Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2003 - Volume 78 - Issue 8 > Simulation‐Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative
Academic Medicine:
Articles

Simulation‐Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative

Ziv, Amitai MD; Wolpe, Paul Root PhD; Small, Stephen D. MD; Glick, Shimon MD

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Dr. Ziv is deputy director, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, and director, Israel Center for Medical Simulation (MSR), Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Dr. Wolpe is at the Center for Bioethics, Departments of Psychiatry and Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, and chief of Bioethics, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Dr. Small is director, the University of Chicago Developing Center for Patient Safety, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and Dr. Glick is professor emeritus, Immanuel Jakobovits Center for Jewish Medical Ethics, Moshe Prywes Center for Medical Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel, Center for Medical Education, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to Dr. Small, Director, University of Chicago Developing Center for Patient Safety, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 4028, Chicago, IL 60637; telephone: (773) 834-2309; fax: (773) 702-5447; e-mail: 〈ssmall@airway.uchicago.edu〉.

Dr. Small was supported by grant numbers U18 HS 11905 and P20 HS 11553 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Collapse Box

Abstract

Medical training must at some point use live patients to hone the skills of health professionals. But there is also an obligation to provide optimal treatment and to ensure patients' safety and well-being. Balancing these two needs represents a fundamental ethical tension in medical education. Simulation-based learning can help mitigate this tension by developing health professionals' knowledge, skills, and attitudes while protecting patients from unnecessary risk. Simulation-based training has been institutionalized in other high-hazard professions, such as aviation, nuclear power, and the military, to maximize training safety and minimize risk. Health care has lagged behind in simulation applications for a number of reasons, including cost, lack of rigorous proof of effect, and resistance to change. Recently, the international patient safety movement and the U.S. federal policy agenda have created a receptive atmosphere for expanding the use of simulators in medical training, stressing the ethical imperative to “first do no harm” in the face of validated, large epidemiological studies describing unacceptable preventable injuries to patients as a result of medical management. Four themes provide a framework for an ethical analysis of simulation-based medical education: best standards of care and training, error management and patient safety, patient autonomy, and social justice and resource allocation. These themes are examined from the perspectives of patients, learners, educators, and society. The use of simulation wherever feasible conveys a critical educational and ethical message to all: patients are to be protected whenever possible and they are not commodities to be used as conveniences of training.

Medical training must at some point use live patients to hone the skills of health professionals. At the same time, there is an obligation to provide optimal treatment and to insure patients' safety and well-being. These conflicting needs create a fundamental ethical tension in medical education, one that is widely recognized although little discussed. Recent articles in the bioethical literature have condemned the unreflective use of patients—especially sedated or dying patients—as training tools for clinicians.1–3

Simulation-based medical education (SBME) (see Table 1 for an overview) can be a valuable tool in mitigating these ethical tensions and practical dilemmas. Recent discussions of medical error and risk reduction strategies4–8 have highlighted simulation as an important tool in improving the safe delivery of medical care. Nevertheless, medicine has lagged behind other high-technology, high-risk professions in the use of simulation, such as aviation, in which sophisticated technical and behavioral skills are necessary.9–11 The reasons include financial outlays in an era of increasing cost containment, limits to accurately modeling complex human pathophysiology, demands for rigorous scientific evidence of effectiveness, and resistance to change from a strong professional culture. However, a more receptive atmosphere for expanding the use of simulators in medical training may now exist. An international patient safety movement based on epidemiological studies delineating the numbers and costs of preventable patient injuries due to medical management has reinvigorated the principle of “first do no harm” in policy debates.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

Simulation has been used unsystematically since the early days of medicine. In the 16th century, mannequins (referred to as “phantoms”) were developed to teach obstetrical skills and reduce high maternal and infant mortality rates.12 Today, it is common for students to do their first injections on an orange, practice suturing on pieces of cloth, rehearse medical interviews while role playing, or practice physical examination on simulated (standardized) patient-actors.13–16

Application of modern medical technologies requires complex team interactions that mandate improved training techniques. Advanced SBME can provide realistic representations of complex clinical environments and allow educators to alter patient reactions and responses in ways unattainable with actual patients.18 The recent Institute of Medicine report on medical errors recommends such an interactive use of simulation.5, p.152 Recent studies have supported the efficacy of screen-based and realistic simulators in enhancing technical, behavioral, and social skills in medicine.17,19–26 Modern medical simulation falls into five main categories18 (Table 1). Further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of each of these categories of SBME, as well as their limitations. Equally important is an examination of the ethical features of SBME and its potential contributions and challenges to medical pedagogy.

In the rest of this article, we discuss the four themes that provide a framework for an ethical analysis of SBME: best standards of care and training, error management and patient safety, patient autonomy, and social justice and resource allocation.

Back to Top | Article Outline

BEST STANDARDS

Best Standards for Patient Care

Patients have the right to receive the best care that can be reasonably provided. It is understood that physicians-in-training will treat patients. However, from an ethical perspective, harm to patients as a byproduct of training or lack of experience is justified only after maximizing approaches that do not put patients at risk.

The clinical encounter in a teaching environment may focus too much on training, at times to the detriment of the patient. Although instructors monitor trainees and patients during procedural and cognitive tasks, strategies to place patient well-being foremost occasionally fail. Novices experience significant performance anxiety, generally cannot focus on multiple tasks, and follow simple rules inflexibly.27 SBME allows trainees to more often have their first encounters with real patients when they are at higher levels of technical and clinical proficiency. Practitioners can use SBME to improve proficiency when learning new procedures or when honing existing skills. The use of simulation wherever feasible also can convey a critical educational and ethical message to all stakeholders in health care: patients are to be protected whenever possible and they are not commodities to be used as conveniences of training.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Best Standards for Education

The responsibility of educators, decision makers, and society to provide clinicians with the best training and most constructive learning experience can also be viewed as a moral commitment to trainees. Yet, increasing fragmentation, production pressure, and cost cutting have placed unprecedented constraints on training, making systematic training in real settings unattainable. SBME may allow consistent trainee exposure to a variety of clinical presentations and procedural contexts, including atypical patterns, rare diseases, critical incidents, near misses, and crises. The process and structure of medical education then becomes a series of progressive choices by educators rather than a response to ad hoc clinical availabilities.

