There has been much interest recently in preparing physicians to care for patients from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds.1–3 Despite this interest, recent studies suggest that this area of medical education is the still most lacking.4,5 The population seeking primary care consists of people from varying racial and ethnic backgrounds, with approximately 40% belonging to racial and ethnic minorities; by 2015, this number will likely be over 50%.6 New Jersey is the first state to mandate cultural competence as a medical licensure requirement, but others will soon follow this trend.7 The Institute of Medicine has stated, on a national level, that cross-cultural training should have a significant role in improving quality of care for minorities and eliminating racial and ethnic disparities.8
One approach to improving the cultural competence of physicians focuses on general attitudinal and organizational shifts and the application of general methods for communicating across different cultures.9,10 Kleinman et al9 pioneered this approach with the use of open-ended ethnographic-type questions in cross-cultural physician–patient encounters. Others have advocated an approach to cross-cultural education based on using specific background information about patients.11
Although both of these approaches have definite merit, we emphasize the importance of the specific cultural and historical factors that influence the nature and outcomes of the clinical encounter. We also assert that specific knowledge of these factors is necessary for the optimal cross-cultural clinical encounter. In this article we focus on the African American experience as a paradigmatic example of minority interaction with the American health care system. The fact that physicians themselves are increasingly coming from varied ethnic backgrounds adds emphasis to the need for greater cultural education, as both patients and providers are often ethnically distinct. Twenty-five percent of physicians practicing in the United States are international medical graduates (IMGs), and many of them come from a variety of countries.12 In New York and New Jersey, IMGs comprise 40% of the physician workforce. Clinical communication between patients and physicians necessarily crosses many different cultural contexts, and effective communication in a cross-cultural clinical encounter hinges on a physician’s ability to bridge cultural divides. IMGs who were raised in other countries will not generally be familiar with American history or cultural aspects, and therefore may have some difficulty communicating with American patients. This, if anything, raises the need for cross-cultural communication education, even as American medical graduates are surely in need of it as well.
As just one example of health care disparities between African Americans and Caucasians, recent studies indicate that differences persist between these two racial groups in terms of coronary refusion therapy and coronary angiography.13,14 Caucasian patients were more likely than African American patients to undergo the potentially lifesaving procedures such as coronary revascularization or reperfusion. Several factors can influence such treatment differences: physician bias, patient mistrust of physicians, reluctance to undergo invasive procedures or preventive testing, fundamentalist religious beliefs, and insurance coverage and other economic influences.
The role of mistrust is one important aspect in the African American experience of medical care. African American history in the United States includes a protracted period of slavery, post-Emancipation “Jim Crow” discrimination and persecution in the South, and an extended period of socioeconomic disadvantages during ghettoization in northern cities.15 Health care during these periods was often unavailable to African Americans, or the quality and quantity of the care was deficient. Specific medically related discrimination included hospital ward segregation, which at one time was common,16 and the well-known U.S. Public Health Service–sponsored Tuskegee syphilis study in which informed consent was not used and indicated treatment was withheld without the patients’ knowledge.17 This event was revealed through an investigative report by the Atlanta Constitution Journal and was followed decades later with a presidential apology.18 Today, the study is widely known in the African American community. The cumulative effect of many negative clinical and clinical research experiences, of which Tuskegee is only the best known, continues to foster distrust of health care providers and the health care system within the African American community.19,20 Many African Americans today, regardless of socioeconomic status, still carry lingering mistrust as the result of this legacy of mistreatment and lack of informed consent.
The historical and cultural legacy of discrimination against African Americans influences their socioeconomic status and affects their health care interactions and clinical outcomes. African Americans receive disparate care for a number of conditions, including cardiac care,21,22 and most caregivers are oblivious to such disparate care differences.23 In addition to the discrimination that is prominent in African American history, certain aspects of the African American cultural historical experience are unique to this particular group. Understanding these cultural aspects is necessary in achieving the optimal cross-cultural clinical encounter between an African American patient and a physician from a different racial or ethnic background.
