Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2005 - Volume 80 - Issue 9 > The Variable Influence of Lifestyle and Income on Medical St...
Academic Medicine:
Featured Topic: Specialty Choice: Featured Topic Research Report

The Variable Influence of Lifestyle and Income on Medical Students’ Career Specialty Choices: Data from Two U.S. Medical Schools, 1998–2004

Newton, Dale A. MD; Grayson, Martha S. MD; Thompson, Lori Foster PhD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Dr. Newton is professor of pediatrics and clinical professor of medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.

Dr. Grayson is professor of clinical medicine and senior associate dean for undergraduate medical education, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York.

Dr. Thompson is assistant professor, Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Newton, Department of Pediatrics, 3E139 Brody, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834; e-mail: 〈newtond@mail.ecu.edu〉.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: Recent reports on medical students' career choices suggest that lifestyle increasingly influences career decisions. The authors addressed the changing influence of lifestyle and income on career choice, how these influences differ by specialty, and the specific careers students identify as lifestyle friendly.

Method: From 1998 to 2004, 1,334 (73%) fourth-year medical students from Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University (no. = 485 graduates) and New York Medical College (no. = 1,348 graduates) completed a questionnaire that addressed career specialty preferences, as well as income and lifestyle concerns. Students were asked to rate career choice influences on a four-point scale (1 = no influence, 4 = major influence). Factor analysis of these influences identified seven factors including one each for lifestyle and income.

Results: A total of 1,327 students indicated a career preference. Lifestyle (p = .018) and income (p = .011) were found to increasingly influence medical students' career choices during the study period. Overall, the authors found significant differences between specialties in the relative contribution of these factors. Students' perceptions of specialties existed on a continuum of lifestyle friendly (e.g., radiology) to lifestyle unfriendly (e.g., obstetrics–gynecology). Contrary to previous reports, the students' responses indicate they perceived the primary care specialties as lifestyle intermediate compared to other specialties.

Conclusions: Lifestyle and income have become more important to medical students in their career choice, and the relative influence of these factors varies considerably between specialties. This study suggests that previous efforts to dichotomize careers into those with controllable and uncontrollable lifestyles may mask important complexities.

Many factors combine in complex and often poorly understood ways to influence medical students' career specialty choices.1,2 The potential lifestyle of a future career has been increasingly recognized as one important factor in specialty choice3 and may play a key role in the recent trend away from the primary care specialties and general surgery.4–7

Although prior studies have looked at lifestyle's influence on career choice, they have usually defined the controllable lifestyle careers on the basis of the investigators' a priori perceptions.3–5,7 For example, a recent study found that a controllable lifestyle was the most significant factor contributing to changing specialty choice trends.4 The authors examined this issue by tracking students' career preferences over time and then classifying choices in terms of lifestyle controllability, income, average work hours per week, and years of graduate medical education required. However, with respect to lifestyles, the authors' classifications may not be congruent with those of less experienced fourth-year medical students. Our study offers insights into medical students' perspectives of lifestyles associated with different career specialty choices.

In one of the earlier reports discussing the relationship between controllable lifestyle and career choice, the definition of “controllable lifestyle” was simply “control of work hours.”3, p. 606 A subsequent factor analysis by the same researchers reported that remuneration was also included within “lifestyle.”7 Indeed lifestyle and income are probably interrelated because medical students anticipating their future careers (compared to other physician specialists) may deem an “ample” income necessary to a satisfactory lifestyle. However, these two factors are not identical and do not always coincide. In accordance with recent work,4 we therefore examined lifestyle and income as two distinct factors in our study. We investigated the separate influence of each of these factors on career choice over time and unlike prior reports,3–5,7 by individual specialty.

We explored the variable influence of lifestyle and income on career choice via questionnaire data produced by students graduating from Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University (BSOM) and New York Medical College (NYMC). For more than a decade, NYMC and BSOM have surveyed entering and graduating medical students about their career choices and the influences on these choices. The two schools are quite different: NYMC is a larger urban, private medical school and BSOM is a smaller rural, public school. Each has a traditional medical school curriculum and both emphasize primary care education which includes rotations in community-based practices. The demographic characteristics of the combined respondents from both schools were similar to national data in a prior study.8 The current version of NYMC's and BSOM's questionnaire has been used since 1998.