SBME can be complex and subtle, enabling training for encounters such as unanticipated patient demise. Curricula have been developed and tested in which medical students and residents engage “speaking” computerized mannequins who unexpectedly die, or in which simulated operating room resuscitation fails. The “deaths” of such simulated patients can evoke close-to-real feelings of loss and responsibility. The SBME protocols may even involve actors posing as the “families” of the simulated patient. Clinician trainees can be trained and evaluated on their approach to informing families of adverse events or the death of a loved one.

Student autonomy in medical education leads to better-trained students with a more humanistic outlook toward patients.28 As with learners in general, trainees and providers in health care learn at different speeds and have different educational needs. SBME allows trainees to practice clinical skills at their own pace, repeating procedures as needed to gain comfortable levels of confidence and proficiency.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Best Standards for Skills Evaluation

Simulation-based skills assessment has played a major role in the transformation of the determination of providers' competency. The traditional focus on the assessment of cognitive skills has slighted the skills of communication, management, cooperation, and interviewing. Deficiencies in these skills are causal factors in adverse outcomes.29,30 Simulation-based assessment has increasingly become a standard method for evaluation.17,31,32 Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) have become a part of licensure examination in both Canada (by the Medical Council of Canada)33 and the United States (by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates).34 Currently, simulation assessment is restricted to “low-tech” methods, using standardized patients to evaluate history taking, physical examination, and communication skills. As the fidelity of medical simulators improves, however, performance assessment studies of hands-on management skills may advance beyond current methods constrained by the use of live patients. Consequently, more professional boards may eventually include more sophisticated simulation-based performance assessment in their routine certification and recertification procedures.35

Back to Top | Article Outline

ERROR MANAGEMENT AND PATIENT SAFETY

Although medical trainees should be closely supervised, especially during the early parts of their clinical training, it is inevitable that trainees will occasionally cause preventable patient injuries. Although such risks are usually considered an unavoidable concomitant of training, the harm caused is ethically tolerable only when minimized to the degree possible by medical pedagogy.

In the clinical setting, errors must be prevented or terminated immediately by supervisors to protect the patient. In contrast, in a simulated environment, errors can be allowed to progress to teach the trainee the implications of the error and allow reactions to rectify deviations. Video feedback strengthens the impact of these learning opportunities and may provide strong incentives to modify behavior. Learning from errors is a key component of improving expertise and serves to organize future behavior.36–38

Errors and failures of expertise occur throughout health professionals' careers.27 SBME is therefore as valuable for continuing medical education and recertification as it is for novice preparation. The model for the use of simulation in a systematic, career-long approach already exists in aviation.

House staffs often handle medical mistakes by denial, discounting personal responsibility, or distancing themselves from the consequences.39 Mistakes made during simulated exercises do not cause harm to living patients and can be more easily exposed and discussed. Mishaps in the course of learning can thus be reviewed openly without concern of liability, blame, or guilt—even decisions and actions that result in the death of the simulated patient. SBME can help break the culture of silence and denial in medicine regarding untoward outcomes and mistakes and their implications about the learner's competence. SBME can foster and nourish a culture of safety, possibly improving the quality of event reporting, an important national policy directive.5

Simulation approaches provide additional means for exploring vulnerabilities in health care delivery and for using that information to improve the competence of providers, the system of care, and interaction between the two. Examples of systems-level applications of simulation include uniform training for interdisciplinary in-hospital resuscitation teams and the increasingly relevant assessment of technology, information systems, and procedures.40

Back to Top | Article Outline

PATIENT AUTONOMY

A fundamental principle of modern bioethics is that patients have the right to direct their own care.41 Standards of informed consent require full disclosure of all pertinent information, and give patients virtually unrestricted rights to refuse a treatment, to participate in research, or to be treated by a trainee or novice.42

In practice, however, these ethical precepts are often violated. Patients are frequently asked in a perfunctory fashion if a learner can engage them or are not asked at all. Sometimes, patients may not even realize they are being treated by a trainee.43 Academic care is time pressured, complex, and hierarchical. Patients may be tired, in pain, or sedated. Procedures for obtaining consent for major anesthesia and surgery have been weakened by the rapid pace and fragmentation of care today. The right to refuse a procedure performed by a trainee is often qualified and may be a fiction in some settings. Research in informed consent procedures indicates that patients frequently do not grasp the nuances and consequences of their consent, even under optimal conditions.44,45

Unconscious, heavily sedated, and recently dead patients are vulnerable subjects for medical training.46 Articles have periodically exposed such practices as the use of anesthetized women for preoperative pelvic examinations by trainees.47 A recent survey of physicians-in-training confirmed the practice of performing nontherapeutic, invasive training procedures during cardiac resuscitation and presented a review of the literature on the controversy of using the recently dead for such purposes.3,48 SBME can significantly reduce the need for training on such patients, helping to fulfill an ethical imperative.49 SBME can also enhance the quality of informed consent by having learners practice informed consent procedures on simulated patients in ethically challenging scenarios, resulting in a more ethically sensitive approach when actual patients are involved later.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SOCIAL JUSTICE AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION

The basic bioethical principle of distributive justice requires that citizens equally share risks of medical innovation, research, and practitioner training. Yet, academic health systems (AHSs) are located in urban areas (only two of more than 115 AHSs are not within a metropolitan statistical area [MSA]), and they provide disproportionate amounts of care to the poor. For example, although AHS hospitals account for only 16% of the beds within MSAs, they recently were noted to account for 45% of the hospital-based charity care.50 As AHSs also provide the vast majority of medical training, it is clear that the already disadvantaged are parties to an unwritten contract to bear a disproportionate amount of the risk of novice training. It is therefore an issue of distributive justice that SBME be explicitly directed toward reducing the proportion of indigent patients used as objects of medical training.

