent output elements may not be independently controlled. For example, when a person tries to produce force with a finger of a hand, other fingers of the hand also show involuntary force production. This phenomenon is called “enslaving” (15). It is a result of both peripheral connections among the fingers, such as shared muscles and inter-digit tendinous connections, and neural factors such as overlapping cortical representations for individual fingers. Such “built-in” dependences among the finger forces require one to look for another set of variables that the CNS manipulates independently. Let us term these hypothetical variables “modes.”Figure 3 illustrates the notion of modes. Each mode induces force production by all the fingers, whereas separate modes can be independently involved to different degrees by the CNS. In the case of multi-finger force production, modes can be assessed by asking a subject to press with only one finger at a time and observing force changes in all four fingers.
In other cases, the situation may be even more complicated. For example, most contemporary scientists would probably agree that muscles are not controlled independently by the CNS. Imagine that you want to analyze multi-muscle synergies. You cannot simply tell your subject “and now activate only your left soleus.” So, multi-muscle modes need to be discovered with other, more subtle means. Such means do not exist yet.
KINEMATIC STUDIES WITHIN THE UCM HYPOTHESIS FRAMEWORK
Until now, there have been a few studies that used the UCM hypothesis to analyze motor systems and tasks of different complexity. The tasks included whole-body motion, joint coordination during a bimanual task, joint coordination during a single-limb task, and finger coordination in a multi-finger force production task. Table 1 summarizes methods of analysis, control hypotheses, and main results obtained in these studies.
Two-dimensional kinematic studies of a sit-to-stand action (9,11,12) and two-arm pointing (2) have shown that the UCM apparatus is capable of distinguishing among different control hypotheses related to selective stabilization of time patterns of particular performance characteristics of these actions. In particular, the studies of the sit-to-stand action showed differences in the stabilization of the horizontal and vertical displacements of the center of mass. The pointing study has provided quantitative support for the hypothesis that joints of the two arms were indeed united into a bimanual synergy rather than being a simple superposition of two unimanual synergies. The latter study also looked at the effects of practice on the structure of joint variability. The UCM analysis showed that both VarUCM and VarORT decreased with practice. However, VarUCM decreased more, leading to smaller RV values (see Fig. 2D). This is an unexpected finding. It may be a result of the task being very simple, such that there was not much room for decreasing VarORT. Other factors, outside the explicit task, could play a role in making the movements more stereotypical, e.g., postural stability. Finally, the path of end-effector positions requires a sequence of different UCMs. The subjects may have learned to limit the range of joint combinations used for a given UCM to improve efficiency of transitions between UCMs.
A three-dimensional study of quick-draw pistol shooting (13) was performed based on an intuitive consideration that accurate shooting depends on two angles (pitch and yaw) describing the orientation of the pistol at the time the trigger is pressed, but not on the third angle (roll) and not on the position of the pistol along the line of shooting (Fig. 4). The results have shown that instantaneous orientation of the pistol barrel with respect to the direction from the backsight to the target was selectively stabilized by the coordinated rotation at the seven major joint axes. Other control hypotheses were tested; they, however, were supported only during the initial phase of the movement. Supporting several hypotheses during the movement initiation was possible because of the relatively large redundancy of the system.
ANALYSIS OF MULTI-FINGER FORCE PRODUCTION
Studies of multi-finger cyclic force production (7,10) used the mode approach as described earlier (Fig. 3). Patterns of finger forces were recomputed into force-mode patterns; then, force-mode patterns were analyzed with respect to two control hypotheses: (H1) individual finger forces were coordinated to stabilize the average total force profile; and (H2) individual finger forces were coordinated to stabilize the average profile of total moment generated by all involved fingers with respect to the midpoint between the two “lateral” fingers. When only two fingers participated in the task, the requirements of force and moment stabilization were incompatible, such that the subjects were forced to choose which of the two variables to stabilize at the expense of the other variable being destabilized. In two-finger tasks, the subjects stabilized total force only within a narrow phase range of the force cycle, close to the peak total force, while the moment-control hypothesis (H2F) was confirmed over most of the cycle (Fig. 5B). Note that the subjects were explicitly asked to reproduce a pattern of total force with no explicit feedback on total moment.