Religion and African Americans
Many African Americans have either a religious orientation or a viewpoint grounded in African American social and cultural history, which may emphasize a holistic approach to health and health care.24 Religion is a source of enormous emotional support for African Americans, and religious observance or religiosity can, in many regards, correlate with improved health outcomes.25
Religious and medical perspectives are, of course, different and could come into conflict, though in general they need not be contradictory. Furthermore, religious belief and practices may vary widely among individuals, even within the same religion or specific denomination. Although most, if not all, religious denominations have memberships that span the racial spectrum, the African American religious experience brings a particular intensity borne of the powerful role that Christian churches played in the African American communities during and after slavery, as well as in the civil rights movement.26 The church became the source of salvation for both body and soul when often there was no other institution available.27
Within the African American community, several distinctive groups of churches can be identified,28,29 including mainstream Baptist or Methodist churches, messianic or nationalistic churches, conversionist (e.g., Pentecostal) churches, and “spiritual” churches that emphasize magical contact with the spirit world to improve physical as well as spiritual states.29 As a prominent component of African American history and culture, religion has a strong role in establishing African Americans’ health care attitudes and practices. The spiritual churches also relate to African American faith healers who provide consultations in individual as well as group settings as an alternative to mainstream health care.30 The mainstream churches are less likely to encourage a fundamentalist religious belief. For African American women, faith-based institutions provide a social context whereby a new awareness of health promotion can be possible.31,32
In addition to Christianity, Islam has had an impact on African American history and culture. It is estimated that 10% to 20% of the slaves brought over from Africa were Muslims, and Islam has had a growing presence in the African American community since the 1960s.33 Individuals who embrace the Islamic faith are likely to define a good physician as one who addresses issues of faith and spirituality as well as biological needs. It is reasonable to expect that African American Islamic patients expect some of these broader issues of faith and belief—not merely biological issues—to be addressed in the clinical encounter.34 If these issues are not addressed or acknowledged by the clinician, the result can be the patient’s mistrust of the physician and noncompliance in the medical regimen. In our opinion, this is likely to be true for patients of other religions as well.
A scientific medical approach does not preclude a religious perspective, but it does qualify the domain of religion to some extent with regard to some health care matters. Many health care providers as well as many hospitals have an overtly religious perspective or mission, yet they deliver evidence-based medical care. In general, it should not be difficult for physicians and other care providers to show courtesy to patients’ religious beliefs without compromising evidence-based health care. In rare circumstances of extreme belief, there may be direct conflict between evidence-based medicine (EBM) and religious belief, and this should be approached with tact as well as community resources.
Many African Americans have a deep sense of spirituality, and this spiritualism is intertwined with other aspects of their lives, including health.29,30 Traditional African American folk beliefs concerning health and illness focus on herbal remedies and magical aspects of illnesses that invoke spiritual components, including hexes, roots, and divine displeasure of people or their offspring.35 The humoral theory of illness that dates back to antiquity and was codified by Galen found its way to the Americas and persists in Hispanic folk medicine culture.36 It also entered the African American health practices of the antebellum South.37 In this spiritual–magical schema, the allopathic physician may have been viewed as inferior to an evangelist or spiritualist “gifted in the healing arts.”37,38 These beliefs and practices were strongest in the South but made their way to northern cities, including Philadelphia.39,40 This phenomenon is analogous with the burgeoning complementary medicine movement in the general population in recent decades.41,42 The urge to have a theurgical or magicoreligious cure to illness perennially supersedes the emotionally colder approach that scientific medical practice tends to entail.