SBME also reduces the need to use live animals for training. Simulators can provide models of human physiology and metabolic responses as well as (and sometimes better than) animals typically used for training purposes. Only recently, the Subcommittee on Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons has approved an alternative model for use during the ATLS Surgical Skills Practicum: an anatomical human body manikin.51

Back to Top | Article Outline

AN ETHICAL IMPERATIVE

Medical schools are redesigning their curricula and rethinking the nature of medical education. This transformation includes a greater emphasis on bioethics, patient-focused care, and the incorporation of the fruits of the medical–technological revolution. Although overreliance on technological medicine may sometimes be a threat to humanistic care, the proper use of simulation technology has the potential to enhance humanistic training in medicine. To optimize the use of SBME and overcome resistance by health professionals, SBME trainers should be skillful in creating a receptive atmosphere, providing constructive feedback, and using video feedback and debriefing. Skillful use of SBME can use the intensity of the simulated experience to nourish culture change and support recognition of fallibility and areas of weakness.52–54

The cost-effectiveness of potentially expensive SBME should also be examined in terms of improvement of clinical competence and its impact on patient safety and error reduction in an era of limited resources.55 Encounters with real patients will always remain essential in exposing health providers to the full complexity of practice. SBME is thus a complementary educational modality rather than an attempt to replace real-patient training encounters.

We suggest that the proper and careful development of SBME is an ethical imperative. While the actual contribution that SBME can make to improving skills awaits empirical study, there seems little question that, when used in a sophisticated manner, SBME has the potential to decrease the numbers and effects of medical errors, to facilitate open exchange in training situations, to enhance patient safety, and to decrease the reliance on vulnerable patients for training. Moreover, by adopting simulation as a standard of training and certification, health systems will be viewed as more accountable and ethical by the populations they serve.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Lynoe N, Sandlund M, Westberg K, Duchek M. Informed consent in clinical training: patient experiences and motives for participating. Med Educ. 1998;32:465–71.

2. Hayes GJ. Issues of consent: the use of the recently deceased for endotracheal intubation training. J Clin Ethics. 1994;5:264–6.

3. Kaldjian LC, Wu BJ, Jekel JF, Kaldjian EP, Duffy TP. Insertion of femoral vein catheters for practice by medical house officers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Eng J Med. 1999;341:2088–91.

4. Feinstein, AR. System, supervision, standards, and the ‘epidemic’ of negligent medical errors. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1285–9.

5. Kohn, L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M (eds). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Committee on Quality in America. Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

6. Berwick DM, Leape LL. Reducing errors in medicine. BMJ. 1999;319:136–7.

7. Doing What Counts for Patient Safety: Federal Actions to Reduce Medical Errors and Their Impact. Report of the Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force to the President. February, 2000. 〈http://www.quic.gov/Report/toc.htm〉. Accessed 5/2/03.

8. Leape, LL. Errors in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851–7.

9. Miller CO. System safety. In: Wiener EL, Nagel DC (eds). Human Factors in Aviation. San Diego CA: Academic Press, 1988.

10. The Aviation Safety System. Aviation Safety Information from the Federal Aviation Administration 〈http://api.hq.faa.gov/strategicgoals/index2.htm〉. Accessed 5/2/03.

11. Weiner EL, Kanki BJ, Helmreich RL (eds). Cockpit Resource Management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1993.

12. Buck GH. Development of simulators in medical education. Gesnerus. 1991;48 Pt 1:7–28.

13. Simpson M. How to use role-play in medical teaching. Med Teach. 1985;7:75–82.

14. Mansfield, F. Supervised role-play in the teaching of the process of consultation. Med Educ. 1991;25:485–90.

15. Barrows, H. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. Acad Med. 1993;68:443–53.

16. Harden R, Gleeson F. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ. 1979;13:41–54.

17. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA. 1999;282:861–6.

18. Ziv A, Small SD, Wolpe PR. Patient safety and simulation-based medical education. Med Teacher. 2000;22:489–95.

19. Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, McGaghie WC, et al. Effectiveness of a computer-based system to teach bedside cardiology. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S93–S95.

20. Helmreich RL, Davies JM. Human factors in the operating room: interpersonal determinants of safety, efficiency and morale. In: Aitkenhead AR (ed). Quality Assurance and Risk Management in Anaesthesia. Balliere's Clinical Anaesthesiology International Practice and Research. London: Bailliere Tindal, 1996:277–95.

21. Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK. Crisis Management in Anesthesiology. New York: Churchill-Livingstone, 1994.

22. Schwid H, Rooke G, Ross B, Sivarajan M. Use of a computerized advanced cardiac life support simulator improves retention of advanced cardiac life support guidelines better than a textbook review. Critical Care Med. 1999;27:821–4.

23. Logan IP, Wills DPM, Avis NJ, Mohsen AMMA, Sherman KP. Virtual environment knee arthroscopy training system. Society for Computer Simulation, Simulation Series. 1996;28(4):17–22.

24. Tuggy M. Virtual reality flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator training: impact of resident performance. J Amer Board of Fam Prac. 1998;11:426–33.

25. Small SD, Wuerz RC, Simon R, Shapiro N, Conn A, Setnik G. Demonstration of high-fidelity simulation team training for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:312–323.

26. Tekian A, McGuire CH, McGaghie WC, et al. (eds). Innovative Simulations for Assessing Professional Competence. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1999.

27. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: MacMillan, 1986.

28. Williams GC, Deci EL, The importance of supporting autonomy in medical education. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:303–8.

29. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mulooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel R. Physician-patient communication. JAMA. 1997;277:553–9.

30. Risser DT, Rice MM, Salisbury M, Simon R, Jay G, Berns SD. The MedTeams Research Consortium. The potential for improved teamwork to reduce medical errors in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:373–84.

31. Allen J, Rashid A. What determines competence within a general practice consultation? Assessment of consultation skills using simulated surgeries. Brit J Gen Prac. 1998;48:1259–62.