In three- and four-finger tasks, the redundancy of the system allows the stabilization of both force and moment at the same time. However, in three-finger tasks, the results were similar to those in two-finger tasks. Actually, the third finger was used to stabilize moment over the whole cycle, not to stabilize force better! Only when all four fingers were used, were the subjects able to avoid force destabilization. However, they still stabilized force only within a relatively narrow phase range, while moment was stabilized over the whole cycle.
These seemingly unexpected findings are likely to reflect the multi-finger synergies elaborated by the CNS during a lifetime based on everyday tasks. Most everyday tasks such as eating with a spoon, drinking from a glass, and writing with a pen impose stronger constraints on permissible errors in moment than in force. In tasks illustrated in Figure 6, grip force should only be sufficiently large to prevent the glass or the pen from slipping out of the hand. It should also be under a magnitude that could potentially crush the glass or the pen. These are relatively weak constraints. The moment, however, needs to be controlled much more precisely if one wants to write legibly and to avoid spilling the contents of the glass.
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF THE UCM APPROACH
The UCM hypothesis and toolbox allow the following issues to be addressed that are central to aspects of motor rehabilitation and motor skill acquisition:
One can test whether an alleged element of a multi-element synergy actually contributes to stabilization of a particular performance variable: if considering the contribution of this element leads to better error compensation (higher RV values) with respect to the selected variable, the element indeed takes part in the synergy.
If a new technique of performing a motor task has emerged, it is possible to test whether the new coordination actually stabilizes performance variables that are essential for the task.
One can test hypotheses about different performance variables being stabilized by apparently atypical coordination patterns. Patients with motor disorders commonly show atypical motor patterns that may result from their pathology or may be consequences of an adaptation within the CNS (6). In the latter case, atypical coordination patterns may be directed not at an apparent motor task but at less obvious performance characteristics related to postural stabilization, avoiding uncomfortable or painful body postures, preserving larger safety margins, etc.
Until now, applications of the UCM approach have been limited to analysis of kinematic and kinetic variables. It is theoretically possible to apply this general theoretical framework and the associated computational approaches to more physiological variables such as muscle activation patterns and patterns of neural signals associated with motor tasks. There are methodological challenges to be met. However, at the present time, we do not see alternatives to studies of the central organization of motor synergies.
This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants HD-35857, AG-018751, and NS-35032, and by NSF grant IBN-0078127.
1. Bernstein, N.A. The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1967.
2. Domkin, D., J. Laczko, S. Jaric, H. Johansson, and M.L. Latash. Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks. Exp. Brain Res.
2001. In press.
3. Gelfand, I.M., and Latash. M.L. On the problem of adequate language in movement science. Motor Control. 2: 306–313, 1998.
4. Gelfand, I.M., and Tsetlin. M.L On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. Models of the Structural-Functional Organization of Certain Biological Systems, edited by Gelfand, I.M. Gurfinkel, V.S. Fomin, S.V. and Tsetlin. M.L. Moscow: Nauka, 1966, p. 9–26.
5. Latash, M.L. How does our brain make its choices?In: Dexterity and Its Development, edited by Latash M.L. and Turvey. M.T. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers, 1996, p. 277–304.
6. Latash, M.L, and Anson. J.G. What are normal movements in atypical populations? Behav. Brain Sci. 19: 55–106, 1996.
7. Latash, M.L., Scholz, J.F. Danion, F.and Schöner. G. Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multi-finger force production tasks. Exp. Brain Res. 141: 153–165, 2001.
8. Newell, K.M., and Corcos. D.M. (Eds.) Variability and Motor Control. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1993.
9. Reisman, D., J.P. Scholz, and G. Schöner. Coordination underlying control of the whole-body momentum during sit-to-stand. Gait Posture
2001. In press.
10. Scholz, J.P., and F. Danion, M.L. Latash, and G. Schöner. Understand-ing finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol. Cybern. 2001. In press.
11. Scholz, J.P., D. Reisman, and G. Schöner. Effects of varying task constraints on solutions to joint control in sit-to-stand. Exp. Brain Res.
2001. In press.
12. Scholz, J.P., and Schöner G. The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp. Brain Res. 126: 289–306, 1999.
13. Scholz, J.P., Schöner G., and Latash M.L. Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp. Brain Res. 135: 382–404, 2000.
14. Turvey, M.T. Coordination. Am. Psychologist. 45: 938–953, 1990.
15. Zatsiorsky, V.M., Li, Z.-M.and Latash. M.L. Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction, enslaving effects, and neural network modeling. Biol. Cybern. 79: 139–150, 1998.