With the fourth-year medical students' responses to this instrument, we addressed the following research questions in our study:

▪ Have lifestyle and income become increasingly valued over time?

▪ What specialties do medical students view as lifestyle-friendly careers (that allow leisure time, opportunities to enjoy life outside of work, predictable work hours, time to pursue activities outside of work, and family time)?

▪ What is the relative influence of income and lifestyle on medical students' career specialty choices, and does this influence vary by specialty?

Back to Top | Article Outline

Method

A total of 1,334 (73%) of the medical students graduating from BSOM (485 graduates) and NYMC (1,348 graduates) between 1998 and 2004 completed the IRB-approved questionnaires prior to residency “Match Day.” The 98-item questionnaire includes demographic and career-related variables. In our study, which was not externally funded, we focused specifically on the items addressing career specialty preferences, income concerns, and lifestyle values.

Early in the questionnaire, students were asked to specify which of 23 medical specialties they intended to pursue or to select an “other” option. Then students were asked to respond to multiple items describing various career attributes by using a four-point scale to rate the influence of each attribute on their selection of career specialties (1 = no influence; 2 = minor influence; 3 = moderate influence; 4 = major influence). We generated these attributes based on a synthesis of earlier literature.1,8

Prior to the present study, we randomly selected 900 first-year and 900 fourth-year students and their ratings were submitted to a principal axis factor analysis, followed by an oblique Promax rotation. Each questionnaire selected was from a different student (no duplications were allowed) and the sampling was from all respondents at both schools between 1998 and 2003. This analysis resulted in seven factors, two of which pertain to our study and supported our decision to examine lifestyle and income separately. Specifically, five of the items clustered to form a lifestyle-friendly factor, and three formed an income factor (see Table 1). Notably, none of these eight items loaded substantially (.3 or higher) on a second factor. Responses to the lifestyle items (alpha = .93) were therefore combined for analysis, as were responses to the income items (alpha = .85). In keeping with other research,9 parametric statistics (e.g., analysis of variance [ANOVA], t test) were used to examine the questionnaire data.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Of the 1,334 fourth-year medical student respondents, 1,327 indicated a career preference. Seven students chose careers selected by fewer than nine other students. These students (and their career choices) were dropped from the analyses because their career groupings lacked the sample size needed to achieve adequate statistical power during between-specialty comparisons. In addition, we eliminated the 32 respondents who selected the “other” category because we presumed their career interests were heterogeneous. The final sample therefore consisted of 1,288 respondents spanning 20 specialty preferences. Of the 1,258 people who reported their gender, 616 (49%) were female. The average age was 28.1 ± 3.2 years. Of the 1,280 respondents who reported their race or ethnicity, 751 (59%) were white, 324 (25%) were Asian or Pacific Islander, 89 (7%) were African American, 34 (3%) were Hispanic, 16 (1%) were American Indian or Alaskan natives, and the remaining 66 (5%) self-identified as “other.” Regarding affiliation, the sample was proportional to the relative size of the two medical school classes; 69% of the respondents were from NYMC.

With our first research question, we investigated whether students were becoming increasingly concerned with lifestyle and income when making career choices. We computed a Pearson correlation coefficient to examine the association between year of graduation and ratings on the lifestyle and income items. Results demonstrated that lifestyle became slightly more important from 1998 to 2004 (r = .07, n = 1,286, p = .018, two-tailed) with a similar rise in the importance of income (r = .07, n = 1,286, p = .011, two-tailed) (see Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

With our second research question, we sought to empirically distinguish lifestyle-friendly and lifestyle-unfriendly careers. We compared respondents intending to pursue the 20 specialties in terms of the degree to which they valued lifestyle. As Figure 2 shows, lifestyle played a notable role in medical students' decisions to specialize in areas such as radiology and physical medicine/rehabilitation, whereas students who valued lifestyle highly seemed relatively unlikely to pursue specialties such as general surgery and obstetrics–gynecology. A one-way ANOVA confirmed that lifestyle concerns differentially influenced the decision to pursue the various specialties (p < .001). Post hoc analyses compared every specialty pair in terms of lifestyle concerns after reducing the .05 significance level via a Bonferroni correction to control for family-wise error (i.e., the inflated type I error risk that occurs when a set of comparisons are made).10 Table 2 shows the degree to which graduating medical students considered each specialty lifestyle friendly. Students who chose lifestyle-friendly careers (radiology, physical medicine/rehabilitation, emergency medicine, ophthalmology, anesthesiology, urology, dermatology, and otolaryngology) valued lifestyle significantly more than did students pursuing many of the other specialties. Conversely, lifestyle matters influenced students pursuing the two lifestyle-unfriendly careers (general surgery and obstetrics–gynecology) significantly less than lifestyle matters influenced students who were pursuing the majority of the alternative specialties.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

