Beliefs of Primary Care Residents Regarding Spirituality and Religion in Clinical Encounters with Patients: A Study at a Midwestern U.S. Teaching Institution
Luckhaupt, Sara E. MD; Yi, Michael S. MD, MSc; Mueller, Caroline V. MD; Mrus, Joseph M. MD, MSc; Peterman, Amy H. PhD; Puchalski, Christina M. MD; Tsevat, Joel MD, MPH
Dr. Luckhaupt is a second-year preventive medicine resident at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. At the time of the study, Dr. Luckhaupt was a research assistant, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; Veterans Healthcare System of Ohio (VISN 10); and the Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Dr. Yi is assistant professor of internal medicine and pediatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Dr. Mueller is associate professor of internal medicine and pediatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Dr. Mrus is assistant professor of internal medicine and pediatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; and physician, Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Healthcare System of Ohio (VISN 10), Cincinnati, Ohio.
Dr. Peterman is director of research, Center on Outcomes, Research, and Education; and Institute for Health Services Research and Policy Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Dr. Puchalski is director of The George Washington Institute of Spirituality and Health, and associate professor of medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Dr. Tsevat is professor of medicine and director of outcomes research, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; research director, Center for Clinical Effectiveness, Institute for the Study of Health, University of Cincinnati Medical Center; and director of health services research and development, Veterans Healthcare System of Ohio (VISN 10), Cincinnati, Ohio.
For information about the authors, see the end of this report.
Some of the results of this study were presented in a poster session at the Annual Meeting of Pediatric Academic Societies, May 3, 2004, San Francisco, California.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Luckhaupt, 2781 Page Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48104; telephone: (734) 973–6267; e-mail: 〈firstname.lastname@example.org〉.
Purpose: To assess primary care residents’ beliefs regarding the role of spirituality and religion in the clinical encounter with patients.
Method: In 2003, at a major midwestern U.S. teaching institution, 247 primary care residents were administered a questionnaire adapted from that used in the Religion and Spirituality in the Medical Encounter Study to assess whether primary care house officers feel they should discuss religious and spiritual issues with patients, pray with patients, or both, and whether personal characteristics of residents, including their own spiritual well-being, religiosity, and tendency to use spiritual and religious coping mechanisms, are related to their sentiments regarding spirituality and religion in health care. Simple descriptive, univariate, and two types of multivariable analyses were performed.
Results: Data were collected from 227 residents (92%) in internal medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine/pediatrics, and family medicine. One hundred four (46%) respondents felt that they should play a role in patients’ spiritual or religious lives. In multivariable analysis, this sentiment was associated with greater frequency of participating in organized religious activity (odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.99), a higher level of personal spirituality (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08), and older resident age (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21; C-statistic 0.76). In general, advocating spiritual and religious involvement was most often associated with high personal levels of spiritual and religious coping and with the family medicine training program. Residents were more likely to agree with incorporating spirituality and religion into patient encounters as the gravity of the patient's condition increased (p < .0001).
Conclusions: Approximately half of primary care residents felt that they should play a role in their patients’ spiritual or religious lives. Residents’ agreement with specific spiritual and religious activities depended on both the patient's condition and the resident's personal characteristics.
The topic of religion and spirituality in health care has generated much discussion and controversy.1–7 Some authors advocate spiritual and religious history-taking as part of a routine office visit8–10; others feel that discussions of spirituality and religion are best reserved for patients facing impending death.11–17 Reasons cited by physicians for addressing spiritual issues in the clinical encounter include evidence supporting a link between spirituality and religion, and health, and the importance of spirituality and religion in physicians’ own lives.18 In addition, several surveys indicate that a substantial percentage of patients would like their physicians to address their spiritual issues19 and be spiritually attuned to them.20 Nevertheless, while some clinicians advocate taking on a role in patients’ spiritual and religious lives, others caution against potential ethical and personal conflicts such involvement may cause.9,21–24 The diversity of spiritual and religious beliefs among both patients and physicians also contributes to the challenge in deciding whether to address these issues in the clinical encounter.25
In the past five years we have witnessed bull-market growth in the number of U.S. medical schools teaching spirituality, and some residency programs are teaching spirituality as well.12,26 A few studies have examined residents’ attitudes and competencies in spirituality. Although previous studies involving residents have compared pediatrics residents with pediatrics faculty or have grouped residents and faculty together in comparing family practitioners to internists,27–29 no previous studies have compared attitudes toward spirituality and religion in clinical encounters among residents from each of the primary care fields: pediatrics, internal medicine, family medicine, and internal medicine/pediatrics. Also, while qualitative studies have found high rates of use of spiritual and religious coping strategies among family practitioners,30,31 coping strategies have not yet been studied to explain differences in physicians’ sentiments regarding spirituality and religion in the clinical encounter.