However, a fundamentalist religious belief that God will cure illness without medical treatment is associated with a greater than fourfold increased likelihood of presentation with late stage of breast cancer among breast cancer patients.43,44 Similarly, the belief that “roots or spells” will cause or cure cancer has a fivefold increase in the likelihood of a patient presenting with an advanced stage of cancer.43 This study found that African American patients are more likely to have such a perspective. Another study showed that African American women who believed in God as a controlling agent over health were less likely to obtain mammography and clinical breast examination.44 These particular aspects of religiosity can complicate health care by delaying appropriate interventions and may contribute to presentation at a late stage of disease.
African American women were also more likely than Caucasian women to consider breast self-examination an effective form of early detection of breast cancer; however, self-examination is insufficient in this role because mammography and physician examination are required for appropriate screening.45 Such an information gap must be closed if clinical outcomes are to improve.
Religious beliefs and practices can affect patients’ attitudes toward health care in a number of ways. On one hand, patients’ spiritual and religious participation tends to correlate with better blood pressure control in some studies of African Americans.46 Conversely, patients with folk beliefs that “high-pertension” (as some of those surveyed referred to the condition) is causally related to stress and a negative emotional state were less likely to comply with a regimen of antihypertensives among African American outpatients in New Orleans.47 The president of the National Medical Association when this article was written, Sandra Lynn Gadson, MD, a nephrologist, related that in one case she needed a court order to dialyze a patient with kidney failure, who was being confined by an alternative “minister” practicing faith healing.48 Dr. Gadson, herself an African American, noted that her own spirituality was a powerful influence in her own life, yet it was compatible with biomedical practice. Clearly, religious beliefs can vary greatly, and some improve health practices whereas others may delay important medical interventions.
At times, belief in God may be accompanied by a reduction in medication compliance. For example, Polzer and Miles49 found that strong spirituality in African American diabetic patients was correlated with self-management of the disease and greater noncompliance with a diabetic regimen. Religious beliefs may at different times exert differing effects, positive or negative, on the delivery of effective health care. The challenge in realizing improved health outcomes among African Americans is to maximize the positive influence of faith while minimizing the negative influence.
Delay in diagnosis of breast cancer is an example of correlation between religiosity and an increased probability of late diagnosis. A “true believer” who is awaiting divine intervention may have a worse outcome than a patient who seeks allopathic medical attention at the first signs of disease. Clinicians must be attuned to this possibility and recommend an approach that permits faith to support the patient without impeding evidence-based evaluation and treatment. Physicians can explain to their patients who adhere to African American religious and cultural traditions that faith can be compatible with timely medical interventions. Physicians can refer to the many examples wherein faith and medical approaches are pursued concurrently, such as by the many faith-based medical institutions, as well as by medical practitioners like Dr. Gadson, the president of the National Medical Association, and many other clinicians who embrace religious faith while practicing EBM. Physicians who express respect for patients’ religious beliefs while providing the latest in EBM are likely to be most positively received in cross-cultural clinical encounters. In one author’s (ARE) practice, a rare, previously invariably fatal infection (cryptococcemia) was effectively treated when the patient’s faith group was permitted to pray at the bedside and the latest medical management was applied.50 This act of respect and acknowledgement of the religious and cultural beliefs of the patient facilitated the cooperation that was necessary for the application of the complicated and difficult medical technology that the patient required. One cannot state that the praying at the bedside altered the clinical outcome, but it did improve mutual respect and communication between the physician and the patient, and it may have improved the patient’s frame of mind. Physicians can also demonstrate respect of their patients’ cultural and religious needs by permitting them to discuss treatment options with their clergy and family before making decisions about treatment.