This article has been cited 173 time(s).
Human Movement SciencePersistent and anti-persistent pattern in stride-to-stride variability of treadmill walking: Influence of rhythmic auditory cueingHuman Movement Science
Sports MedicineUnderstanding and Treating Lateral Ankle Sprains and their Consequences A Constraints-Based ApproachSports Medicine
Journal of NeuroscienceLearning to be Lazy: Exploiting Redundancy in a Novel Task to Minimize Movement-Related EffortJournal of Neuroscience
Proceedings 2012 Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Smc)
Leg joint synergy emerged from the body dynamics during walking
Proceedings 2012 Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Smc), ():
Movement systems as dynamical systems - The functional role of variability and its implications for sports medicine
Sports Medicine, 33(4):
Experimental Brain ResearchJoint angle variability in 3D bimanual pointing: uncontrolled manifold analysisExperimental Brain Research
Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vols 1-5
Evolutionary training of a biologically realistic spino-neuromuscular system
Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Vols 1-5, ():
Experimental Brain ResearchPractice effects on local and global dynamics of the ski-simulator taskExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMuscle synergies during voluntary body sway: combining across-trials and within-a-trial analysesExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchPrehension synergies: principle of superposition and hierarchical organization in circular object prehensionExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyFatigue and Motor Redundancy: Adaptive Increase in Finger Force Variance in Multi-Finger TasksJournal of Neurophysiology
Experimental Brain ResearchFinger synergies during multi-finger cyclic production of moment of forceExperimental Brain Research
Gait & PostureKinematic characterization of functional reach to grasp in normal and in motor disabled childrenGait & Posture
Experimental Brain ResearchMotor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trialsExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Applied PhysiologyThe effects of strength training on finger strength and hand dexterity in healthy elderly individualsJournal of Applied Physiology
Progress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary PerspectiveNeural Control of Hand Muscles During PrehensionProgress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Behavioural Brain ResearchStructure learning in actionBehavioural Brain Research
Constraints on the Complete Optimization of Human Motion
Sports Medicine, 39(1):
Experimental Brain ResearchThe sources of two components of variance: an example of multifinger cyclic force production tasks at different frequenciesExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchPrehension synergies: Effects of object geometry and prescribed torquesExperimental Brain Research
Clinical BiomechanicsA comparison of individual joint contributions to multijoint position reproduction acuity in overhead-throwing athletesClinical Biomechanics
Experimental Brain ResearchAnticipatory adjustments of multi-finger synergies in preparation for self-triggered perturbationsExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMuscle modes and synergies during voluntary body swayExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchEmerging and disappearing synergies in a hierarchically controlled systemExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchUncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndromeExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyWhat do synergies do? Effects of secondary constraints on multidigit synergies in accurate force-production tasksJournal of Neurophysiology
Brain Research BulletinMuscle synergies involved in shifts of the center of pressure while standing on a narrow supportBrain Research Bulletin
Human Movement ScienceOnline feedback and the regulation of degrees of freedom in motor controlHuman Movement Science
Experimental Brain ResearchJoint coordination during quiet stance: effects of visionExperimental Brain Research
Clinical NeurophysiologyMuscle synergies involved in preparation to a step made under the self-paced and reaction time instructionsClinical Neurophysiology
Measurement and evaluation of dynamic joint stability of the knee and ankle after injury
Sports Medicine, 36(5):
Gait & PostureBilateral foot center of pressure measures predict hemiparetic gait velocityGait & Posture
Experimental Brain ResearchThe role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reachingExperimental Brain Research
Neuroscience LettersEffect of motor planning on use of motor abundanceNeuroscience Letters
Variability and coordinative function in human gait
Clinical BiomechanicsElderly show decreased adjustments of motor synergies in preparation to actionClinical Biomechanics
Experimental Brain ResearchMotor equivalent control of the center of mass in response to support surface perturbationsExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Applied PhysiologyAge-related changes in multifinger synergies in accurate moment of force production tasksJournal of Applied Physiology
5Th International Scientific Conference on Kinesiology, Proceedings Book
Hierarchies of Synergies in Human Movements
5Th International Scientific Conference on Kinesiology, Proceedings Book, ():
Plos Computational BiologyCoordinate Dependence of Variability AnalysisPlos Computational Biology
Neuroscience LettersInfluence of motor learning on utilizing path redundancyNeuroscience Letters
Experimental Brain ResearchFinger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removalExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMuscle synergies involved in shifting the center of pressure while making a first stepExperimental Brain Research
Brain Research BulletinMuscle proprioceptive feedback and spinal networksBrain Research Bulletin
Engineering of Sport 7, Vol 1
Driving performance variability among elite golfers
Engineering of Sport 7, Vol 1, ():
Human Movement ScienceKinematic synergies during saccades involving whole-body rotation: A study based on the uncontrolled manifold hypothesisHuman Movement Science
Motor control: The heart of kinesiology
Hierarchies of Synergies in Human Movements
Experimental Brain ResearchNeuromechanical stabilization of leg length and orientation through interjoint compensation during human hoppingExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchHierarchical control of static prehension: I. BiomechanicsExperimental Brain Research
Gait & PostureThe effects of dual-tasking on postural control in people with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuryGait & Posture
Trends in Cognitive SciencesThe coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyondTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Experimental Brain ResearchLearning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysisExperimental Brain Research
Brain ResearchThe effects of muscle vibration on anticipatory postural adjustmentsBrain Research
Rotational equilibrium during multi-digit pressing and prehension
Motor Control, 8(4):
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Adapting to changing task demands: Variability in children's response to manipulations of resistance and cadence during pedaling
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75(4):
Journal of Motor Behavior
Change in the organization of degrees of freedom with learning
Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(2):
Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchLearning motor synergies by persons with Down syndromeJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Human Movement ScienceFinger inter-dependence: Linking the kinetic and kinematic variablesHuman Movement Science
Experimental Brain ResearchFlexible muscle modes and synergies in challenging whole-body tasksExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchAngular momentum synergies during walkingExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMulti-muscle synergies in a dual postural task: evidence for the principle of superpositionExperimental Brain Research
Goal-equivalent joint coordination in pointing: Affect of vision and arm dominance
Motor Control, 6(2):
Experimental Brain ResearchMuscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing personsExperimental Brain Research
Human Movement ScienceAction and perception at the level of synergiesHuman Movement Science
Do synergies improve accuracy? A study of speed-accuracy trade-offs during finger force production
Motor Control, 12(2):
Experimental Brain ResearchPrehension synergies and control with referent hand configurationsExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMotor variability within a multi-effector system: experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulsesExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchTask-dependent organization of pinch grip forcesExperimental Brain Research
Music Perception"It is different each time I play": Variability in highly prepared musical performanceMusic Perception
British Journal of Sports MedicineMuscle activation in coupled scapulohumeral motions in the high performance tennis serveBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
13Th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Vols 1-3
The Influence of Load Placement on Postural Sway Parameters
13Th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Vols 1-3, 23():
Experimental Brain ResearchManipulation of a fragile objectExperimental Brain Research
Acta PhysiologicaOn functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck-shoulder regionActa Physiologica
Experimental Brain ResearchControl of finger force direction in the flexion-extension planeExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchThe emergence and disappearance of multi-digit synergies during force-production tasksExperimental Brain Research
Neuroscience LettersHand dominance and multi-finger synergiesNeuroscience Letters
Journal of Neuroscience MethodsDetection of changes in grip forces on a sliding objectJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Ieee Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringEstimating effective degrees of freedom in motor systemsIeee Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Journal of Neuroscience MethodsDynamic torque during a precision grip task comparable to picking a raspberryJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Experimental Brain ResearchEmergent flexibility in motor learningExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Applied PhysiologyAge-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasksJournal of Applied Physiology
Journal of NeurophysiologyImpedance Control and Its Relation to Precision in Orofacial MovementJournal of Neurophysiology
Adaptation of Joint Flexibility During a Reach-to-Grasp Movement
Motor Control, 13(3):
Experimental Brain ResearchInterjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in strokeExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchUncontrolled manifold analysis of single trials during multi-finger force production by persons with and without Down syndromeExperimental Brain Research
Neuroscience LettersAnticipatory covariation of finger forces during self-paced and reaction time force productionNeuroscience Letters
Synergies in intra-and interpersonal interlimb rhythmic coordination
Motor Control, 11(4):
Journal of Human Kinetics
Evolution of motor control: From reflexes and motor programs to the equilibrium-point hypothesis
Journal of Human Kinetics, 19():
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Use of Relative Phase as a Measure of Motor Control at the Ankle in Persons With Cerebral Palsy: A Preliminary Study
Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 24(4):
