Letters to the Editor
Chief of psychiatry, North York General Hospital, and associate professor of psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clinical psychologist (supervised practice), WaterStone Clinic, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; firstname.lastname@example.org.
Disclosures: Funding for the preparation of this letter was supported by the North York General Hospital (NYGH) Foundation.
To the Editor:
Innovation is gaining attention alongside research and education as legitimate scholarly activity. In our experience, identifying an individual as an informal and unofficial “Innovation Forager” was crucial to stimulating academic innovation, enabling success in developing our hospital’s academic strategy and micro-grant project.1 With a supportive manner, genuine interest, enthusiasm, and academic curiosity, it was often the Innovation Forager who first identified for others that their work was innovative and worthy of turning into scholarly activity. We found that many people did not self-identify their work as innovative or academic in nature. They therefore had not sought out or responded to traditional academic grant strategies or requests for proposals. In retrospect, most of our innovation projects were prompted by someone culturally connected with the clinical environment and constantly on the lookout for innovation potential. Without the encouragement of the Innovation Forager, most of our scholarly low-hanging fruit would have spoiled on the vine.
The role of an Innovation Forger may be particularly helpful in peripheral “distributed” academic environments, such as community hospitals, where a culture of scholarship is less prioritized or top of mind. The greatest unrealized academic potential of these distributed sites may be the opportunities for innovation in generalizable, real-world practice settings. It has been said that innovation often occurs in the fringes, unencumbered by bureaucracy and red tape. Capturing the scholarly opportunity of a community site may require contextualizing and customizing the methodologic design and approach to academic development, as in our discovery of the role of an Innovation Forager.
It is our belief that an Innovation Forager, someone to stimulate and support those who would not initially think their ideas and work are of academic merit, may be an important ingredient to encourage innovation scholarship, and thereby furthering academic knowledge. Formally identifying, designating, and researching the role of an Innovation Forager as part of academic development may be worthwhile.
Thomas Ungar, MD, MEd, FRCPC
Chief of psychiatry, North York General Hospital,
and associate professor of psychiatry, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Madalyn Marcus, PhD
Clinical psychologist (supervised practice),
WaterStone Clinic, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario,
1. Ungar T, Marcus M. Microfinance grants stimulating academic growth in community hospitals. Acad Med. 2012;87:133