32. Holmboe E, Hawkins R. Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:42–8.

33. Reznick RK, Blackmore D, Dauphinee WD, Rothman AI, Smee S. Large-scale high-stakes testing with an OSCE: report from the Medical Council of Canada. Acad Med. 1996;711(suppl):S19–S21.

34. Sutnick AI, Stillman PL, Norcini JJ, et al. ECFMG assessment of clinical competence of graduates of foreign medical schools. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. JAMA. 1993;270:1041–5.

35. Murray D. Clinical simulation: technical novelty or innovation in education. Anesth. 1998;89:1–2.

36. Blumenthal D. Making medical errors into ‘medical treasures. JAMA 1994;272:1867–8.

37. Rasmussen J. The role of error in organizing behavior. Ergonomics 1990;33:1185–99.

38. Senders JW, Moray NP. Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ; 1991:19–40.

39. Mizrahi T. Managing medical mistakes: ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training. Social Science & Medicine. 1984;19:135–46.

40. Forrest F, Mather S, Tooley M. The expanding role of simulators in risk management [letter; comment]. Comment on: Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:633–4, Comment on: Br J Anaesth. 1997 Sep;79:411. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:128.

41. Wolpe PR. The triumph of autonomy in American medical ethics: a sociological view. In: DeVries R, Subedi J (eds). Bioethics and Society: Sociological Investigations of the Enterprise of Bioethics. New York: Prentice Hall, 1998.

42. Faden R, Beauchamp T. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford U Press, 1986.

43. Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Medical student nametags: identification or obfuscation? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:669–71.

44. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Capacities of hospitalized, medically ill patients to consent to treatment. Psychosomatics. 1997;38:119–25.

45. Freda MC, DeVore N, Valentine-Adams N, Bombard A. Merkatz IR. Informed consent for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening in an inner city population: how informed is it? J Obst, Gynec & Neonatal Nurs. 1998;27:99–106.

46. Moore GP. Ethics seminars: the practice of medical procedures on newly dead patients-is consent warranted? Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:389–92.

47. Silver-Isenstadt A, Ubel PA. Erosion in medical students' attitudes about telling patients they are students. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:481–7.

48. Yediot Acharonot Daily News. Israel. 1999 April 4; Sect. A, Pages 3–4.

49. Macintosh MC, Chard T. Pelvic manikins as learning aids. Med Educ. 1997;31:194–6.

50. Association of American Medical Colleges, 〈www.aamc.org/advocacy/library/teachphys/testimony/2002/021402.htm〉. Accessed 6/10/03.

51. Alternative Models for the ATLS Surgical Skills Practicum [press release] ACS, November 7, 2001.

52. Small SD, Barach P, Raemer D, Carroll J. Description of a new RRC and ABA approved simulation elective, and resident attitudes towards expanded simulation training. Anesth. 1999;91:A1150.

53. Kurrek MM, Fish KJ. Anaethesia crisis resource management training: an intimidating concept, a rewarding experience. Can J Anaesth. 1996;43:430–4.

54. Lederman LC. Debriefing: toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation and Gaming. 1992;23:145–60.

55. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Newhouse JP, Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado. Inquiry. 1999;36:255.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 112 time(s).

Laryngoscope
A qualitative analysis of faculty motivation to participate in otolaryngology simulation boot camps
Deutsch, ES; Orioles, A; Kreicher, K; Malloy, KM; Rodgers, DL
Laryngoscope, 123(4): 890-897.
10.1002/lary.23965
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Improving patient safety in the operating theatre and perioperative care: obstacles, interventions, and priorities for accelerating progress
Sevdalis, N; Hull, L; Birnbach, DJ
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 109(): I3-I16.
10.1093/bja/aes391
CrossRef
Seminars in Perinatology
Obstetric simulation for medical student, resident, and fellow education
Deering, S; Auguste, T; Lockrow, E
Seminars in Perinatology, 37(3): 143-145.
10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.003
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
Technology-enhanced Simulation in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ilgen, JS; Sherbino, J; Cook, DA
Academic Emergency Medicine, 20(2): 117-127.
10.1111/acem.12076
CrossRef
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
A Systematic Review of Simulators in Otolaryngology
Javia, L; Deutsch, ES
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 147(6): 999-1011.
10.1177/0194599812462007
CrossRef
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Sophia Title
Nelson, D; Ziv, A; Bandali, KS
Postgraduate Medical Journal, 89(): 599-603.
10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-200665rep
CrossRef
Revista Medica De Chile
Simulation in medical education: a synopsis
Corvetto, M; Bravo, MP; Montana, R; Utili, F; Escudero, E; Boza, C; Varas, J; Dagnino, J
Revista Medica De Chile, 141(1): 70-79.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Temporary Hemodialysis Catheter Placement by Nephrology Fellows: Implications for Nephrology Training
Clark, EG; Schachter, ME; Palumbo, A; Knoll, G; Edwards, C
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 62(3): 474-480.
10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.380
CrossRef
Veterinary Journal
Augmented reality intravenous injection simulator based 3D medical imaging for veterinary medicine
Lee, S; Lee, J; Lee, A; Park, N; Lee, S; Song, S; Seo, A; Lee, H; Kim, JI; Eom, K
Veterinary Journal, 196(2): 197-202.
10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.09.015
CrossRef
Journal of Nippon Medical School
An Effective Training Program for Chest Tube Drainage for Medical Interns in a Clinical Simulation Laboratory
Yoshimura, A; Kosaihira, S; Morimoto, T; Kim, C; Tsueshita, T; Adachi, K; Aso, R; Shimura, T; Nakano, H; Gemma, A
Journal of Nippon Medical School, 79(6): 403-408.