Home or Natural Remedies
Home or natural remedies are commonly known and are used by African Americans, particularly among the elderly. Turning to an herbalist for remedies is a part of the African American cultural history dating back to the time of slavery, and in Africa before slavery.51 Indeed, it is difficult to separate African herbal medicinal usage from African religions, including those of Igbo, Yoruba, and other traditions.52 African Americans were often deprived of standard medical treatments during slavery and for some time thereafter. As a result, a common practice in the past among African Americans was to try the home herbal remedies before accessing medical institutions that were often inhospitable or, in many instances, unavailable. For example, an ailing person may have tried Epsom salt ingestion and apple vinegar for a cathartic effect to “cleanse” the body of illness. Root or faith healing is a tradition dating back to African origins that was nurtured during slavery and has endured to current times. It is not uncommon that an African American today has tried a home remedy before seeking medical treatment. Traditionally, the family matriarch was the source of knowledge of roots and home remedies, and this knowledge was considered part of domestic expertise and was passed down from the matriarch to her daughters.53 One study reveals that elderly African Americans with osteoarthritis are more likely than elderly Caucasian patients to perceive that traditional remedies are efficacious and are less likely to seek joint-replacement therapy.54
One author (GE) was the proprietor of a health food and herbal store located near the hospital of the University of Pennsylvania during the 1990s. It was his personal experience that African American patients routinely went to the store directly from a physician’s office or clinic to seek an herbal remedy alternative to the physician’s prescribed treatment. Often, the patients would not inform the physician that they were taking the herbal remedy instead of or in addition to the prescribed medication. A clinical study in North Carolina found that African Americans and American Indians were 81% and 76%, respectively, more likely to use food home remedies than Caucasian study participants.55
Health care providers, physicians, and others need to understand the role of home remedies in the social history of African Americans and how that role influences the current context of a clinical counter today. If the providers show some understanding and respect for these traditions, even without endorsing them, it can help in caring for African Americans by gaining their respect and trust. Minority groups’ skepticism about evidence-based medicine can be bridged by creating trusting relationships grounded in physicians’ understanding of particular aspects of the minority culture.
Distrust and Race
We note that distrust of institutions and authority figures is rooted in the African American history of racial discrimination, including slavery, post-Emancipation persecution, and persistent racial discrimination.56 Boulware et al57 have demonstrated that African Americans were less likely to trust their physicians and hospitals than Caucasians were. The Tuskegee syphilis study is frequently cited for this distrust and undoubtedly contributes to it, as do more recent instances of racial bias in health care.19,20 Distrust itself contributes to racial disparity in health outcomes. Trust in a physician has been shown to increase the likelihood of compliance with a medical regimen, despite cost pressures and other influences.58,59 Patients with lower levels of trust were less likely to comply with a medical regimen for diabetes.60 Furthermore, the quality of patient–physician communication may be lower when Caucasian physicians treat African American patients. According to Johnson et al,61 physicians were more verbally dominant and less engaged in patient-centered communications when dealing with African Americans. In another study, African Americans were less trusting of Caucasians regarding medical research participation.62 This distrust of medical intervention, illustrated by African Americans’ unease with cross-cultural physician–patient communication and medical research participation, also applies to invasive but effective clinical practices. African American veterans were significantly less likely to accept a recommendation for carotid endarterectomy in VA system hospitals.63 In this study, African American patients were more likely to express a high aversion to such an intervention and fewer African American patients received the intervention, though all patients had a carotid stenosis of at least 50%.
Within the African American community, a patient’s distrust of institutions and physicians may act synergistically with fundamentalist religious beliefs to cause him or her to delay seeking medical treatments in favor of trying faith healing or herbal remedies first. Clearly, there exists an opportunity for African American religious and community leaders to affirm to their community members the value of evidence-based medical care and its concordance with religious beliefs. Although there may be some religious beliefs that are incompatible with evidenced-based medical practice, most are not. We suggest in this regard the perspective that “God helps those who help themselves to preventive care and timely medical intervention,” though we recognize that all religious leaders may not agree with this proposition.
Distrust of physicians occurs among Caucasians and African Americans as well as other ethnic groups. Surveys reveal a somewhat higher rate of distrust of physicians among African Americans.64 Physicians can mediate racial differences by showing emotional support for their patients and involving other health care providers (nurses, social workers, therapists, dietitians) of various ethnicities in the patient’s care. Respectful, emotionally supportive dialogue can help overcome racial barriers.