Journal of NeurophysiologyReversal of Bimanual Feedback Responses With Changes in Task GoalJournal of Neurophysiology
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaSimplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical TherapySelf-Assessed Disability and Functional Performance in Individuals With and Without Ankle Instability: A Case Control StudyJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
Experimental Brain ResearchJoint-level kinetic redundancy is exploited to control limb-level forces during human hoppingExperimental Brain Research
NeuroscienceVelocity-Dependent Changes of Rotational Axes in the Non-Visual Control of Unconstrained 3D Arm MotionsNeuroscience
Motor Abundance Contributes to Resolving Multiple Kinematic Task Constraints
Motor Control, 14(1):
Neuroscience LettersMulti-joint coordination in ballet dancersNeuroscience Letters
Biological CyberneticsFeed-forward control of a redundant motor systemBiological Cybernetics
Psychological ReviewExploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning in a modular sensorimotor control architecturePsychological Review
Journal of NeurophysiologyPrehension synergies: Trial-to-trial variability and principle of superposition during static prehension in three dimensionsJournal of Neurophysiology
Muscle & NerveAn alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patientsMuscle & Nerve
Journal of NeurophysiologyContributions of online visual feedback to the learning and generalization of novel finger coordination patternsJournal of Neurophysiology
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Anticipatory synergy adjustments in preparation to self-triggered perturbations in elderly individuals
Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 24(2):
Progress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary PerspectiveMulti-Finger Prehension: Control of a Redundant Mechanical SystemProgress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Journal of Motor Behavior
Regular and Random Components in Aiming-Point Trajectory During Rifle Aiming and Shooting
Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(4):
Journal of Motor Behavior
Influence of Augmented Feedback on Coordination Strategies
Journal of Motor Behavior, 41(4):
Human Movement ScienceAmount and structure of force variability during short, ramp and sustained contractions in males and femalesHuman Movement Science
Experimental Brain ResearchThe control of foot force during pushing efforts against a moving pedalExperimental Brain Research
Biological CyberneticsA mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasksBiological Cybernetics
Experimental Brain ResearchPrehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performanceExperimental Brain Research
ErgonomicsThe size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting taskErgonomics
Experimental Brain ResearchPostural control during upper body locomotor-like movements: similar synergies based on dissimilar muscle modesExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchMuscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effect of instability and additional supportExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Changes in postural sway and its fractions in conditions of postural instability
Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 22(1):
Functional degrees of freedom
Motor Control, 10(4):
Experimental Brain ResearchLearning effects on muscle modes and multi-mode postural synergiesExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyEndpoint Force Fluctuations Reveal Flexible Rather Than Synergistic Patterns of Muscle CooperationJournal of Neurophysiology
Human Movement ScienceBimanual coordination as task-dependent linear control policiesHuman Movement Science
From parallel sequence representations to calligraphic control: A conspiracy of neural circuits
Motor Control, 8(4):
Biological CyberneticsA central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural modelBiological Cybernetics
Behavioral NeuroscienceReduced variability of postural strategy prevents normalization of motor changes induced by back pain: A risk factor for chronic trouble?Behavioral Neuroscience
Experimental Brain ResearchThe effects of neuromuscular fatigue on task performance during repetitive goal-directed movementsExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchArm-trunk coordination in the absence of proprioceptionExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchFinger interaction during accurate multi-finger force production tasks in young and elderly personsExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyTwo kinematic synergies in voluntary whole-body movements during standingJournal of Neurophysiology
Experimental Brain ResearchAccurate production of time-varying patterns of the moment of force in multi-finger tasksExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchChanges in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck-shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movementExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchDo synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force productionExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Physiology-ParisThe remapping of space in motor learning and human-machine interfacesJournal of Physiology-Paris
Journal of BiomechanicsThe problem of measurement indeterminacy in complex neurobiological movement systemsJournal of Biomechanics
Journal of the Royal Society InterfaceRate-dependent control strategies stabilize limb forces during human locomotionJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Journal of Neuroscience MethodsAnalyses of joint variance related to voluntary whole-body movements performed in standingJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Experimental Brain ResearchFinger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasksExperimental Brain Research