The goals of our study were to assess primary care residents’ beliefs regarding what their roles in patients’ spiritual and religious lives should be, and to assess how house officers’ own spirituality and religiosity and other characteristics may affect those beliefs. We hypothesized that levels of spiritual and religious coping activities used by residents to deal with their own stressors may also be associated with their attitudes about spiritual and religious activities in clinical encounters. Therefore, in addition to using measures of spiritual well-being and religious activity similar to those in previous studies of physicians,27–29,32 we also measured levels of positive and negative spiritual and religious coping activities among residents as potential predictors of attitudes toward spiritual and religious behaviors in various clinical settings.
Between July and October 2003, we invited all 247 internal medicine, pediatrics, family medicine, and internal medicine/pediatrics residents at a major teaching institution in the midwestern United States to complete a questionnaire regarding spirituality and religion in health care immediately after taking their in-service examinations. We chose these four residency programs because they include all of the tracks offered by our institution that are considered primary care residency programs by the Bureau of Health Professions in the Health Resources and Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.33 Our university's Institutional Review Board approved this study.
We measured the primary outcomes by responses to a list of 12 statements about spirituality and religion in the medical encounter that we adapted from a study of patients’ preferences by the Religion and Spirituality in the Medical Encounter (RSME) Study Group.34 Statements in our questionnaire included, “As a doctor, I should not play a role in my patients’ spiritual or religious lives”; “As a doctor, I should be aware of my patients’ spiritual or religious beliefs”; “It is important to a patient that his/her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs”; and a series of statements about whether “As a doctor, I should ‘ask about spiritual or religious beliefs,’ ‘say a silent prayer,’ or ‘pray with a patient’ in a routine office visit, a hospitalization, or an impending death.” As in the RSME study, we asked our participants to respond using a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree). For analyses, we dichotomized results to agree (strongly agree/agree) versus disagree (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree). For the first statement, which was framed negatively, we dichotomized results to disagree/strongly disagree versus neutral/agree/strongly agree.
Residents’ demographics and health.
We asked residents about their demographic characteristics (age, race, sex), residency program, postgraduate year (PGY), current rotation (ward or intensive care unit versus ambulatory/other), and religious affiliation. In our analyses, we stratified religious affiliation responses into five categories: Catholic, Protestant (including nondenominational Protestant), Jewish, other religion (including Muslim and Hindu), and nonaffiliated (presumably secularists). Recent studies have suggested empirical differences in the way Catholics, Protestants, and Jews characterize personal religiosity.35,36 We measured overall health status on a health rating scale (HRS) from 0 to 100 (0 = dead, 100 = perfect health), and level of depressive symptoms using the ten-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CESD-10; range, 0–30, with scores ≥ 10 representing significant depressive symptoms).37
Residents’ spirituality and religiosity.
We used three different instruments, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-SpEx), the Duke Religion Index (DRI), and the Brief RCOPE measure to assess residents’ personal spirituality and religiosity. The FACIT-SpEx, which includes 23 statements about spiritual well-being, was designed for use in samples of people dealing with chronic illness, but with the help of one of the instrument's developers (A. Peterman, PhD), we adapted the statements to apply to residents dealing with the stress of medical training. Responses are scored on a five-point Likert scale with an overall range of 0–92, with higher scores indicating greater levels of spirituality.38 The DRI assesses organized religious activity (frequency of attending services), nonorganized religious activity (prayer, meditation, Bible study, etc.), and subjective or intrinsic religiosity using five items scored on five- or six-point Likert-type scales. Total scores range from 5–27, with higher scores indicating greater levels of religiosity.39,40 We used subscales of the Brief RCOPE that address positive religious coping, negative religious coping, and religious discontent, with higher scores indicating greater use of coping strategies (see List 1). Like the FACIT-SpEx, the Brief RCOPE was designed for use in samples of people dealing with chronic illness, but we adapted the statements to apply to residents dealing with the stress of medical training.41–43 Data were also collected for other subscales from the Brief RCOPE designed to measure religious support-seeking and spiritual support-seeking, but we did not include those data in our analyses because they correlated strongly with the positive religious coping subscale.
We performed analyses using the SAS system for Windows, version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Descriptive statistics included means, standard deviations, and proportions. We compared means by using the Wilcoxon rank sum and t tests, as appropriate. We compared proportions of respondents who agreed versus disagreed with each outcome statement by using the Fisher exact test, and we tested for trends in agreement with each of three behaviors—asking about patients’ beliefs, saying a silent prayer for the patient, and praying out loud with the patient—across the three patient settings (office visit, hospitalization, and imminent death) with chi-squared tests for trends. We considered a p < .05 as significant in univariate analysis. Next, for independent variables with a p < .20 in univariate analyses, we performed backward elimination logistic regression analyses for each of 12 primary outcome statements, with a stay-level p ≤ .05. Finally, we tested additional models for each of the 12 outcome statements to examine the influence of three different types of explanatory variables (demographic variables, residency variables, and religious variables). In the multivariable analyses, when comparing results by residency program type, we used family medicine as the reference group. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and C-statistics (a measure of discrimination equal to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) are reported for backward elimination logistic regression analyses. For the additional analyses, only C-statistics are reported here, but ORs and CIs are available in the online appendix 〈http://www.ihphsr.uc.edu/PDF/reports/LuckhauptAdditionalAnalyses.pdf〉. For all multivariable analyses, we dichotomized religion into Christian versus non-Christian due to the small numbers of residents belonging to certain religions. Similarly, we dichotomized residents’ race/ethnicity into white versus nonwhite in multivariable analyses.
We collected data from 227 residents (92%) in the four primary care training programs. Respondents’ mean (SD) age was 28.7 (3.8) years; 131 (58%) were women; 167 (74%) were white, and 30 (13%) were Asian or Pacific Islander. One hundred seven (47%) were Protestant, 58 (26%) were Catholic, 15 (7%) were Jewish, 24 (11%) reported other religious affiliations, and 22 (10%) reported no religious affiliation (secular). One hundred twelve (49%) were pediatrics residents, 62 (27%) were internal medicine residents, 27 (12%) were family medicine residents, and 26 (11%) were internal medicine/pediatrics residents (see Table 1). The distributions of residents’ scores on the HRS, CESD-10, and spirituality and religiosity scales are shown in Table 2.
General statements about spirituality and religion in the clinical encounter
Overall, 104 (46%) house officers believed that they should play a role in patients’ spiritual or religious lives, 203 (90%) believed that they should be aware of their patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs, and 62 (27%) believed that it is important to a patient that his or her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs (see Figure 1). Agreement with questionnaire statements by resident characteristics is shown in Table 3. Mean age and scores on the HRS, CESD-10, and spirituality and religiosity scales for residents who agreed versus those who disagreed with selected statements are shown in Table 4. In univariate analyses, agreeing that house officers should play a role in patients’ spiritual or religious lives was associated with religious affiliation (55% of Protestants, 43% of Catholics, 42% of others, 32% of secularists, and 20% of Jews, p = .050), program type (33% of internal medicine residents, 46% of pediatrics residents, 50% of internal medicine/pediatrics residents, and 74% of family medicine residents agreed, p = .004), greater frequency of personal religious activity (organized, nonorganized, and intrinsic, all p < .0001), greater spiritual well-being (p < .0001), and higher levels of positive religious coping (p < .0001). Believing that a doctor should be aware of patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs was only significantly associated with program type (79% internal medicine, 88% internal medicine/pediatrics, 95% pediatrics, and 96% family medicine agreed, p = .007). Believing that it is important to a patient that his or her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs was significantly associated with race (56% of blacks, 27% of whites, and 17% of Asians and others, p = .038), religious affiliation (38% of Protestants, 21% of Catholics and others, 13% of Jews, and 9% of secularists, p = .014); greater levels of organized and nonorganized religious activity and greater intrinsic religiosity (all p < .0001); greater spiritual well being (p = .0002); and greater use of positive religious coping strategies (p < .0001).