African American patients rated their encounters with physicians more rewarding and participatory when the physician was also African American. However, only 22% of respondents expressed a preference for an African American physician, but those who did were more likely to express satisfaction with a racially concordant physician.65 The Commonwealth Fund’s Health Care Quality Survey found that African Americans were more likely to rate their physicians as excellent if the physician was also African American.66 Racially discordant clinical dyads were found to be less likely to engage in a participatory communication process.61 It is unlikely in the foreseeable future that most minority patients will be treated by racially concordant physicians, given the differing patient and physician demographics. African American physicians account for less than 4% of the medical profession, whereas African Americans account for approximately 13% of the population,67 so the majority of African Americans will see non-African American physicians. The ability to cross cultural and ethnic divides is an essential component of the 21st-century physicians’ “toolkit.” Moreover, today physicians themselves come from diverse ethnic backgrounds, making cross-cultural clinical dialogue inevitable, and all physicians should work to improve their cultural competence.
Bridging the Gulf
Cultural competence in the clinical setting indicates that the physician is sensitive to the individual patient’s needs and establishes rapport across ethnic differences. Establishing interpersonal rapport with a patient by identifying and relating to his or her personal humanity has been described in the context of narrative ethics.68,69 Physicians needs to comprehend the “patient’s story,” not merely detect the disease and treat it. Such a more narrative approach can also help bridge cultural differences and improve clinical communications in general.
Demonstrating humility and mutual concern can also be effective in this regard, although the former is not a common physician characteristic. Bridging the cultural gap requires the non–African American physician to reach out to the African American patient to establish an individual rapport that transcends historical distrust of medical institutions. The physician can establish such a rapport by making an effort to observe, learn, and practice the techniques of cross-cultural communication. For example, although it may be necessary, referring to insurance coverage does not build trust between the physician and the patient. When possible, it is preferable for the physician to leave this aspect of interaction to his or her support staff to avoid the appearance that self-interest is guiding the physician–patient interactions. A patient’s perception of a physician’s self-interest can also be one of the causes for mistrust.
List 1 summarizes techniques we suggest in this article for bridging the gulf in cross-cultural clinical communication.
The prohibition against educating African American slaves has seriously impacted on the long-term literacy of certain components of the African American population.24 Health illiteracy is a common hindrance to optimal health care and is more frequent in lower socioeconomic groups.70 Among ethnically and racial diverse patients, 43% report difficulty understanding information in the clinical encounter. Among patient with chronic illness, three quarters have limited literacy. Low literacy in diabetic patients was associated with worse glycemic control and increased rates of retinopathy and blindness.
One of the authors (ARE) was part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–sponsored research collaboration that developed and evaluated a multimedia computer program for diabetes education in low-literacy minority populations.71 This program was developed with the concept that racial and ethnic concordance enhance communication of information. The study demonstrated that the program increased perceived awareness of susceptibility to diabetic complications, especially among those with low literacy. Other studies reveal that health illiteracy increases medical costs and reduced efficiency of services.72 Thus, improving health literacy can conceivably improve outcomes and reduce costs if it is culturally sensitive.
Certified health educators are infrequently African American (10%) and only a minority (34%) of health educators are community based.73 Hence, there are relatively few African American health educators to provide racially concordant health education. Health educators can educate patients about self-care, communicate with health care providers, and advocate for patients with reduced health literacy.74 Federal funding of community-based ethnically similar health educators may be efficacious and cost-effective if it is shown to improve compliance and avoid late-stage disease.
Cultural Competence of Health Care Providers and Cross-Cultural Education
Betancourt75 delineated a useful framework of cross-cultural medical education that noted three approaches to or components of such education: promoting awareness of attitudes, including self-reflection; knowledge of cultural issues; and developing the ethnographic skills in a clinical setting to understand the cultural context of illness for a given patient.