Biological CyberneticsMuscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: identification of muscle modesBiological Cybernetics
Journal of Applied PhysiologyHand function: peripheral and central constraints on performanceJournal of Applied Physiology
Motor Control and Learning
Changes in finger coordination and hand function with advanced age
Motor Control and Learning, ():
Experimental Brain ResearchAdjustments of prehension synergies in response to self-triggered and experimenter-triggered load and torque perturbationsExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyPrehension synergies in the grasps with complex friction patterns: Local versus synergic effects and the template controlJournal of Neurophysiology
Progress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary PerspectiveMotor Learning: Changes in the Structure of Variability in a Redundant TaskProgress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Journal of Human Kinetics
Force Coordination in Object Manipulation
Journal of Human Kinetics, 20():
Experimental Brain ResearchMulti-muscle synergies in an unusual postural task: quick shear force productionExperimental Brain Research
Experimental Brain ResearchResolving kinematic redundancy in target-reaching movements with and without external constraintExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchTongue Movements During Water Swallowing in Healthy Young and Older AdultsJournal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Human Movement ScienceApproaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor systemHuman Movement Science
Experimental Brain ResearchChanges in finger coordination and responses to single pulse TMS of motor cortex during practice of a multifinger force production taskExperimental Brain Research
Analysis of Increasing and Decreasing Isometric Finger Force Generation and the Possible Role of the Corticospinal System in This Process
Motor Control, 17(3):
Experimental Brain ResearchMulti-muscle synergies in elderly individuals: preparation to a step made under the self-paced and reaction time instructionsExperimental Brain Research
Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyMuscle lengthening surgery causes differential acute mechanical effects in both targeted and non-targeted synergistic musclesJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
2012 4Th Ieee Ras & Embs International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob)
Robot-assisted acquisition of a motor skill: evolution of performance and effort
2012 4Th Ieee Ras & Embs International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob), ():
Plos OneWhat Autocorrelation Tells Us about Motor Variability: Insights from Dart ThrowingPlos One
Journal of Motor BehaviorOptimization and Variability of Motor Behavior in Multifinger Tasks: What Variables Does the Brain Use?Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Applied PhysiologyContrasting effects of fatigue on multifinger coordination in young and older adultsJournal of Applied Physiology
Experimental Brain ResearchBilateral synergies in foot force production tasksExperimental Brain Research
Journal of NeurophysiologyTwo heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint actionJournal of Neurophysiology
Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceDirectionality in distribution and temporal structure of variability in skill acquisitionFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Journal of Motor BehaviorPracticing Elements Versus Practicing Coordination: Changes in the Structure of VarianceJournal of Motor Behavior
Journal of NeurophysiologyRandom walk of motor planning in task-irrelevant dimensionsJournal of Neurophysiology
Robotics and Autonomous SystemsCompliant skills acquisition and multi-optima policy search with EM-based reinforcement learningRobotics and Autonomous Systems
Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyStandardized activities of daily living in presence of sub-acute low-back pain: A pilot studyJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
Journal of BiomechanicsApplication of principal component analysis in clinical gait research: Identification of systematic differences between healthy and medial knee-osteoarthritic gaitJournal of Biomechanics
Experimental Brain ResearchEffects of muscle vibration on multi-finger interaction and coordinationExperimental Brain Research
Plos OneCredit Assignment during Movement Reinforcement LearningPlos One
Experimental Brain ResearchEffects of movement duration on error compensation in periodic bimanual isometric force productionExperimental Brain Research
AgeAge-related changes in joint coordination during balance recoveryAge
Journal of Motor BehaviorAccuracy of Pattern Detection Methods in the Performance of Golf PuttingJournal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor BehaviorIdentifying Coordinative Structure Using Principal Component Analysis Based on Coherence Derived From Linear Systems AnalysisJournal of Motor Behavior
Human Movement ScienceSynergistic control of joint angle variability: Influence of target shapeHuman Movement Science
Journal of NeurophysiologyTrial-to-trial dynamics and learning in a generalized, redundant reaching taskJournal of Neurophysiology
Plos OneThe Force Synergy of Human Digits in Static and Dynamic Cylindrical GraspsPlos One
Exercise and Sport Sciences ReviewsDeconstructing Neurobiological Coordination: The Role of the Biomechanics-Motor Control NexusExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
Exercise and Sport Sciences ReviewsOn the Functional Aspects of Variability in Postural ControlExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
Clinical Journal of Sport MedicineGender and Limb Differences in Dynamic Postural Stability During LandingClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
variablility; synergy; redundancy; finger; human
© 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read