Nurse Education Today
Simulation-based education (SBE) within postgraduate emergency on-call physiotherapy in the United Kingdom
Gough, S; Yohannes, AM; Thomas, C; Sixsmith, J
Nurse Education Today, 33(8): 778-784.
10.1016/j.nedt.2012.03.015
CrossRef
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
CME Congress, Simulation Technology, and the Relationship Between Means and Ends
Olson, CA
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4): 227-229.
10.1002/chp.21149
CrossRef
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Simulation for Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology: The First Two Years
McIvor, W; Burden, A; Weinger, MB; Steadman, R
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(4): 236-242.
10.1002/chp.21151
CrossRef
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
The role of simulation in surgical skills training in gynaecological endoscopy
Haerizadeh, H; Frappell, J
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27(3): 339-347.
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.12.008
CrossRef
Bmj Quality & Safety
Going DEEP: guidelines for building simulation-based team assessments
Grand, JA; Pearce, M; Rench, TA; Chao, GT; Fernandez, R; Kozlowski, SWJ
Bmj Quality & Safety, 22(5): 436-448.
10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000957
CrossRef
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Simulation for training in oral cancer biopsy: A surgical model and feedback from GDPs
Seoane, J; Varela-Centelles, P; Esparza-Gomez, G; Cerero-Lapiedra, R; Seoane-Romero, JM; Diz, P
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal, 18(2): E246-E250.
ARTN 17998
CrossRef
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Hybrid Simulation for Knee Arthrocentesis: Improving Fidelity in Procedures Training
Stroud, L; Cavalcanti, RB
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(5): 723-727.
10.1007/s11606-012-2314-z
CrossRef
Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques
Effectiveness of Simulator-Based Echocardiography Training of Noncardiologists in Congenital Heart Diseases
Wagner, R; Razek, V; Grafe, F; Berlage, T; Janousek, J; Daehnert, I; Weidenbach, M
Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques, 30(6): 693-698.
10.1111/echo.12118
CrossRef
Annals of Internal Medicine
Simulation Exercises as a Patient Safety Strategy A Systematic Review
Schmidt, E; Goldhaber-Fiebert, SN; Ho, LA; McDonald, KM
Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(5): 426-+.

Bmc Medical Education
Teaching ultrasound in a curricular course according to certified EFSUMB standards during undergraduate medical education: a prospective study
Heinzow, HS; Friederichs, H; Lenz, P; Schmedt, A; Becker, JC; Hengst, K; Marschall, B; Domagk, D
Bmc Medical Education, 13(): -.
ARTN 84
CrossRef
4Th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (Inted 2010)
Simulation in Pre-Clinical Nursing Curriculum As A Means of Implementing Evaluation and Assessment
Ottestad, AS; Jacobsen, APL
4Th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (Inted 2010), (): 5753-5758.

Chest
Simulation-Based Bronchoscopy Training Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Kennedy, CC; Maldonado, F; Cook, DA
Chest, 144(1): 183-192.
10.1378/chest.12-1786
CrossRef
Medical Teacher
Simulation Based Medical Education: an opportunity to learn from errors
Ziv, A; Ben-David, S; Ziv, M
Medical Teacher, 27(3): 193-199.
10.1080/01421590500126718
CrossRef
Advances in Physiology Education
An experimental approach to the fundamental principles of hemodynamics
Pontiga, F; Gaytan, SP
Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3): 165-171.
10.1152/advan.00009.2005
CrossRef
2008 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium
Human performance metrics for a virtual reality simulator to train chest tube insertion
Cline, BC; Badejo, AO; Rivest, II; Scanlon, JR; Taylor, WC; Gerling, GJ
2008 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, (): 168-173.

Journal of Nursing Education
Standardized Patients: A Creative Teaching Strategy for Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Students
Shawler, C
Journal of Nursing Education, 47(): 528-531.

Anaesthesia
Standards for simulation
Cumin, D; Merry, AF; Weller, JM
Anaesthesia, 63(): 1281-1284.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05787.x
CrossRef
Journal of Nursing Education
Reevaluating Simulation in Nursing Education: Beyond the Human Patient Simulator
Schiavenato, M
Journal of Nursing Education, 48(7): 388-394.
10.3928/01484834-20090615-06
CrossRef
Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi
Knowledge of new entrant medical students about medical errors in Selcuk University: An educational perspective
Karaoglu, N; Seker, M; Kara, F; Okka, B
Turkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(5): 663-671.

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Assessing competence in emergency medicine trainees: an overview of effective methodologies
Sherbino, J; Bandiera, G; Frank, JR
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(4): 365-371.

Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 17 - Nextmed: Design for/the Well Being
The Evolution of Medical Simulators
Combs, CD; Walia, MK
Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 17 - Nextmed: Design for/the Well Being, 142(): 55-58.

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
Is simulation based medicine training the future of clinical medicine?
Murphy, JG; Cremonini, F; Kane, GC; Dunn, W
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 11(1): 1-8.

Seminars in Perinatology
Optimizing Outcomes Through Protocols, Multidisciplinary Drills, and Simulation
Fuchs, KM; Miller, RS; Berkowitz, RL
Seminars in Perinatology, 33(2): 104-108.
10.1053/j.semperi.2008.12.002
CrossRef
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia
Bould, MD; Crabtree, NA; Naik, VN
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 103(4): 472-483.
10.1093/bja/aep241
CrossRef
Journal of Critical Care
Simulation medicine in intensive care and coronary care education
Murphy, JG; Torsher, LC; Dunn, WF
Journal of Critical Care, 22(1): 51-55.
10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.003
CrossRef
Family Medicine
Papaya: A simulation model for training in uterine aspiration
Paul, M; Nobel, K
Family Medicine, 37(4): 242-244.

Obstetrics and Gynecology
Twin goals: Continuing professional development and improved patient care - Report of an ACOG District I retreat focused on the future of obstetrics and gynecology
Barbieri, RL; Tesoro, M; Frigoletto, FD
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(2): 435-440.

Academic Medicine
The Israel Center for Medical Simulation: A paradigm for cultural change in medical education
Ziv, A; Erez, D; Munz, Y; Vardi, A; Barsuk, D; Levine, I; Benita, S; Rubin, O; Berkenstadt, H
Academic Medicine, 81(): 1091-1097.

Gruppendynamik Und Organisationsberatung
Use of simulation patients in communication- and interaction training for physicians: Demand analysis - training - perspectives
Schultz, JH; Schonemann, J; Lauber, H; Nikendei, C; Herzog, W; Junger, J
Gruppendynamik Und Organisationsberatung, 38(1): 7-23.

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future
Schout, BMA; Hendrikx, AJM; Scheele, F; Bemelmans, BLH; Scherpbier, AJJA
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 24(3): 536-546.
10.1007/s00464-009-0634-9
CrossRef
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation
Hybrid simulation: A new concept for new learning goals
Boet, S; Collange, O; Mahoudeau, G
Annales Francaises D Anesthesie Et De Reanimation, 29(5): 407-408.
10.1016/j.annfar.2010.03.022
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
See one, do one, teach one: Advanced technology in medical education
Vozenilek, J; Huff, JS; Reznek, M; Gordon, JA
Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(): 1149-1154.
10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.003
CrossRef
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Review of mannequin-based high-fidelity simulation in emergency medicine
Fritz, PZ; Gray, T; Flanagan, B
Emergency Medicine Australasia, 20(1): 1-9.
10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01022.x
CrossRef
Transactions on Edutainment I
Online learning and clinical procedures: Rapid development and effective deployment of game-like interactive simulations
Moreno-Ger, P; Blesius, C; Currier, P; Sierra, JL; Fernandez-Manjon, B
Transactions on Edutainment I, 5080(): 288-304.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Lessons from the battlefield: human factors in defence anaesthesia
Mercer, SJ; Whittle, CL; Mahoney, PF
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 105(1): 9-20.
10.1093/bja/aeq110
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
Multiple encounter simulation for high-acuity multipatient environment training
Kobayashi, L; Shapiro, MJ; Gutman, DC; Jay, G
Academic Emergency Medicine, 14(): 1141-1148.
10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.015
CrossRef
Medical Teacher
Learner-centred feedback using remote assessment of clinical procedures
Kneebone, R; Bello, F; Nestel, D; Mooney, N; Codling, A; Yadollahi, F; Tierney, T; Wilcockson, D; Darzi, A
Medical Teacher, 30(8): 795-801.
10.1080/01421590801949941
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
Simulation in graduate medical education 2008: A review for emergency medicine
McLaughlin, S; Fitch, MT; Goyal, DG; Hayden, E; Kauh, CY; Laack, TA; Nowicki, T; Okuda, Y; Palm, K; Pozner, CN; Vozenilek, J; Wang, E; Gordon, JA
Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(): 1117-1129.
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00188.x
CrossRef
Journal of Critical Care
Simulation for clinical research trials: A theoretical outline
Brindley, PG; Dunn, WF
Journal of Critical Care, 24(2): 164-167.
10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.01.009
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Simulation training for emergency medicine residents: time to move forward
Langhan, TS
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(5): 467-469.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Obstetric care in low-resource settings: What, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?
Hofmeyr, GJ; Haws, RA; Bergstrom, S; Lee, ACC; Okong, P; Darmstadt, GL; Mullany, LC; Oo, EKS; Lawn, JE
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 107(): S21-S45.
10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.017
CrossRef
American Journal of Surgery
Effective instruction of vascular anastomosis in the surgical skills laboratory
Jensen, AR; Milner, R; Achildi, O; Gaughan, J; Wilhite, DB; Grewal, H
American Journal of Surgery, 195(2): 189-194.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.032
CrossRef
Journal of Medical Ethics
Medical education and patients' responsibilities: back to the future?
Draper, H; Ives, J; Parle, J; Ross, N
Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(2): 116-119.
10.1136/jme.2006.019257
CrossRef
Military Medicine
Simulation in health care provider education at Brooke Army Medical Center
Stamper, DH; Jones, RS; Thompson, JC
Military Medicine, 173(6): 583-587.

Medical Teacher
Distributed simulation - Accessible immersive training
Kneebone, R; Arora, S; King, D; Bello, F; Sevdalis, N; Kassab, E; Aggarwal, R; Darzi, A; Nestel, D
Medical Teacher, 32(1): 65-70.
10.3109/01421590903419749
CrossRef
Medical Education
Meeting the needs of simulated patients and caring for the person behind them?
Spencer, J; Dales, J
Medical Education, 40(1): 3-5.
10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02375.x
CrossRef
Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie
Simulation as strategy for risk minimizing in Anesthesia
Roll, M; Dieckmann, P; Manser, T; Zieger, J; Unertl, K
Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie, 39(4): 240-247.
10.1055/s-2004-814407
CrossRef
Surgical Clinics of North America
Educating surgery residents in patient safety
Sachdeva, AK; Blair, PG
Surgical Clinics of North America, 84(6): 1669-+.
10.1016/j.suc.2004.06.004
CrossRef
Academic Emergency Medicine
Simulation-based morbidity and mortality conference: New technologies augmenting traditional case-based presentations
Vozenilek, J; Wang, E; Kharasch, M; Anderson, B; Kalaria, A
Academic Emergency Medicine, 13(1): 48-53.
10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.015
CrossRef
American Surgeon
The changing paradigm of residency education in surgery: A perspective from the American College of Surgeons
Sachdeva, AK
American Surgeon, 73(2): 120-129.

Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology
Management of aerodigestive tract foreign bodies: Innovative teaching concepts
Deutsch, ES; Dixit, D; Curry, J; Malloy, K; Christenson, T; Robinson, B; Cognetti, D
Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 116(5): 319-323.

Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12
Distributed interactive virtual environments for collaborative experiential learning and training independent of distance over Internet2
Alverson, DC; Saiki, SM; Jacobs, J; Saland, L; Keep, MF; Norenberg, J; Baker, R; Nakatsu, C; Kalishman, S; Lindberg, M; Wax, D; Mowafi, M; Summers, KL; Holten, JR; Greenfield, JA; Aalseth, E; Nickles, D; Sherstyuk, A; Haines, K; Caudell, TP
Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12, 98(): 7-12.

Anaesthesia
EchoComTEE - a simulator for transoesophageal echocardiography
Weidenbach, M; Drachsler, H; Wild, F; Kreutter, S; Razek, V; Grunst, G; Ender, J; Berlage, T; Janousek, J
Anaesthesia, 62(4): 347-353.
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04978.x
CrossRef
World Journal of Surgery
Support for simulation-based surgical education through american college of surgeons - Accredited education institutes
Sachdeva, AK; Pellegrini, CA; Johnson, KA
World Journal of Surgery, 32(2): 196-207.
10.1007/s00268-007-9306-x
CrossRef
Archives of Internal Medicine
Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing
Edelson, DP; Litzinger, B; Arora, V; Walsh, D; Kim, S; Lauderdale, DS; Vanden Hoek, TL; Becker, LB; Abella, BS
Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(): 1063-1069.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
Simulation and training in anaesthesia
Wheeler, DW; Williams, CE; Merry, AF
British Journal of Anaesthesia, 103(5): 771.

Clinics in Perinatology
Patient safety in the neonatal intensive care unit
Edwards, WH
Clinics in Perinatology, 32(1): 97-+.
10.1016/j.clp.2004.11.009
CrossRef
Surgery
Patient safety curriculum for surgical residency programs: Results of a national consensus conference
Sachdeva, AK; Philibert, I; Leach, DC; Blair, PG; Stewart, LK; Rubinfeld, IS; Britt, LD
Surgery, 141(4): 427-441.
10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.009
CrossRef
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Virtual Reality Skills Training for Health Care Professionals in Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention
Fleming, M; Olsen, D; Stathes, H; Boteler, L; Grossberg, P; Pfeifer, J; Schiro, S; Banning, J; Skochelak, S
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 22(4): 387-398.
10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.080208
CrossRef
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Bridging the gap: Enhancing interprofessional education using simulation
Robertson, J; Bandali, K
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(5): 499-508.
10.1080/13561820802303656
CrossRef
Medical Teacher
Developing practical criteria for evaluating online patient simulations: a preliminary study
Shim, B; Brock, D; Jenkins, L
Medical Teacher, 27(2): 175-177.
10.1080/01421590400019450
CrossRef
Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Proceedings
Assessing the real-time cognitive capabilities of first responders using emerging technologies in manikin simulators
Connolly, KK; Burgess, L
Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Proceedings, 4565(): 314-322.

American Journal of Surgery
The use of "war games" to enhance high-risk clinical decision-making in students and residents
Hedrick, TL; Young, JS
American Journal of Surgery, 195(6): 843-849.
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.032
CrossRef
Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology
Multimodality Education for Airway Endoscopy Skill Development
Deutsch, ES; Christenson, T; Curry, J; Hossain, J; Zur, K; Jacobs, I
Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 118(2): 81-86.

Journal of Perinatology
Analysis of enacted difficult conversations in neonatal intensive care
Lamiani, G; Meyer, EC; Browning, DM; Brodsky, D; Todres, ID
Journal of Perinatology, 29(4): 310-316.
10.1038/jp.2008.228
CrossRef
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Improving Training in Nephrology Procedures: Yes We Can
O'Neill, WC
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 54(1): 4-5.
10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.03.001
CrossRef
Journal of Critical Care
Medical education in critical care
Wong, N
Journal of Critical Care, 20(3): 270-273.
10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.08.001
CrossRef
Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health
Simulation-based learning for midwives: Background and pilot implementation
Lathrop, A; Winningham, B; VandeVusse, L
Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 52(5): 492-498.
10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.03.018
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Simulation-based education in Canada: will anesthesia lead in the future?
Byrick, RJ; Naik, VN; Wynands, JE
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 56(4): 273-278.
10.1007/s12630-009-9053-6
CrossRef
Sleep
Awareness level of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during routine unstructured interviews of a standardized patient by primary care physicians
Reuveni, H; Tarasiuk, A; Wainstock, T; Ziv, A; Elhayany, A; Tal, A
Sleep, 27(8): 1518-1525.

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Application of a low-cost web-based simulation to improve students' practical skills in medical education
Moreno-Ger, P; Torrente, J; Bustamante, J; Fernandez-Galaz, C; Fernandez-Manjon, B; Comas-Rengifo, MD
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6): 459-467.
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.017
CrossRef
Medical Education
The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions
Bradley, P
Medical Education, 40(3): 254-262.
10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x
CrossRef
Resuscitation
Simulation in resuscitation training
Perkins, GD
Resuscitation, 73(2): 202-211.
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.01.005
CrossRef
Paediatrics & Child Health
Simulation in paediatrics: An educational revolution
Cheng, A; Duff, J; Grant, E; Kissoon, N; Grant, VJ
Paediatrics & Child Health, 12(6): 465-468.

Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Simulation training for emergency medical personnel: it's time to go back to before
Langhan, TS
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(5): 470-473.

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Patient-specific simulation for endovascular procedures: qualitative evaluation of the development process
Willaert, WIM; Aggarwal, R; Nestel, DF; Gaines, PA; Vermassen, FE; Darzi, AW; Cheshire, NJ
International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 6(2): 202-210.
10.1002/rcs.307
CrossRef
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Simulation-based training in critical resuscitation procedures improves residents' competence
Langhan, TS; Rigby, IJ; Walker, IW; Howes, D; Donnon, T; Lord, JA
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 11(6): 535-539.

2007 Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vols 1-8
Simulation framework for training chest tube insertion using virtual reality and force feedback
Raja, NS; Schleser, JA; Norman, WP; Myzie, CD; Gerling, GJ; Martin, ML
2007 Ieee International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vols 1-8, (): 3587-3592.

Annals of Emergency Medicine
A comprehensive medical simulation education curriculum for emergency medicine residents
Binstadt, ES; Walls, RM; White, BA; Nadel, ES; Takayesu, JK; Barker, TD; Nelson, SJ; Pozner, CN
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 49(4): 495-504.
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.023
CrossRef
Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Proceedings
Performance compared to experience level in a virtual reality surgical skills trainer
Aschwanden, C; Burgess, L; Montgomery, K
Foundations of Augmented Cognition, Proceedings, 4565(): 394-399.

Pediatric Clinics of North America
Resuscitation education: Narrowing the gap between evidence-based resuscitation guidelines and performance using best educational practices
Hunt, EA; Fiedor-Hamilton, M; Eppich, WJ
Pediatric Clinics of North America, 55(4): 1025-+.
10.1016/j.pcl.2008.04.007
CrossRef
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine
The Utility of Simulation in Medical Education: What is the Evidence?
Okuda, Y; Bryson, EO; DeMaria, S; Jacobson, L; Quinones, J; Shen, B; Levine, AI
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 76(4): 330-343.
10.1002/msj.20127
CrossRef
Medical Education
The effect of simulator training on clinical skills acquisition, retention and transfer
Fraser, K; Peets, A; Walker, I; Tworek, J; Paget, M; Wright, B; McLaughlin, K
Medical Education, 43(8): 784-789.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03412.x
CrossRef
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Simulation training in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship
Jude, DC; Gilbert, GG; Magrane, D
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 195(5): 1489-1492.
10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.003
CrossRef
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Needle stick injuries and medical education
Karaoglu, N
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 60(7): 599.

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie
Barriers to use of simulation-based education
Savoldelli, GL; Naik, VN; Hamstra, SJ; Morgan, PJ
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie, 52(9): 944-950.

Academic Medicine
A Simulator-Based Curriculum to Promote Comparative and Reflective Analysis in an Internal Medicine Clerkship
McMahon, GT; Monaghan, C; Falchuk, K; Gordon, JA; Alexander, EK
Academic Medicine, 80(1): 84-89.

PDF (87)
Academic Medicine
The Research We Still Are Not Doing: An Agenda for the Study of Computer-Based Learning
Cook, DA
Academic Medicine, 80(6): 541-548.

PDF (221)
Academic Medicine
Teaching Medical Students About Medical Errors and Patient Safety: Evaluation of a Required Curriculum
Halbach, JL; Sullivan, LL
Academic Medicine, 80(6): 600-606.

PDF (69)
Anesthesiology
Evaluation of Patient Simulator Performance as an Adjunct to the Oral Examination for Senior Anesthesia Residents
Savoldelli, GL; Naik, VN; Joo, HS; Houston, PL; Graham, M; Yee, B; Hamstra, SJ
Anesthesiology, 104(3): 475-481.

PDF (244)
Anesthesiology
Simulation-based Training Improves Physicians' Performance in Patient Care in High-stakes Clinical Setting of Cardiac Surgery
Bruppacher, HR; Alam, SK; LeBlanc, VR; Latter, D; Naik, VN; Savoldelli, GL; Mazer, CD; Kurrek, MM; Joo, HS
Anesthesiology, 112(4): 985-992.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d3e31c
PDF (429) | CrossRef
Annals of Surgery
Laparoscopic Skills Are Improved With LapMentor™ Training: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study
Andreatta, PB; Woodrum, DT; Birkmeyer, JD; Yellamanchilli, RK; Doherty, GM; Gauger, PG; Minter, RM
Annals of Surgery, 243(6): 854-863.
10.1097/01.sla.0000219641.79092.e5
PDF (614) | CrossRef
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Emergency and critical care pediatrics: use of medical simulation for training in acute pediatric emergencies
Eppich, WJ; Adler, MD; McGaghie, WC
Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 18(3): 266-271.
10.1097/01.mop.0000193309.22462.c9
PDF (68) | CrossRef
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA)
Learning fibreoptic intubation with a virtual computer program transfers to ‘hands on’ improvement
Boet, S; Bould, MD; Schaeffer, R; Fischhof, S; Stojeba, N; Naik, VN; Diemunsch, P
European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 27(1): 31-35.
10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283312725
PDF (389) | CrossRef
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Recurrent Obstetric Management Mistakes Identified by Simulation
Maslovitz, S; Barkai, G; Lessing, JB; Ziv, A; Many, A
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109(6): 1295-1300.
10.1097/01.AOG.0000265208.16659.c9
PDF (708) | CrossRef
The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing
Shoulder Dystocia: Using Simulation to Train Providers and Teams
Fahey, JO; Mighty, HE
The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 22(2): 114-122.
10.1097/01.JPN.0000319097.05415.1d
PDF (109) | CrossRef
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
The Use of “War Games” to Evaluate Performance of Students and Residents in Basic Clinical Scenarios: A Disturbing Analysis
Young, JS; DuBose, JE; Hedrick, TL; Conaway, MR; Nolley, B
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 63(3): 556-564.
10.1097/TA.0b013e31812e5229
PDF (426) | CrossRef
Simulation in Healthcare
Absolute and Relative Value of Patient Simulator Features as Perceived by Medical Undergraduates
Grant, T; McNeil, MA; Luo, X
Simulation in Healthcare, 3(3): 133-137.
10.1097/SIH.0b013e31816736fb
PDF (260) | CrossRef
Simulation in Healthcare
A Measurement Tool for Simulation-Based Training in Emergency Medicine: The Simulation Module for Assessment of Resident Targeted Event Responses (SMARTER) Approach
Rosen, MA; Salas, E; Silvestri, S; Wu, TS; Lazzara, EH
Simulation in Healthcare, 3(3): 170-179.
10.1097/SIH.0b013e318173038d
PDF (670) | CrossRef
Simulation in Healthcare
One Drop at a Time: Research to Advance the Science of Simulation
Cook, DA
Simulation in Healthcare, 5(1): 1-4.
10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181c82aaa
PDF (144) | CrossRef
Simulation in Healthcare
Assessment of Patient Simulation Use in Selected Baccalaureate Nursing Programs in the United States
Katz, GB; Peifer, KL; Armstrong, G
Simulation in Healthcare, 5(1): 46-51.
10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181ba1f46
PDF (234) | CrossRef
Simulation in Healthcare
Improved Fourth-Year Medical Student Clinical Decision-Making Performance as a Resuscitation Team Leader After a Simulation-Based Curriculum
Ten Eyck, R; Tews, M; Ballester, J; Hamilton, G
Simulation in Healthcare, 5(3): 139-145.
10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181cca544
PDF (1193) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2003 Association of American Medical Colleges

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share