Academic Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182992630
Letters to the Editor

To the Editor

Archer, Julian MD, Med, PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

NIHR career development fellow, clinical senior lecturer, and director, Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom; Julian.archer@pms.ac.uk.

To the Editor: I read Cook and West’s1 essay “Reconsidering the focus on ‘outcomes research’ in medical education: A cautionary note” with interest. They raise a series of important points about the futility of often trying to directly link medical education interventions with patient outcomes. They remind us of the complexities of such research and how, methodologically, we would need to work more closely with our health services research colleagues.

However, as research colleagues in other medical science fields are being increasingly challenged to make their research more focused on the bedside, I am concerned that this essay might be seen as giving the opposite message. We, as medical education researchers, must continually challenge each other to demonstrate the potential impact of our work on medical care in order that our research does not become sotheoretical and distant frompatientsthat it is considered irrelevant.

Julian Archer, MD, Med, PhD

NIHR career development fellow, clinical

senior lecturer, and director, Collaboration

for the Advancement of Medical Education

Research and Assessment, Plymouth

University Peninsula Schools of Medicine

and Dentistry, Plymouth, United Kingdom;

Julian.archer@pms.ac.uk.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Reference

1. Cook DA, West CP. Perspective: Reconsidering the focus on “outcomes research” in medical education: A cautionary note. Acad Med. 2013;88:162–167

© 2013 by the Association of American Medical Colleges

Login

Article Tools

Share