Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2012 - Volume 87 - Issue 10 > Additional Perspectives on Transforming Science Into Medicin...
Academic Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182682dd2
Letters to the Editor

Additional Perspectives on Transforming Science Into Medicine

Nagasako, Elna M. MD, PhD, MPH

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Mongan Commonwealth Fund Fellow in Minority Health Policy, (2011–2012) Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; elna_nagasako@post.harvard.edu.

Back to Top | Article Outline

In Reply to Rysavy et al:

Roberts and colleagues1 discuss the need for increasing support for physician–scientists to improve the translation of biomedical research findings into clinical treatments. Expanding on this theme in their letter, Rysavy et al highlight the importance of including clinician–scientists with training in population-health-oriented disciplines in these translation efforts.

To these important points, I would add that supporting dual-degree training in population-health-oriented sciences and related fields such as health economics and health policy may also benefit the development of evidence-based interventions that target factors outside biomedical pathways.

Such factors are important. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America noted that “although medical care is essential for relieving suffering and curing illness, only an estimated 10 to 15 percent of preventable mortality has been attributed to medical care.”2 Social and economic factors are also determinants of health outcomes, and interventions such as the Place Matters initiative3 attempt to address these factors through community-based collaborative partnerships. In the health system context, interventions targeting health care payment and delivery, such as value-based purchasing and patient-centered medical homes, have the potential to profoundly affect both the practice environments in which we care for our patients and also their resulting health outcomes.

As these interventions are designed, evaluated, and disseminated, the “realistic understanding of clinical practice” and the “tools and techniques of population-health-oriented disciplines” that Rysavy et al note to be the fruits of dual-degree training in population health science may prove to be important not only for the translation of basic science into medicine but also for bridging the gap between health care and health outcomes.

Elna M. Nagasako, MD, PhD, MPH

Mongan Commonwealth Fund Fellow in Minority Health Policy, (2011–2012) Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; elna_nagasako@post.harvard.edu.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Roberts SF, Fischhoff MA, Sakowski SA, Feldman EL. Perspective: Transforming science into medicine: How clinician–scientists can build bridges across research’s “valley of death.” Acad Med. 2012;87:266–270

2. . Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission to Build a Healthier America. Beyond Health Care: New Directions to a Healthier America. http://www.commissiononhealth.org/Report.aspx?Publication=64498. Accessed June 23 2012

3. . Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Health Policy Institute. Place Matters. http://www.jointcenter.org/hpi/pages/place-matters. Accessed June 23 2012

© 2012 Association of American Medical Colleges

Login

Article Tools

Share