You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

The Status and Future of Osteopathic Medical Education in the United States

Shannon, Stephen C. DO, MPH, MA; Teitelbaum, Howard S. DO, PhD, MPH

Academic Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a43be8
Osteopathic Medicine and Medical Education
Abstract

Osteopathic medical education (OME) developed during the 20th century into a separate system of training U.S. physicians. Doctors of osteopathic medicine (DOs) were educated in osteopathic medical colleges and residencies in osteopathic hospitals, took separate specialty and licensure examinations, and generally practiced in separate clinical environments from those of MDs. Founded more than 110 years ago in the United States to train osteopaths as an alternative to MD training of that time, by midcentury schools of osteopathy became schools of osteopathic medicine with the adoption of public health and biomedical principles, and osteopaths became osteopathic physicians, achieving full practice rights throughout the country. By 2000 there were 19 osteopathic medical schools, 42,000 practitioners, and a parallel system of osteopathic graduate medical education specialty training. Recently, OME’s academic and clinical training environment has changed. Heightened accreditation requirements, curriculum innovations, competency-based standards, evidence-based training, increased research on osteopathic manipulative medicine (a distinctive aspect of OME), and new and expanding colleges have occurred (nine new osteopathic campuses developed between 2000 and 2008 and a 30% increase in the first-year osteopathic medical student class). During recent decades, a movement away from osteopathic medicine’s traditionally primary-care-focused and separate training/practice system has occurred. Nearly all osteopathic hospitals closed or were integrated into allopathic hospital systems, student clinical training expanded into venues with MD education programs, fewer DO graduates pursued traditional primary care training, 60% entered training programs of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and DO and MD specialty practice integration became widespread. These developments have triggered a reassessment process for OME and professional organizational leadership.

Author Information

Dr. Shannon is president, American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, Chevy Chase, Maryland.

Dr. Teitelbaum is professor of internal medicine/public health and associate dean of research, grants, and sponsored programs, Lincoln Memorial University–DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Harrogate, Tennessee.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Shannon, AACOM, Suite 310, 5550 Friendship Blvd., Chevy Chase, MD 20815; telephone: (301) 968-4142; fax: (301) 968-4101; e-mail: (sshannon@aacom.org).

© 2009 Association of American Medical Colleges