Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2003 - Volume 78 - Issue 6 > Junior Faculty's Perspectives on Mentoring
Academic Medicine:
Special Theme: Cultural Competence: RESEARCH REPORTS

Junior Faculty's Perspectives on Mentoring

Chew, Lisa D. MD, MPH; Watanabe, Jill M. MD, MPH; Buchwald, Dedra MD; Lessler, Daniel S. MD, MHA

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Dr. Chew is a research fellow, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System and Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington; Dr. Watanabe is assistant professor, Dr. Buchwald is professor, and Dr. Lessler is associate professor, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington and Harborview Medical Center, Seattle.

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Chew, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services Research and Development (S-152), 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108; e-mail: 〈lchew@u.washington.edu〉.

Collapse Box

Abstract

The prevalence and characteristics of mentorship among junior faculty in clinician–scientist and clinician–educator tracks were evaluated. Comprehensive improvement strategies are needed.

Studies within the health professions have demonstrated a positive relationship between mentoring and research skills and productivity. However, most studies of mentoring have not distinguished between faculty who spend the majority of their time in research (clinician–scientists) and those in clinical care and teaching (clinician–educators).1,2,3 We evaluated the prevalence and associated characteristics of adequate mentorship among junior faculty in these two tracks.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHOD

We surveyed all 162 junior faculty (acting instructor, acting assistant professor, assistant professor) at the University of Washington School of Medicine in the clinician–scientist and clinician–educator tracks of the departments of medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery. Respondents ranked the extents to which they agreed with the statement “I have adequate mentorship” on a five-point scale. Respondents who “agreed” or “strongly agreed” were classified as mentored and the remainder as non-mentored. Respondents also indicated whether they had access to a trusted senior faculty member and estimated the proportion of their time spent in scholarly work or research, patient care, teaching, and administration.

We compared mentored and non-mentored faculty using descriptive analyses and conducted stratified analyses by academic track to evaluate the association between mentorship and professional-time allocation and access to senior faculty members. Multivariate logistic regression identified characteristics independently associated with adequate mentorship.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Of the 122 respondents (75%), the mean age was 38.7, 46% were women, and 36% were mentored. In bivariate analyses, mentored faculty were more likely to be men (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.7), clinician–scientists (OR = 5.8, 95% CI = 2.2–15.3), fellowship-trained (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.0–7.3), and have access to senior faculty (OR = 12.7, 95% CI = 2.5–63.4). After adjusting for age, years on faculty, and fellowship training, mentored faculty were still more likely to be men (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.1–7.6) and clinician–scientists (OR = 10.3, 95% CI = 3.1–33.8).

Clinician–scientists with access to a senior faculty member were more likely to be mentored than those without access (69% versus 6%, p ≤ .001). Conversely, we found little difference in mentorship between clinician–educators with and without access to a senior faculty member (18% versus 8%, p = .66). Mentored clinician–educators spent a higher proportion of time in scholarly activity than non-mentored clinician–educators (20.6% versus 11.5%, p ≤ .01), but time allocated to professional activities did not differ between mentored and non-mentored clinician–scientists.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Less than half of the junior faculty felt adequately mentored, suggesting that all junior faculty may benefit from improved mentoring. In particular, women and clinician–educator faculty are at risk for inadequate mentorship. Although access to a trusted senior faculty member was significantly associated with adequate mentorship, it may not meet the needs of many junior faculty, particularly clinician–educators. Therefore, mentoring programs relying solely on linking junior and senior faculty may be insufficient.

Mentoring relationships contribute to the success of junior faculty and academic medical centers. Multifaceted strategies tailored to the needs of all junior faculty should be developed, supported, and evaluated. Assessments of mentorship at other institutions that prospectively evaluate the impact of mentoring on career outcomes and satisfaction are needed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154:423–6.

2. Fried LP, Francomano CA, MacDonald SM, et al. Career development for women in academic medicine: multiple interventions in a department of medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:898–905.

3. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al. Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73:318–23.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 14 time(s).

Academic Emergency Medicine
Mentoring for clinician-educators
Farrell, SE; Digioia, NM; Broderick, KB; Coates, WC
Academic Emergency Medicine, 11(): 1346-1350.
10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.009
CrossRef
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
R-x for recruitment and retention of veterinarian scientists: Money, marketing, mentoring
Freeman, LC
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(3): 328-336.

Academic Psychiatry
Early career professional development issues for military academic psychiatrists
Warner, CH; Bobo, WV; Flynn, J
Academic Psychiatry, 29(5): 437-442.

Medical Teacher
Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring
Leslie, K; Lingard, L; Whyte, S
Medical Teacher, 27(8): 693-698.
10.1080/0142159002771217
CrossRef
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Nurturing Passion in a Time of Academic Climate Change: The Modern-Day Challenge of Junior Faculty Development
Chapman, AB; Guay-Woodford, LM
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(6): 1878-1883.
10.2215/CJN.04240808
CrossRef
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
How to succeed in academic gastroenterology
Elta, GH
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 64(6): S29-S30.
10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.042
CrossRef
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Program directors' views of the importance and prevalence of mentoring in internal medicine residencies
Castiglioni, A; Bellini, LM; Shea, JA
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(7): 779-782.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
Mentorship in academic general internal medicine - Results of a survey of mentors
Luckhaupt, SE; Chin, MH; Mangione, CM; Phillips, RS; Bell, D; Leonard, AC; Tsevat, J
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(): 1014-1018.
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.215.x
CrossRef
Medical Teacher
Twelve tips for developing effective mentors
Ramani, S; Gruppen, L; Kachur, EK
Medical Teacher, 28(5): 404-408.
10.1080/01421590600825326
CrossRef
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Pharmacy scholarship reconsidered: The report of the 2003-2004 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee
Leslie, SW; Corcoran, GB; MacKichan, JJ; Undie, AS; Vanderveen, RP; Miller, KW
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 68(3): -.
ARTN S6
CrossRef
Clinics in Plastic Surgery
How to become a successful clinical investigator
Thoma, A; Haines, T; Duku, E; McKnight, L; Goldsmith, C
Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 35(2): 305-+.
10.1016/j.cps.2007.10.008
CrossRef
Gastroenterology
How to Make a Successful Transition From Fellowship to Faculty in an Academic Medical Center
Mehta, SJ; Forde, KA
Gastroenterology, 145(4): 703-707.
10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.040
CrossRef
Academic Medicine
Who Are Physician–Scientists’ Role Models? Gender Makes a Difference
Bakken, LL
Academic Medicine, 80(5): 502-506.

PDF (53)
Academic Medicine
The POD: A New Model for Mentoring Underrepresented Minority Faculty
Lewellen-Williams, C; Johnson, VA; Deloney, LA; Thomas, BR; Goyol, A; Henry-Tillman, R
Academic Medicine, 81(3): 275-279.

PDF (97)
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2003 Association of American Medical Colleges

Login

Article Tools

Share