With our final research question, we looked at the importance of lifestyle compared to income by examining a mixed model ANOVA, which included value (lifestyle versus income) as the within-subjects factor and career specialty as the between-subjects factor. Results revealed a nonsignificant within-subjects effect (p = .949), indicating that the average value placed on lifestyle (2.70 ± .85) did not reliably differ from the average value placed on income (2.72 ± .76). A significant interaction term (p < .001) suggested that this balanced concern with lifestyle and income did not characterize all career specialties. After using a Bonferroni correction to adjust the .05 level of significance to control for family-wise error, we conducted a series of paired samples t tests to compare the value placed on lifestyle versus income within each specialty. As Figure 2 shows, medical students who chose seven specialties were significantly more likely to value lifestyle over income: radiology, physical medicine/rehabilitation, emergency medicine, ophthalmology, psychiatry, family practice, and general pediatrics. Meanwhile, students who chose four specialties were significantly more likely to value income over lifestyle: internal medicine subspecialties, orthopedics, general surgery, and obstetrics–gynecology.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

Our data representing lifestyle and income's influences on medical students' career specialty choices show that between 1998 and 2004, both lifestyle and income became increasingly important to the graduating medical students in our study. However, the correlations between year of graduation and lifestyle/income were small, suggesting that recent rises in the importance of lifestyle and income may not be as dramatic as indicated by past work looking at career choice trends in the absence of data assessing students' perceptions of the factors they considered important when selecting a specialty.4

While lifestyle and income became only slightly more important over time to the students in our study, the absolute importance of these two factors (irrespective of time) should not be overlooked. When students were asked to indicate the influence of lifestyle and income, the average rating assigned to both of these factors was higher than 2 on the four-point scale (1 = no influence, 4 = major influence). It is interesting to note that the influence of lifestyle, as compared to income, did not differ significantly for the study group as a whole. However, when we examined specialty careers individually, we found a significant difference in the influence of income versus lifestyle for 11 of the 20 specialties studied.

Our respondents viewed eight specialties as lifestyle friendly: radiology, physical medicine/rehabilitation, emergency medicine, ophthalmology, anesthesiology, urology, dermatology, and otolaryngology. Students who chose each of these eight specialties indicated that lifestyle was significantly more influential in their career choices than did students who chose a number of other specialties. In addition, no other specialty received significantly higher lifestyle ratings than did these eight specialties. To the contrary, students with relatively minor lifestyle concerns tended to choose general surgery and obstetrics–gynecology, specialties considered more lifestyle unfriendly than any of the other 18 specialty choices.

Ten specialties (psychiatry, family practice, neurology, general pediatrics, general internal medicine, plastic surgery, the pediatric and internal medicine subspecialties, combined internal medicine–pediatrics, and orthopedics) were between the extremes, or lifestyle intermediate, as the students viewed them as more lifestyle friendly than some specialties and less so than others. It is of note that we found significant variation within the lifestyle-intermediate group. Both neurology and psychiatry were highly rated and only considered to be less lifestyle friendly than one specialty, radiology. In contrast, students rated three specialties at the lower end of the lifestyle-intermediate group: internal medicine subspecialties, combined internal medicine–pediatrics, and orthopedics. Although students gave these three specialties a low lifestyle rating, they rated them significantly higher than general surgery and obstetrics–gynecology.

While prior studies about the influence of lifestyle have defined controllable lifestyle careers on the basis of the investigators' a priori perceptions,3–5,7 we looked at the perceptions of fourth-year medical students in our study. The data revealed some important differences between the views of these students and the views of investigators published in the literature. First, in our study urology emerged as a lifestyle-friendly career specialty even though past studies have placed it in the uncontrollable-lifestyle category.4 Second, it was of great interest to note that in our study students rated physical medicine/rehabilitation, a specialty not included in prior studies, as the second most lifestyle-friendly specialty. Additionally, our data suggest that in the past investigators' tendency to dichotomize careers into lifestyle-controllable versus lifestyle-uncontrollable categories may have masked important complexities. The data in Table 2 reveal finer gradations and lead to the conclusion that in the eyes of fourth-year medical students, some of the careers typically lumped into the uncontrollable-lifestyle category (e.g., family practice, general pediatrics, general internal medicine) may actually reside between the lifestyle-friendly and lifestyle-unfriendly extremes.

In our study, we defined a lifestyle-friendly career as one that allows leisure time, opportunities to enjoy life outside of work, predictable work hours, time to pursue activities outside of work, and family time. Our definition of “lifestyle friendly” is therefore somewhat different than the definition of “controllable lifestyle” used in past research.7 Recent researchers who have based their work on defining controllable lifestyle as simply control of work hours acknowledged that controllable lifestyle may “capture other less tangible and even less easily quantified influences that ultimately affect lifestyle.”4,p.1,177 Thus, our expansion of the lifestyle construct may provide a useful addition to the literature.

From a practical standpoint, our study can be used to examine a number of the career trends in the medical community. For example, there has been an overall decrease in applications to primary care residencies, but an increase in the applications to medicine and pediatrics subspecialties.11 Because general internal medicine, general pediatrics, combined internal medicine–pediatrics, family practice, and medicine and pediatrics subspecialties were included in our list of potential career choices, our data provide insights into perceptions about ultimate career paths for students entering the primary care residencies. In general, students' perceptions of the primary care fields as a whole were consistent, all clustering in the lifestyle intermediate range. However, careers in internal medicine subspecialties or in combined internal medicine-pediatrics were rated as more lifestyle unfriendly than any of the other generalist specialties. We are unclear why a career in combined internal medicine–pediatrics was viewed less favorably than was a career in either of the two separate specialties, general internal medicine and general pediatrics. Although students rated a career in a subspecialty of medicine or pediatrics as lifestyle intermediate, we realize that this rating may have masked differences in students' perceptions of each of the various subspecialties. It is possible that students viewed one subspecialty, such as endocrinology, as more lifestyle friendly than another one, such as cardiology, thus leading to a mean score within the lifestyle-intermediate range.

Finally, while the analysis of recent changes in career trends has been largely attributed to lifestyle issues,4–6,12 we found that income concerns were also on the rise. As Figure 2 shows, lifestyle and income played distinct roles that varied by chosen specialty. Students entering fields such as orthopedics, general surgery, obstetrics–gynecology, and internal medicine subspecialties were more influenced by income issues than by lifestyle.

Our study had several limitations. First, the sample sizes characterizing certain career specialties were rather small, thereby limiting our power to detect statistically significant mean differences when examining those particular specialties. We took some measures to diminish this concern (i.e., careers chosen by fewer than ten students were dropped from the data set). Nevertheless, we looked at several careers with relatively modest sample sizes (e.g., plastic surgery, otolaryngology). Despite potential power limitations, we chose to include these careers to afford readers the opportunity to examine the ratings associated with these important specialties. Second, we conducted our study at two schools that both emphasize primary care education. Although the emphasis on primary care education may have influenced the absolute numbers of students who chose primary care careers, we do not believe this emphasis affected the relationship between student-rated influences and career choice. Also, the characteristics of the two schools are quite different, and the combined study population had demographic characteristics very similar to national data.8 Third, our results are students' reports of anticipated long-term specialty choice, rather than their actual entry to a preferred residency or fellowship. It is possible that a student stating plans to enter a career, such as a pediatrics subspecialty, would change his or her mind over the three years of a pediatrics residency. Fourth, we used a four-point scale that allowed students to express equal weights for lifestyle and income, if they were so inclined. We are unable to determine which factor would have emerged as the primary factor if respondents were forced to choose between the two. Fifth, we did not determine the accuracy of students' insights into the factors shaping their career preferences. However, choosing among specialties tends to be a very deliberative process; accordingly, we believe students' ratings provide meaningful information about the factors driving their career decisions. Finally, by design in this study we focused on only two factors (lifestyle and income) that influence career choice. We did not investigate the influence of other factors (e.g., altruism, debt, demographic characteristics).

Although recent literature has focused on the influence of lifestyle on medical students' career choices, we found that both lifestyle and income play a notable role. In order to reverse the current downward trend in applications to fields considered lifestyle unfriendly or economically unrewarding, the current models of practice and reimbursement may need to be restructured. Certain specialties have the potential to become more lifestyle friendly, with a reorganization of expected work hours within shared practices or with the increased use of physician extenders. It is possible that the wider use of technology, such as the electronic medical record, may allow some physicians the flexibility to do part of their work at home. Finally, the disparity in reimbursement by specialty for physician services continues to have a major influence on specialty choice. Policymakers need to take these considerations into account as they plan for future workforce needs.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1.Bland CJ, Meurer LN, Maldonado G. Determinants of primary care specialty choice: a non-statistical meta-analysis of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70:620–41.

2.Newton DA, Grayson MS, Whitley TW. What predicts medical student career choice? J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:200–3.

3.Schwartz RW, Jarecky RK, Strodel WE, Haley JV, Young B, Griffen WO. Controllable lifestyle: a new factor in career choice by medical students. Acad Med. 1989;64:606–9.

4.Dorsey ER, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA. 2003;290:1173–78.

5.Lind DS, Cendan JC. Two decades of student career choice at the University of Florida: increasingly a lifestyle decision. Am Surg. 2003;69:53–55.

6.Thornton J, Esposto F. How important are economic factors in choice of medical specialty? Health Econ. 2003;12:67–73.

7.Schwartz RW, Haley JV, Williams C, et al. The controllable lifestyle factor and students' attitudes about specialty selection. Acad Med. 1990;65:207–10.

8.Grayson MS, Newton DA, Whitley T. First-year medical students' knowledge of and attitudes toward primary care careers. Fam Med. 1996;28:337–42.

9.Reed VA, Jernstedt GC, McCormick TR. A longitudinal study of determinants of career satisfaction in medical students 〈http:www.med-ed-online.org/volume9.htm#res00089〉. Accessed 19 May 2005. Med Educ Online. 2004;9, 11.

10.Keppel G. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1991.

11.Newton DA, Grayson MS. Trends in career choice by us medical school graduates. JAMA. 2003;290:1179–82.

12.Gelfand D, Podnos Y, Wilson S, Cooke J, Williams R. Choosing general surgery: insights into career choices of current medical students. Arch Surg. 2002;137:941–47.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 60 time(s).

Medical Teacher
Medical career selection among newly graduated physicians in Madinah, KSA
Zolaly, MA; Kasim, K; Mahmoud, MI
Medical Teacher, 35(): S63-S67.
10.3109/0142159X.2013.765541
CrossRef
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Work values and job satisfaction of family physicians
Bouwkamp-Memmer, JC; Whiston, SC; Hartung, PJ
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3): 248-255.
10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.001
CrossRef
Human Resources for Health
Does salary affect the choice of residency in non-university teaching hospitals? A panel analysis of Japan Residency Matching Programme data
Enari, T; Hashimoto, H
Human Resources for Health, 11(): -.
ARTN 12
CrossRef
Medical Education
Association of medical student burnout with residency specialty choice
Enoch, L; Chibnall, JT; Schindler, DL; Slavin, SJ
Medical Education, 47(2): 173-181.
10.1111/medu.12083
CrossRef
Medicina Clinica
Specialized health education: Medical students' preferences and perceptions
Mena, G; Llupia, A; Sequera, VG; Aldea, M
Medicina Clinica, 140(3): 135-138.
10.1016/j.medcli.2012.09.031
CrossRef
Medical Education Online
Factors affecting future specialty choice among medical students in Kuwait
Al-Fouzan, R; Al-Ajlan, S; Marwan, Y; Al-Saleh, M
Medical Education Online, 17(): -.
ARTN 19587
CrossRef
Bmc Medical Education
What is different about medical students interested in non-clinical careers?
Kim, KJ; Park, JH; Lee, YH; Choi, K
Bmc Medical Education, 13(): -.
ARTN 81
CrossRef
Family Medicine
The ROAD Confirmed: Ratings of Specialties' Lifestyles by Fourth-Year US Medical Students With a Military Service Obligation
Dezee, KJ; Byars, LA; Magee, CD; Rickards, G; Durning, SJ; Maurer, D
Family Medicine, 45(4): 240-246.

Teaching and Learning in Medicine
What Does a Good Lifestyle Mean to You? Perspectives of 4th-Year U.S. Medical Students With Military Service Obligations in 2009
DeZee, KJ; Corriere, MD; Chronister, SM; Durning, SJ; Hemann, B; Kelly, W; Hanson, JL; Hemmer, PA; Maurer, D
Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 24(4): 292-297.
10.1080/10401334.2012.715264
CrossRef
American Journal of Surgery
Medical student subinternships in surgery: characterization and needs assessment
Lindeman, BM; Lipsett, PA; Alseidi, A; Lidor, AO
American Journal of Surgery, 205(2): 175-181.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.008
CrossRef
Archives of Internal Medicine
Residency training in the modern era - The pipe dream of less time to learn more, care better, and be more professional
O'Malley, PG; Khandekar, JD; Phillips, RA
Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(): 2561-2562.

Journal of Family Practice
Image of family medicine - not yet picture-perfect
Khan, OA
Journal of Family Practice, 57(5): 296-297.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
The Impact of the Internal Medicine Sub-internship on Medical Student Career Choice
Kogan, JR; Shea, JA; O'Grady, E; Bellini, LM; Ciminiello, F
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(5): 403-407.
10.1007/s11606-010-1263-7
CrossRef
Swiss Medical Weekly
Primary care in Switzerland - no longer attractive for young physicians?
Buddeberg-Fischer, B; Klaghofer, R; Stamm, M; Marty, F; Dreiding, P; Zoller, M; Buddeberg, C
Swiss Medical Weekly, 136(): 416-424.

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology-Journal Canadien D Ophtalmologie
Factors influencing career choice in ophthalmology
Noble, J
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology-Journal Canadien D Ophtalmologie, 41(5): 596-599.

New England Journal of Medicine
Medicare, graduate medical education, and new policy directions
Iglehart, JK
New England Journal of Medicine, 359(6): 643-650.

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Do women seeking care from obstetrician-gynaecologists prefer to see a female or a male doctor?
Makam, A; Saroja, CSM; Edwards, G
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 281(3): 443-447.
10.1007/s00404-009-1199-5
CrossRef
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Regarding "Predicted shortage of vascular surgeons in the United States: Population and workload analysis"
Reed, AB; Brown, K; Bush, R; Halpern, V; Kibbe, M; Killewich, L; Mureebe, L; Ozsvath, K; Rzucidlo, E; Starr, J
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 51(4): 1076-1077.
10.1016/j.jvs.2009.11.060
CrossRef
Healthmed
The reasons for being a doctor and the future expectations
Nazan, K; Kurtulus, O; Muzaffer, S
Healthmed, 4(2): 335-343.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
The effect of the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship on students' interest in a career in obstetrics and gynecology
Hammoud, MM; Stansfield, RB; Katz, NT; Dugoff, L; McCarthy, J; White, CB
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(5): 1422-1426.
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.044
CrossRef
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Academic career selection and retention in radiation oncology: The Joint Center for Radiation Therapy experience
Balboni, TA; Chen, MH; Harris, JR; Recht, A; Stevenson, MA; D'Amico, AV
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 68(1): 183-186.
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.044
CrossRef
American Journal of Surgery
Attrition: Our biggest continuing challenge
Longo, WE
American Journal of Surgery, 194(5): 567-575.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.010
CrossRef
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Who are our future surgeons? Characteristics of medical school graduates planning surgical careers: Analysis of the 1997 to 2004 Association of American Medical Colleges' Graduation Questionnaire National Database
Andriole, DA; Klingensmith, ME; Jeffe, DB
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 203(2): 177-185.
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.04.026
CrossRef
Journal of Vascular Surgery
When I grow up, I want to be successful like daddy: I just don't want to be a doctor
Perler, BA
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 45(3): 627-634.
10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.039
CrossRef
Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan
Career goals of trainee physicians in internal medicine
Patel, MJ; Riaz, M; Tariq, M; Jamil, S; Ansari, T; Khan, MS; Samdani, AJ; Ayaz, SI; Sorathia, A; Akhtar, J
Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 18(6): 352-356.

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
MEDICAL PROFESSIONALISM crossing a generational divide
Walsh, C; Abelson, HT
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 51(4): 554-564.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
A randomized trial comparing 2 outpatient educational settings for clerkship students: private practice office vs hospital clinic
Abdessamad, HM; Ashby, KL; Greenfield, M
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199(5): -.
ARTN 569.e1
CrossRef
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Attracting Surgical Clerks to Surgical Careers: Role Models, Mentoring, and Engagement in the Operating Room
Berman, L; Rosenthal, MS; Curry, LA; Evans, LV; Gusberg, RJ
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 207(6): 793-800.
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.003
CrossRef
Annals of Internal Medicine
Changes in career decisions of internal medicine residents during training
West, CP; Popkave, C; Schultz, HJ; Weinberger, SE; Kolars, JC
Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(): 774-779.

Annals of Internal Medicine
The primary care-specialty income gap: Why it matters
Bodenheimer, T; Berenson, RA; Rudolf, P
Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(4): 301-306.

Medical Education
The effect of gender on medical students' aspirations: a qualitative study
Drinkwater, J; Tully, MP; Dornan, T
Medical Education, 42(4): 420-426.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03031.x
CrossRef
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Basic Biomedical Sciences and the Future of Medical Education: Implications for Internal Medicine
Brass, EP
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(): 1251-1254.
10.1007/s11606-009-0998-5
CrossRef
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Medical Students' Attitudes toward Underserved Populations: Changing Associations with Choice of Primary Care versus Non-Primary Care Residency
Wayne, S; Timm, C; Serna, L; Solan, B; Kalishman, S
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(2): 438-447.

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
An AOA-COA Symposium Orthopaedic Education-Are We Attracting the Best and the Brightest?
Emery, SE; Waddell, JP; Waddell, AE; McCaslin, M; Black, K
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 91A(5): 1253-1263.
10.2106/JBJS.H.01572
CrossRef
Bmc Health Services Research
Swiss residents' speciality choices - impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals
Buddeberg-Fischer, B; Klaghofer, R; Abel, T; Buddeberg, C
Bmc Health Services Research, 6(): -.
ARTN 137
CrossRef
Journal of Family Practice
Primary care's eroding earnings: Is congress concerned?
Laing, BY; Bodenheimer, T; Phillips, RL; Bazemore, A
Journal of Family Practice, 57(9): 578-583.

Academic Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine Career Choice: A Profile of Factors and Influences from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaires
Boyd, JS; Clyne, B; Reinert, SE; Zink, BJ
Academic Emergency Medicine, 16(6): 544-549.
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00385.x
CrossRef
Health Affairs
Can We Close The Income And Wealth Gap Between Specialists And Primary Care Physicians?
Vaughn, BT; DeVrieze, SR; Reed, SD; Schulman, KA
Health Affairs, 29(5): 933-940.
10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0675
CrossRef
Family Medicine
Family medicine in Switzerland: Training experiences in medical school and residency
Buddeberg-Fischer, B; Stamm, M; Marty, F
Family Medicine, 39(9): 651-655.

