Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > November 2002 - Volume 77 - Issue 11 > Clinical Research Career Development: The Individual Perspec...
Academic Medicine:
November 2002 - Volume 77 - Issue 11 - p 1084-1088
Articles

Clinical Research Career Development: The Individual Perspective

Wolf, Myles MD, MMSc

Collapse Box

Abstract

The process of integrating medical scientific break-throughs into improved clinical practice requires talented and dedicated clinical investigators. Unfortunately, substantial impediments deter gifted physicians from clinical research. The experience of Dr. Ross, an aspiring (fictional) clinical investigator, is presented in this report. The factors that ultimately contribute to Dr. Ross' choice to abandon an academic clinical research career are explored. Issues relating to research training, mentoring, funding, and academic promotion standards are analyzed from his individual perspective. Special emphasis is given to the intense financial pressure trainees face. Finally, potential solutions are presented. These include a description of the National Institutes of Health K23, K24, and K30 programs and its new extramural Loan Repayment Program for clinical researchers. These important advances provide much-needed support, but additional work must be done. In the absence of further reform, academic medicine's mission to train tomorrow's clinical investigators will erode further.

In this era of explosive medical scientific growth, the ability to translate laboratory discoveries into gains at the bedside depends on the availability, dedication, and creativity of talented clinical investigators. In this same era, substantial impediments prevent gifted young physicians from developing into independent patient-oriented investigators. This observation is not new; it has been the topic of many reports.1-12 In these reports, issues such as educational debt and financial disincentives were analyzed from the macroeconomic perspective of the academic community as a whole. Whereas this approach best illustrates system-wide flaws, it lacks the sensitivity to illustrate the individual's experience. In this essay, I sought to convey the individual's perspective through the eyes of Dr. Ross, the subject of a fictional (but based in truth) case study.

© 2002 Association of American Medical Colleges

Login




Help

Forgot Password?