In backward-elimination multivariable analyses, believing that one should play a role in patients’ spiritual or religious lives was associated with greater organized religious activity (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.20–1.99), older age (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21), and greater spiritual well-being (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08, C-statistic = 0.76; see Table 5). Believing that a doctor should be aware of patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs was only associated with program type, with internal medicine residents being less likely to agree with the statement than were family medicine residents (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10–0.63, C-statistic = 0.66). Believing that it is important to a patient that his or her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs was associated with higher levels of both positive (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15–1.32) and negative (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.39) religious coping (C-statistic = 0.78).
Asking about patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs
Eighty-two (36%) residents felt that they should ask patients about spiritual and religious beliefs during an office visit, but 175 (77%) felt they should ask about spiritual and religious beliefs if the patient was near death (p < .0001). Family medicine residents were more likely than were other residents to agree with asking about patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs in each of the three clinical settings (see Table 5). For office visits, for example, factors associated with favoring asking about patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs in univariate analyses included family medicine residency, fewer years of residency (lower PGY level), better self-rated health, fewer depressive symptoms, greater spiritual well-being, greater religious activity (organized, nonorganized, and intrinsic religiosity), and greater levels of positive religious coping. In backward-elimination multivariable analyses, internal medicine (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05–0.41), pediatrics (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.64), and internal medicine/pediatrics (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07–0.81) residents were much less likely than were family medicine residents to agree with asking about patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs during a routine office visit. PGY (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.98) and spiritual well-being (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08) were also significantly related to agreeing with asking patients about spiritual and religious beliefs during a routine office visit. The C-statistic for the logistic regression model was 0.74.
Sex and race were inconsistently associated with asking about beliefs. Men were less likely than were women to agree with asking about the spiritual and religious beliefs of hospitalized patients (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27–0.92), while white residents were more likely than were nonwhites to agree with asking about the spiritual and religious beliefs of dying patients (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.15–4.99).
Prayer in the clinical encounter
Across all patient settings, residents were less likely to agree with praying silently than with inquiring about beliefs, and were least likely to agree with praying aloud with a patient (see Figure 1). Residents were more likely to agree with praying (silently or aloud) in the clinical encounter as the gravity of the patient's condition increased. Eighty-seven (39%) residents agreed with praying with a dying patient, while only 26 (12%) agreed with praying with a patient during a routine office visit (p < .0001).
Of the three instruments used to assess residents’ spirituality and religiosity, scores on the Brief RCOPE subscales were most frequently associated with agreement about prayer in the clinical encounter, particularly for saying a silent prayer for a patient during a routine office visit and praying (aloud) with a patient during a routine office visit. For silent prayer, positive religious coping was the only significant variable in the logistic regression model (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27–1.54; C-statistic 0.87). In the multivariable analysis for praying (aloud) with a patient during a routine office visit, only positive religious coping (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16–1.47) and religious discontent (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.94) were associated with favoring praying (aloud) with a patient during a routine office visit (C-statistic 0.84).
Trends from additional multivariable analyses
Additional multivariable analyses illustrate general trends in how three different types of resident characteristics help to predict responses to the 12 outcome statements (see Table 6). In models testing only demographic variables, C-statistics ranged from 0.54 for agreeing with praying with a patient who is dying to 0.69 for agreeing with praying with a patient during a routine office visit. For models adding residency characteristics, C-statistics ranged from 0.61 for agreeing with saying a silent prayer for a patient who is dying to 0.76 for agreeing that physicians should be aware of patients’ spiritual and religious beliefs. Finally, for models adding the spiritual and religious variables to the prior models, C-statistics ranged from 0.73 for asking a hospitalized patient about his or her spiritual and religious beliefs to 0.91 for agreeing with saying a silent prayer for a patient during a routine office visit.