Medical Education
Becoming an academic doctor: perceptions of scholarly careers
O'Sullivan, PS; Niehaus, B; Lockspeiser, TM; Irby, DM
Medical Education, 43(4): 335-341.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03270.x
CrossRef
Gesundheitswesen
Young physcians' view on factors that increase the attractiveness of general practice
Buddeberg-Fischer, B; Stamm, M; Buddeberg, C; Klaghofer, R
Gesundheitswesen, 70(3): 123-128.
10.1055/s-2008-1062721
CrossRef
Pediatrics
All Primary Care Trainees Are Not the Same: The Role of Economic Factors and Career Choice
Freed, GL; Dunham, KM
Pediatrics, 125(3): 574-577.
10.1542/peds.2009-1976
CrossRef
Journal of the National Medical Association
A 3-Year Medical Curriculum
Klatt, EC
Journal of the National Medical Association, 102(3): 250-252.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Why obstetrics/gynecology, and what if it were not an option? A survey of resident applicants
Ogburn, T; Espey, E; Autry, A; Leeman, L; Bachofer, S
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 197(5): -.
ARTN 538.e1
CrossRef
Medical Education
Recruitment to academic medicine
Dornan, T
Medical Education, 43(4): 300-302.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03294.x
CrossRef
Journal of Career Development
Measurement invariance in careers research - Using IRT to study gender differences in medical students' specialization decisions
Behrend, TS; Thompson, LF; Meade, AW; Newton, DA; Grayson, MS
Journal of Career Development, 35(1): 60-83.
10.1177/0894945308317936
CrossRef
Medical Teacher
Medical students' and prospective medical students' uncertainties about career intentions: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies
Maudsley, G; William, L; Taylor, D
Medical Teacher, 32(3): E143-E151.
10.3109/01421590903386773
CrossRef
Clinical Pediatrics
Money, Lifestyle, or Values? Why Medical Students Choose Subspecialty Versus General Pediatric Careers
Newton, DA; Grayson, MS; Thompson, LF
Clinical Pediatrics, 49(2): 116-122.
10.1177/0009922809350216
CrossRef
Medicina-Buenos Aires
Medical students' attitudes regarding professional practice
Borracci, RA; Pittaluga, RD; Manente, D; Giorgi, MA; Rubio, M
Medicina-Buenos Aires, 69(6): 607-611.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes
Factors Leading to Radiology Career Selection: Results of the 2004 National Physician Survey
Maj, L; Baerlocher, MO
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes, 57(3): 175-178.

Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Analysis of the current applicant pool to vascular surgery: Who are they and where do they come from?
Eidt, JF
Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 19(4): 172-179.
10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2006.08.003
CrossRef
Academic Psychiatry
Planning the Future Mental Health Workforce: With Progress on Coverage, What Role Will Psychiatrists Play?
Vernon, DJ; Salsberg, E; Erikson, C; Kirch, DG
Academic Psychiatry, 33(3): 187-192.

Croatian Medical Journal
Factors affecting choice of specialty among first-year medical students of four universities in different regions of Turkey
Dikici, MF; Yaris, F; Topsever, P; Filiz, TM; Gurel, FS; Cubukcu, M; Gorpelioglu, S
Croatian Medical Journal, 49(3): 415-420.
10.3325/cmj.2008.3.415
CrossRef
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
The Financial Impact of Orthopaedic Fellowship Training
Gaskill, T; Cook, C; Nunley, J; Mather, RC
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 91A(7): 1814-1821.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Capsule Commentary on Choi et al., Primary Care Careers Among Recent Graduates of Research-Intensive Private and Public Medical Schools
Jackson, JL
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(6): 835.
10.1007/s11606-012-2326-8
CrossRef
Bmc Medical Education
Characteristic profiles among students and junior doctors with specific career preferences
Takeda, Y; Morio, K; Snell, L; Otaki, J; Takahashi, M; Kai, I
Bmc Medical Education, 13(): -.
ARTN 125
CrossRef
Academic Medicine
Revenue-Based Cost Assignment: A Potent but Hidden Threat to the Survival of the Multispecialty Medical Practice
Cooper, R; Kramer, TR
Academic Medicine, 85(3): 538-547.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd4cf7
PDF (301) | CrossRef
Academic Medicine
Perspective: Transforming Chronic Care for Older Persons
Boult, C; Christmas, C; Durso, SC; Leff, B; Boult, LB; Fried, LP
Academic Medicine, 83(7): 627-631.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181782b14
PDF (55) | CrossRef
Annals of Surgery
Effect of Educational Debt on Career and Quality of Life among Academic Surgeons
Doria, C; Kim, RD; Mankani, MH; Corbett, SA; Biffl, WL; Schwarze, ML; for the Issues Committee of the Association for Academic Surgery and the Social and Legislative Issues Committee of the Society of University Surgeons, ; Kibbe, MR; Troppmann, C; Barnett, CC; Nwomeh, BC; Olutoye, OO
Annals of Surgery, 249(2): 342-348.
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195e5c8
PDF (697) | CrossRef
Neurosurgery
Predictors of Neurosurgical Career Choice Among Residents and Residency Applicants
Lawton, MT; Narvid, J; Quiñones-Hinojosa, A
Neurosurgery, 60(5): 934-939.
10.1227/01.NEU.0000255445.51989.33
PDF (81) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2005 Association of American Medical Colleges

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share