Lavizzo-Mourey and Mackenzie76 have recommended including cultural sensitivity and knowledge of differences among subpopulations in medication response as a part of medical quality. We hold that cultural competence encompasses a variety of different competencies, some knowledge based and others more rooted in communication styles based on cultural awareness.
Some, out of concern that it might lead to stereotyping, have discouraged the knowledge approach to cultural competence training.77 Others have argued that cultural humility is superior to cultural competence because the latter suggests the “detached mastery of a finite body of knowledge.”78
We contend that ignorance is not bliss and that cultural and even historical knowledge is needed to inform physicians’ sensitivity and permit an ethnographic approach to cross-cultural communication. More specifically, physicians, nurses, and other health care providers need to be better informed regarding the history, sociology, and cultural–religious aspects of minority patients, including African Americans. Cultural competence requires learning specific information, including the role of religion in health-related decision making and effects of historical racism that may render an African American patient reluctant to seek needed medical care. Self-reflection regarding personal, institutional, internalized, and subtle forms of bias is an important part of cultural competence in general. Cultural competence training requires both general attitudinal approaches as well as specific advice based on cultural aspects of minority life.
Such cultural competence education should be modular and tailored for the ethnic and racial minorities that are present in the community served by specific health care providers. Individualized cultural information and awareness can be taught in the settings of graduate and undergraduate medical education, as well as continuing medical education (CME) as states are beginning to add CME to the regulatory mandate. Computer-based cultural competency education can be useful and can include video streaming, but should be in addition to live interactive workshops.
An experiential component of cultural competence education is important inasmuch as didactic material is inadequate in communicating the emotive content of some historical and cultural information, events, attitudes, and values. Works of cultural and historical context from the world of performing arts, such as Joan Myers Brown’s Philadanco dance company performing Tally Beaty’s “Southern Landscape,” which depicts the brutal repercussions of Reconstruction events involving African Americans 79 are capable of communicating viscerally across differing cultures. Such cultural works, if recorded and replayed for physicians-in-training, could help provide an experiential component of cultural histories of African American populations and provide such trainees with greater cultural awareness.
Experiential workshops using actors can have a strong emotional as well as cognitive impact on physicians-in-training. For example, one author (GE) participated in a workshop demonstrating ethnic issues in medical ethics consultation.80 In such workshops, individuals simulate clinical ethics consultation and elicit interaction that includes cross-cultural dialogue. Seminar participants receive observer feedback on their interaction. This type of experiential education could become a standard part of undergraduate and graduate medical education.
Accepting the Challenge
The challenge of achieving culturally competent medical care in a multicultural society requires several different skill sets. Specific knowledge of minority communities’ culture and history is crucial to the cross-cultural clinical encounter. The authors have pointed out some of the key features of that knowledge with regard to the literature on African Americans’ interaction with health care. Belief systems, especially religious ones, have a unique and complex relationship to health care. This needs to be taken into consideration for all patients, but especially for minorities. Health literacy is a crucial aspect of being an informed consumer of health care, and providers also need to be aware that there are barriers to this. We recommend that cultural and historical information for different ethnic minority groups be compiled and that physicians and physicians-in-training have both experiential and informational training on the appropriate cultures and ethnic groups that characterize their patients. These methods need to be further evaluated by methodologically vigorous studies. It is reasonable to expect that efforts in this regard will, at least in part, reduce disparities in health outcomes.81
1 Flores G, Gee D, Kasner B. Teaching cultural issues in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2000;75:451–455.
2 Lum C, Korenman S. Cultural-sensitivity training in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1994;69:239–241.
3 Carillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829–834.
4 Azad N, Power B, Dollin J, Chery S. Cultural sensitivity training in Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2002;77 222–228.
5 Cultural competence and the culture of medicine. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:1316–1318.
7 Adams D. N.J. mandates cultural-competency training. AM News. April 21, 2005.
8 Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
9 Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural reseach. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251–258.
10 Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carillo JE. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and healthcare. Public Health Rep. 2003;118:293–302.
11 Crawley LM, Lo B, Koenig BA. Strategies for cultural effective end-of-life care. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:673–679.
12 AMA Masterfile. Prepared for the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) by Center for Workforce Studies; 2005.
13 Canto JG, Allision JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1094–1100.
14 Cromwell J, McCall NT, Burton J, Urato C. Race/ethnic disparities in utilization of lifesaving technologies by Medicare ischemic heart disease beneficiaries. Med Care. 2005;43:330–337.
16 Rosenberg CE. The Care of Strangers. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1987.
19 Thomas SB, Quinn SC. The Tuskegee Syphillis Study 1932–1972, implications for HIV education in the black community. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1498–1505.
20 Gamble VN. Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1773–1778.
21 Jha AK, Fisher ES, Li Z, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Racial trends in the use of major procedures among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:683–691.
22 Lurie N, Fremont A, Jain A, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in care: the perspectives of cardiologists. Circulation. 2005;111:1264–1269.
24 Du Bois WEB. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago, Ill: McClurg & Co. (Cambridge); 1903.
25 Newlin K, Knafl K, Melkus GD. African-American spirituality. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2002;25:57–70.
26 Koenig HG. Religious attitudes and practices of hospitalized medically ill older adults. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry. 1998;13:213–224.
27 George LK, Ellison CG, Larson DB. Explaining the relationships between religious involvement and health. Inquiry. 2002;13:190–200.
28 Lincoln EC. The Black Experience in Religion. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press; 1974:5.
29 Baer HA. Prophets and advisors in black spiritual churches: therapy, palliative or opiate? Cult Med Psychiatry. 1981;5:145–170.
30 Fausset A. Black Gods of the Metropolis. Philadelphia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1971.
31 Lillie-Blanton M, Parsons PE Gayle H, Dievler A. Racial differences in health: not just black and white, but shades of gray. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:411–448.
32 Drayton-Brooks S, White N. Health promoting behaviors among African American women with faith-based support. Assoc Black Nursing Faculty J. 2004;15:84–90.
33 Lincoln EC. Black Muslims in America. Boston, Mass: Beacon Press; 1961:22–26.
34 El-Kadi A. Healing from Quran. In: Athar S, ed. Islamic Perspective in Medicine. Indianapolis, Ind: American Trust; 1994:123.
35 Davis RE. Coming to a place of understanding: the meaning of health and illness for African American women. J Multicult Nursing Health. 1998;4:32–41.
36 Maduro R. Curanderismo and Latino views of disease and curing. Western Med J. 1983;139:868–874.
37 Snow LF. Traditional health beliefs and practices among lower class black Americans. Western Med J. 1983;139:820–828.
38 Murphree AH, Barrow M. Physician dependence, self-treatment practices, and folk remedies in a rural area. South Med J. 1980;63:403–408.
39 LF Snow. Folk medical beliefs and their implications for care of patients. A review based on studies among black Americans. Ann Intern Med. 1974;81:82–96.
40 Winslow DJ, Bishop E. Everett and some aspects of occultism and folk religion in negro Philadelphia Keystone Folklore Q. 1969;14:59–90.
41 Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:246–252.
42 Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine. JAMA. 1998;279:1548–1553.
43 Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, et al. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors in racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1801–1807.
44 Kinney AY, Emery G, Dudley WN, Croyle RT. Screening behaviors among African-American women at high risk for breast cancer: do beliefs in God matter? Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:835–843.
45 Holt CL, Clark EM, Kreuter MW. Spiritual health locus of control and breast cancer beliefs among urban African-American women. Health Psychol. 2003;22:294–299.
46 Aaron KF, Levine D, Burstin HR. African American church participation and health care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:908–913.
47 Heurtin-Roberts S, Reisin E. The relation of culturally influenced lay models of hypertension to compliance with treatment. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:787–792.
48 Shields L. NMA head extends helping hand to all. Med Herald. 2005;17:4.
49 Polzer R, Miles MS. Spirituality and self-mangement of diabetes in African Americans. J Holistic Nurs. 2005;23:230–250.
50 Eiser AR, Neff MS, Slifkin RF. Cure of cryptococcemia in an immuno-compromised patient with lupus nephritis. Am J Nephrol. 1982;2:95–97.
51 Rocereto LR. Root work and the root doctor. Nurs Forum. 1973;12:414–427.
52 Levine L. The sacred world of black slaves: the quest for control, slave folk belief. In: Black Consciousness. Oxford, UK: Oxford, University Press; 1977.
54 Ibrahim SA, Siminoff LA, Burant CJ, Kwoh CK. Variation in perceptions of treatment and self-care practices in the elderly with osteoarthritis: a comparison between African American and white patients. Arthr Care Res. 2001;45:340–345.
55 Arcury TA, Bell RA, Snively BM, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine use as health self-management: rural older adults with diabetes J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61:S62–S70.
56 Hacker A. Two Nations: Black and White: Separate, Hostile, Unequal. New York, NY: Scribner; 1992.
57 Boulware LE, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118:358–365.
58 Kerse N, Buetow S, Mainous AG, et al. Physician–patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:455–461.
59 Piette JD, Heisler M, Krein S, Kerr EA. The role of the patient-physician trust in moderating medication nonadherence due to cost pressures. Arch Intern Med. 2005;1749–1755.
60 Alazri MH, Neal RD. The association between satisfaction with services provided in primary care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Med. 2003;20:486–490.
61 Johnson RL, Roter D, Powe NR, Cooper LA. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:2084–2090.
62 Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St. George DM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2468–1463.
63 Oddone EZ, Horner RD, Johnston CC, et al. Carotid endartectomy and race: do clinical indications and patient preferences account for differences? Stroke. 2002;33:2936–2943.
64 Chen FM, Fryer GE Jr, Phillips RL, Wilson E, Pathman DE. Patients’ beliefs about racism, preferences for physician race, and satisfaction with care. Ann Family Med. 2005;3:138–143.
65 Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient–physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–589.
66 Saha S, Komarony M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient–physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 2005;159:997–1004.
68 Murray TH. What do we mean by “narrative ethics” Med Humanit Rev. 1997;11:44–57.
69 Charon R, Montello MM. Stories Matter: The Role of Narrative in Medical Ethics. New York, NY: Routledge; 2002.
70 Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288:475–482.
71 Gerber BS, Brodsky IG, Lawless KA, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a low-literacy diabetes education computer multimedia application. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1574–1580.
72 Howard DH, Gazmararian J, Parker RM. The impact of low health literacy on the medical costs of Medicare managed care enrollees. Am J Med. 2005;118:371–377.
73 Tappe MK, Galer-Untl RG. Health educators’ role in promoting health literacy and advocacy for the 21st century. School Health. 2001;71:477–482.
74 Finoccchio LJ, Love MB, Sanchez EV. Illuminating the MPH health educator workforce. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:683–694.
75 Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural medical education: conceptual approaches and frameworks for evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:560–569.
76 Lavizzo-Mourey R, Mackenzie ER. Cultural competence: essential measurements of quality for managed care organizations. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:919–921.
77 Domini-Lenhoff FG, Hedrick HL. Increasing awareness and implementation of cultural competence principles in health profession education. J Allied Health. 2000;29:241–245.
78 Tervalon M, Murray-Garcia J. Cultural humility versus cultural competence:. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1998;9:117–125.
81 Brach C, Fraser I. Can cultural competency reduce racial and ethnic health disparities? Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(1 suppl):181–217.