Studying physicians’ beliefs and behaviors regarding spirituality and religion in clinical encounters with patients is important because, on the one hand, a majority of the American public and patients believe that spirituality, religion, and health are connected, while on the other hand, there is disagreement about how health care professionals, specifically physicians, should take this belief into account.7,34,44–46 In a cohort of primary care house officers at a large training institution, we found that almost half of the residents felt that they should play a role in patients’ spiritual or religious lives. The percentage of residents who agreed with specific types of spiritual and religious involvement varied greatly by patient setting and by specific activity. Residents’ own spiritual and religious characteristics, especially levels of positive religious coping, were associated with favoring incorporating spiritual and religious activity in general, and especially with incorporating praying (silently or aloud) into clinical encounters.
As demonstrated in the multivariable analyses, only a small amount of the variance in residents’ responses to outcome statements could be explained by residents’ demographics. Residents’ age, sex, and levels of significant depressive symptomatology were all significantly associated with certain statements, but these isolated results are likely spurious because they do not follow any logical trends. Adding residency-related variables to the analyses explained more of the variance, most likely due to differences between family medicine residents and residents in other programs. Family medicine program type was significantly more strongly associated with agreeing with asking about spiritual and religious beliefs in all three clinical settings when compared with other programs. Substantially more variance in residents’ responses to outcome statements was explained by considering residents’ own spirituality and religion.
Ours was the first study to assess physicians’ spiritual and religious coping patterns in the context of their beliefs regarding spirituality and religion in the clinical encounter with patients. We found that higher levels of positive religious coping with the stresses of residency were associated with favoring most of the spiritual and religious activities in the clinical encounter. One subscale of negative coping patterns—religious discontent—was negatively associated with favoring praying with patients, except in the case of dying patients. Surprisingly, both greater levels of positive religious coping and negative religious coping were associated with a greater likelihood of believing that it is important to a patient that his or her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs. The finding of more frequent significant associations between religious coping and agreement with spiritual and religious activities in clinical encounters than between the other measures of spirituality and religion and the outcome statements suggests that religious coping may be a more meaningful variable to study in this context. The tendency for physicians to use religious coping mechanisms in a positive way in their own lives seems to be predictive of their attitudes toward favoring using spiritual and religious coping strategies (i.e., discussing beliefs or praying) with patients.
Our other findings corroborate and expand upon previous research.27–29,32 The RSME Study Group asked similar questions of a cohort of family practitioners and internists in residency or fellowship training, academic practice, or private practice.29 In their study, 31% of physicians felt that they should ask about spiritual or religious beliefs in an office setting and 74% felt they should ask about spiritual or religious beliefs if the patient was dying. Only 6% felt they should pray with a patient in the office, and 27% felt they should pray with a dying patient. Those percentages are slightly lower than corresponding percentages in our study. As in the RSME study, our physicians’ attitudes depended heavily on the clinical setting and specific behavior. Associations with favoring spiritual and religious involvement in the RSME study included training in family medicine and having a greater level of spiritual well-being.
Whereas the RSME Study Group found a consistent association between family medicine (versus internal medicine) residency and almost all of the primary outcome statements, we found a consistent association between family medicine (versus internal medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine/pediatrics) specialty and agreement with asking patients about spiritual and religious beliefs across the spectrum of clinical settings, but we did not find consistent associations between specialty type and agreeing with saying silent prayers or praying with patients. There is some evidence that family practice residency programs emphasize learning about patients’ spiritual beliefs and acquiring skill in spiritual history-taking more so than residency programs in other primary care specialties: Such skills are included in the “Recommended Core Educational Guidelines for Family Practice Residents” published by the American Academy of Family Practice under the topic of “Health Promotion and Disease Prevention,”47 but are not explicitly included in curricula promulgated by internal medicine and pediatrics training organizations.
Two studies of pediatricians have compared faculty and resident attitudes versus experiences with religion and spirituality in the medical encounter.27,28 Those studies suggest that attitudes of residents are different from attitudes of faculty, and suggest a greater level of comfort with spiritual and religious issues among pediatricians than other investigators have found among internists and family practitioners. Siegel and colleagues28 found that 93% of pediatrics faculty and residents would ask about spirituality and religion when discussing life-threatening illness. A strong personal spiritual and religious orientation was associated with believing that spirituality and religiosity and medicine are connected, but was not associated with reports of actions; also, residents were more likely than were faculty to say it is appropriate to pray with patients if asked. Armbruster and colleagues27 surveyed 46 faculty and 44 residents and found that faculty were more likely than were residents to ask new patients about religious affiliation, but residents were more likely than were faculty to be asked to pray during health crises (61% of residents versus 28% of faculty said they were asked to pray “often” or “sometimes”), to believe that spirituality and religion have health relevance, and to perceive pediatrician-initiated prayer as appropriate. We did not find a trend for pediatrics residents to be more likely than other primary care residents to agree with spiritual and religious inquiry or prayer with patients; if anything, pediatricians were much less likely to endorse those activities than were family physicians. The reason for the much higher overall level of agreement with asking about the spiritual and religious beliefs of a dying patient in Siegel and colleagues’ study is unclear. Both our study and theirs used similar questions and surveyed physicians working in large urban children's hospitals.
While training program type was associated with opinions regarding asking patients about their spiritual and religious beliefs, opinions regarding prayer in the clinical encounter were only associated with residents’ tendency to use religious coping strategies in their own lives. An increased tendency to agree with asking patients about their spiritual and religious beliefs among “newer” (lower PGY level) residents may be explained by an increased emphasis on spirituality and religion in medical school training in recent years. Another explanation might be that senior residents are likely to be less thorough history-takers, in general, than are newer residents because senior residents are generally responsible for more patients and have less time to spend with each.
Additionally, agreement with prayer in the clinical encounter may be explained by transference of residents’ personal coping strategies to their patients. Transference could also help explain why higher levels of positive religious coping are associated with believing that it is important to a patient that his or her doctor has strong spiritual beliefs. For the less specific question about whether a physician should play a role in patients’ spiritual and religious lives, general measures of spiritual well-being and organized religious activity replaced the RCOPE subscales in multivariable analyses as significantly associated variables. As in a previous study of physicians’ attitudes regarding spiritual and religious behavior in patient encounters,29 rates of favoring silent prayer and praying aloud with patients were significantly lower than rates of favoring spiritual and religious inquiry, and residents’ agreement with each activity increased as the gravity of the patient's clinical situation increased.
It is interesting to note that although 90% of the residents surveyed in our study agreed that physicians should be aware of patients’ spiritual or religious beliefs, less than 40% agreed that they should ask about beliefs during a routine office visit, and less than 80% agreed with asking about beliefs even when a patient is near death. It is unclear how physicians expect to become aware of patients’ beliefs if they do not ask about them, but it is possible that residents and other physicians would be more comfortable obtaining this information from a written intake form than obtaining it verbally from patients. Alternatively, it is possible that residents would be comfortable asking about spiritual and religious beliefs if they knew how to address it quickly during routine history-taking; Puchalski and colleagues12 have developed a four-question instrument for such purposes.
Our study had several limitations. One was the large number of variables, both independent and dependent, that we analyzed which may have yielded spurious findings. Second, we modified measures of spiritual well-being and religious coping strategies that were developed for use in patients with chronic disease, and used them in a group of participants who (we presumed) did not have chronic disease. Furthermore, although 73% of our respondents were Christian, comments written in the margins of the questionnaires suggested that some respondents were uncomfortable with the perceived Christian slant to our study instruments. Perhaps other types of spiritual and religious practices, such as referral to a chaplain, would be more acceptable to residents than would be saying a silent prayer or praying with a patient.
In the survey questionnaire we used, we did not differentiate between patient-requested prayer and physician-initiated prayer, a potentially important distinction, as physician-led prayer has been discouraged by some because of the risk of potential coercion or proselytizing.9,14 In their survey of physicians, the RSME Study Group included questions starting with the preface “If the patient requests” (e.g., “If a patient requests, an MD should say a silent prayer for the patient” or “If a patient requests, an MD should pray with the patient”), and found that physicians were more likely to endorse prayer if asked, but 23% of physicians still disagreed with praying with a patient near death even at the patient's request, perhaps because of ethical conflicts that physicians have regarding praying with people with spiritual backgrounds different from their own or from not being comfortable with that level of intimacy with a patient. Nevertheless, with a 2001 poll showing that approximately 50% of respondents would like their doctor to pray with them during times of illness,48 some physicians and medical educators would likely support training about praying with patients so that physicians can at least respond to requests sensitively and respect patients’ needs without compromising their own values and beliefs.
Although univariate analyses suggested some trends for black residents to endorse some activities more than did nonblack residents, we did not have enough black residents in our sample size to stratify by black race in multivariable analyses. Instead, blacks were classified with Asians as “nonwhites,” even though Asians appeared to respond more like whites in univariate analyses. Although univariate analyses also suggested differences between Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, other religious, and secularist residents in responses to several outcome statements, the small numbers of non-Christians in our sample prohibited us from stratifying religious affiliation in multivariable analyses beyond dichotomization into Christian and non-Christian. The trend for Jews to more closely resemble secularists than Christians in univariate analyses is consistent with recent studies demonstrating that religious affiliation is less predictive of strong beliefs in the areas we studied for Jews than it is for Catholics or Protestants.35,36 In addition, the small number of family medicine residents surveyed (no. = 27; 12% of total sample) limits the generalizability of our findings of differences between family medicine residents and other residents. Finally, our study was limited to house officers at one medical center in the midwestern United States, and our results may not be applicable to trainees at other centers in other parts of the country. It is encouraging, however, that we found results similar to those obtained by the RSME Study Group conducted at medical centers in the southeastern and northeastern United States.
Our study also had several important strengths. We were able to collect data from a large number of house officers and had a response rate of 92%. Internal medicine, pediatrics, family medicine, and internal medicine/pediatrics trainees represent the breadth of primary care residents and their beliefs have not been directly compared previously. We used three different instruments to measure resident spirituality and religiosity in order to examine different facets of spirituality and religion and their relationships with attitudes concerning spiritual and religious activities in the patient encounter. To our knowledge, ours is the first study to look for an association between religious coping among physicians versus attitudes regarding spiritual and religious activities in the physician–patient encounter.
In conclusion, approximately half of primary care residents in our study believed that they should play a role in their patients’ spiritual and religious lives. Spiritual and religious coping patterns and training program type—specifically family medicine (versus other primary care program types)—appear to have been important factors in residents’ attitudes about incorporating spirituality and religion in clinical encounters. Further studies are needed to examine other ways in which primary care residents feel they could or should play a role in the spiritual and religious lives of their patients.
The authors are grateful to Kenneth Pargament, PhD, of Bowling Green State University, for helping to adapt the Brief RCOPE. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This project was supported by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (grants R01 AT001147 and K24 AT001676), and Health Services Research and Development, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (grant # ECI 01–195). Dr. Yi is supported by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Career Development Award (grant # 1K23HD046690-01A1). Dr. Mrus is a recipient of a Career Development Award (grant # RCD 01011–2) from the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service.
1 Mills PJ. Spirituality, religiousness, and health: from research to clinical practice. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:1–2.
2 Ayele H, Mulligan T, Gheorgiu S, Reyes-Ortiz C. Religious activity improves life satisfaction for some physicians and older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:453–5.
3 Harris WS, Gowda M, Kolb JW, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2273–8.
4 Meraviglia M. The effects of spirituality on well-being of people with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31:89–94.
5 Daaleman TP, Perera S, Studenski SA. Religion, spirituality, and health status in geriatric outpatients. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:49–53.
6 Rossman ML. Should a doctor ask about a patient's spiritual beliefs? Adv Mind Body Med. 2001;17:101–3.
7 Fletcher CE. Health care providers’ perceptions of spirituality while caring for veterans. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:546–61.
8 Sulmasy DP. Is medicine a spiritual practice? Acad Med. 1999;74:1002–5.
9 Post SG, Puchalski CM, Larson DB. Physicians and patient spirituality: professional boundaries, competence, and ethics. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:578–83.
10 Anandarajah G. Spirituality and medical practice: using the HOPE questions as a practical tool for spiritual assessment. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63:81–8.
11 Larson DB, Koenig HG. Is God good for your health? The role of spirituality in medical care. Cleve Clin J Med. 2000;67:80, 83–4.
12 Puchalski CM. Spirituality and end-of-life care: a time for listening and caring. J Palliat Med. 2002;5:289–94.
13 Block SD. Psychological considerations, growth, and transcendence at the end of life: the art of the possible. JAMA. 2001;285:2898–905.
14 Lo B, Kates LW, Ruston D, et al. Responding to requests regarding prayer and religious ceremonies by patients near the end of life and their families. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:409–15.
15 Lo B, Ruston D, Kates LW, et al. Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians. JAMA. 2002;287:749–54.
16 Daaleman TP, VandeCreek L. Placing religion and spirituality in end of life care. JAMA. 2000;284:2514–7.
17 Schuetz B. Spirituality and palliative care. Aust Fam Physician. 1995;24:775–7.
18 Ellis MR, Campbell JD, Detwiler-Breidenbach A, Hubbard DK. What do family physicians think about spirituality in clinical practice? J Fam Pract. 2002;51:249–54.
19 Yankelovich Partners, Inc., for TIME/CNN, 12–13 June 1996. In: Wallis C. Faith and healing. Time. 1996;147:28–62.
20 The George H. Gallup International Institute. Spiritual beliefs and the dying process: a report on a national survey. Conducted for the Nathan Cummings Foundation and the Fetzer Institute, New York, NY, 1997.
21 Scheurich N. Reconsidering spirituality and medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:356–60.
22 Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T. Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet. 1999;353:664–7.
23 Lawrence RJ. The witches’ brew of spirituality and medicine. Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:74–6.
24 VandeCreek L. Should physicians discuss spiritual concerns with patients? J Relig Health. 1999;38:193–201.
25 Groopman J. God at the bedside. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1176–8.
26 Puchalski CM, Larson DB, Lu FG. Spirituality courses in psychiatry residency programs. Psychiatr Ann. 2000;30:543–8.
27 Armbruster CA, Chibnall JT, Legett S. Pediatrician beliefs about spirituality and medicine: associations with clinical practice. Pediatrics. 2003;111:e227–35.
28 Siegel B, Tenenbaum A, Jamanka A, Barnes L, Hubbard C, Zuckerman B. Faculty and resident attitudes about spirituality and religion in the provision of pediatric health care. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2:5–10.
29 Monroe M, Bynum D, Susi B, et al. Primary care physician preferences regarding spiritual behavior in medical practice. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2751–6.
30 Post DM, Weddington WH. Stress and coping of the African-American physician. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:70–5.
31 Post DM. Values, stress, and coping among practicing family physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:252–5.
32 Chibnall JT, Brooks CA. Religion in the clinic: the role of physician beliefs. South Med J. 2001;94:374–9.
34 MacLean CD, Susi B, Phifer N, et al. Patient preference for physician discussion and practice of spirituality: results from a multicenter patient survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:38–43.
35 Cohen AB. The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3:287–310.
36 Cohen A.B., Siegel J.I., Rozin P. Faith versus practice: different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2003;33:287–95.
37 Andresen E, Malmgren J, Carter W, Patrick D. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.
38 Peterman A, Fitchett G, Brady M, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the Functional Assessment Of Chronic Illness Therapy—Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med. 2002;24:49–58.
39 Koenig HG, Parkerson G Jr, Meador K. Religion index for psychiatric research. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:885–6.
40 Sherman A, Plante T, Simonton S, Adams D, Harbison C, Burris S. A multidimensional measure of religious involvement for cancer patients: The Duke Religion Index. Support Care Cancer. 2000;8:102–9.
41 Pargament, Kenneth I., PhD, professor of psychology, Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio. Personal written communication, June 9, 2003.
42 Pargament K, Smith B, Koenig HG. Patterns of positive and negative religious coping with major life stressors. J Sci Stud Relig. 1998;37:710–24.
43 Pargament K, Koenig HG, Perez LM. The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE. J Clin Psychol. 2000;56:519–43.
44 Hebert RS, Jenckes MW, Ford DE, O'Connor DR, Cooper LA. Patient perspectives on spirituality and the patient-physician relationship. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:685–92.
45 Ehman JW, Ott BB, Short TH, Ciampa RC, Hansen-Flaschen J. Do patients want physicians to inquire about their spiritual or religious beliefs if they become gravely ill? Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1803–6.
46 Mansfield CJ, Mitchell J, King DE. The doctor as God's mechanic? Beliefs in the southeastern United States. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:399–409.
48 The Gallup Organization. Health of the Nation Survey (2001). Princeton, NJ, 2002.
This article has been cited 1 time(s).
© 2005 Association of American Medical Colleges
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again soon.
Readers Of this Article Also Read