Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
You currently have no recent searches
Caron, Rosemary M. PhD, MPH
Associate professor, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, and chair-elect, Association for University Programs in Health Administration, Public Health Faculty Network; email@example.com.
Given that the overarching goal of health care reform is to improve the health of our population, the focus of health services management (as well as clinical practice) should be on the health of the populations they serve and not solely the fiscal health of their institutions.1 For this reason, I maintain that the science of public health management, namely managerial epidemiology, is the evaluation tool of choice. It is that branch of epidemiology that utilizes the traditional quantitative and causal reasoning methods taught in medical schools. It also incorporates the business aspects of health care that monitor demand, delivery, clinical outcome measurement, resource allocation, strategic analysis, program planning, and managed care. With 30 million more people in our health care system, we need to refine further our ability to provide equitable care while containing costs and ultimately reducing the demand for health care. Managerial epidemiology is “the scientific basis for any health system reform”2 and is the science that must pervade professional preparation in both clinical and management practice.
Our health care leaders and providers need to be change agents in aligning social and economic objectives so that the improvement of population health is the prime metric of success. Integrating public health and personal health care policy and services is the silent and significant challenge. Distinctively, managerial epidemiology can measure the effectiveness of our newly revised system. It can tell us whether our reformed health care system is any more effective in improving the human condition. It is the metric to assess the implications of health care reform.
Rosemary M. Caron, PhD, MPH
© 2010 Association of American Medical Colleges
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Academic Medicine.
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics